All YOU have to know about THE SCUM of Chicago..Anti-Trump Crowd Flies A Communist Flag At Protest!

[BluesLegend]

Watching Trump's speech in Kansas City demonstrates once again that he doesn't have the temperament to be President. He doesn't have the sense to know when he needs to be calm.

Calling reporters "lying thieving reporters" and attacking the protestors after what happened in Chicago is unbelievable.

It's hard to believe that a sizable amount of the population thinks this guy should have control over the most powerful armed forces in the world.

Maybe you could talk Romney into losing again?

Why would I do that when Trump's going to a good job of it all by himself?

Can't you manage a single coherent sentence?

 

[flacaltenn]

Apparently ALL OTHER CANDIDATES, are SCUM..... Now you can see WHY so many are going for TRUMP, the REST of them are the ESTABLISHMENT!...even CRUZ... I would have expected him to be ABOVE the other 2 pieces of shit, BUT he plays POLITICS just like the others!!!!! This will BACKFIRE on all 3 as ALL ATTACKS on Trump has!

• Cruz, Rubio and Kasich criticize Trump for creating ‘environment’ for Chicago protest
  The Washington Post ^ | March 11, 2015 | David Weigel
  "The responsibility for that lies with protesters, who took violence into their own hands. But in any campaign, responsibility starts at the top. Any candidate is responsible for the culture of a campaign. And when you have a campaign that disrespects the voters, when you have a campaign that affirmatively encourages violence, when you have a campaign that is facing allegations of physical violence against members of the press, you create an environment that only encourages this sort of nasty discord," Cruz said

Cruz, Rubio and Kasich are absolutely correct.

The tone is set by the leaders. Trump is saying he wants to punch people in the face, that he'll pay for the legal bills of people who engage in violence, and singles out reporters at his rallies as scum.

When he should lowering the temperature at his rallies, his amping it up.

It demonstrates once again that Trump does not have the temperament to be President. The President should be someone who is calm and rational, not threatening to punch people in the face.

You were saying....

That's true.. There's the source of the pent-up anger about not confronting this jerks "programs and plans". .
But they get in my face -- I make them look childish and silly. I don't adopt the Alinsky method.

The weakness of Rules for Radicals -- the manifesto of the New Democrats-- is that it's a TACTICAL trainer. And there is nothing to train the radical mental midgets in what their objective realy is...

 

[Vigilante]

Apparently ALL OTHER CANDIDATES, are SCUM..... Now you can see WHY so many are going for TRUMP, the REST of them are the ESTABLISHMENT!...even CRUZ... I would have expected him to be ABOVE the other 2 pieces of shit, BUT he plays POLITICS just like the others!!!!! This will BACKFIRE on all 3 as ALL ATTACKS on Trump has!

• Cruz, Rubio and Kasich criticize Trump for creating ‘environment’ for Chicago protest
  The Washington Post ^ | March 11, 2015 | David Weigel
  "The responsibility for that lies with protesters, who took violence into their own hands. But in any campaign, responsibility starts at the top. Any candidate is responsible for the culture of a campaign. And when you have a campaign that disrespects the voters, when you have a campaign that affirmatively encourages violence, when you have a campaign that is facing allegations of physical violence against members of the press, you create an environment that only encourages this sort of nasty discord," Cruz said

Cruz, Rubio and Kasich are absolutely correct.

The tone is set by the leaders. Trump is saying he wants to punch people in the face, that he'll pay for the legal bills of people who engage in violence, and singles out reporters at his rallies as scum.

When he should lowering the temperature at his rallies, his amping it up.

It demonstrates once again that Trump does not have the temperament to be President. The President should be someone who is calm and rational, not threatening to punch people in the face.

You were saying....

So Vagifail, your response to a bad, divisive President is to elect an even worse one?



Awesome.

Only an asshole, like yourself, would believe that! Bullshitter!

 

[Toro]

Watching Trump's speech in Kansas City demonstrates once again that he doesn't have the temperament to be President. He doesn't have the sense to know when he needs to be calm.

Calling reporters "lying thieving reporters" and attacking the protestors after what happened in Chicago is unbelievable.

It's hard to believe that a sizable amount of the population thinks this guy should have control over the most powerful armed forces in the world.

Maybe you could talk Romney into losing again?

Why would I do that when Trump's going to a good job of it all by himself?

Can't you manage a single coherent sentence?

Apparently I am speaking at a too high level of intelligence for you, so I'll dumb it down.

Trump is going to lose.

Do you understand?

 

[Vigilante]

Apparently ALL OTHER CANDIDATES, are SCUM..... Now you can see WHY so many are going for TRUMP, the REST of them are the ESTABLISHMENT!...even CRUZ... I would have expected him to be ABOVE the other 2 pieces of shit, BUT he plays POLITICS just like the others!!!!! This will BACKFIRE on all 3 as ALL ATTACKS on Trump has!

• Cruz, Rubio and Kasich criticize Trump for creating ‘environment’ for Chicago protest
  The Washington Post ^ | March 11, 2015 | David Weigel
  "The responsibility for that lies with protesters, who took violence into their own hands. But in any campaign, responsibility starts at the top. Any candidate is responsible for the culture of a campaign. And when you have a campaign that disrespects the voters, when you have a campaign that affirmatively encourages violence, when you have a campaign that is facing allegations of physical violence against members of the press, you create an environment that only encourages this sort of nasty discord," Cruz said

Cruz, Rubio and Kasich are absolutely correct.

The tone is set by the leaders. Trump is saying he wants to punch people in the face, that he'll pay for the legal bills of people who engage in violence, and singles out reporters at his rallies as scum.

When he should lowering the temperature at his rallies, his amping it up.

It demonstrates once again that Trump does not have the temperament to be President. The President should be someone who is calm and rational, not threatening to punch people in the face.

You were saying....

That's true.. There's the source of the pent-up anger about not confronting this jerks "programs and plans". .
But they get in my face -- I make them look childish and silly. I don't adopt the Alinsky method.

The weakness of Rules for Radicals -- the manifesto of the New Democrats-- is that it's a TACTICAL trainer. And there is nothing to train the radical mental midgets in what their objective realy is...

They don't care about WINNING a debate... they care about OBSTRUCTION and DISRUPTION.

 

[Toro]

Apparently ALL OTHER CANDIDATES, are SCUM..... Now you can see WHY so many are going for TRUMP, the REST of them are the ESTABLISHMENT!...even CRUZ... I would have expected him to be ABOVE the other 2 pieces of shit, BUT he plays POLITICS just like the others!!!!! This will BACKFIRE on all 3 as ALL ATTACKS on Trump has!

• Cruz, Rubio and Kasich criticize Trump for creating ‘environment’ for Chicago protest
  The Washington Post ^ | March 11, 2015 | David Weigel
  "The responsibility for that lies with protesters, who took violence into their own hands. But in any campaign, responsibility starts at the top. Any candidate is responsible for the culture of a campaign. And when you have a campaign that disrespects the voters, when you have a campaign that affirmatively encourages violence, when you have a campaign that is facing allegations of physical violence against members of the press, you create an environment that only encourages this sort of nasty discord," Cruz said

Cruz, Rubio and Kasich are absolutely correct.

The tone is set by the leaders. Trump is saying he wants to punch people in the face, that he'll pay for the legal bills of people who engage in violence, and singles out reporters at his rallies as scum.

When he should lowering the temperature at his rallies, his amping it up.

It demonstrates once again that Trump does not have the temperament to be President. The President should be someone who is calm and rational, not threatening to punch people in the face.

You were saying....

So Vagifail, your response to a bad, divisive President is to elect an even worse one?



Awesome.

Only an asshole, like yourself, would believe that! Bullshitter!

Yes, Vagifail, let's look at all the things Trump the non-divisive candidate has done and said.

• Mock handicapped people

• Call decorated POWs "losers"

• Brand all Mexican immigrants as rapists, criminals, drug mules, and "some, I assume, are good people."

• Say that a woman can't be President because she's ugly

• Create a database of all persons of a specific religion

• Say that some protesters deserve to get roughed up.

• Say that it is "disgusting" when a female goes to the bathroom.

• Call a newspaper editor who criticizes you a "lowlife."

• Retweet a White Supremacist neo Nazi who supports you

• Accuse your opponent of being dishonest because "he's Canadian."

• Tell companies "to go **** themselves."

• Threaten to sue your primary opponent for running negative ads against you.

• Say you'd like to punch a protester in the face.

• Threaten the Speaker of the House

• Feign ignorance of the Ku Klux Klan when they endorse you.

• Say you hadn't heard of David Duke, even though he was an active and highly visible member of your party (at the time) when you were considering running for the party's leadership.

• Say you'll pay for the legal bills of your supporters who engage in violence.

Yes, Trump is a unifier, dignified and Presidential.

 

[Vigilante]

Watching Trump's speech in Kansas City demonstrates once again that he doesn't have the temperament to be President. He doesn't have the sense to know when he needs to be calm.

Calling reporters "lying thieving reporters" and attacking the protestors after what happened in Chicago is unbelievable.

It's hard to believe that a sizable amount of the population thinks this guy should have control over the most powerful armed forces in the world.

Maybe you could talk Romney into losing again?

Why would I do that when Trump's going to a good job of it all by himself?

Can't you manage a single coherent sentence?

Apparently I am speaking at a too high level of intelligence for you, so I'll dumb it down.

Trump is going to lose.

Do you understand?

Apparently ALL OTHER CANDIDATES, are SCUM..... Now you can see WHY so many are going for TRUMP, the REST of them are the ESTABLISHMENT!...even CRUZ... I would have expected him to be ABOVE the other 2 pieces of shit, BUT he plays POLITICS just like the others!!!!! This will BACKFIRE on all 3 as ALL ATTACKS on Trump has!

• Cruz, Rubio and Kasich criticize Trump for creating ‘environment’ for Chicago protest
  The Washington Post ^ | March 11, 2015 | David Weigel
  "The responsibility for that lies with protesters, who took violence into their own hands. But in any campaign, responsibility starts at the top. Any candidate is responsible for the culture of a campaign. And when you have a campaign that disrespects the voters, when you have a campaign that affirmatively encourages violence, when you have a campaign that is facing allegations of physical violence against members of the press, you create an environment that only encourages this sort of nasty discord," Cruz said

Cruz, Rubio and Kasich are absolutely correct.

The tone is set by the leaders. Trump is saying he wants to punch people in the face, that he'll pay for the legal bills of people who engage in violence, and singles out reporters at his rallies as scum.

When he should lowering the temperature at his rallies, his amping it up.

It demonstrates once again that Trump does not have the temperament to be President. The President should be someone who is calm and rational, not threatening to punch people in the face.

You were saying....

So Vagifail, your response to a bad, divisive President is to elect an even worse one?



Awesome.

Only an asshole, like yourself, would believe that! Bullshitter!

Yes, Vagifail, let's look at all the things Trump the non-divisive candidate has done and said.

• Mock handicapped people

• Call decorated POWs "losers"

• Brand all Mexican immigrants as rapists, criminals, drug mules, and "some, I assume, are good people."

• Say that a woman can't be President because she's ugly

• Create a database of all persons of a specific religion

• Say that some protesters deserve to get roughed up.

• Say that it is "disgusting" when a female goes to the bathroom.

• Call a newspaper editor who criticizes you a "lowlife."

• Retweet a White Supremacist neo Nazi who supports you

• Accuse your opponent of being dishonest because "he's Canadian."

• Tell companies "to go **** themselves."

• Threaten to sue your primary opponent for running negative ads against you.

• Say you'd like to punch a protester in the face.

• Threaten the Speaker of the House

• Feign ignorance of the Ku Klux Klan when they endorse you.

• Say you hadn't heard of David Duke, even though he was an active and highly visible member of your party (at the time) when you were considering running for the party's leadership.

• Say you'll pay for the legal bills of your supporters who engage in violence.

Yes, Trump is a unifier, dignified and Presidential.

All we need to know


RCP Average -- Trump 36.0 Cruz 21.8 Rubio 18.0 Kasich 12.0

Trump +14.2

 

[Deleted member 53821]

There is no point in pointing this out because they would just deny it.

 

[BlackSand]

That's true.. There's the source of the pent-up anger about not confronting this jerks "programs and plans". .
But they get in my face -- I make them look childish and silly. I don't adopt the Alinsky method.

The weakness of Rules for Radicals -- the manifesto of the New Democrats-- is that it's a TACTICAL trainer. And there is nothing to train the radical mental midgets in what their objective realy is...

It all depends on how you want to define radicals … And I won’t argue about who you may or may not call radical.
What I can say is that the GOP has taken a large portion of its stalwart supporters over the years … And fed them a never ending line of crap with the assumption that their vote was guaranteed because they wouldn’t vote for the opposition.

Perhaps they underestimated the reality of the situation when they assumed a few folks would stay home when they offered up the same old-same old yet again.
I don’t think they understood that their supporters were not only pissed off at being taken for granted … But would burn the fricken house down to boot.

.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Toro]

All we need to know


RCP Average -- Trump 36.0 Cruz 21.8 Rubio 18.0 Kasich 12.0

Trump +14.2

All you need to know

Clinton Trump
RCP Average 2/11 - 3/6 -- -- 47.3 41.0 Clinton +6.3
NBC News/Wall St. JrnlNBC/WSJ 3/3 - 3/6 1200 RV 2.8 51 38 Clinton +13
ABC News/Wash PostABC/WP 3/3 - 3/6 864 RV 4.0 50 41 Clinton +9
Rasmussen ReportsRasmussen 2/29 - 3/1 1000 LV 3.0 41 36 Clinton +5
CNN/ORCCNN/ORC 2/24 - 2/27 920 RV 3.0 52 44 Clinton +8
FOX NewsFOX News 2/15 - 2/17 1031 RV 3.0 47 42 Clinton +5

Get your list of excuses for why Trump gets stomped on by Clinton, Vagifail!

 

[my2¢]

I have no use for these commies and I don't want to hear it's their heritage crap.

 

[Vigilante]

All we need to know


RCP Average -- Trump 36.0 Cruz 21.8 Rubio 18.0 Kasich 12.0

Trump +14.2

All you need to know

RCP Average 2/11 - 3/6 -- -- 47.3 41.0 Clinton +6.3
NBC News/Wall St. JrnlNBC/WSJ 3/3 - 3/6 1200 RV 2.8 51 38 Clinton +13
ABC News/Wash PostABC/WP 3/3 - 3/6 864 RV 4.0 50 41 Clinton +9
Rasmussen ReportsRasmussen 2/29 - 3/1 1000 LV 3.0 41 36 Clinton +5
CNN/ORCCNN/ORC 2/24 - 2/27 920 RV 3.0 52 44 Clinton +8
FOX NewsFOX News 2/15 - 2/17 1031 RV 3.0 47 42 Clinton +5

Get your list of excuses for why Trump gets stomped on by Clinton, Vagifail!

In March 1980 Ronald Reagan was polling 33% to Jimmy Carter's 58%, 6 months later in Nov. 1980 Reagan WON 44 states and became president... Trump is doing MUCH BETTER than Reagan at the same time in the campaign...BUT don't let HISTORY get in your way, Bullshitter!

1. FLASHBACK: Reagan Trailed Carter 58% to 33% in ...
   FLASHBACK: Hillary Clinton Eulogized KKK Kleagle Lawmaker in 2010 - The Gateway Punditreagan-trailed-carter-58-to-33-in-march-1980/
   2 days ago ... Republican elites are very concerned this year that Donald Trump can not beat Hillary Clinton or Socialist Bernie Sanders in a general election.
   

 

[bodecea]

Our fathers and grandfathers fought a WAR over this shit, and now their GRANDCHILDREN ARE MOCKING THEIR SACRIFICES!!!!!

Townhall.com ^ | March 11, 2016 | Leigh Wolf
I want to say I'm surprised, but I'm not. Anti-Trump protester is seen in the background of CNN's live coverage holding up a Communist flag. I suppose since the left seems to forget the fact that Communism is responsible for more deaths than any other form of government, this guy will get some high fives among the Sanders crowd.

Some of us REMEMBER this......

Yo, the police need to crack down on these Radicals, period! Not having to worry about the Justice Department, which is involved in the Socialist Party! They need to start arresting these bought and paid for losers, period! Then let the Socialist Party fight it in court!!! I can`t believe these sorry local Governments giving in to a Socialist Party trying to takeover America? The Police Department should arrest the Mayor for being a Traitor, period! I will not give up my Freedoms to Invaders of The U.S.A., NEVER!!!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 66951

Ooooooo a toughie.

The Communist flag...just the other side of the con-federate flag coin.

 

[Vigilante]

Our fathers and grandfathers fought a WAR over this shit, and now their GRANDCHILDREN ARE MOCKING THEIR SACRIFICES!!!!!

Townhall.com ^ | March 11, 2016 | Leigh Wolf
I want to say I'm surprised, but I'm not. Anti-Trump protester is seen in the background of CNN's live coverage holding up a Communist flag. I suppose since the left seems to forget the fact that Communism is responsible for more deaths than any other form of government, this guy will get some high fives among the Sanders crowd.

Some of us REMEMBER this......

Yo, the police need to crack down on these Radicals, period! Not having to worry about the Justice Department, which is involved in the Socialist Party! They need to start arresting these bought and paid for losers, period! Then let the Socialist Party fight it in court!!! I can`t believe these sorry local Governments giving in to a Socialist Party trying to takeover America? The Police Department should arrest the Mayor for being a Traitor, period! I will not give up my Freedoms to Invaders of The U.S.A., NEVER!!!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 66951

Ooooooo a toughie.

The Communist flag...just the other side of the con-federate flag coin.

A Communist lesbian posted this...who would have thought.... and she sides with the muslim's who would kill her for being queer!

 

[Toro]

All we need to know


RCP Average -- Trump 36.0 Cruz 21.8 Rubio 18.0 Kasich 12.0

Trump +14.2

All you need to know

RCP Average 2/11 - 3/6 -- -- 47.3 41.0 Clinton +6.3
NBC News/Wall St. JrnlNBC/WSJ 3/3 - 3/6 1200 RV 2.8 51 38 Clinton +13
ABC News/Wash PostABC/WP 3/3 - 3/6 864 RV 4.0 50 41 Clinton +9
Rasmussen ReportsRasmussen 2/29 - 3/1 1000 LV 3.0 41 36 Clinton +5
CNN/ORCCNN/ORC 2/24 - 2/27 920 RV 3.0 52 44 Clinton +8
FOX NewsFOX News 2/15 - 2/17 1031 RV 3.0 47 42 Clinton +5

Get your list of excuses for why Trump gets stomped on by Clinton, Vagifail!

In March 1980 Ronald Reagan was polling 33% to Jimmy Carter's 58%, 6 months later in Nov. 1980 Reagan WON 44 states and became president... Trump is doing MUCH BETTER than Reagan at the same time in the campaign...BUT don't let HISTORY get in your way, Bullshitter!

1. FLASHBACK: Reagan Trailed Carter 58% to 33% in ...
   FLASHBACK: Hillary Clinton Eulogized KKK Kleagle Lawmaker in 2010 - The Gateway Punditreagan-trailed-carter-58-to-33-in-march-1980/
   2 days ago ... Republican elites are very concerned this year that Donald Trump can not beat Hillary Clinton or Socialist Bernie Sanders in a general election.

So this is your argument for Cruz winning the nomination? Cruz is going to come roaring back and win more delegates because all the polls saying Trump is leading the nomination are wrong?

I mean, if the polls are wrong for Trump losing the general, they are also wrong for Trump winning the nomination, right?

Or are you just selectively picking things that is convenient to you?

Of course, it's the last one.

In more relevant history that isn't 40 years old, McCain and Romney trailed for most of the campaign and lost. And both had most of their party behind them, unlike Trump. Neither of them tore their party apart. Neither of them alienated most of the people who already weren't supporting them. But you keep telling yourself that the candidate with highest negatives ever recorded, the one whose own party leaders said they could never support, will win the general.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Apparently ALL OTHER CANDIDATES, as SCUM..... Now you can see WHY so many are going for TRUMP, the REST of them are the ESTABLISHMENT!...even CRUZ... I would have expected him to be ABOVE the other 2 pieces of shit, BUT he plays POLITICS just like the others!!!!! This will BACKFIRE on all 3 as ALL ATTACKS on Trump has!

• Cruz, Rubio and Kasich criticize Trump for creating ‘environment’ for Chicago protest
  The Washington Post ^ | March 11, 2015 | David Weigel
  "The responsibility for that lies with protesters, who took violence into their own hands. But in any campaign, responsibility starts at the top. Any candidate is responsible for the culture of a campaign. And when you have a campaign that disrespects the voters, when you have a campaign that affirmatively encourages violence, when you have a campaign that is facing allegations of physical violence against members of the press, you create an environment that only encourages this sort of nasty discord," Cruz said

That is it. I am done with that coward Ted Cruz. Anyone that blames the victim because he sees political opportunity does not belong in the White House.

Standing up for the right to assemble and protest is never cowardly. Bernie Sanders losing his microphone to 2 young black ladies IS cowardly.. And so is a candidate who INCITES violence against protesters from the microphone as Trump has repeatedly done.

One's a chicken, but the other is a bully.. And BOTH of them have EMBOLDEN protesters who just want to disrupt and shout. NEITHER should be considered for Commander in Chief...

Your pathetic attempt to equal Sanders to Trump's actions to incite people is laughable. Sanders was not at a campaign rally he was at a public event he was invited to speak at. What was he supposed to do, take over the stage and say this is my event now and screw everyone else? Since he was not in control of the event he smartly walked off the stage and into the crowd to talk to people. Since it was not Sanders' event blaming him for enabling protesters is ridiculous. Blame the organizers who didn't control their event.

Trump on the other hand is inciting violence at his own rallies. That you can't tell the difference and equate them both as emboldening protesters shows a lack of comprehension, facts, and likely intelligence.

 

[Vigilante]

All we need to know


RCP Average -- Trump 36.0 Cruz 21.8 Rubio 18.0 Kasich 12.0

Trump +14.2

All you need to know

RCP Average 2/11 - 3/6 -- -- 47.3 41.0 Clinton +6.3
NBC News/Wall St. JrnlNBC/WSJ 3/3 - 3/6 1200 RV 2.8 51 38 Clinton +13
ABC News/Wash PostABC/WP 3/3 - 3/6 864 RV 4.0 50 41 Clinton +9
Rasmussen ReportsRasmussen 2/29 - 3/1 1000 LV 3.0 41 36 Clinton +5
CNN/ORCCNN/ORC 2/24 - 2/27 920 RV 3.0 52 44 Clinton +8
FOX NewsFOX News 2/15 - 2/17 1031 RV 3.0 47 42 Clinton +5

Get your list of excuses for why Trump gets stomped on by Clinton, Vagifail!

In March 1980 Ronald Reagan was polling 33% to Jimmy Carter's 58%, 6 months later in Nov. 1980 Reagan WON 44 states and became president... Trump is doing MUCH BETTER than Reagan at the same time in the campaign...BUT don't let HISTORY get in your way, Bullshitter!

1. FLASHBACK: Reagan Trailed Carter 58% to 33% in ...
   FLASHBACK: Hillary Clinton Eulogized KKK Kleagle Lawmaker in 2010 - The Gateway Punditreagan-trailed-carter-58-to-33-in-march-1980/
   2 days ago ... Republican elites are very concerned this year that Donald Trump can not beat Hillary Clinton or Socialist Bernie Sanders in a general election.

So this is your argument for Cruz winning the nomination? Cruz is going to come roaring back and win more delegates because all the polls saying Trump is leading the nomination are wrong?

I mean, if the polls are wrong for Trump losing the general, they are also wrong for Trump winning the nomination, right?

Or are you just selectively picking things that is convenient to you?

Of course, it's the last one.

In more relevant history that isn't 40 years old, McCain and Romney trailed for most of the campaign and lost. And both had most of their party behind them, unlike Trump. Neither of them tore their party apart. Neither of them alienated most of the people who already weren't supporting them. But you keep telling yourself that the candidate with highest negatives ever recorded, the one whose own party leaders said they could never support, will win the general.

Stupid Bullshitter!

Florida Atlantic University ^ | 3/12/16 | FAU
A new Florida Atlantic University statewide poll has GOP front runner Donald Trump surging with the support of 44% of likely Republican primary voters, and an overall 23 point lead on his closest competitors Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio who are statistically tied at 21%.

 

[BluesLegend]

Watching Trump's speech in Kansas City demonstrates once again that he doesn't have the temperament to be President. He doesn't have the sense to know when he needs to be calm.

Calling reporters "lying thieving reporters" and attacking the protestors after what happened in Chicago is unbelievable.

It's hard to believe that a sizable amount of the population thinks this guy should have control over the most powerful armed forces in the world.

Maybe you could talk Romney into losing again?

Why would I do that when Trump's going to a good job of it all by himself?

Can't you manage a single coherent sentence?

Apparently I am speaking at a too high level of intelligence for you, so I'll dumb it down.

Trump is going to lose.

Do you understand?

Oh the irony, Cliff Claven is that you?

 

[Vigilante]

Apparently ALL OTHER CANDIDATES, as SCUM..... Now you can see WHY so many are going for TRUMP, the REST of them are the ESTABLISHMENT!...even CRUZ... I would have expected him to be ABOVE the other 2 pieces of shit, BUT he plays POLITICS just like the others!!!!! This will BACKFIRE on all 3 as ALL ATTACKS on Trump has!

• Cruz, Rubio and Kasich criticize Trump for creating ‘environment’ for Chicago protest
  The Washington Post ^ | March 11, 2015 | David Weigel
  "The responsibility for that lies with protesters, who took violence into their own hands. But in any campaign, responsibility starts at the top. Any candidate is responsible for the culture of a campaign. And when you have a campaign that disrespects the voters, when you have a campaign that affirmatively encourages violence, when you have a campaign that is facing allegations of physical violence against members of the press, you create an environment that only encourages this sort of nasty discord," Cruz said

That is it. I am done with that coward Ted Cruz. Anyone that blames the victim because he sees political opportunity does not belong in the White House.

Standing up for the right to assemble and protest is never cowardly. Bernie Sanders losing his microphone to 2 young black ladies IS cowardly.. And so is a candidate who INCITES violence against protesters from the microphone as Trump has repeatedly done.

One's a chicken, but the other is a bully.. And BOTH of them have EMBOLDEN protesters who just want to disrupt and shout. NEITHER should be considered for Commander in Chief...

Your pathetic attempt to equal Sanders to Trump's actions to incite people is laughable. Sanders was not at a campaign rally he was at a public event he was invited to speak at. What was he supposed to do, take over the stage and say this is my event now and screw everyone else? Since he was not in control of the event he smartly walked off the stage and into the crowd to talk to people. Since it was not Sanders' event blaming him for enabling protesters is ridiculous. Blame the organizers who didn't control their event.

Trump on the other hand is inciting violence at his own rallies. That you can't tell the difference and equate them both as emboldening protesters shows a lack of comprehension, facts, and likely intelligence.

Pathetic Little man...a coward and another NO BALLS Socialist!