DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 16,929
- 24,858
- 2,288
- Thread starter
- #21
Fyi
John Solomon works or worked for Trump
Source?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fyi
John Solomon works or worked for Trump
~~~~~~
He was formerly an executive and editor-in-chief at The Washington Times.
Formerly, the key word!
![]()
How John Solomon helped kickstart the Ukraine saga
Top diplomats have repeatedly linked President Donald Trump’s posture toward Ukraine to John Solomon, the journalist whowww.politifact.com
John Solomon is a Trump stooge
Always has been
Got booted from Politico because of his partisan dishonesty
What was the swear? The fact that his family was getting money from Ukraine? Or was the smear the fact his family wasn’t recording that income?Fyi
John Solomon works or worked for Trump so anything he reports would be considered biased and not reliable....he also worked with Giuliani on Giuliani's fake Ukraine story to help Trump smear Joe Biden before the election....
The Washington Times is actually the most respectedThe Moonie Times is the least credible newspaper in Washington.
I was wrong it was The HillPolitico is a left wing media source.
The Moonie Times is the least credible newspaper in Washington.
The Washington Post Corrects Two Stories, Removes Part of Two Stories Regarding the Steele Dossier
Yeah I think I read that story on Huffington PostI was wrong it was The Hill
And he was fired for cause. Read about it
I was wrong it was The Hill
And he was fired for cause. Read about it
The Democrats illegally used the power of the intelligence and law enforcement branches of gov't to spy on the Trump campaign, thwart Trump's first term, jail Trump admin officials, prosecute Trump, and interfere with the 2020 election. Now, they will pay a heavy price.
Normally I would never watch a 43 minute video link from anyone who posted here on either side but I watched this video all of the way through. Very interesting. Well worth the 43 minutes.
He's believable because he talks about the deep state from both sides, while making the case that the dems really went over the top into new uncharted territory when it comes to political dirty tricks and that if we want to put trust back into the government and intelligence and law enforcement agencies then the ones who started it should be held accountable.Thanks. He does a good job summarizing what the Democrats and deep state did.
He's believable because he talks about the deep state from both sides, while making the case that the dems really went over the top into new uncharted territory when it comes to political dirty tricks and that if we want to put trust back into the government and intelligence and law enforcement agencies then the ones who started it should be held accountable.
Just who is behind your source? Who checks the facts of the fact checkers?
"Since 2019, The Washington Post has been partnering with the Poynter Institute to increase diversity in media, with the goal to expand Poynter's annual Leadership Academy for Diversity in Digital Media training journalists to become founders, top-level executives and innovators.[14][15] Other sponsors are CNN, the Scripps Howard Foundations, Craig Newmark Philanthropies, the Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation and TEGNA Foundation.[16]
Poynter published a list of over 515 news websites that it labeled "unreliable" in 2019. The author of the piece used various fake news databases (including those curated by the Annenberg Public Policy Center, Merrimack College, PolitiFact, and Snopes) to compile the list and called on advertisers to "blacklist" the included sites. The list included conservative news websites such as the Washington Examiner, The Washington Free Beacon, and The Daily Signal as well as conspiracy outfits including InfoWars.[17] After backlash from both readers of and contributors to some of the included publications, Poynter retracted the list, citing "weaknesses in the methodology".[18] Poynter issued a statement, saying: "[w]e regret that we failed to ensure that the data was rigorous before publication, and apologize for the confusion and agitation caused by its publication."[19] Reason pointed out that the author was a freelancer hired by the Institute who typically works for the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Reason drew parallels between the accuracy of the list with SPLC's own work on hate groups."
Poynter Institute - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Wikipedia is NOT a credible source. On anything
The left wing media will NEVER report on anything damaging to the democraps. Maybe that is why democraps live in a bubble? Do democraps even have an idea of how much they are manipulated psychologically by their own party and its collusion with the MSM? Obviously not. But they are convinced the RNC and right wing media does it to their viewers. And they say the right is in a cult.
The "deep state" is a creature of the Globalist Establishment, which is itself the offspring of The Robber Barons - going back some 140 years.He's believable because he talks about the deep state from both sides, while making the case that the dems really went over the top into new uncharted territory when it comes to political dirty tricks and that if we want to put trust back into the government and intelligence and law enforcement agencies then the ones who started it should be held accountable.
Then why didn't they expose.............Judicial Watch has also used FOIA to uncover deep state corruption.