What attack?Period of calm is when only Palestinians are being attacked.
Link?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What attack?Period of calm is when only Palestinians are being attacked.
(COMMENT)Period of calm is when only Palestinians are being attacked.
You missed the point. Israel will have a ceasefire then will continue to attack, arrest, kill, destroy, and steal just like nothing ever happened.RE: Part 2 Continuing on exposing Mahmoud Abbas' lies in a single speech to the world...
SUBTOPIC: State of Calm
P F Tinmore, et al,
Calm, in this case, means nothing more than the cessation of hostile activities.
IF the Israelis are not detecting NAIC initiated THEN there be no retaliatory response.
The International Law and Hague Regulation covers it:
Israel is to ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, unless Arab Palestine attempt to undermine the peace.
- The Palestinians who commit offenses which is solely intended to harm the Israelis,
- The Palestinians who commit offenses and attempts on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, present collective danger,
- The Palestinians who commit offenses that attempt to damage the property of the occupying forces the administration,
- The Palestinians who commit offenses that attempt to damage the installations used by the Israelis,
Shall be liable to arrest, prosecution, and (if necessary) imprisonment,
(COMMENT)
But as the many contributions of our friends like "Sixties Fan" • "Hollie" • "rylah" • "MJB" and others - the discussion of peace has to be a good faith effort. But the like-minded who advocate for Armed struggle as the only way, certainly do not.
Most Respectfully,
R
Nothing in support of that emotional outburst.You missed the point. Israel will have a ceasefire then will continue to attack, arrest, kill, destroy, and steal just like nothing ever happened.
As the filmmaker explained to interviewer Sophia Hoffinger, what she conveys in the film is that foraging by Palestinians is “an act of resistance” against an Israeli law that “representForagers is about the top-down violence of colonial laws around preservation practices.
Perhaps the reviewer believes that appending “what has been called” to the epithet “apartheid state” absolves him of practicing inappropriate journalistic bias. But without noting that the false “apartheid” charge is a slur specifically designed by Israel’s enemies to delegitimize the Jewish state, Heinrich is following the pattern of other unethical journalists who present their own biased opinions and partisan positions under the guise of being widely accepted truths.We hear a lot about violence in Israel and the occupied territories. We don’t hear quite as much about the softer edges of living in what has been called an “apartheid state” — the absurdity, the insanity, the ever-present anxiety.
In other words, he doesn’t really know whether or not Jews eat akkoub, but who cares? Tossing it out there bolsters the suggestion that the law singled out Palestinians for criminalization just as an apartheid state would do. And just in case he is wrong about Jews not eating the plant, he tosses out another qualification to lend weight to his apartheid argument: Jewish Israelis don’t really pick the plant in the wild, as do Palestinians, with the implication that the ban targeted Palestinians alone. That’s like saying issuing speeding tickets to those who drive over a certain speed limit while sparing those who stick to the speed limit is somehow an example of apartheid law. Yes, scofflaws were targeted while law abiders were not: how does that support the message that this was an apartheid law? Nor does Heinrich note that the Israel Nature and Parks Authority have similarly protected other over-harvested plants – for example, sage and hyssop that are popular among Jewish Israelis – because conservation of nature, ecosystems, plant and animal diversity is their job.— but Jewish Israelis don’t really eat akkoub or, if they do, they’ll buy it from a kibbutz where it grows in orderly rows.
The New York Times reviewer thus lauds and promotes the filmmaker’s partisan, skewed narrative of a land belonging to indigenous Palestinians suffering under the yoke of colonial, occupying Jews. It is yet example of anti-Zionist messaging that is becoming increasingly normalized in the New York Times.But if you’re watching “Foragers” as an art piece rather than as a straight documentary, this development hardly changes its impact: Harassment of people gathering a wild green said to taste like artichoke, whether or not this particular harassment is still happening, is a perfectly intelligible stand-in for all the other tools a modern state can use to tell people they’re unwanted.
The new alert urges customers searching for rentals in Israeli settlements to review their government’s travel advisories before booking in the area, “which may be considered conflict-affected.”
Online travel agency Booking.com has added warning banners to both Israeli and Palestinian properties in the occupied West Bank, the company said Saturday, under a new policy on conflict zones that Israel hailed as a “victory”.
“Please review any travel advisories provided by your government to make an informed decision about your stay in this area, which may be considered conflict-afflicted,” the company’s website now says, in searches for accommodation in Jewish settlements or Palestinian localities. . . .
Israel hailed the move to not distinguish between Israeli and Palestinian properties in the West Bank a “diplomatic achievement”, saying the company’s original intention was to designated Israeli settlements only as “occupied territory” and visits there as a “high risk to safety and human rights.”
“We thank Booking.com for changing its decision,” Prime Minister Yair Lapid said in a statement that credited the foreign and tourism ministries for a “discrete and effective dialogue” with the company that had brought about the change.
“Israel won an important victory in the battle against delegitimisation,” he said. (Emphases added.)
On Sunday (Oct. 2), CAMERA notified AP yesterday about Booking.com’s policy change of one day earlier — (although presumably a news agency which so promptly reported the booking site’s news Friday would have known about Saturday’s change) — and yet AP has still failed to dispatch its intrepid reporters, leaving its news consumers straggling behind saddled with the old, outdated reported highlighting an alleged BDS victory which never got off the ground.Online travel agency Booking.com has added safety labels to listings in the occupied West Bank, which Israel, having initially opposed the move, welcomed for not singling out Jewish settlements.
The move was rebuked by Palestinian officials, who said the advisory should only be used for Israeli settlements.
The company now posts an advisory on its website when customers search for West Bank properties in both Palestinian cities as well Israeli settlements . . .
OK, so?-De-legitimization of both the existence of the State of Israel and the Jews’ very presence in the country. Israel does not appear on the map and is replaced by Palestine as the sovereign state in the region.
The Jews are presented as colonialist settlers and their cities — including Tel Aviv — do not appear on the map as well.
You are barking up the wrong tree. The UNCCP is charged with with refugee settlement not the UNRWA.-Demand that UNRWA advance resettlement of fourth and fifth generation refugees from the 1948 war,
UNRWA is in charge of the Islamic terrorist propaganda and welfare begging component of the Pally refugee scam.You are barking up the wrong tree. The UNCCP is charged with with refugee settlement not the UNRWA.