Alec Baldwin Melts Down, Threatens To ‘Snap’ Trump Impersonator’s Neck

[RhodyPatriot]

Gonzalo Lira risked his life telling the truth and lost it, eventually. That was journalism.

I agree.

This little **** is in no danger buggering Baldwin

So?

Satirical wit need not put one's life in danger to be poignant.

 

[hadit]

The POV would have pointed at the camera, not her. He pointed the gun at her because he was pissed off that she made him do a repeat of a scene.

And if, as a cinematographer does, she's standing behind the camera so she can see what it sees, and they have a safe distance to prevent injury from a blank, there's little reason to doubt he would hit her. Look, the guy is despicable, but you have no way of knowing any of that is true to credibly accuse him of murder. I'm presenting a very likely scenario. The armorer got 18 months because of this, which is appropriate.

 

[marvin martian]

The incompetent armorer who allowed a loaded gun on set played no role?

She had one job…..

She's been punished for her role in the killing. Baldwin got off scot free because of his Democrat privilege.

 

[hadit]

She's been punished for her role in the killing. Baldwin got off scot free because of his Democrat privilege.

He could still be held liable in a civil suit, should her family want to file one.

 

[AlexanderPK]

I agree.



So?

Satirical wit need not put one's life in danger to be poignant.

I just put myself in Alec's shoes and boy, do I want to break the satirical wit's neck? Yes I do!!! Poignant or not, too bad those blood sucking paparazzi can't be kicked to the ground unconscious and pissed on without a judgemental gaze of a ******* law abiding passer-by.

 

[westwall]

And if, as a cinematographer does, she's standing behind the camera so she can see what it sees, and they have a safe distance to prevent injury from a blank, there's little reason to doubt he would hit her. Look, the guy is despicable, but you have no way of knowing any of that is true to credibly accuse him of murder. I'm presenting a very likely scenario. The armorer got 18 months because of this, which is appropriate.

She stands ALONGSIDE the camera. Look at the pictures, long gone are the days(like 80 years ago) when the cinemetographer was behind the camera.

 

[marvin martian]

He could still be held liable in a civil suit, should her family want to file one.

I believe they already got paid off to drop it.

 

[hadit]

She stands ALONGSIDE the camera. Look at the pictures, long gone are the days(like 80 years ago) when the cinemetographer was behind the camera.

Behind, beside, how much difference is there when a guy who has no idea what he's doing with a gun is pointing it in that direction from a minimum of 10-15 feet away?

 

[westwall]

Behind, beside, how much difference is there when a guy who has no idea what he's doing with a gun is pointing it in that direction from a minimum of 10-15 feet away?

A lot. He claims she told him to do a POV shot. That means you point it at the camera.

The fact he pointed it at her is a criminal act.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

At least Alec Baldwin didn't support Pres. Zelinsky

 

[ThisIsMe]

This just underscores the need for every actor who handles a firearm that is capable of firing a live round to get enough training to know what's going to happen when they pull the trigger. They are the last line of defense. It is no mystery to me that accidents happen when stereotypically anti-gun actors are handed a potentially deadly weapon and told to make it go bang.

The prop department needed to not have LIVE rounds in set. There was no reason for it.

This was not a murder case, there was no murder.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

And safety precautions require that there be enough separation between the gun muzzle and anyone in the area to prevent injury from a blank round.

If she's standing behind the camera, which is where cinematographers normally stand when getting a shot, it is reasonable that she would be hit instead of the camera. Baldwin is not known for being a good shot.

No one is willing lets someone shoot even a blank at them. Blanks are dangerous -there is no bullet but the exploding powder hits you.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

.

I'd like to know how the rationale escaped them all to just have the camera standing alone, with all personnel far enough away from it for safety's sake.


.

Of course. Blanks are dangerous too. Halyna would have never let someone shoot a blank into her face.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

And if, as a cinematographer does, she's standing behind the camera so she can see what it sees, and they have a safe distance to prevent injury from a blank, there's little reason to doubt he would hit her. Look, the guy is despicable, but you have no way of knowing any of that is true to credibly accuse him of murder. I'm presenting a very likely scenario. The armorer got 18 months because of this, which is appropriate.

HAHAHA. That is space alien talk. No one lets someone shoot even a blank into their face. THINK, you moron.

 

[el midgetron]

 

[hadit]

HAHAHA. That is space alien talk. No one lets someone shoot even a blank into their face. THINK, you moron.

There's a big difference between a blank being fired "in your face" and one fired from 45 feet away.

 

[bendog]

Alec Baldwin, always keepin' it classy.

Of course, he has to mention THE CHILDREN to try and maintain the illusion of some sort of moral high ground.

Because the guy who was recorded calling his own daughter "a little pig" is about as much of an example for aspiring fathers as Nancy Pelosi is to aspiring botox users.

Maybe not the greatest.



At the conclusion, the impersonator says Alec has "big balls".

But, honestly, I think this Jason Scoop guy is the one with the tremendous testicles.

And I say that as a straight cisgender male.

I dunno but that mofo is a killah!

 

[AlexanderPK]

And I say that as a straight cisgender male.

Cisgender? What the f is that? Couldn't you just have said that you were a man? Is it not enough these days to define normalcy?

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Cisgender? What the f is that? Couldn't you just have said that you were a man? Is it not enough these days to define normalcy?

A little tongue in cheek on my part.

But you're not wrong.