AG nominee Pam Bondi has said that the bad prosecutors at the DOJ will be prosecuted

Xiden said the DOJ targeted him, the judge doesn’t bring prosecutions you idiot…and xiden didn’t claim that
Targeted his son because his son committed crimes. You seem to be the one believing the feelings of politicians over the results of court cases. :itsok: :lol:
 
Targeted his son because his son committed crimes. You seem to be the one believing the feelings of politicians over the results of court cases. :itsok: :lol:
Ah so Biden is lying, his son wasn’t politically prosecuted by his DOJ, he did commit crimes, and he gave him blanket immunity for a 10 year period

Is that what you are saying?

Well thankfully we got rid of that guy!
 
Ah so Biden is lying, his son wasn’t politically prosecuted by his DOJ, he did commit crimes, and he gave him blanket immunity for a 10 year period

Is that what you are saying?

Well thankfully we got rid of that guy!
And got a convict instead? Your ability to think critically is shit. :lol:
 
Nixon was not tried or convicted.
Correct, and why the Big Guy was able to give Hunter a blanket pardon from all federal crimes from the time he started working for a corrupt Ukrainian gas company until now.

Which begs the question, what other crimes is the Big Guy aware of, and how does he know of them?
 
So was xiden right or was he lying? Why is it so hard for you to answer straight forward questions?
Are those the only two options your dumb MAGAt brain can think of? :dunno: :lol:

Maybe he's just mistaken. I don't know if he's lying or just clouded by emotion but his son was found guilty in a court of law. You're the one who switches up whether you believe courts over politicians depending on which one agrees with you emotionally. :itsok: :lol:
 
Are those the only two options your dumb MAGAt brain can think of? :dunno: :lol:

Maybe he's just mistaken. I don't know if he's lying or just clouded by emotion but his son was found guilty in a court of law. You're the one who switches up whether you believe courts over politicians depending on which one agrees with you emotionally. :itsok: :lol:
Mistaken? He runs the DOJ, is he that senile that he’s mistaken about the very agency he runs? Geez, and you all voted for him?

How long has been mistaken about the branch of govt he runs? This really explains a lot, but my goodness opens the doors to even more questions
 
Mistaken? He runs the DOJ, is he that senile that he’s mistaken about the very agency he runs? Geez, and you all voted for him?
Over a convict and adjudicated sex abuser. Happily. You're the one who refuses to believe the courts in those cases because of your feeble MAGAt emotions..... :lol:
How long has been mistaken about the branch of govt he runs? This really explains a lot, but my goodness opens the doors to even more questions
Does it explain why you prefer a convict and sex abuser? :dunno: :lol:
 
Over a convict and adjudicated sex abuser. Happily. You're the one who refuses to believe the courts in those cases because of your feeble MAGAt emotions..... :lol:

Does it explain why you prefer a convict and sex abuser? :dunno: :lol:
I believe Joey Xiden, and that his admin is engaged in political prosecutions
 
I believe Joey Xiden, and that his admin is engaged in political prosecutions
But you didn't vote for him and voted for a convict and sex abuser instead? :dunno:

These are the kinds of hilarious arguments you're forced to make when you don't have a real one to be proud of. :lmao:
 
Bottom line they still have to prove that prosecutors did not follow the law. That there was no case against Trump.

So now they are going to rehash on the Trump crimes. So what Trump can beat women in a political race. It also seems that he can sexually assault them and claim that they are lying.

So grabbing them by the P is okay

Cheating on his wife is okay

keeping classified government records is okay

OKay so prosecutors lose their job , hey now they can sue the government for doing their job.
 
Last edited:
Did they prosecute Trump? Ever heard of Jack Smith and AG Garland?

AG Garland never prosecuted Trump, and specifically assigned Jack Smith as a special prosecutor with independence…which was used AGAINST the case by shameless Trumptard judge Cannon.

Cannon stalled as long as she could and then dismissed the documents case, not on any merit, but on the grounds that Jack Smith’s operational independence from the department is unconstitutional.

That’s what weak wristed Garland got for treating special people with special accommodations. Had he gone with straight forward prosecution out of Miami dale like he would with ANYONE else then Trump would be in jail before 2024.
 
Last edited:
Bottom line they still have to prove that prosecutors did not follow the law. That there was no case against Trump.

So now they are going to rehash on the Trump crimes. So what Trump can beat women in a political race. It also seems that he can sexually assault them and claim that they are lying.

So grabbing them by the P is okay

Cheating on his wife is okay

keeping classified government records is okay

OKay so prosecutors lose their job , hey now they can sue the government for doing their job.
Of course there was. You have no idea at all about the law on this.
 
Back
Top Bottom