Admitting Putin picked Trump means that USMB Cons would have to admit...

[eddiew37]

So, the left is pissed that the Russians used their corruption against them? Nothing like shooting the messenger.

No not pissed over that Pissed over the love you repubs have for Putin over the love of the protectors of our country I call your republicans traitors

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

RaTz ran a sleazy campaign, got kicked to the curb and are now trying to blame someone for their own failures. It really is as simple as that.

 

[bripat9643]

So, the left is pissed that the Russians used their corruption against them? Nothing like shooting the messenger.

No not pissed over that Pissed over the love you repubs have for Putin over the love of the protectors of our country I call your republicans traitors

You're only pissed that Hillary's criminality and corruption were exposed and that the country was saved from being run by a crime family. That's genuine treason.

 

[PredFan]

So, the left is pissed that the Russians used their corruption against them? Nothing like shooting the messenger.

No not pissed over that Pissed over the love you repubs have for Putin over the love of the protectors of our country I call your republicans traitors

That only exists in your alleged mind. We don't love Putin but we don't hate him either.

As for the other, you know you are lying. You guys are really pissed off that the Russians exposed the corruption of Hillary and the DNC.

 

[Avatar4321]

Exactly what Russia prop did usmb cons fall for?

 

[Contumacious]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

There is NO EVIDENCE that Mr. Putin interfered in our elections.

Assuming, for arguments sake, that he did

then Russia's and the US' NATIONAL SECURITY

demanded that he take action in order to prevent a mad woman from starting WWIII.


.

You mean there's no evidence available to the public, meaning you and the rest of us. Unless there's something you can't tell us because you'd have to kill us.
God you idiots are stupid.

NO, there is NO EVIDENCE because there is NO EVIDENCE.

The so-called "intelligence" community has been politicized


Purge the CIA

They’re a threat to the republic


Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified at a hearing on “Russian interference” in the election that there’s a difference between “skepticism” of the intelligence community’s assessment and “disparagement” of said community. While stopping short of asking for a “safe space,” this admitted liar used the opportunity to cry on the shoulders of Donald Trump’s assembled enemies: “We’re not perfect,” he burbled, but hey everybody makes mistakes."

.

 

[SavannahMann]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

Let's try something. Do you know why Russia didn't like Hillary? Any idea? Let's take a moment and consider. It was Hillary's State Department that approved and endorsed the idea of funneling weapons into Syria to gin up a "civil war" made up primarily of foreign fighters in the "rebels". These weapons were funneled through with a lot of assistance from the State Department. The move didn't have a damned thing to do with Assad, but had everything to do with denying the Russians access to their one Naval Base in the entire Mediterranean Sea.

Now, when this bogged down, the State Department decided to go after the next best thing, taking the Naval Base from the Russians that is located in Ukraine. This saw radical nationalists take control of the nation, and Russia promptly acted to safe their base and fought back.

Weapons funneled from Libya to Syria. The Benghazi outrage we actually should be talking about

Hillary and Obama and the Democrats essentially declared war on Russia, and are mad that Russia refused to be defeated in Syria, and then took the base in Ukraine, and then fought back smart. All the billions of dollars to fight the Russians in Syria, all the effort, lost. Then the same result in Ukraine, and now defeated in the ballot box at home.

Sun Tzu would approve. But let's take the last part of your post shall we? I mean, now we understand why Russia would be pissed. We would have bombed the crap out of Russia if they had ginned up a bunch of terrorist groups and threatened our Naval Bases, but we're moving along. What "agit prop" did they release? The Hackers, if they were Russians, and I wouldn't doubt that they would have plenty of reason, released the truth.

Now, I don't understand something. Perhaps you can help me. The job of a Journalist is to report the facts, report the truth. The job of a voter is to weigh the information available, and make the best decision possible in the voting booth. To make that good decision, the voter needs access to information, truthful information. So the horrible thing that the hackers did was tell the truth. This is the propaganda you decry. The truth.

When did we become terrified of the truth? When did we become outraged because someone spoke the truth? What the hell happened to our nation that we claim that truth is propaganda?

One of my longstanding complaints about Hillary is based on her record. She keeps trying to do things and manage these clever plans. Unfortunately, she's always just short of clever enough to make them actually work. No matter how much she screws up, everyone says she's got great experience. We know Hillary is Corrupt, and all the Hackers did was expose the corruption going on in the DNC and the Clinton Campaign. Did it make a difference? Perhaps a tiny difference. All it did was prove to those who already believed that Hillary and the DNC were corrupt. It was proof of the image that the DNC and Hillary had already created. A sense of entitlement, and that the DNC existed solely to get Hillary elected. It exposed the sham primary where a handful of also ran candidates were supposed to give the illusion that Hillary was the choice by a wide margin.

The job is to represent the people, and we can't choose our representative unless we know the truth about them, and what they've done. That's all the Hackers did, confirm to those who already believed that Hillary was corrupt, that Hillary was in fact corrupt.

 

[eddiew37]

So, the left is pissed that the Russians used their corruption against them? Nothing like shooting the messenger.

No not pissed over that Pissed over the love you repubs have for Putin over the love of the protectors of our country I call your republicans traitors

You're only pissed that Hillary's criminality and corruption were exposed and that the country was saved from being run by a crime family. That's genuine treason.

What criminality ? What corruption?? All republican BS and you guys eat it up And crime family?? LOL LOL who tf you think is entering our WH on the 20th? How many of your swamp people have business connections with our enemy Russia??

 

[PredFan]

Half of the left are stupid, and the other half are lying assholes.

If it was only the emails that were released by the Russians, then why did the Democrats in the house and senate lose more seats and more power? The answer is very simple. It isn't the hacking, it's the fact that Americans now know that the democrats are corrupt and should be removed from power. If it was just the hacked emails then only Hillary would have lost.

 

[sartre play]

. Putin thought he could have a better relationship with Trump than Clinton. each side will use what ever info they can to discredit the other side. its a done deal, Trump will be president. we need not use J assange to beat on each other. he has been very clear in his hate of the USA. so he is an enemy of USA.

 

[easyt65]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop.

Waiting for definitive evidence while refusing to take Barry's word for it and 'being duped' are two seperate things, CC. You should attempt to fully comprehend that...except your partisanship presents a challenge to your doing so.

 

[bripat9643]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

There is NO EVIDENCE that Mr. Putin interfered in our elections.

Assuming, for arguments sake, that he did

then Russia's and the US' NATIONAL SECURITY

demanded that he take action in order to prevent a mad woman from starting WWIII.


.

You mean there's no evidence available to the public, meaning you and the rest of us. Unless there's something you can't tell us because you'd have to kill us.
God you idiots are stupid.

NO, there is NO EVIDENCE because there is NO EVIDENCE.

The so-called "intelligence" community has been politicized


Purge the CIA

They’re a threat to the republic


Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified at a hearing on “Russian interference” in the election that there’s a difference between “skepticism” of the intelligence community’s assessment and “disparagement” of said community. While stopping short of asking for a “safe space,” this admitted liar used the opportunity to cry on the shoulders of Donald Trump’s assembled enemies: “We’re not perfect,” he burbled, but hey everybody makes mistakes."

.

Obama politicized everything he touched. He politicized the Justice Department, the State Department, the Military, the Intelligence agencies, the HHS . . . you name it.

 

[PredFan]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

Let's try something. Do you know why Russia didn't like Hillary? Any idea? Let's take a moment and consider. It was Hillary's State Department that approved and endorsed the idea of funneling weapons into Syria to gin up a "civil war" made up primarily of foreign fighters in the "rebels". These weapons were funneled through with a lot of assistance from the State Department. The move didn't have a damned thing to do with Assad, but had everything to do with denying the Russians access to their one Naval Base in the entire Mediterranean Sea.

Now, when this bogged down, the State Department decided to go after the next best thing, taking the Naval Base from the Russians that is located in Ukraine. This saw radical nationalists take control of the nation, and Russia promptly acted to safe their base and fought back.

Weapons funneled from Libya to Syria. The Benghazi outrage we actually should be talking about

Hillary and Obama and the Democrats essentially declared war on Russia, and are mad that Russia refused to be defeated in Syria, and then took the base in Ukraine, and then fought back smart. All the billions of dollars to fight the Russians in Syria, all the effort, lost. Then the same result in Ukraine, and now defeated in the ballot box at home.

Sun Tzu would approve. But let's take the last part of your post shall we? I mean, now we understand why Russia would be pissed. We would have bombed the crap out of Russia if they had ginned up a bunch of terrorist groups and threatened our Naval Bases, but we're moving along. What "agit prop" did they release? The Hackers, if they were Russians, and I wouldn't doubt that they would have plenty of reason, released the truth.

Now, I don't understand something. Perhaps you can help me. The job of a Journalist is to report the facts, report the truth. The job of a voter is to weigh the information available, and make the best decision possible in the voting booth. To make that good decision, the voter needs access to information, truthful information. So the horrible thing that the hackers did was tell the truth. This is the propaganda you decry. The truth.

When did we become terrified of the truth? When did we become outraged because someone spoke the truth? What the hell happened to our nation that we claim that truth is propaganda?

One of my longstanding complaints about Hillary is based on her record. She keeps trying to do things and manage these clever plans. Unfortunately, she's always just short of clever enough to make them actually work. No matter how much she screws up, everyone says she's got great experience. We know Hillary is Corrupt, and all the Hackers did was expose the corruption going on in the DNC and the Clinton Campaign. Did it make a difference? Perhaps a tiny difference. All it did was prove to those who already believed that Hillary and the DNC were corrupt. It was proof of the image that the DNC and Hillary had already created. A sense of entitlement, and that the DNC existed solely to get Hillary elected. It exposed the sham primary where a handful of also ran candidates were supposed to give the illusion that Hillary was the choice by a wide margin.

The job is to represent the people, and we can't choose our representative unless we know the truth about them, and what they've done. That's all the Hackers did, confirm to those who already believed that Hillary was corrupt, that Hillary was in fact corrupt.

Well done.

 

[bripat9643]

So, the left is pissed that the Russians used their corruption against them? Nothing like shooting the messenger.

No not pissed over that Pissed over the love you repubs have for Putin over the love of the protectors of our country I call your republicans traitors

You're only pissed that Hillary's criminality and corruption were exposed and that the country was saved from being run by a crime family. That's genuine treason.

What criminality ? What corruption?? All republican BS and you guys eat it up And crime family?? LOL LOL who tf you think is entering our WH on the 20th? How many of your swamp people have business connections with our enemy Russia??

Selling her office for financial gain is corrupt, obviously. So was allowing four of her employees to be killed because keeping them alive and safe wasn't politically expedient. Then there were her numerous gross violations of our secrecy laws.

 

[PredFan]

So, the left is pissed that the Russians used their corruption against them? Nothing like shooting the messenger.

No not pissed over that Pissed over the love you repubs have for Putin over the love of the protectors of our country I call your republicans traitors

You're only pissed that Hillary's criminality and corruption were exposed and that the country was saved from being run by a crime family. That's genuine treason.

What criminality ? What corruption?? All republican BS and you guys eat it up And crime family?? LOL LOL who tf you think is entering our WH on the 20th? How many of your swamp people have business connections with our enemy Russia??

This kind of stupidity is why your party has been removed from power. The rest of the country isn't as stupid. But hey double down on stupid, the next democrat president hasn't been born yet.

 

[eddiew37]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

Let's try something. Do you know why Russia didn't like Hillary? Any idea? Let's take a moment and consider. It was Hillary's State Department that approved and endorsed the idea of funneling weapons into Syria to gin up a "civil war" made up primarily of foreign fighters in the "rebels". These weapons were funneled through with a lot of assistance from the State Department. The move didn't have a damned thing to do with Assad, but had everything to do with denying the Russians access to their one Naval Base in the entire Mediterranean Sea.

Now, when this bogged down, the State Department decided to go after the next best thing, taking the Naval Base from the Russians that is located in Ukraine. This saw radical nationalists take control of the nation, and Russia promptly acted to safe their base and fought back.

Weapons funneled from Libya to Syria. The Benghazi outrage we actually should be talking about

Hillary and Obama and the Democrats essentially declared war on Russia, and are mad that Russia refused to be defeated in Syria, and then took the base in Ukraine, and then fought back smart. All the billions of dollars to fight the Russians in Syria, all the effort, lost. Then the same result in Ukraine, and now defeated in the ballot box at home.

Sun Tzu would approve. But let's take the last part of your post shall we? I mean, now we understand why Russia would be pissed. We would have bombed the crap out of Russia if they had ginned up a bunch of terrorist groups and threatened our Naval Bases, but we're moving along. What "agit prop" did they release? The Hackers, if they were Russians, and I wouldn't doubt that they would have plenty of reason, released the truth.

Now, I don't understand something. Perhaps you can help me. The job of a Journalist is to report the facts, report the truth. The job of a voter is to weigh the information available, and make the best decision possible in the voting booth. To make that good decision, the voter needs access to information, truthful information. So the horrible thing that the hackers did was tell the truth. This is the propaganda you decry. The truth.

When did we become terrified of the truth? When did we become outraged because someone spoke the truth? What the hell happened to our nation that we claim that truth is propaganda?

One of my longstanding complaints about Hillary is based on her record. She keeps trying to do things and manage these clever plans. Unfortunately, she's always just short of clever enough to make them actually work. No matter how much she screws up, everyone says she's got great experience. We know Hillary is Corrupt, and all the Hackers did was expose the corruption going on in the DNC and the Clinton Campaign. Did it make a difference? Perhaps a tiny difference. All it did was prove to those who already believed that Hillary and the DNC were corrupt. It was proof of the image that the DNC and Hillary had already created. A sense of entitlement, and that the DNC existed solely to get Hillary elected. It exposed the sham primary where a handful of also ran candidates were supposed to give the illusion that Hillary was the choice by a wide margin.

The job is to represent the people, and we can't choose our representative unless we know the truth about them, and what they've done. That's all the Hackers did, confirm to those who already believed that Hillary was corrupt, that Hillary was in fact corrupt.

How do you know the hackers told the truth ?.... and the intel plainly shows that Russia favored repubs and trump

 

[Fueri]

Given it was the rooshins, Putin picked whoever wasn't hillary, just like millions of Americans.

Different reasons for that, of course, as he had a personal axe to grind with hillary, while many americans just thought she was a dung pile, but putin's actions, if there were any, likely had more to do with hillary than trump.

The left likes to ignore that, as it knocks their "he's illegitimate" narrative off the rails, but hillary herself has acknowledged that grudge.

 

[PredFan]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

Let's try something. Do you know why Russia didn't like Hillary? Any idea? Let's take a moment and consider. It was Hillary's State Department that approved and endorsed the idea of funneling weapons into Syria to gin up a "civil war" made up primarily of foreign fighters in the "rebels". These weapons were funneled through with a lot of assistance from the State Department. The move didn't have a damned thing to do with Assad, but had everything to do with denying the Russians access to their one Naval Base in the entire Mediterranean Sea.

Now, when this bogged down, the State Department decided to go after the next best thing, taking the Naval Base from the Russians that is located in Ukraine. This saw radical nationalists take control of the nation, and Russia promptly acted to safe their base and fought back.

Weapons funneled from Libya to Syria. The Benghazi outrage we actually should be talking about

Hillary and Obama and the Democrats essentially declared war on Russia, and are mad that Russia refused to be defeated in Syria, and then took the base in Ukraine, and then fought back smart. All the billions of dollars to fight the Russians in Syria, all the effort, lost. Then the same result in Ukraine, and now defeated in the ballot box at home.

Sun Tzu would approve. But let's take the last part of your post shall we? I mean, now we understand why Russia would be pissed. We would have bombed the crap out of Russia if they had ginned up a bunch of terrorist groups and threatened our Naval Bases, but we're moving along. What "agit prop" did they release? The Hackers, if they were Russians, and I wouldn't doubt that they would have plenty of reason, released the truth.

Now, I don't understand something. Perhaps you can help me. The job of a Journalist is to report the facts, report the truth. The job of a voter is to weigh the information available, and make the best decision possible in the voting booth. To make that good decision, the voter needs access to information, truthful information. So the horrible thing that the hackers did was tell the truth. This is the propaganda you decry. The truth.

When did we become terrified of the truth? When did we become outraged because someone spoke the truth? What the hell happened to our nation that we claim that truth is propaganda?

One of my longstanding complaints about Hillary is based on her record. She keeps trying to do things and manage these clever plans. Unfortunately, she's always just short of clever enough to make them actually work. No matter how much she screws up, everyone says she's got great experience. We know Hillary is Corrupt, and all the Hackers did was expose the corruption going on in the DNC and the Clinton Campaign. Did it make a difference? Perhaps a tiny difference. All it did was prove to those who already believed that Hillary and the DNC were corrupt. It was proof of the image that the DNC and Hillary had already created. A sense of entitlement, and that the DNC existed solely to get Hillary elected. It exposed the sham primary where a handful of also ran candidates were supposed to give the illusion that Hillary was the choice by a wide margin.

The job is to represent the people, and we can't choose our representative unless we know the truth about them, and what they've done. That's all the Hackers did, confirm to those who already believed that Hillary was corrupt, that Hillary was in fact corrupt.

How do you know the hackers told the truth ?.... and the intel plainly shows that Russia favored repubs and trump

Are you so stupid that you don't know that one does not nullify the other?

 

[Meathead]

Putin is an excellent judge of character. He figured out Obama was a wimp pretty fast and the Beast was a ***** from the get-go.

 

[eddiew37]

So, the left is pissed that the Russians used their corruption against them? Nothing like shooting the messenger.

No not pissed over that Pissed over the love you repubs have for Putin over the love of the protectors of our country I call your republicans traitors

You're only pissed that Hillary's criminality and corruption were exposed and that the country was saved from being run by a crime family. That's genuine treason.

What criminality ? What corruption?? All republican BS and you guys eat it up And crime family?? LOL LOL who tf you think is entering our WH on the 20th? How many of your swamp people have business connections with our enemy Russia??

Selling her office for financial gain is corrupt, obviously. So was allowing four of her employees to be killed because keeping them alive and safe wasn't politically expedient. Then there were her numerous gross violations of our secrecy laws.

She allowed nothing just repub BS And selling her office ? Man you repubs are biggest suckers in the world