All the presidents men must testify in the Senate trial

[BWK]

Lawrence O'Donnel can go sit in the corner with that hack Rachel Maddow.

Nothing these partisan hacks say can, or should, be taken seriously.

So, it didn't take long for the chicken shit pussies to come along and attack the messenger. Grow a pair and debate the message coward.

When the messenger is a Democrat operative, have at it.

As to the message? Already flattened.

That's not an argument. That's a chicken shit surrender from a ***** Trump supporter.

Are you 'on the rag'?
Blast through another bottle of cheap sherry and you'll feel better.

What's the matter, is that rag blocking your keyboard from typing an intelligent rebuttal to this thread?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

A senate trial is not an official trial without witnesses and documents.

Can't wait to see the whistleblower on the stand.

Did you promise the whistleblower witness protection from the millions of Trump deplorables who want to see his head on a plate for exposing the truth about your criminal imposter president?

Whistleblower rules don't promise anonymity.

In other words, **** the whistleblower for exposing the truth of this case. Got it.

Why would testifying in an impeachment trial "**** the whistleblower"?

Seriously? Do you know what is at stake if the whistleblower testifies? Trump and his goons will be tweeting death threats faster than you can say don't do it. You can't seriously be that stupid to ask that question right?

Seriously? Do you know what is at stake if the whistleblower testifies?

You don't want to get to the truth?

Trump and his goons will be tweeting death threats faster than you can say don't do it.

That's awful!!! Only left-wingers get to tweet death threats.

 

[Care4all]

Senate holds the trial.
The house does the investigation and presents the Articles.

If the House had done it's job instead of being in a hurry, that's on the House.

No need for the Senate to re-investigate!

That's just the way it is.....

no prosecutor holds back evidence if he acquires it after he has already indicted a person....

the trial is where ALL evidence, comes out, and if new evidence is available, the trial prosecutors admit it in to evidence at the trial, same with new or additional witnesses, while also notifying the defense of it....

same with the defense team, they can start with one witness list and then modify it, with different witnesses if they are more pertinent to their defense case...

NO ONE is LOCKED IN to just what was available at the time of the original indictment....?

THAT is considered a fair trial, for both the defendant, and for whom the defendant allegedly harmed.

so, I do not understand why a fair impeachment trial, would not be similar??

 

[BWK]

Did you promise the whistleblower witness protection from the millions of Trump deplorables who want to see his head on a plate for exposing the truth about your criminal imposter president?

Whistleblower rules don't promise anonymity.

In other words, **** the whistleblower for exposing the truth of this case. Got it.

Why would testifying in an impeachment trial "**** the whistleblower"?

Seriously? Do you know what is at stake if the whistleblower testifies? Trump and his goons will be tweeting death threats faster than you can say don't do it. You can't seriously be that stupid to ask that question right?

Seriously? Do you know what is at stake if the whistleblower testifies?

You don't want to get to the truth?

Trump and his goons will be tweeting death threats faster than you can say don't do it.

That's awful!!! Only left-wingers get to tweet death threats.

Your counter argument is retarded. Try again.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Whistleblower rules don't promise anonymity.

In other words, **** the whistleblower for exposing the truth of this case. Got it.

Why would testifying in an impeachment trial "**** the whistleblower"?

Seriously? Do you know what is at stake if the whistleblower testifies? Trump and his goons will be tweeting death threats faster than you can say don't do it. You can't seriously be that stupid to ask that question right?

Seriously? Do you know what is at stake if the whistleblower testifies?

You don't want to get to the truth?

Trump and his goons will be tweeting death threats faster than you can say don't do it.

That's awful!!! Only left-wingers get to tweet death threats.

Your counter argument is retarded. Try again.

We should eliminate the right to face our accusers? Ok...….

 

[CrusaderFrank]

A senate trial is not an official trial without witnesses and documents.

Can't wait to see the whistleblower on the stand.

Did you promise the whistleblower witness protection from the millions of Trump deplorables who want to see his head on a plate for exposing the truth about your criminal imposter president?

Whistleblower rules don't promise anonymity.

In other words, **** the whistleblower for exposing the truth of this case. Got it.

Why would testifying in an impeachment trial "**** the whistleblower"?

Seriously? Do you know what is at stake if the whistleblower testifies? Trump and his goons will be tweeting death threats faster than you can say don't do it. You can't seriously be that stupid to ask that question right?

Eric Ciaramella MUST testify, he'll be the first and only witness

 

[B. Kidd]

Senate holds the trial.
The house does the investigation and presents the Articles.

If the House had done it's job instead of being in a hurry, that's on the House.

No need for the Senate to re-investigate!

That's just the way it is.....

no prosecutor holds back evidence if he acquires it after he has already indicted a person....

the trial is where ALL evidence, comes out, and if new evidence is available, the trial prosecutors admit it in to evidence at the trial, same with new or additional witnesses, while also notifying the defense of it....

same with the defense team, they can start with one witness list and then modify it, with different witnesses if they are more pertinent to their defense case...

NO ONE is LOCKED IN to just what was available at the time of the original indictment....?

THAT is considered a fair trial, for both the defendant, and for whom the defendant allegedly harmed.

so, I do not understand why a fair impeachment trial, would not be similar??

ONLY IN CRIMINAL TRIALS!

THIS IS A POLITICAL TRIAL!!

Nice try, partisan moonbat.

 

[B. Kidd]

A totally partisan impeachment, which this is, relegates impeachment itself, to be on the same level as jaywalking.

Dimms and the Dimm controlled state media haven't caught up to this truth, yet.

 

[BWK]

A totally partisan impeachment, which this is, relegates impeachment itself, to be on the same level as jaywalking.

Dimms and the Dimm controlled state media haven't caught up to this truth, yet.

None of this makes sense, and has no relationship with anything factual.

 

[BWK]

Did you promise the whistleblower witness protection from the millions of Trump deplorables who want to see his head on a plate for exposing the truth about your criminal imposter president?

Whistleblower rules don't promise anonymity.

In other words, **** the whistleblower for exposing the truth of this case. Got it.

Why would testifying in an impeachment trial "**** the whistleblower"?

Seriously? Do you know what is at stake if the whistleblower testifies? Trump and his goons will be tweeting death threats faster than you can say don't do it. You can't seriously be that stupid to ask that question right?

Eric Ciaramella MUST testify, he'll be the first and only witness

Okay! The Left has nothing to hide.

 

[B. Kidd]

A totally partisan impeachment, which this is, relegates impeachment itself, to be on the same level as jaywalking.

Dimms and the Dimm controlled state media haven't caught up to this truth, yet.

None of this makes sense, and has no relationship with anything factual.

What?!?
Are you saying that this impeachment is not totally partisan?

FACT: IT IS.

 

[PredFan]

Lawrence: All the president's men must testify in Senate impeachment trial There simply is no other way, after we find out that the 84 day conspiracy to collude and abuse power by Trump and his butt boys must occur if the Republicans in the Senate are working for the American people.

We know the crime occured with Trump, and he was impeached for it. But now we need to confirm how many more were involved in the crime to attack the US in a US election, and what were the particulars of their possible assistance to the crime that may have involved their own personal footprint.

As we speak Mike Pompeo is heading to Ukraine to do what? Get involved in US politics as it relates to Joe Biden? State Dept. demurs on Pompeo-Zelenskiy meeting That's not Pompeo's job, yet, his spokesperson couldn't answer the question when pressed bout it. Even as Trump is impeached in real time, it is a very real possibility that Trump's butt boy Pompeo will discuss Biden and not Ukraines security, and is he going there for the sole purpose to campaign for Trump?

For McConnell and the Senate not to bring these witnesses in, would be the culmination of their own crimes as accomplices, and quite likely the party will take a huge hit nation wide from this treasonous act of malfeasance.

Funny how we see the left doing the same things over and over. Like this above. thety do an investigation, find nothing at all, make shit up out of thin air and then start making demands as if the shit they invented was real.

that's why reality ***** slaps those idiots so much.

 

[BWK]

In other words, **** the whistleblower for exposing the truth of this case. Got it.

Why would testifying in an impeachment trial "**** the whistleblower"?

Seriously? Do you know what is at stake if the whistleblower testifies? Trump and his goons will be tweeting death threats faster than you can say don't do it. You can't seriously be that stupid to ask that question right?

Seriously? Do you know what is at stake if the whistleblower testifies?

You don't want to get to the truth?

Trump and his goons will be tweeting death threats faster than you can say don't do it.

That's awful!!! Only left-wingers get to tweet death threats.

Your counter argument is retarded. Try again.

We should eliminate the right to face our accusers? Ok...….

If their lives are in danger because of the possibility of death threats to the whistleblower by the accused, hell yes. What kind of stupid question is that? If a witness is an alien from Mars and has concrete, undeniable evidence, but needs to be protected from exposing its identity, you damn right it should be protected.

You advocate for criminals and could give two shits about the law and justice when its not convenient for you. And that is the problem these Trump goons have.

 

[BWK]

Lawrence: All the president's men must testify in Senate impeachment trial There simply is no other way, after we find out that the 84 day conspiracy to collude and abuse power by Trump and his butt boys must occur if the Republicans in the Senate are working for the American people.

We know the crime occured with Trump, and he was impeached for it. But now we need to confirm how many more were involved in the crime to attack the US in a US election, and what were the particulars of their possible assistance to the crime that may have involved their own personal footprint.

As we speak Mike Pompeo is heading to Ukraine to do what? Get involved in US politics as it relates to Joe Biden? State Dept. demurs on Pompeo-Zelenskiy meeting That's not Pompeo's job, yet, his spokesperson couldn't answer the question when pressed bout it. Even as Trump is impeached in real time, it is a very real possibility that Trump's butt boy Pompeo will discuss Biden and not Ukraines security, and is he going there for the sole purpose to campaign for Trump?

For McConnell and the Senate not to bring these witnesses in, would be the culmination of their own crimes as accomplices, and quite likely the party will take a huge hit nation wide from this treasonous act of malfeasance.

Funny how we see the left doing the same things over and over. Like this above. thety do an investigation, find nothing at all, make shit up out of thin air and then start making demands as if the shit they invented was real.

that's why reality ***** slaps those idiots so much.

The evidence was real, and the Left acted on it accordingly while the Right was left with their fingers up their asses with no defense. Get over it. He was found guilty.

And the Left has not done the same thing over and over and you have zero evidence of that. You're a chicken shit liar who has nothing to debate.

 

[BWK]

A totally partisan impeachment, which this is, relegates impeachment itself, to be on the same level as jaywalking.

Dimms and the Dimm controlled state media haven't caught up to this truth, yet.

None of this makes sense, and has no relationship with anything factual.

What?!?
Are you saying that this impeachment is not totally partisan?

FACT: IT IS.

Protocol and the rules of this impeachment process went according to the rules. If you have anything that proves it was not, spill it out with links proving me wrong. If you don't, you too are nothing but a bald faced liar.

 

[B. Kidd]

A totally partisan impeachment, which this is, relegates impeachment itself, to be on the same level as jaywalking.

Dimms and the Dimm controlled state media haven't caught up to this truth, yet.

None of this makes sense, and has no relationship with anything factual.

What?!?
Are you saying that this impeachment is not totally partisan?

FACT: IT IS.

Protocol and the rules of this impeachment process went according to the rules. If you have anything that proves it was not, spill it out with links proving me wrong. If you don't, you too are nothing but a bald faced liar.

Just keep channeling Martian metaphors, you ultra-TDS afflicted loser!

 

[BWK]

Folks, we've got ourselves a couple of liars who can't debate their claims. Lol! Color me surprised.

 

[BWK]

A totally partisan impeachment, which this is, relegates impeachment itself, to be on the same level as jaywalking.

Dimms and the Dimm controlled state media haven't caught up to this truth, yet.

None of this makes sense, and has no relationship with anything factual.

What?!?
Are you saying that this impeachment is not totally partisan?

FACT: IT IS.

Protocol and the rules of this impeachment process went according to the rules. If you have anything that proves it was not, spill it out with links proving me wrong. If you don't, you too are nothing but a bald faced liar.

Just keep channeling Martian metaphors, you ultra-TDS afflicted loser!

You're a proven liar. Thanks for the confirmation once again. Look at these chicken shit ***** liars running from their own claims and bs. They can't back up what they say. "it's totally partisan." No hell it isn't, and your candy ass couldn't prove it.

 

[B. Kidd]

Folks, we've got ourselves a couple of liars who can't debate their claims. Lol! Color me surprised.

Debating facts is not your strong suit as you ignore the basic ones to begin with!

Please resume your normal activities on the Martian landscape.

 

[georgephillip]

We know the crime occured with Trump, and he was impeached for it. But now we need to confirm how many more were involved in the crime to attack the US in a US election, and what were the particulars of their possible assistance to the crime that may have involved their own personal footprint.

We also should know some of Trump's many crimes come with criminal penalties:

The Actual Laws Trump Has Broken Amount to 10 Years in Prison

"A variety of felony criminal statutes plainly implicate Trump’s behavior, and come with lengthy prison sentences — the types of sentences doled out for high crimes, to say nothing of misdemeanors. Indeed, many of them are straightforward.

"Altogether, if the impeachment inquiry is limited simply to Trump’s pressure on Ukraine, the charges could amount to more than 10 years in prison.

"Take 18 U.S. Code § 872: “Extortion by officers or employees of the United States.” It’s not hard to grasp:"