About Those J6 “People”

Silly contrived hyperbolic nonsense. Worked out just the way the Democrats planned it LOL
.....video footage of MAGA fighting cops to break into the capitol is....Democrat plan?

Are you continiously being dropped on your head? Wtf is wrong with you?
 
You looked at the videos above and call those maga assholes nonviolent

You’re insane
I see cowardly pussified police acting like the sky is falling and totally losing control of the situation. These are your democrats? You should be ashamed
Screenshot_20220106-180646_Samsung Internet.webp
 
.....video footage of MAGA fighting cops to break into the capitol is....Democrat plan?

Are you continiously being dropped on your head? Wtf is wrong with you?
Yeah you only needed 270 FBI people and some cowardly Democrat policemen to pull it off. Good plan on the fencing off of the capital grounds I'll give that to you. It all worked out pretty well until now..
Screenshot_20210727-220105_Chrome.webp
 
Yeah you only needed 270 FBI people

Trump's current FBI director Kesh Patel testified to Congress that 274 FBI agents RESPONDED to the attack on the Capitol. They were not there to initiate it and that the claim is nothing more than a baseless conspiracy theory.

He is in on it too, right nutter?
 
Last edited:
Trump's current FBI director Kesh Patel testified to Congress that 274 FBI agents RESPONDED to the attack on the Capitol. They were not there to initiate it and that the claim is nothing more than a baseless conspiracy theory.

He is in on it too, right nutter?
He didn't explain what they were doing there to my satisfaction
 
Except for the fact they were illegal. Fischer v. United States proved it.




Glad, you are admitting he asked for peace that day. There may be hope for you.

The Supreme Court and justice still stands regardless of any corrupt rukDem effort to hijack the law. Haven't learned your lesson yet?
They didn't make it illegal. They limited the scope to apply to those who "impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or other things used in an official proceeding, or attempted to do so." And that was only as of when SCOTUS ruled on Fischer.

Saying it was illegal before SCOTUS ruled on Fischer v. US is like saying abortions between Roe v. Wade and Dobbs v. JWHO were illegal because Dobbs determined the Constitution does not give women a right to an abortion.
 
Visitors do not need consent. Consent is also implied as when you visit a men's toilet.
Criminals must be judged in a court as criminals.

Will you post the law about citizens entering the capitol since I have been inside it and never was accused of being a criminal. Senator Feinsteins Senate office gave me a pass for merely asking for it. They did not ascertain if I was a past criminal or not.

The capitol is the public set of offices and meeting rooms owned by the public. We own it, we can visit so how can that be a criminal act? Can you be a criminal for entering your own home?
I showed you the definition which hinges on consent. What you do with the definition is entirely up to you.
 
People went to the Capitol to protest the stolen election, then were waved in by leftists including from the FBI. Completely different deal than the paid Communist maggots killing people and destroying cities every night in thr 2020 riots.
What leftist and FBI waved them in?
 
15th post
Stolen elections sure have consequences. Look at all that space in front of the capital that they were cordoning off from the protesters. Whose idea was that? They were inviting conflict.
Worse are those who delude themselves into believing the election was stolen despite not having evidence to prove it.
 
Worse are those who delude themselves into believing the election was stolen despite not having evidence to prove it.
Worse are those who delude themselves into believing that Maga didn't have the right to protest what they perceived as a stolen election. Authoritarian pieces of crap.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom