DGS49
Diamond Member
Are you serious?
There was no "affair."
There was no "relationship."
If you sign a contract and accept the consideration required by the contract ($130,000), then YOU are bound by the contract, regardless of whether the other party signed, by virtue of your having accepted the payment.
And oh, by the way: If you sign a Contract that says you may not do X, and the other party reminds you that you will be liable for damages of you DO X, that is not a "threat." It is not "bullying."
In fact, it would be entirely normal and appropriate for the other party to DEMAND a written commitment that you will abide by the contract, and not do X.
Nothing. Burger.
There was no "affair."
There was no "relationship."
If you sign a contract and accept the consideration required by the contract ($130,000), then YOU are bound by the contract, regardless of whether the other party signed, by virtue of your having accepted the payment.
And oh, by the way: If you sign a Contract that says you may not do X, and the other party reminds you that you will be liable for damages of you DO X, that is not a "threat." It is not "bullying."
In fact, it would be entirely normal and appropriate for the other party to DEMAND a written commitment that you will abide by the contract, and not do X.
Nothing. Burger.
Poor Libs, they keep turning over rocks and coming up with a lot of mud and not much else.