After 9 Years of Investigation (Russiagate), Here’s What I Uncovered | John Solomon

[buckeye]

John Solomon is a Trump stooge

Always has been

Got booted from The Hill because of his partisan dishonesty

You're pretty dishonest yourself. You first wrote this post saying Solomon got booted from Politico. Someone called you out on that and now you're saying he got booted from the Hill.

The facts are he didn't get "booted" from either. He left the Hill to start Just the News.

 

[Marener]

Serious question.....where do you get your news? John Solomon never worked for Trump. And what in the world is Giuliani's fake Ukraine story?

The left seems really misinformed.

Solomon was kicked off The Hill for serious breaches of journalistic integrity and has been pushing false stories to attack the left for many years now.

The Hill finds John Solomon 'failed' to identify key details of sources

The publication reviewed the former columnist's work after it came under scrutiny during the impeachment inquiry.

www.politico.com

He failed as an actual journalist but you can make a lot of money pushing right wing propagandist.

 

[struth]

Solomon was kicked off The Hill for serious breaches of journalistic integrity and has been pushing false stories to attack the left for many years now.

The Hill finds John Solomon 'failed' to identify key details of sources

The publication reviewed the former columnist's work after it came under scrutiny during the impeachment inquiry.

www.politico.com

He failed as an actual journalist but you can make a lot of money pushing right wing propagandist.

So after he left to start his own paper, some of his former coworkers reviewed his work and wrote a piece attacking the new rival paper?

Hahab

 

[SeaMajor7]

There was NOTHING NEW in what was released to your podcasters in that Whitehouse photo op handing out the Epstein file booklets prepared by Bondi and Patel etc.

THAT IS WHY, this whole Epstein thing BACKFIRED on them and the Epstein Commotion started....promises made to MAGA and Q supporters, that were NOT met. Democrats only jumped on to the ride, when President Trump really weirded out and stopped the release of Phase 2 of the Epstein file release, and started wigging out with things like disowning supporters who want Epstein files, calling the Epstein young age sex ring and exploitation of the under age girls a HOAX, a Democratic Party creation, and sending lawyer to meet with Maxwell and reducing her conviction penalty by putting her in a cushy Club Fed...etc etc etc

Trump has gone nuts on trying to hide something, and THAT brought Dems in to this...which to me is understandable... Trump is who has CAUSED this focus on Trump and Epstein by his ABNORMAL actions.... guilty of something...type actions.

Your Epstein Epstein Epstein crying has NOTHING TO DO WITH the SEDITIOUS GRAND CONSPIRACY that was waged against Donald Trump and the American People over the last DECADE.
Please just STOP with your over emotional DEFLECTIONS and NONSENSE.

 

[buckeye]

Solomon was kicked off The Hill for serious breaches of journalistic integrity and has been pushing false stories to attack the left for many years now.

The Hill finds John Solomon 'failed' to identify key details of sources

The publication reviewed the former columnist's work after it came under scrutiny during the impeachment inquiry.

www.politico.com

He failed as an actual journalist but you can make a lot of money pushing right wing propagandist.

Where in the article does it says Solomon got fired from the Hill?

He left voluntarily. And if you paid attention, you'd know that everything he published in the Hill is being shown to be true with the recent releases by Gabbard.

You're so hard working and smart, I'd have thought you already knew that. Nice run away from your errors, btw.

 

[DonGlock26]

Where in the article does it says Solomon got fired from the Hill?

He left voluntarily. And if you paid attention, you'd know that everything he published in the Hill is being shown to be true with the recent releases by Gabbard.

You're so hard working and smart, I'd have thought you already knew that. Nice run away from your errors, btw.

 

[Marener]

Where in the article does it says Solomon got fired from the Hill?

He left voluntarily. And if you paid attention, you'd know that everything he published in the Hill is being shown to be true with the recent releases by Gabbard.

You're so hard working and smart, I'd have thought you already knew that. Nice run away from your errors, btw.

Sure, okay. Hang your hat on that. You love picking out an insignificant detail that allows you to ignore the bigger picture.

The fact remains that he was excoriated by the Hill because of his lack of journalistic integrity which is why his articles were changed to editorials.

The facts of the Hill investigation demonstrated he was little more than a mouthpiece for MAGA propaganda.

He’s not a journalist. Full stop. But he provides cover for MAGAs by claiming to be so.

 

[buckeye]

You love picking out an insignificant detail that allows you to ignore the bigger picture.

You said he got fired when in fact he didn't. It's hardly insignificant.

The fact remains that he was excoriated by the Hill because of his lack of journalistic integrity which is why his articles were changed to editorials.

That occurred 4-5. months after he left to start a new paper that rivals the Hill.

And again, what he said in his news articles while employed by the Hill is all correct. All you have to do is inform yourself of all the classified material released by Gabbard.

You continue to struggle knowing the difference between your opinion and facts.

 

[candycorn]

The Democrats illegally used the power of the intelligence and law enforcement branches of gov't to spy on the Trump campaign, thwart Trump's first term, jail Trump admin officials, prosecute Trump, and interfere with the 2020 election. Now, they will pay a heavy price.

None of that happened.

 

[DonGlock26]

None of that happened.

That will be for multiple juries to decide.

 

[candycorn]

That will be for multiple juries to decide.

Great...so when can we expect indictments, arrests, trials....?

Just give me a date when YOU will either expect to see the above or when YOU will be admit there was no wrongdoing when there isn’t any indictments, arrests, trials....

 

[DonGlock26]

Great...so when can we expect indictments, arrests, trials....?

Just give me a date when YOU will either expect to see the above or when YOU will be admit there was no wrongdoing when there isn’t any indictments, arrests, trials....

These things take time. You may see Democrats being frog marched past the mid terms.

 

[candycorn]

These things take time. You may see Democrats being frog marched past the mid terms.

So by November of next year...when there are no indictments, arrests, or trials that’s when you’ll admit none of what you just alleged happened...happened?

Cool...I’ll rub your nose in it then.

 

[SeaMajor7]

None of that happened.

"They don't think it be like it is,but it do."
OG

Great...so when can we expect indictments, arrests, trials....?

Just give me a date when YOU will either expect to see the above or when YOU will be admit there was no wrongdoing when there isn’t any indictments, arrests, trials....

What is with you and your "just give me a date" bullshit?
That, and "never happened" are LAME RETORTS.

 

[justoffal]

Ironically, the "full court press" against a fairly elected President and the continuing persecution of same for 8 years, actually made him much more focused and much more effective when the debacle of 2020 was finally rectified in 2024. History will record that he is the most impactful President of the past hundred years...and he's just getting started.

Yes to everything

 

[Marener]

You said he got fired when in fact he didn't. It's hardly insignificant.

That occurred 4-5. months after he left to start a new paper that rivals the Hill.

And again, what he said in his news articles while employed by the Hill is all correct. All you have to do is inform yourself of all the classified material released by Gabbard.

You continue to struggle knowing the difference between your opinion and facts.

Actually it’s Solomon who has a problem differentiating opinion and facts which is why his articles were appropriately relabeled as opinion pieces.

Because he’s not actually a journalist.

Solomon was found pushing propaganda to help elect Trump by smearing Biden. We know this. Just look at his cozy relationship with Lev Parnas.

How a Veteran Reporter Worked with Giuliani’s Associates to Launch the Ukraine Conspiracy

Lev Parnas, recently indicted for foreign influence in U.S. elections, collaborated closely with The Hill’s John Solomon to fuel spurious allegations involving the Bidens and Ukraine.

www.propublica.org

Solomon got into deep shit with The Hill well before he left, and did so because he could make a lot more money pushing right wing propaganda without having to worry about standards which he stopped living up to.

 

[buckeye]

Solomon was found pushing propaganda to help elect Trump by smearing Biden. We know this. Just look at his cozy relationship with Lev Parnas.

Smearing Biden?? Your link from ProPublica in 2019 is just hilarious. Almost all of it can be disproven by the releases of material from Gabbard and the House investigation.

1. Are you still insisting that Russia, Russia, Russia!!!! was in fact colluding with Trump to get elected in 2016?

2. How do you explain Hillary hiring a Brit and Russians to find dirt on Trump in 2016?

3. Do you believe the Steele Dossier is true?

4. Do you know that the FBI colluded with democrats to hurt Trump?

 

[Marener]

Smearing Biden?? Your link from ProPublica in 2019 is just hilarious. Almost all of it can be disproven by the releases of material from Gabbard and the House investigation.

1. Are you still insisting that Russia, Russia, Russia!!!! was in fact colluding with Trump to get elected in 2016?

2. How do you explain Hillary hiring a Brit and Russians to find dirt on Trump in 2016?

3. Do you believe the Steele Dossier is true?

4. Do you know that the FBI colluded with democrats to hurt Trump?

You’re very confused. You seem to be mixing up the 2016 collision scandal with the 2019 Ukraine-Biden scandal.

The Solomon scandal, the thing he got excoriated about, was the fact that he was a mouthpiece for corrupt oligarchs. They were trying to ingratiate themselves to Trump in order to get a favor for their benefactor, by fabricating stories about Biden and corruption in Ukraine.

Solomon was using these corrupt people as his sources, and it blew up in his face.

Not that any of you guys ever heard about it because you’re not allowed to know truth.

 

[buckeye]

You seem to be mixing up the 2016 collision scandal with the 2019 Ukraine-Biden scandal.

Go to your linked article. If I am confused, so are they. Who colluded with Russians in 2016?

Parnas and his partner Igor Fruman were working with the president’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, to promote a story that it was Democrats and not Republicans who colluded with a foreign power in the 2016 election.

1. Are you still insisting that Russia, Russia, Russia!!!! was in fact colluding with Trump to get elected in 2016?

2. How do you explain Hillary hiring a Brit and Russians to find dirt on Trump in 2016?

3. Do you believe the Steele Dossier is true?

4. Do you know that the FBI colluded with democrats to hurt Trump (by using the Steele Dossier which they knew was unverified and likely false)?

 

[Marener]

Parnas and his partner Igor Fruman were working with the president’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, to promote a story that it was Democrats and not Republicans who colluded with a foreign power in the 2016 election.

It seems like you read that sentence and just stopped thinking.

This is not a scandal where anyone is saying that Trump colluded with Russia.

It’s a bunch of corrupt Ukrainians and Russians seeking to peddle bullshit about Joe Biden to ingratiate themselves to Trump in the hopes that it would help their corrupt oligarch benefactor.

Your questions have exactly zero relevance to the scandal.