Affluent Votes Switching to Democrats

Toro

Diamond Member
Sep 29, 2005
113,822
70,108
2,605
Surfing the Oceans of Liquidity
Higher-earners, which have traditionally supported the Republicans, are leaning towards the Democrats.

In the 2004 election, exit surveys showed President Bush defeated John Kerry by 58% to 41% among those earning more than $100,000. In 2006, Republican House candidates edged Democrats among that group by 51% to 47%. Now the Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll shows Americans earning more than $100,000 want Democrats to win the White House next year by 48% to 41%, and want Democrats to win control of Congress by 45% to 42%.

Campaign-finance data represents another yardstick. The top five Democratic presidential candidates raised $242 million through the first three quarters of 2007, according to Federal Election Commission figures compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics. The top five Republican candidates have raised $167 million.

"There's a difference in the type of giver that I've seen," observes Kirk Dornbush, a veteran Democratic fund-raiser who runs an Atlanta-based biotechnology firm. In the past, he explains, affluent donors from business or the professions were often "people that needed access."

Now, he says, Democrats are benefiting from concerns over America's "loss of standing in the world," Mr. Bush's environmental policies, and concern over the possibility of recession. An increasing number of high-income Americans "are yearning for something different. And something different is the Democrats." ...

NA-AO556_VOTESH_20071115212123.gif


Scott Reed, who managed Republican Bob Dole's 1996 presidential campaign, sees three overlapping problems for Republicans among business leaders and high-income voters. One is desire to go with the winning side at a time when Democrats have captured Congress; a second is loss of confidence in the Bush administration's competence; and a third is "a sense that the leadership of the Republican Party is too beholden to a small group of self-appointed social conservative leaders."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119518268221495363.html?mod=todays_us_page_one
 
And the ignorant ones that believe that War is Peace, employers actually care about their employees, White is right and Black is WRONG, and tax cuts for the rich somehow benefit poor and working class people can continue within the boundaries of their own ignorance, correct?
 

Forum List

Back
Top