Alex Jones returns to YOUTUBE

How does any of what you just posted prove that Trump colluded with Putin. . . . I'm confused, please clear that up.
There was no investigation of that allegation, until Donnie fired Comey and Republicans were force to appoint Mueller to investigate. Mueller looked for a criminal conspiracy, because collusion is not an actual crime. While he found several instances of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians with ties to Putin, he didn't find enough evidence to recommend a charge of criminal conspiracy, and none were ever filed.
 
While he found several instances of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians with ties to Putin, he didn't find enough evidence to recommend a charge of criminal conspiracy, and none were ever filed.
This is false.

What he found was possible obstruction of justice, and left it up to congress to do something about that. The report found absolutely no collusion between the Trump administration and Russia.

As far as I know. Link to the page of the report that stated otherwise if you really bleev this lie.
 
More logic fail. I guess that's why anyone should listen to you.

My logic is fine.

Alex Jones is a drunk (he has been busted for DUI multiple times)
Alex Jones was almost ruined by losing a libel suit over his lies.
And he peddles snake oil to suckers, and lots of fake news.

But you like that stuff, and the lowbrow demagoguery that right trash media feeds you.

Why bother with sober real news, when you can get your "news" from nobodies, ex disc jockeys, and other right wing reactionaries making it up on X.
 
This is false.

What he found was possible obstruction of justice, and left it up to congress to do something about that. The report found absolutely no collusion between the Trump administration and Russia.

As far as I know. Link to the page of the report that stated otherwise if you really bleev this lie.
This is false.

Numerous, almost routine communication and coordination between the Trump campaign and various individuals acting as cut outs were confirmed. The facts have not changed.

Trump skated because he had an Attorney General who covered for him. And because he employed cut outs to do the collusion, so no one in the official campaign could be accuses of collusion using the legal definition.

It had never occurred to anyone to pass a law outlawing Presidential campaigns from receiving covert support from other nations or their intelligence agencies.

The idea was unthinkable.

Until Trump thought of it.

Then the Trump regime engaged in a wholesale pattern of obstruction of justice up to and including defying Congressional subpoenas.

Mueller assembled the facts, and then turned them over to the Justice Department, then headed by Trump's "wing man", who made sure no grand jury ever saw the report. So, since no action was taken, Barr submarined the "collusion" case.
 
This is false.

Numerous, almost routine communication and coordination between the Trump campaign and various individuals acting as cut outs were confirmed. The facts have not changed.

Trump skated because he had an Attorney General who covered for him. And because he employed cut outs to do the collusion, so no one in the official campaign could be accuses of collusion using the legal definition.

It had never occurred to anyone to pass a law outlawing Presidential campaigns from receiving covert support from other nations or their intelligence agencies.

The idea was unthinkable.

Until Trump thought of it.

Then the Trump regime engaged in a wholesale pattern of obstruction of justice up to and including defying Congressional subpoenas.

Mueller assembled the facts, and then turned them over to the Justice Department, then headed by Trump's "wing man", who made sure no grand jury ever saw the report. So, since no action was taken, Barr submarined the "collusion" case.




1758897049119.webp



a7aq18.jpg
 



View attachment 1166421


a7aq18.jpg

So, rather than cite the actual facts, or the report, you try and hide behind Barr's summary of the report, which said that there was no evidence of legally defined collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

This was a summary was deliberately and wildly misleading, as it was intended to be.

And it also confirms my point that Trump skated because Barr covered for him, rather than submit the report to a grand jury.

You made my case.

So, perhaps you can tell me why the Trump Campaign invited known Russian intelligence operatives to a meeting in his campaign headquarters in the middle of an election campaign.

Trumpsters always run away from the question too. And don't even bother to try the Majinsky Act cover up, either.

If Trump wasn't intent to cash in on Russian intelligence and influence, why was he meeting with Russians. They didn't cross the bridge to meet with the Clinton campaign.

For that matter, why has Trump kissed Putin's ass at every opportunity since?
 
So, rather than cite the actual facts, or the report, you try and hide behind Barr's summary of the report, which said that there was no evidence of legally defined collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
You're the one the made the claim that Mueller found collision between Trump and Russia. All the media reported that no collusion was found.

I'm not interested in yoar fevered interpretation of the facts. Cite where Mueller found collusion.

Put up or shut up.
 
This is false.

What he found was possible obstruction of justice, and left it up to congress to do something about that. The report found absolutely no collusion between the Trump administration and Russia.

As far as I know. Link to the page of the report that stated otherwise if you really bleev this lie.
Volume I describes the factual results of the Special Counsel’s investigation of Russia’sinterference in the 2016 presidential election and its interactions with the Trump Campaign.

Starts on PP 33.


He does have a separate section for possible obstruction charges too.
 
You're the one the made the claim that Mueller found collision between Trump and Russia. All the media reported that no collusion was found.

I'm not interested in yoar fevered interpretation of the facts. Cite where Mueller found collusion.

Put up or shut up.
Democrats could easily admit that they were pissed after Clinton lost the election which Democrats gave her a guaranteed victory against Trump. Bunch of ******* sore losers
 
Volume I describes the factual results of the Special Counsel’s investigation of Russia’sinterference in the 2016 presidential election and its interactions with the Trump Campaign.

Starts on PP 33.


He does have a separate section for possible obstruction charges too.
None of which lead to the conclusion that Trump's organization colluded with Russia to get elected.

It in fact confirms the opposite.

1758914778217.webp


<snip>

1758914882719.webp
 
The available information was missing the Russian half of the equation so of course he couldn't prove a conspiracy.
Yoar own source determines yoar conspiracy theory is false, but somehow you know more than the entire IC community?

proxy-image
 
15th post
If you say 9/11 was an inside job, or 10/7 was a setup. Do people get to sue you?
Yes. This is America, you can sue anybody. Doesn't mean you'll win or even get your case heard in court. But you can file suit. Maybe if you claimed all the carnage of 9/11 of 10/7 was staged, and created a myth that the victims really didn't die, and your herd of rabid followers started a harassments campaign against the victims families, yeah maybe those families would win too.
 
Yoar own source determines yoar conspiracy theory is false, but somehow you know more than the entire IC community?

proxy-image
It proved Russia was trying to help Trump and Trump was eagerly accepting whatever help they had to offer. There was nothing phony about the Russian hackers immediate response to Benedict Donald's request that they find Hillary's email. That was a form of collusion. There was no agreement between two sides just a request made and a response given. Like a wink and a nod.
 
It proved Russia was trying to help Trump and Trump was eagerly accepting whatever help they had to offer. There was nothing phony about the Russian hackers immediate response to Benedict Donald's request that they find Hillary's email. That was a form of collusion. There was no agreement between two sides just a request made and a response given. Like a wink and a nod.
It was a leak, not a hack, nor was it "Russian Hackers."

This truth will eventually come out.
 
Back
Top Bottom