AG nominee Pam Bondi has said that the bad prosecutors at the DOJ will be prosecuted

[struth]

When you have to pretend I said one thing when I actually said I'm not privy to Bidens medical condition, is what makes you an obvious loser. Why not try attacking the things I actually say? How afraid of me are you?

So was xiden lying or not? It’s really a simple question

Why are you beating around the bush?

 

[Curried Goats]

So was xiden lying or not? It’s really a simple question

Why are you beating around the bush?

I'm not beating around the bush when I say I don't know if he's lying or emotional over his son being in trouble. I don't do cosplay. That's your lane. What I know is that his son was convicted in a court of law and admitted to his crimes as a condition of accepting his pardon.

 

[Billo_Really]

Time to clean house at the corrupt DOJ/FBI cesspool. This is what we voted for.
No wonder there were early reports of panic among the DOJ lawyers, when Trump won.

Don't even talk about corruption, when you pit the most corrupt man in America back in the White House.

 

[kyzr]

Don't even talk about corruption, when you pit the most corrupt man in America back in the White House.

The most corrupt man in America is in the WH now, along with his criminal-druggie son, aka the Biden Crime Family.

 

[Marener]

The most corrupt man in America is in the WH now, along with his criminal-druggie son, aka the Biden Crime Family.

You spent years and millions of dollars with no results investigating Joe Biden.

But you keep pretending like your allegations mean anything.

 

[struth]

I'm not beating around the bush when I say I don't know if he's lying or emotional over his son being in trouble. I don't do cosplay. That's your lane. What I know is that his son was convicted in a court of law and admitted to his crimes as a condition of accepting his pardon.

Or just telling the truth about his DOJ?

 

[Zincwarrior]

So is the intent to try to prosecute Smith for the Documents Case? Can you imagine how awesome that trial would be? All the illegal docs would e used in his defense, how Trump hid them, the guys he told to hide and Trump's own lawyers on the stand. Oh man let me get my popcorn!

 

[Seymour Flops]

So is the intent to try to prosecute Smith for the Documents Case? Can you imagine how awesome that trial would be? All the illegal docs would e used in his defense, how Trump hid them, the guys he told to hide and Trump's own lawyers on the stand. Oh man let me get my popcorn!

Defense?

Why would Bondi give Smith a chance to defend himself? Did Garland or Smith give Trump a chance to defend himself before Trump spent millions fighting the charges?

Smith better start up a PAC.

With Smith no longer in government, if ever he was, how will he get the “illegal” documents?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Defense?

Why would Bondi give Smith a chance to defend himself? Did Garland or Smith give Trump a chance to defend himself before Trump spent millions fighting the charges?

With Smith no longer in government, if ever he was, how will he get the “illegal” documents?

Defense at trial, on what charges you think, I have no idea.
the documents were part of the pleadings for the grand jury.

Who else do you want to prosecute?

 

[struth]

So is the intent to try to prosecute Smith for the Documents Case? Can you imagine how awesome that trial would be? All the illegal docs would e used in his defense, how Trump hid them, the guys he told to hide and Trump's own lawyers on the stand. Oh man let me get my popcorn!

Why would or how would he get those documents in at trial? How is that even a defense what he could be charged with?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Why would or how would he get those documents in at trial? How is that even a defense what he could be charged with?

We're proceeding with the argument that he could be charged for the documents case yes? He can use the documents, witness testimony, indeed even the lawyers Trump tried to get to say had looked through everything, in his defense. He could even call Trump as a witness. Love it!

Who else?

 

[struth]

We're proceeding with the argument that he could be charged for the documents case yes? He can use the documents, witness testimony, indeed even the lawyers Trump tried to get to say had looked through everything, in his defense. He could even call Trump as a witness. Love it!

Who else?

Who? Trump can't....there was nothing illegal about what he did. Xiden can't, even for this time as VP and Senator when he had no athroughty to take them, because DOJ determined he was too senile to prosecute.

I thought you were talking about Jack Smith, he can be prosecuted for what he did....which was the illegal political prosecution of Trump. The documents themselves, have no relevance to that.

 

[Zincwarrior]

I thought you were talking about Jack Smith, he can be prosecuted for what he did....which was the illegal political prosecution of Trump. The documents themselves, have no relevance to that.

What charge is that specifically?
Smith is entitled to any exonerating evidence. If you are somehow arguing illegal prosecution, he is entitled to put up the evidence of the documents and witnesses to show he had reasonable grounds to pursue the case, as determined by the grand jury. As Trump cannot now be tried he is not subject to 5th Amendment protections and could be compelled to testify. I AM SO GIDDY!!!

Who else?

 

[struth]

What charge is that specifically?
Smith is entitled to any exonerating evidence. If you are somehow arguing illegal prosecution, he is entitled to put up the evidence of the documents and witnesses to show he had reasonable grounds to pursue the case, as determined by the grand jury. As Trump cannot now be tried he is not subject to 5th Amendment protections and could be compelled to testify. I AM SO GIDDY!!!

Who else?

18 U.S.C. § 241

The documents aren't exonerating. moreover, he has had access to them, illegally, but the Xiden admin.

He had no reasonable grounds from the get go, since he was illegally appointed.

I don't think Trump would have an issue testifying in the case....but his testimony wouldn't be needed.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Defense at trial,

Trial? What trial? You’re getting way ahead of yourself.

First AG Bondi has to APPOINT A SPECIAL COUNSEL to dig into every part of Jack Smith’s life, and charge people around him so that they will turn evidence against him.

SHe will have to spend hundreds of millions of tax dollars, get indictments from rubberstamp grand juries, ask for amended indictments, and selectively leak negative information about jack Smith.

Even Democrats now admit that the Department of Justice is inappropriately politicized.

You know what they say about payback…

on what charges you think, I have no idea.

If I were her, I would go for malicious prosecution and obstruction of justice. But she is way smarter than me so who knows what she will come up with.

Democrats think they are clever when it comes up to trumped up charges. Now that they have given Donald Trump carte blanche, they will see what Trumped up charges really are.

the documents were part of the pleadings for the grand jury.

Who else do you want to prosecute?

There are dozens, if not, hundreds, of people who could be investigated and indicted.

Of course, the Democrats have one way out.

All they have to do is admit how inappropriate the lawfare against Trump has been and asked Trump for a summit to discuss making sure that never happens again.

The leader of the Democrats has already admitted that many prosecution are inappropriately, political and unfair. The rest of you need to get on board.

Yes, you will have to be a little bit hat in hand, and that will sting. But better than watch your party decapitated by Lawfare. Far more aggressive and well executed then your pathetic amateur attempts.

 

[Zincwarrior]

18 U.S.C. § 241

The documents aren't exonerating. moreover, he has had access to them, illegally, but the Xiden admin.

He had no reasonable grounds from the get go, since he was illegally appointed.

I don't think Trump would have an issue testifying in the case....but his testimony wouldn't be needed.

They are exonerating in that Trump attempted to hide them and had them in the first place. He can force Trump to testify and force the other witnesses to testify to that effect.

Whether or not he was legally appointed his appointment was under the color of law.

Please please do this. Its going to be so fun!

 

[Zincwarrior]

First AG Bondi has to APPOINT A SPECIAL COUNSEL TO dig into every part of Jack Smith’s life, and charge people around him so that they will turn evidence against him.

He will have to spend hundreds of millions of dollars, get indictments from rubberstamp grand juries, ask for amended indictments, and selectively leak negative information about jack Smith.

Ah the dread pirate fishing expedition. He just pleads the Fifth. Of course to you special counsels are now illegal. HAHAHAAHAH
Now tell us the indictments.

If I were her, I would go for malicious prosecution and obstruction of justice. But she is way smarter than me so who knows what she will come up with.

Which means he is fully entitled to the defense I stated. I hope Trump enjoys testifying.

There are dozens, if not, hundreds, of people who could be investigated and indicted.

Humor me. name five. They can make Trump testify too.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I hope Bondi goes after Bragg and Letitia for "Prosecutorial misconduct" for the LAWFARE they used against Trump.

They don't work for the federal government. She has no power over them. That is the Governor of NYs's responsibility.

 

[Zincwarrior]

They don't work for the federal government. She has no power over them. That is the Governor of NYs's responsibility.

Same for the Georgia case.

Just FYI, I predict literally none of this will happen. Gym Jordan my try some stunt hearings but that will be it.

 

[struth]

They are exonerating in that Trump attempted to hide them and had them in the first place. He can force Trump to testify and force the other witnesses to testify to that effect.

Whether or not he was legally appointed his appointment was under the color of law.

Please please do this. Its going to be so fun!

well the evidence didn't show that he attempted to hide them....he certainly had them, true, but the evidence shows he was working with NA to return them....unlike Joey Xiden, who was caught with them, going back years, and was not prosecuted. Which shows this was done as a political prosecution.

No, it wasn't under the color of law, because it was illegal. Certainly, other people he conspired with did so under the color of law, members of the DOJ, that were legally appointed.....and that too is a crime :

18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law

www.law.cornell.edu