I don't want to offend you, but again, statements like that make it easy to see why we're losing our country. And why people are so lost. They've been indoctrinated to believe lies, to the point where things end up being totally upside-down.
I don't want to get too off topic, but I will say this. The same people who claim that morality is imaginary will show that they don't actually believe that through their actions. Because when you're wronged, you'll object, of course. But why should you, if morality is subjective and doesn't actually exist? If that's the case, then you would have no right to object to anything anyone does, because their subjective opinion is just as right as yours. And logically, you have no leg to stand on when they (or the government, or anyone) wrongs you, because according to your own position, right and wrong don't exist. That, btw, makes all values meaningless. It makes things like love, kindness and compassion equal to hate, cruelty, exploitation, violence, etc. It makes an action like violent rape equal to an action like selfless love and mercy.... which everyone but a total sociopath intuitively knows is not true.
Moral subjectivism is an illogical, flawed idea, and that way of thinking is what leads to most of the evils in this world. I said I wasn't going to get into this topic, so I'll end this with a quote.
Guess who shares your view on morality? I'll let you guess who said these words.
"Then I learned that all moral judgments are “value judgments,” that all value judgments are subjective, and that none can be proved to be either ‘right’ or ‘wrong.’ I even read somewhere that the Chief Justice of the United States had written that the American Constitution expressed nothing more than collective value judgments. Believe it or not, I figured it out for myself – what apparently the Chief Justice couldn’t figure out for himself – that if the rationality of one value judgment was zero, multiplying it by millions would not make it one whit more rational. Nor is there any ‘reason’ to obey the law for anyone, like myself, who has the boldness and daring – the strength of character – to throw off its shackles…. I discovered that to become truly free, truly unfettered, I had to become truly uninhibited. And I quickly discovered that the greatest obstacle to my freedom, the greatest block and limitation to it, consists in the insupportable ‘value judgment’ that I was bound to respect the rights of others. I asked myself, who were these ‘others’? Other human beings, with human rights? Why is it more wrong to kill a human animal than any other animal, a pig or a sheep or a steer? Is your life more to you than a high’s life to a hog? Why should I be willing to sacrifice my pleasure more for the one than for the other? Surely you would not, in this age of scientific enlightenment, declare that God or nature has marked some pleasures as ‘moral’ or ‘good’ and others as ‘immoral’ or ‘bad’?
In any case, let me assure you, my dear young lady, that there is absolutely no comparison between the pleasure I might take in eating ham and the pleasure I anticipate in raping and murdering you. That is the honest conclusion to which my education has led me – after the most conscientious examination of my spontaneous and uninhibited self."
