Zone1 Abortion and Transgender is Demonic

[HeyNorm]

Bingo. You are statting to understand.

Is there a medical reason that anyone should give birth?

 

[HeyNorm]

What do you mean?

Not a complicated question.

 

[Trickster]

Is there a medical reason that anyone should give birth?

I still do not understand what this means.

 

[Trickster]

Not a complicated question.

You have to ask God.

 

[HeyNorm]

You have to ask God.

I get it, you’re not an intelligent person.

 

[Trickster]

I get it, you’re not an intelligent person.

Giving birth in The West is now relatively safe. Maternal mortality is low and postpartum care is good.

If that was your question.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Turd Diddlers Feigning Forgiveness "

* Wrong Ignorant Fool Trying To Set A Precedence For Escalation *

It's a speeding ticket. Speeding tickets aren't so bad.

For hiring , any employer requires disclosure of criminal charges for the last 7 years , class c or otherwise .

Disclosing personal information for the edification of coprophiliacs and tabloid sycophants is stupid .

 

[HeyNorm]

Giving birth in The West is now relatively safe. Maternal mortality is low and postpartum care is good.

If that was your question.

But what is the sound medical reasoning for giving birth?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Hurting Perpetrators Of Victimless Crimes To Help Them Feel Better "

* Ding Dong Advocates For Damned Dirty Apes - We Are Government To Make It Worse *

Why women agonize over the decision to get an abortion?

We have all noted the ding dong solution to instantiate the public susceptibility to anthropocentric psychosis .

Zone1 - Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Callous Indifference To Angst Of Circus Side Show Freaks "

* 6reak 6armer 6anatics *

But what is the sound medical reasoning for giving birth?

What is the medical reasoning for giving birth to an anencephalic or the 3% of all pregnancies with severe congenital abnormalities ?

The literal meaning of an after life is genetic continuance and that is the purpose of giving birth .

 

[Donald H]

Human beings are not property to be disposed of at the will of its owner.

Your bible says otherwise.
Is the bible the word of the god?

I think it's time to ask you if you've broken free of religious superstitious beliefs?

You've finally spoken out against many of the lies that we've been working on correcting. You're ballpark estimate on the age of the earth has dispensed with a major whopper.

 

[Trickster]

But what is the sound medical reasoning for giving birth?

There is none. Get a cat.

 

[HeyNorm]

" Callous Indifference To Angst Of Circus Side Show Freaks "

* 6reak 6armer 6anatics *

What is the medical reasoning for giving birth to an anencephalic or the 3% of all pregnancies with severe congenital abnormalities ?

The literal meaning of an after life is genetic continuance and that is the purpose of giving birth .

I see you, as always, ran from the question.

Mark me not surprised

 

[HeyNorm]

There is none. Get a cat.

Cool, the childbirth is 100% the responsibility of the Woman. Men should not be forced to support her decision.

Now we can have a real discussion.

And, I’m a dog kinda guy.

 

[Trickster]

Cool, the childbirth is 100% the responsibility of the Woman.

Yes! You finally got it!

Men should not be forced to support her decision.

That is a separate discussion that is a lot more complicated.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Is Not Concerned With Foundation Less Pretenses For Audacity

* Knot Not Sure Prize *

I see you, as always, ran from the question.
Mark me not surprised

This moniker is not conditioned to respond with angst , or outrage , or grief for loss of every hue mammon instance , and this moniker is not conditioned to believe that the life of every hue mammon instance can be or must be defended ; in deed , yearn expectations to the contrary are absurd .

When empathy for suffering becomes valid , representation by proxy for those suffering becomes an ethical dilemma .

Which is the purpose in not reiterating " the question " except to feign that your feelings are relevant , as the question of purpose for giving birth was answered in the consequent sentence ?

The literal meaning of an after life is genetic continuance and that is the purpose of giving birth .

 

[HeyNorm]

Yes! You finally got it!

That is a separate discussion that is a lot more complicated.

Not at all lil dude. If women want to hold all the cards, then they have all the responsibility.

In States that allow legal abortion, and we have agreed it then becomes birth control, then failure to exert such control should result in forfeiture of the right to State compelled child support. Child support in these states should only be voluntary in nature.

Thanks.

 

[HeyNorm]

" Is Not Concerned With Foundation Less Pretenses For Audacity

* Knot Not Sure Prize *

This moniker is not conditioned to respond with angst , or outrage , or grief for loss of every hue mammon instance , and this moniker is not conditioned to believe that the life of every hue mammon instance can be or must be defended ; in deed , yearn expectations to the contrary are absurd .

When empathy for suffering becomes valid , representation by proxy for those suffering becomes an ethical dilemma .

Which is the purpose in not reiterating " the question " except to feign that your feelings are relevant , as the question of purpose for giving birth was answered in the consequent sentence ?

The literal meaning of an after life is genetic continuance and that is the purpose of giving birth .

Bless your iddy bitty heart.

 

[Trickster]

Not at all lil dude. If women want to hold all the cards, then they have all the responsibility.

In States that allow legal abortion, and we have agreed it then becomes birth control, then failure to exert such control should result in forfeiture of the right to State compelled child support. Child support in these states should only be voluntary in nature.

Thanks.

It is a legitamate philosophical question that is not as simple and clear cut as abortion. The obvious difference being that one happens before there is another human and the other when there is one. A child has many needs and expenses like food, diapers, medical care, clothes, crayons, Legos and dollies... For 18 long years.

The two are not equivalent.

 

[HeyNorm]

It is a legitamate philosophical question that is not as simple and clear cut as abortion. The obvious difference being that one happens before there is another human and the other when there is one. A child has many needs and expenses like food, diapers, medical care, clothes, crayons, Legos and dollies... For 18 long years.

The two are not equivalent.

They don’t need equivalency. If abortion is birth control, and only thr woman has the control, she must be responsible