Albuquerque carry ban: Where's the "We need more gun control!!" crowd?

There yah go. We should bypass the courts and throw all the crazy people in jail.

That's even more fascist then taking their guns.

Good job.
Nah, just the dems and fags, they are certainly crazy and don't own many guns to begin with.

You know a national mental health "emergancy".....Sauce for the goose Mr. Savvik and all that. ;)
 
There yah go. We should bypass the courts and throw all the crazy people in jail.

That's even more fascist then taking their guns.

Good job.
LOL. You want to bypass the courts and take their guns away. If you can't trust one of these crazy people with a gun then why should they be trusted with other weapons? Why is it OK for them to have knives, etc.?
 
Nah, just the dems and fags, they are certainly crazy and don't own many guns to begin with.

You know a national mental health "emergancy".....Sauce for the goose Mr. Savvik and all that. ;)
Yes but many in the left choose not to own guns, what we are discussing is taking guns from the crazy people and fuck the courts because they take to long.
 
LOL. You want to bypass the courts and take their guns away. If you can't trust one of these crazy people with a gun then why should they be trusted with other weapons? Why is it OK for them to have knives, etc.?
Not sure. Good question.

Perhaps you can ask Trump at the next rally?

“Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court, because that’s another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida, he had a lot of firearms – they saw everything – to go to court would have taken a long time, so you could do exactly what you’re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.

 
Not sure. Good question.

Perhaps you can ask Trump at the next rally?

“Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court, because that’s another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida, he had a lot of firearms – they saw everything – to go to court would have taken a long time, so you could do exactly what you’re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.

I'm asking the left.
 
I figured.
They are the ones who want to let dangerous people run around loose and then try to pass laws to keep guns out of their hands, like that would really keep guns out of their hands. A crazy person on the loose is a crazy person on the loose. If you have enough evidence to take guns away from them because they are crazy then you have enough evidence to keep them out of the public.
 
They are the ones who want to let dangerous people run around loose and then try to pass laws to keep guns out of their hands, like that would really keep guns out of their hands. A crazy person on the loose is a crazy person on the loose. If you have enough evidence to take guns away from them because they are crazy then you have enough evidence to keep them out of the public.
So you agree with Trump that we should bypass due process and take guns from people someone or some group claims is crazy?
 
People have got to stand up to Dimocrats and their anti-gun agenda.

New Mexico sheriff refuses to enforce governor's gun ban​



"This order will not do anything to curb gun violence other than punish law-abiding citizens who have a constitutional right to self defense," Allen said at a press briefing.
 
So you agree with Trump that we should bypass due process and take guns from people someone or some group claims is crazy?
This is what the left have repeatedly said they want to do, take guns away from people. I say if a person is crazy enough to take their guns away from them then they shouldn't be out in the first place.
 
For reference:
Open and concealed carry laws suspended in Albuquerque for 30 days

Been reading though the relevant topics on this board and others; I find the lack of support from the usual suspects for this move quite fascinating.
To be fair, I have a number of idiots and trolls on ignore, so maybe I intentionally missed some of what I expected – but they’re idiots and trolls, so they don’t, ever, count.

So.... what’s what, guys?
Why aren’t you standing and cheering for the governor and her bold action to save the children?
Where’s your defense of such a bold and beautiful act?
This -IS- the sort of thing you believe needs done – right?
So what happens when the gun violence goes to zero and nobody is attacked by the government?
 
it is a state of emergency to which governor is closer than i. do you really think a governor can not take such measures?
~~~~~~
It's a product of DSA Democrat policies allowing criminals to go free using legislature to decriminalize the laws.
Using Public Health laws to violate the Constitution has become a DSA Democrat signature and American citizens must stop these Marxist Socialists.
Their aim is to remove all laws of self protection from the citizens of America just as the Nazi`s did in the 1930`s.
 

Forum List

Back
Top