This thread is insight into know-nothing, warmongering chickenhawks who want their trillion dollar wars to also come without any responsibility for the consequences of displacing vast numbers of people.
Of the 4 million registered Syrian refugees, 2.1 million are women. Yet RWNJ's continue to confuse that number with the 72% of refugees being male who crossed the Mediterranean sea. Men went that way because women and children were mostly shipped on land, some by air.
Don't want refugees? Then don't bomb or invade other countries, hypocrites.
Republicans are disqualified from holding the Oval Office because they stubbornly cling to fighting a 21st century challenge with a big, bulky, 20th century military model that isn't designed to produce the results we need today.
Democrats at their debate all agree the costly military overhead of tanks and other outdated equipment need to go. They understand that more resources need to be shifted into turning it into a better counter-terrorism apparatus. On the Sunday shows today, Republicans already were barking for troops on the ground. Lindsay Graham, Queen of the Chickenhawks, proposed sending 10,000 troops immediately.
How are 10,000 troops in Syria going to be able to anticipate and neutralize a threat by a terror cell that has gone virtually dark in a major American city?
Leave it to RWNJ's to disqualify what we all know needs to happen, which is the modernizing of our defense to meet today's threats. Republicans used to be the National Security party, but that is no longer the case these days. American boots in Syria would be repeating the same mistake as going into Iraq was.