Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.....video footage of MAGA fighting cops to break into the capitol is....Democrat plan?Silly contrived hyperbolic nonsense. Worked out just the way the Democrats planned it LOL
I see cowardly pussified police acting like the sky is falling and totally losing control of the situation. These are your democrats? You should be ashamedYou looked at the videos above and call those maga assholes nonviolent
You’re insane
Yeah you only needed 270 FBI people and some cowardly Democrat policemen to pull it off. Good plan on the fencing off of the capital grounds I'll give that to you. It all worked out pretty well until now.......video footage of MAGA fighting cops to break into the capitol is....Democrat plan?
Are you continiously being dropped on your head? Wtf is wrong with you?
Yeah you only needed 270 FBI people
Byrd was never pardoned. Why didn't Trump have him charged? Just how weak is Trump?
AgainI see cowardly pussified police acting like the sky is falling and totally losing control of the situation. These are your democrats? You should be ashamedView attachment 1271105
That doesn't cover Byrd. He wasn't on the select committee nor was he one of the officers who testified for the select committee. So why is Trump too weak to have Byrd charged with murder?
Yes, it applies to them too. Which makes it strange that you call the mob who invaded the Capitol, "vistors". But you don't call illegal aliens, "visitors".You explained illegal aliens quite well.
He didn't explain what they were doing there to my satisfactionTrump's current FBI director Kesh Patel testified to Congress that 274 FBI agents RESPONDED to the attack on the Capitol. They were not there to initiate it and that the claim is nothing more than a baseless conspiracy theory.
He is in on it too, right nutter?
What happened to I'm in a cult? LOLAgain
You’re insane
They didn't make it illegal. They limited the scope to apply to those who "impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or other things used in an official proceeding, or attempted to do so." And that was only as of when SCOTUS ruled on Fischer.Except for the fact they were illegal. Fischer v. United States proved it.
Glad, you are admitting he asked for peace that day. There may be hope for you.
The Supreme Court and justice still stands regardless of any corrupt rukDem effort to hijack the law. Haven't learned your lesson yet?
Yes, I brought them up and triggered you. You haven't stopped talking about them since.YOU brought them up LOL. That's the only reason that you like Obama is because of beyonce! What a brainless piece of crap you must be
I showed you the definition which hinges on consent. What you do with the definition is entirely up to you.Visitors do not need consent. Consent is also implied as when you visit a men's toilet.
Criminals must be judged in a court as criminals.
Will you post the law about citizens entering the capitol since I have been inside it and never was accused of being a criminal. Senator Feinsteins Senate office gave me a pass for merely asking for it. They did not ascertain if I was a past criminal or not.
The capitol is the public set of offices and meeting rooms owned by the public. We own it, we can visit so how can that be a criminal act? Can you be a criminal for entering your own home?
You sound paranoid.Tell me you don't know about Democrats two tier justice system without telling me. Rules for thee but not for me
What leftist and FBI waved them in?People went to the Capitol to protest the stolen election, then were waved in by leftists including from the FBI. Completely different deal than the paid Communist maggots killing people and destroying cities every night in thr 2020 riots.
Of course. I don't deny reality.So, you agree that the summer of 2020 was full of violent criminal behavior by your ilk?
Worse are those who delude themselves into believing the election was stolen despite not having evidence to prove it.Stolen elections sure have consequences. Look at all that space in front of the capital that they were cordoning off from the protesters. Whose idea was that? They were inviting conflict.
Yet you keep responding to it LOL. Are you brainless or what?Yes, I brought them up and triggered you. You haven't stopped talking about them since.
Worse are those who delude themselves into believing that Maga didn't have the right to protest what they perceived as a stolen election. Authoritarian pieces of crap.Worse are those who delude themselves into believing the election was stolen despite not having evidence to prove it.