Al Franken

[rightwinger]

.
Never underestimate the power of a stupid person in a large group.

Good movie

Yes it was. All the bad guys were rich liberals.

You must have seen a different movie
The Duke brothers were arch conservatives that would put the Koch brothers to shame

 

[Votto]

Franken is a very intelligent man and a hard worker for his state

He has made a good Senator

Cuz he is good enough, smart enough, and dog gone it, rightwigner likes him.

 

[there4eyeM]

From the recent Presidents America has had, one might think Franken's I.Q. is over the allowed limit.

 

[Votto]

From the recent Presidents America has had, one might think Franken's I.Q. is over the allowed limit.

Racist! Are you suggesting Obaummer was stupid?

 

[percysunshine]

.
Never underestimate the power of a stupid person in a large group.

Good movie

Yes it was. All the bad guys were rich liberals.

You must have seen a different movie
The Duke brothers were arch conservatives that would put the Koch brothers to shame

.
Ha! Only a liberal would think up the social science experiment which is the plot of the entire movie. Add to that all of Winthorpes rich virtue seeking liberal friends who dis-own him at the club...heh. Since the time frame was the 1980s, there was not a single Reagan voting character on the bad guy list.

 

[rightwinger]

.
Never underestimate the power of a stupid person in a large group.

Good movie

Yes it was. All the bad guys were rich liberals.

You must have seen a different movie
The Duke brothers were arch conservatives that would put the Koch brothers to shame

.
Ha! Only a liberal would think up the social science experiment which is the plot of the entire movie. Add to that all of Winthorpes rich virtue seeking liberal friends who dis-own him at the club...heh. Since the time frame was the 1980s, there was not a single Reagan voting character on the bad guy list.

LOL...those were wealthy Republican spawn at the club

 

[percysunshine]

.
Never underestimate the power of a stupid person in a large group.

Good movie

Yes it was. All the bad guys were rich liberals.

You must have seen a different movie
The Duke brothers were arch conservatives that would put the Koch brothers to shame

.
Ha! Only a liberal would think up the social science experiment which is the plot of the entire movie. Add to that all of Winthorpes rich virtue seeking liberal friends who dis-own him at the club...heh. Since the time frame was the 1980s, there was not a single Reagan voting character on the bad guy list.

LOL...those were wealthy Republican spawn at the club

.
Their life was virtue by charity donation because they felt guilty for being born rich. Typical rich liberals.

 

[The Original Tree]

Anything is possible and let's not forget.
View attachment 111208

Franken was a successful comedian and political commentator

He has made a great Senator

Name his significant accomplishments. And not him signing on to a bill sponsored by someone else.
He supports Obamacare which is the single most expensive piece of legislation, and the single largest tax increase in US history. It's pretty hard to set a record in both categories, but Liberals indeed did accomplish that and Al Franken right along with him.

So he better have a glowing record to unbury himself from that fiasco.

 

[Campbell]

Who would want a television personality for President?

Ronald Reagan anyone??

There wouldn't even be a national debt if Reagan had not cut tax rates for the rich to 50 year lows and quadrupled the national debt:

.....................................................Total U S Debt......................................................




09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)((Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

 

[basquebromance]

we just elected a celebrity. why not another one? unfortunately, Franken lost all his humor and became all serious when he became a politician.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

we just elected a celebrity. why not another one? unfortunately, Franken lost all his humor and became all serious when he became a politician.

You obviously have not watched him in committee hearings!

 

[Campbell]

we just elected a celebrity. why not another one? unfortunately, Franken lost all his humor and became all serious when he became a politician.

You obviously have not watched him in committee hearings!

Your opinion is just that............an opinion. Alan Stuart "Al" Franken is an American politician, comedian, actor, and writer.

 

[FJO]

Oh, please run that jackass.

The people of Minnesota seem to be very well pleased with him.

The people of Minnesota are, apparently, certifiable idiots.

Being the ONE state not voting for Reagan in 1984.
Electing the wrestling clown for governor in 1998.
Electing Al Franken senator in 2008.
Re-electing the bastard in 2014.
Tolerating him all these years.

Allowing to create and encouraging the growth of New Somalia. (Not yet known by that name, but soon will be).

Electing the first Muslim congress man.

Are the people of Minnesota even Americans?

And now, with the aid of Washington state, they are bent on allowing and welcoming terrorists into America,

 

[Desperado]

The dems run a grown up version of "pajama boy"

 

[Snouter]

The thing Franken was really a talentless, goofy idiot who made a name on SNL working with unfunny cocaine addicts. How he became Senator without any comment by the MSM proves the hypocrisy of the "left."

 

[Rexx Taylor]

The thing Franken was really a talentless, goofy idiot who made a name on SNL working with unfunny cocaine addicts. How he became Senator without any comment by the MSM proves the hypocrisy of the "left."

i wonder how massive the crowds would be if he ran, being the average Hillary crowd was 43.7

 

[Campbell]

The dems run a grown up version of "pajama boy"

Compared to the warmonger Bush he's a saint!

Another thing.....Trump hasn't had time to show how goddamned ignorant he is.....we're in for a real treat if we don't all end up dead from a nuclear attack!

 

[Marion Morrison]

 

[there4eyeM]

Being a television celebrity does not qualify one to be President of the United States, true. An intelligence test might be better. Franken vs Trump would be interesting.

 

[Kosh]

Oh, please run that jackass.

The people of Minnesota seem to be very well pleased with him.

You mean the far left in Minnesota!

They were also happy with Michele Bachmann, I bet you far left drones were not!

But what do you expect from those that supported the illegal wars of Obama!

LOL....Obama??

The Republicans had been trying to get into a war in Iraq since Saddam Hussein tried to have old man Bush assassinated in Qatar...this letter proves it:


December 18, 1998

The Honorable William J. Clinton
President of the United States
Washington, DC

Dear Mr. President,

We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding,
and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end
of the Cold War. In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear
and determined course for meeting this threat. We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a
new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world.
That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime from power. We stand ready
to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor. The policy of containment of Saddam
Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months. As recent events have demonstrated, we
can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War coalition to continue to uphold the sanctions or to
punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections. Our ability to ensure that Saddam Hussein is not
producing weapons of mass destruction, therefore, has substantially diminished. Even if full inspections
were eventually to resume, which now seems highly unlikely, experience has shown that it is difficult if
not impossible to monitor Iraq's chemical and biological weapons production. The lengthy period during
which the inspectors will have been unable to enter many Iraqi facilities has made it even less likely
that they will be able to uncover all of Saddam's secrets. As a result, in the not-too-distant future we
will be unable to determine with any reasonable level of confidence whether Iraq does or does not possess
such weapons. Such uncertainty will, by itself, have a seriously destabilizing effect on the entire Middle
East. It hardly needs to be added that if Saddam does acquire the capability to deliver weapons of mass
destruction, as he is almost certain to do if we continue along the present course, the safety of American
troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant
portion of the world's supply of oil will all be put at hazard. As you have rightly declared, Mr. President,
the security of the world in the first part of the 21st century will be determined largely by how we handle
this threat. Given the magnitude of the threat, the current policy, which depends for its success upon the
steadfastness of our coalition partners and upon the cooperation of Saddam Hussein, is dangerously inadequate.
The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use or threaten
to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action
as diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power. That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.
We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration's attention to implementing a strategy
for removing Saddam's regime from power. This will require a full complement of diplomatic, political and
military efforts. Although we are fully aware of the dangers and difficulties in implementing this policy,
we believe the dangers of failing to do so are far greater. We believe the U.S. has the authority under
existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests
in the Gulf. In any case, American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council. We urge you to act decisively. If you act now to end the threat of weapons of mass destruction against the U.S. or its allies, you will be acting in the most fundamental national security interests of the country. If we accept a course of weakness and drift, we put our interests and our future at risk.

Sincerely,

Elliott Abrams Richard L. Armitag William J. Bennett
Jeffrey Bergner John Bolton Paula Dobriansky
Francis Fukuyama Robert Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad
William Kristol Richard Perle Peter W.Rodman
Donald Rumsfeld William Schneider, Jr. Vin Weber
Paul Wolfowitz R. James Woolsey Robert B. Zoellick

More far left religious dogma not connected to reality!

They prove over an over that they do not connect to reality, but they will support the illegal wars of Obama/Clinton!