Al Gore Can't Save The Global Warming Cult

American_Jihad

Flaming Libs/Koranimals
May 1, 2012
11,534
3,715
350
Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
Gore is a f**king bore and is so full of bull/shit...

AL GORE CAN’T SAVE THE GLOBAL WARMING CULT
The fake science has been exposed.
July 24, 2017

Bruce Thornton
al_gore_at_power_shift_2011_in_washington_dc_-_20110415-02.jpg


Following Donald Trump’s withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord, Al Gore is releasing an update of his 2006 documentary An Inconvenient Truth. It’s called An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power, in which no doubt we will hear the same apocalyptic hysteria of its predecessor, and the same lurid predictions that will never come true. The difference between the 2006 Academy Award winner and the updated version is that now volumes of counter-evidence and exposure of the manipulation of climate data make it obvious that catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is a progressive cult-belief and alternative energy boondoggle, not real science.

Earlier this month PJMedia covered a new report that seriously challenges the data all warmists rely on to buttress their case that the planet has been steadily warming to disastrous levels. This peer-reviewed paper examines how the raw data from weather stations are manipulated and altered by the three main purveyors of temperature data known as Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST)––The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, NASA, and the Hadley Center for Climate Prediction and Research––before being used by other researchers. Incorporating more reliable satellite temperature data––which for going on two decades do not show any meaningful rise in temperature, let alone the steep rise that the GAST data show––the authors come to this devastating conclusion:

...

That sums up the problem. The solution is to start practicing real science again, take the big thumb of the federal government and its deep pockets off the scales of the debate, and base energy policy on science and what is best for the American people, rather than on what serves the pecuniary interests of researchers, progressive politicians, and countries like China, and that gratifies the weird combination of stale nature-love and two-bit Marxist clichés about the evils of industrialism that passes for science among the bicoastal elites.

Al Gore Can’t Save the Global Warming Cult
 
Dumb little fuck, this is not about Al Gore. It is about all the evidence that the scientists have presented that increasing the amount of GHGs in the atmosphere warms the atmosphere and oceans. And that warming is almost certain to have a negative effect on the human population of this planet.

Now real scientists belong to scientific societies that have peer reviewed journals that disseminate the latest research.

And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University on Earth has statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. And little lying bastards like you have zero standing. It is doubtful that you have the equivalent of a high school education in science, yet here you are trying to tell us that all the scientists are wrong.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: cnm
Well, lookie there at who has ORANGE hair.
 
Dumb little fuck, this is not about Al Gore. It is about all the evidence that the scientists have presented that increasing the amount of GHGs in the atmosphere warms the atmosphere and oceans. .

Really? Lets see a single piece of observed, measured, quantified evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.

Your claim is about all the evidence so if there is that much, surely you won't have any problem showing some of it...just cut and paste a single piece of real evidence here that favors the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...

Or you could do what you always do and post your steaming pile of bullshit post which doesn't contain a single piece of real evidence...or you could run away...or you could lie, and claim that you or some other warmer wacko already posted it...which never happened.

So lets see it rocks...what have you got...step on up to the plate and slap me down with some real, observed, measured, quantified evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.
 
Nobody alive knows dick about AGW and its long term effects. Nobody. Statements to the contrary just don't conform with reality.:2up:

My guess or the guess of any member of this forum is potentially as accurate as any goofball AGW scientist.
 
Dumb little fuck, this is not about Al Gore. It is about all the evidence that the scientists have presented that increasing the amount of GHGs in the atmosphere warms the atmosphere and oceans. And that warming is almost certain to have a negative effect on the human population of this planet.

Now real scientists belong to scientific societies that have peer reviewed journals that disseminate the latest research.

And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University on Earth has statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. And little lying bastards like you have zero standing. It is doubtful that you have the equivalent of a high school education in science, yet here you are trying to tell us that all the scientists are wrong.
STFU old balls your science sucks like you, even cave men knew more about weather than you libtarts...
t750-3e57e2e93df33a0c376e9e1a93f7d8aa68e16054.jpg


...
 
Dumb little fuck, this is not about Al Gore. It is about all the evidence that the scientists have presented that increasing the amount of GHGs in the atmosphere warms the atmosphere and oceans. .

Really? Lets see a single piece of observed, measured, quantified evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.

Your claim is about all the evidence so if there is that much, surely you won't have any problem showing some of it...just cut and paste a single piece of real evidence here that favors the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...

Or you could do what you always do and post your steaming pile of bullshit post which doesn't contain a single piece of real evidence...or you could run away...or you could lie, and claim that you or some other warmer wacko already posted it...which never happened.

So lets see it rocks...what have you got...step on up to the plate and slap me down with some real, observed, measured, quantified evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.
Stupid fuck, as has been pointed out to you a hundred times, the absorption spectra of CO2 and CH4 does is exactly what you are asking for.
 
Dumb little fuck, this is not about Al Gore. It is about all the evidence that the scientists have presented that increasing the amount of GHGs in the atmosphere warms the atmosphere and oceans. And that warming is almost certain to have a negative effect on the human population of this planet.

Now real scientists belong to scientific societies that have peer reviewed journals that disseminate the latest research.

And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University on Earth has statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. And little lying bastards like you have zero standing. It is doubtful that you have the equivalent of a high school education in science, yet here you are trying to tell us that all the scientists are wrong.
STFU old balls your science sucks like you, even cave men knew more about weather than you libtarts...
t750-3e57e2e93df33a0c376e9e1a93f7d8aa68e16054.jpg


...
Your portrait? Kind of looks like what your posts indicate.

Yes, you listen to the numbnuts like the obese junkie on the AM radio, or the fake British Lord, and think that you have a scientific education. In truth, you merely seek what confirms your willful ignorance.
 
Stupid fuck, as has been pointed out to you a hundred times, the absorption spectra of CO2 and CH4 does is exactly what you are asking for.

I guess I didn't mention the option of lying your ass off and claiming that you or some other warmer has provided some actual observed, measured data that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability.

It hasn't been done and a chart of the absorption spectra of a gas isn't such evidence...those gasses absorb and in the open atmosphere emit the energy in the form of radiation once in a billion times...the other 999 million...999 thousand...999 times they pass the energy along via collisions with other molecules.

And to date you haven't shown anything like evidence that absorption and emission, or energy transfer via collisison with another molecule equals heating...
 
INCONVENIENT TRUTH: GORE'S POOL USES 6X MORE POWER THAN YOUR HOME
August 3, 2017

Daniel Greenfield
gore3.jpg


The inconvenient truths just keep right on coming.

In just this past year, Gore burned through enough energy to power the typical American household for more than 21 years, according to a new report by the National Center for Public Policy Research...

Over the last 12 months, Gore used more electricity just heating his outdoor swimming pool than six typical homes use in a year.

...

The inconvenient truth is that environmentalists are hypocrites. That they want others living in misery while they have heated pools. They want you to go hungry while they gorge. They want you to be miserable while they live it up... and still sancitomoniously lecture you on your environmental sins.

www.frontpagemag.com/point/267466/inconvenient-truth-gores-pool-uses-6x-more-power-daniel-greenfield
 

Forum List

Back
Top