AG nominee Pam Bondi has said that the bad prosecutors at the DOJ will be prosecuted

No, a recipient of a Presidential pardon does not have to have been convicted of a crime. A Presidential pardon can be granted to someone who has been convicted, charged, or even to someone who has not yet been formally accused of a crime. The pardon serves to forgive the individual for any federal offenses they may have committed, effectively removing any legal penalties associated with those offenses.

A notable example is President Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon. Nixon had not been formally charged with any crimes related to the Watergate scandal at the time of the pardon.
 
What? You don't have to be convicted of anything to receive a pardon.

AG Garland never prosecuted Trump, and specifically assigned Jack Smith as a special prosecutor with independence…which was used AGAINST the case by shameless Trumptard judge Cannon.

Cannon stalled as long as she could and then dismissed the documents case, not on any merit, but on the grounds that Jack Smith’s operational independence from the department is unconstitutional.

That’s what weak wristed Garland got for treating special people with special accommodations. Had he gone with straight forward prosecution out of Miami dale like he would with ANYONE else then Trump would be in jail before 2024.

So they didn't prosecute Trump as you claimed.

AG Garland appointed Smith to prosecute Biden's political rival. That backfired badly and the American People fired the Democrat Party.
 

AG nominee Pam Bondi has said that the bad prosecutors at the DOJ will be prosecuted....​

Will $25,000 dismiss them, like she did with Trump?

apnews.com · events-united-states-presidentialFlorida AG asked Trump for donation before nixing fraud case


Jun 7, 2016 · The new disclosure from Attorney General Pam Bondi’s spokesman to The Associated Press on Monday provides additional details around the unusual circumstances of...............

The money came from a Trump family foundation in apparent violation of rules surrounding political activities by charities. A political group backing Bondi’s re-election, called And Justice for All, reported receiving the check Sept. 17, 2013 — four days after Bondi’s office publicly announced she was considering joining a New York state probe of Trump University’s activities, according to a 2013 report in the Orlando Sentinel.

After the check came in, Bondi’s office nixed suing Trump, citing insufficient grounds to proceed.
 
But you didn't vote for him and voted for a convict and sex abuser instead? :dunno:

These are the kinds of hilarious arguments you're forced to make when you don't have a real one to be proud of. :lmao:
I voted for America’s Mandela that was victimized by political prosecutions…that the current US president has admitted was common practice in his admin

How much clearer can I be for you?
 
I voted for America’s Mandela that was victimized by political prosecutions…that the current US president has admitted was common practice in his admin

How much clearer can I be for you?
How am I to explain your fantasies? You explain them. :lol:
 
I think you are trying to redefine words. Fantasies? Haha are you really denying what xiden himself said???
Can you provide the quote where he said political prosecutions are common practice in the DOJ or did you make believe that? :dunno: :lol:
 
Did he say it was common though or that they did so to Trump or did you just make believe that? :dunno: :lol:
Of course it is common. His own DOJ went after the boss’s son. They are running wild over there! Heck they even illegally appointed a guy to go after a political threat

Thankfully, the people have spoken and we will be cleaning house starting in jan
 
Of course it is common. His own DOJ went after the boss’s son. They are running wild over there! Heck they even illegally appointed a guy to go after a political threat

Thankfully, the people have spoken and we will be cleaning house starting in jan
So did he say it or not? Where's the quote? :dunno:
 
So did he say it or not? Where's the quote? :dunno:
Yes he said his son was politically prosecuted

Did you not read his statement when he gave the pardon?

Why do you try to discuss things you don’t even have a clue about?
 
Yes he said his son was politically prosecuted
Ok. But not Trump. Nor did he say this was common. All that you imagined and fantasized.
Did you not read his statement when he gave the pardon?
I did. The statement he made about his son. I didn't read any statements he made about political prosecutions being common or that Trump was a victim of any. All that you fantasized.
Why do you try to discuss things you don’t even have a clue about?
I have a clue on what's real and what's your fantasy. What's wrong with you? :dunno: :lol:
 
Ok. But not Trump. Nor did he say this was common. All that you imagined and fantasized.

I did. The statement he made about his son. I didn't read any statements he made about political prosecutions being common or that Trump was a victim of any. All that you fantasized.

I have a clue on what's real and what's your fantasy. What's wrong with you? :dunno: :lol:
how do you know not trump? It was so common, they went after the boss's own son!
 
how do you know not trump? It was so common, they went after the boss's own son!
How do you know Trump or that it was common just because Biden said it happened to his son? And do you just believe everything Biden says? :dunno:
 
So when he called Trump a convicted felon he'd know that was a real conviction and not a political one? :dunno: This is your logic after all.... :itsok: :lol:
I think his office was wildly engaged in political prosecutions, so wildly engaged they went after his own son.
 
I think his office was wildly engaged in political prosecutions, so wildly engaged they went after his own son.
So this is just something you think and not something Biden actually said? Why didn't you just start there instead of all this pretending like Biden said that?
 
Back
Top Bottom