Abrego's deportation to Uganda on hold?

Federal appeals court says Trump unlawfully invoked the Alien Enemies Act for deportations​

A divided federal appeals court on Tuesday said President Donald Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to rapidly deport alleged Venezuelan gang members is unlawful and blocked its use in several southern states, issuing another blow to Trump’s invocation of the 18th century law.

The Fifth US Circuit Court of Appeals said in a 2-1 ruling that Trump cannot move forward with using the sweeping wartime authority for deportations in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi. The president has not leaned on the 1798 law for removals since mid-March, when his invocation of it sparked the first in a series of legal challenges.

Tuesday’s ruling is notable because it’s likely the vehicle through which the issue will reach the Supreme Court for the justices to potentially review Trump’s use of the law in full.


Not a great week for Don so far. His takeover of LA was ruled to be illegal. His use of the AEA was ruled illegal. And his ankles got bigly.

View attachment 1157755
That's called "muffing-top cankles."
 
His daughter? No, wait, that was Joe Biden.
E. Jean Carroll. You folks have really poor memories.

“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
 
With fake conservative Roberts on the court anything can happen
He has to follow the law and precedent once in a while to maintain the appearance he isn't in the bag for Dotard.
 
E. Jean Carroll. You folks have really poor memories.

“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”

E.Jean Carroll couldn't even narrow down the year that President Trump supposedly raped her, much less give a date.

Actually a smart move on her part, made it impossible for the President to give an alibi, especially as he never met the dame.

Trump never forced himself on any broad, and he wouldn't have fucked this Carroll broad with your dick.
 
Except it does! It means he had the right even without AEA
Concentrate. This ruling involves his use of the AEA to deport the Venezuelans. If he could have legally deported them without invoking the AEA why didn't he?
 
See now there you go making shit up cuz you're embarrassed and frustrated with all the rulings on the illegality of Don's actions. Why can't you admit to the truth? Which is all people should want is for the regime to follow the law in its dealings with illegal aliens. That's all we're asking for.

I agree. They each deserve a 3-minute hearing before they get deported.
 
These low-level judges are having a great time playing Armchair President.

They picked the wrong issue, though, if they want to keep playing. Amnesty for illegals is a nonstarter. Even when Democrats owned the Houe, the Senate and the White House they did not pass any amnesty bill.

The voters will not sit still for amnesty by judicial fiat. especially since it is painfully obvious that these carefully shopped for judges are acting out of Trump Derangement rather than following any particular law.
 
E. Jean Carroll. You folks have really poor memories.

“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
Lewis A. Kaplan was nominated as a federal judge by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1994, and is identified with the Democratic Party
.
 
Lewis A. Kaplan was nominated as a federal judge by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1994, and is identified with the Democratic Party
.


A Clinton appointee would know about rape I guess. Slick Willy never denied the rape of Juannitta Broadderick.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom