Act of Political retribution by the Right?

Here is an interesting fact.

The murder rate in the 25 states that voted for Trump has exceeded the murder rate of the 25 states that voted for Biden. In fact, that has been the case for the past 20 years.

Here is the link (to Congress.com) to that information:

The Two-Decade Red State Murder Problem Takeaways

No downloads please. Copy and paste the information or provide a normal web link
 
This should be tried in the court of public opinion, thanks for getting it started. :rolleyes-41:
I don't know much about the issue.

Do you believe a trans leftist did this, or a magaturd? :dunno:

Please reveal your latest talking point.
 

View attachment 1170448

House of South Carolina Judge Criticized by Trump Administration Burns Down

The 69-year-old judge had received death threats in the weeks leading up to the fire, multiple sources told FITSNews. Last month, Goodstein had temporarily blocked the state’s election commission from releasing its voter files to the Department of Justice, a decision that was openly criticized by Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon and later reversed by the state Supreme Court. The DOJ had sought the information, including names, addresses, driver’s license numbers, and social security numbers, of over three million registered voters as part of President Donald Trump’s March executive order restricting non-citizens from registering to vote. (Non-citizens are already not allowed to vote in federal and state elections.)

This happened 2 days ago and as such, no determination has yet been made as to whether it was accidental or arson. Nonetheless, the judge's rulings against the Trump administration's actions and the death threats that ensued thereafter, suggest that this was a political act of vengeance against the judge.

Within the next few days, we will know more!
If you don't have evidence jump straight to making baseless accusations.

From the article you posted.

“At this time, there is no evidence to indicate the fire was intentionally set,” South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) Chief Mark Keel told TIME in a statement on Monday, noting that the investigation into the house fire on Edisto Beach is “active and ongoing.”
 
An update:



Update Summary
  • Investigators (SLED) continue to report no evidence so far that the fire was intentional (arson).
  • They also say there is no indication at this point of a “pre-fire explosion.”
  • The investigation remains active and ongoing, and authorities have warned the public and media to avoid speculation and unverified claims.
  • The fire destroyed most of the home. The three injured people were taken to hospitals; one was airlifted.
  • Some initial reports had suggested the fire began with an apparent explosion, but those statements are not confirmed by the SLED investigation.
  • Goodstein was not at home when the fire occurred (she was walking her dogs).
Luckyone’s didn’t get his wish for violence, now who to blame for all the worlds woes?
 
If you don't have evidence jump straight to making baseless accusations.

From the article you posted.

“At this time, there is no evidence to indicate the fire was intentionally set,” South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) Chief Mark Keel told TIME in a statement on Monday, noting that the investigation into the house fire on Edisto Beach is “active and ongoing.”
Hey, life is all about studying what is happening and making assessments as to the "probabilities" of what an event means

It is of NOTE that the judge was given death threats right before the fire. Is that not a reason to believe someone would set fire to her house and try to kill her>

Whether is turned out this way or that way, speculation on such an event is normal and expected.
 
So what about it, Luckyone ? Is Papageorgio correct? If not, then provide some evidence.
I wouldn't know because I have Papageorgio on ignore. I put him on ignore because all he supplied was biased garbage. With that thought in mind, I would say "he is not correct"! If you want me to answer you, you need to let me know what the statement from lying Papa was.
 

View attachment 1170448

House of South Carolina Judge Criticized by Trump Administration Burns Down

The 69-year-old judge had received death threats in the weeks leading up to the fire, multiple sources told FITSNews. Last month, Goodstein had temporarily blocked the state’s election commission from releasing its voter files to the Department of Justice, a decision that was openly criticized by Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon and later reversed by the state Supreme Court. The DOJ had sought the information, including names, addresses, driver’s license numbers, and social security numbers, of over three million registered voters as part of President Donald Trump’s March executive order restricting non-citizens from registering to vote. (Non-citizens are already not allowed to vote in federal and state elections.)

This happened 2 days ago and as such, no determination has yet been made as to whether it was accidental or arson. Nonetheless, the judge's rulings against the Trump administration's actions and the death threats that ensued thereafter, suggest that this was a political act of vengeance against the judge.

Within the next few days, we will know more!
Maybe it was Israel?
 
I wouldn't know because I have Papageorgio on ignore. I put him on ignore because all he supplied was biased garbage. With that thought in mind, I would say "he is not correct"! If you want me to answer you, you need to let me know what the statement from lying Papa was.
If you can't rebut him, then the debate goes to him.
 
Hey, life is all about studying what is happening and making assessments as to the "probabilities" of what an event means

It is of NOTE that the judge was given death threats right before the fire. Is that not a reason to believe someone would set fire to her house and try to kill her>

Whether is turned out this way or that way, speculation on such an event is normal and expected.
UPDATE!

No evidence of arson currently
SLED (South Carolina’s Law Enforcement Division) has publicly stated that so far, they have found no evidence the fire was intentionally set.
They also report no evidence of a “pre-fire explosion” in preliminary investigations.

And nothing but excuses flow out of luckeone’s mouth for his lie claiming a person on the right and Trump caused this.

Luckyone continues his lies as this thread continues, I also know he is reading my posts, he may have me on ignore but he is reading my posts. Just one lie after another.
 
If you can't rebut him, then the debate goes to him.
I put him on ignore because he consistently made debasing comments but never was able to support them in any way. That is his style as he is a Trump supporter who does not allow data, statistics and facts to interfere with his beliefs.

In addition, if I have him on ignore, how can I rebut him?

Your comment is ridiculous
 
I put him on ignore because he consistently made debasing comments but never was able to support them in any way. That is his style as he is a Trump supporter who does not allow data, statistics and facts to interfere with his beliefs.

In addition, if I have him on ignore, how can I rebut him?

Your comment is ridiculous
Baloney, I disproved you so many times and called out your lies, just like you are doing now, and you were the one that started the name calling way back when you told me that Harris would win the election, I disagreed and said it was a coin flip, and then you called me ignorant, that is it.

I also never supported Trump, never voted for him, but hey, you are who you are and you continue to lie and defend your lies.
 
I put him on ignore because he consistently made debasing comments but never was able to support them in any way. That is his style as he is a Trump supporter who does not allow data, statistics and facts to interfere with his beliefs.

In addition, if I have him on ignore, how can I rebut him?

Your comment is ridiculous
Funny how luckyone posts right after I do, it’s like he knows and just lying that I am on ignore, he is such a liar.
 
Another update, seems like the little liar is still hoping!

No confirmed arson or explosion
SLED (South Carolina’s Law Enforcement Division) continues to say they have found no evidence that the fire was intentionally set.
They also say there is no indication of a “pre-fire explosion” based on current findings.
 
15th post
Another update on the fire.

No evidence of arson or explosion so far
SLED continues to say that agents have found no indication the fire was intentionally set, and there’s no confirmation of a “pre-fire explosion.”

Investigation remains ongoing
Authorities are still probing the cause and haven’t released a final determination.
Chief Mark Keel has asked the public and media to avoid speculation and only share verified information.

And still no apology from the arrogant, narcissistic OP.
 
Hey, life is all about studying what is happening and making assessments as to the "probabilities" of what an event means

It is of NOTE that the judge was given death threats right before the fire. Is that not a reason to believe someone would set fire to her house and try to kill her>

Whether is turned out this way or that way, speculation on such an event is normal and expected.
The probability of what an event means eh? In reality, you profiled a group and assumed they were guilty before proven innocent..without due process.
 
The probability of what an event means eh? In reality, you profiled a group and assumed they were guilty before proven innocent..without due process.
These days, everyone is doing that, especially Trump and the Republicans that support him. It is Trump's playing field and the rules he has set up. If there is one person that throws blame around with "due process", it is Trump. What is worse is that Trump himself has been found guilty of many occasions and it has meant nothing to him or to his supporters.

Just a thought, right?
 
These days, everyone is doing that, especially Trump and the Republicans that support him. It is Trump's playing field and the rules he has set up. If there is one person that throws blame around with "due process", it is Trump. What is worse is that Trump himself has been found guilty of many occasions and it has meant nothing to him or to his supporters.

Just a thought, right?
Funny how you call it ‘Trump’s playing field’ when he’s the one who was being dragged onto it by partisan refs blowing the whistle on every breath he takes. If ‘witch hunts’ were real justice, we’d have broomsticks in the evidence locker by now.

Right?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom