Alabama and Mississippi will also honor Robert E. Lee on Martin Luther King Jr. Day

Segregation and discriminatory housing policies were also theft. When we all work and pay taxes and yet some get to benefit from policies paid for by those taxes and hard work and others don't that is also theft. Black Americans were owed those same housing benefits as white Americans that helped build the white middle class through home ownership.


So, IF (******* “IF”????) over sixty years ago, black people had received some government subsidies, they would be as well off as white people?

Did Asians get the same subsidies?
 
So, IF (******* “IF”????) over sixty years ago, black people had received some government subsidies, they would be as well off as white people?

Did Asians get the same subsidies?
Not IF you dipshit. Where the **** do you see an IF in that passage? :dunno: :lol: That shit happened. I gave you the link and everything. You can read right?
 
Not IF you dipshit. Where the **** do you see an IF in that passage? :dunno: :lol: That shit happened. I gave you the link and everything. You can read right?
That is your claim, “IF black people had the same subsidies they would be economically comparable to whites”. You might have avoided using the word “IF” but the premise is dependent upon “IF”. It’s a hypothetical, it did not happen, therefore “IF”.

Did Asians receive those subsides? Of course they didn’t. Your woke ass will ignore the disparities that don’t support your narrative.

So, apparently blacks were so oppressed under segregation that they have yet to recover. Yet Asians were oppressed just enough to have since exceed whites economically. How does that happen?
 
That is your claim, “IF black people had the same subsidies they would be economically comparable to whites”. You might have avoided using the word “IF” but the premise is dependent upon “IF”. It’s a hypothetical, it did not happen, therefore “IF”.

Did Asians receive those subsides? Of course they didn’t. Your woke ass will ignore the disparities that don’t support your narrative.

So, apparently blacks were so oppressed under segregation that they have yet to recover. Yet Asians were oppressed just enough to have since exceed whites economically. How does that happen?
Nope. That isn't my claim you dipshit. Also your continued attempts to bring Asians into the argument is irrational on its face. They are a different group of people that faced their own socioeconomic challenges. Also they are not a monolithic group. Asians come from all over the world at different times and in different social contexts. The poor Chinese who were coming here to work on railroads during American expansion aren't the Chinese and Indians who've been immigrating since the turn of the century to fill middle and upper middle class tech jobs. Even comparing Black Americans to Black immigrants is intellectually disingenuous because people immigrating from other countries tend to be people with means.

What I am saying is that Black Americans were purposefully robbed and disenfranchized by housing policies that were designed to do just that. And that home ownership is where the vast majority of middle class white wealth is situated because those are simply facts.
 
It relates to the socioeconomic inequities between Black and White Americans. It really is like holding a child's hand through simple arithmetic.... :lol:
Today? So you are saying that because blacks were “robbed and disenfranchised” it relates to the inequities of today? How so?
 
You're making my point. White racists in this country think they're entitled to a white majority because they're frail entitled white racists and they think crying about other countries is an excuse for their fragility. It isn't. It's being pushed on white racists here because they're powerless cucks.

Again, what racism? Present something other than your sad little feelings. :dunno: I'm responding to ignorant racist who imagine themselves entitled to a white majority.
On the other hand, frail black racists presume the white man owes them something and whines about their own frailties.
 
Today? So you are saying that because blacks were “robbed and disenfranchised” it relates to the inequities of today? How so?
******* christ.... you really are dumb.


Let's try this again. Through the 30s up until the 60s US housing policies actively discriminated against Black Americans and their communities through policies which denied them ability to buy homes in communities their tax dollars were being used to subsidize the building and insuring of while at the same time it refused to insure or invest in Black communities. They literally drew a red line, that's where the term red lining comes from, to mark the areas that the federal government refused to invest in and refused to federally insure the contractors and investors that did. That effectively prevented Black Americans from growing equity in the homes they were did own and could buy. And yes, these policies, which only ended 65 years ago, are the a large part of the socioeconomic inequities today. Now you may argue, with all your racist little feelings, that it's Black Americans fault themselves for not working hard to over come an inequity that wasn't caused by a lack of hard work to begin with but that would be irrational and an argument based on your Simp feelings. It's simply a fact that Black American wealth was robbed through these racist policies.
 
On the other hand, frail black racists presume the white man owes them something and whines about their own frailties.
I don't presume anything. I've shown and detailed the robbery. You participation trophy whites don't know how to do simple ******* logic. :lol:
 
I don't presume anything. I've shown and detailed the robbery. You participation trophy whites don't know how to do simple ******* logic. :lol:
You were robbed? Black on black crime is a real problem. You should demand reparations.
 
You were robbed? Black on black crime is a real problem. You should demand reparations.
I wasn't robbed by the policies of racist segregationists in America. My family came to this country in the 1980s. And I'm not demanding reparations for myself. Do you even know what you're arguing against you Moron? :dunno: :lol:
 
Says your frail feelings and I'm happy to watch you frail them at me for as long as you need to, emotionally. But I've proven the objective truth of my argument.
What makes you think the injustices of the past have any bearing on today? Why would anything be different than it is?
 
15th post
What makes you think the injustices of the past have any bearing on today? Why would anything be different than it is?
Because I understand how cause and effect work. :dunno: I don't really know how to explain simple shit to you. I don't know if you're pretending to be this stupid or if you actually are and if you are I'm not really the type of person to help you so much as point and laugh at you. :lol:
 
Convinced to free their black slaves, hell you pretty much wiped them out. You put them on reservations and damn near starved them to death.
Took a lot to convince them to free their black slaves.. Part of the deal was to accept those black people as citizen of their tribes. But your “people of color” largely refused to associate with former black slaves, and few were granted citizenship into those tribes.
 
I don't really know how to explain simple shit to you.
You sure don’t.

You are talking about two different and completely separate things. The injustices of the past have no relation to the disparities of today. Nothing would be different. Why are you claiming those two things are even related?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom