ABC moderators slammed for their pathetic bias.

[Marener]

So fucking what?

Have you stopped beating innocent puppies? Your answer must be “yes” or “no.”

If someone asked me if I’d beat up a puppy I’d be able to answer pretty easily.

Why can’t Trump answer if he’d veto an abortion ban?

Is it because he’s weak?

 

[Nostra]

 

[Marener]

In now way does that link back up your lies, Moroner.

Try again.

Lack of vaccination got hundreds of thousands of people killed.

So the administration asked Facebook to keep vaccine misinformation off their website.

It’s not censorship. It’s an attempt to protect Americans.

 

[Nostra]

Eric Swallowswell has major meltdown at hearing over memes.

 

[Nostra]

Lack of vaccination got hundreds of thousands of people killed.

So the administration asked Facebook to keep vaccine misinformation off their website.

It’s not censorship. It’s an attempt to protect Americans.

So you have no data.

Got it.

 

[eagle1462010]

Here’s the fact check that ABC didn’t give Kamala Harris

 

[Marener]

So you have no data.

Got it.

Didn’t you read the study?

 

[Nostra]

Didn’t you read the study?

It doesn't back up your claim posts on Facebook led to the deaths of 'hundreds of thousands".

Bring your data, Moroner.

GO!

 

[Marener]

It doesn't back up your claim posts on Facebook led to the deaths of 'hundreds of thousands".

I said “perhaps”.

 

[BackAgain]

If someone asked me if I’d beat up a puppy I’d be able to answer pretty easily.

Why can’t Trump answer if he’d veto an abortion ban?

Is it because he’s weak?

Answer the question put to you.

You evader.

 

[Marener]

Answer the question put to you.

You evader.

Your question has a dishonest premise. That’s not comparable to the question as to whether he would veto an abortion ban which contains no such dishonest premise.

 

[BackAgain]

Your question has a dishonest premise.

It was indeed a set up question.

Congratulations on finally getting the point.

There is no reason to answer a bullshit question.

That’s not comparable to the question as to whether he would veto an abortion ban which contains no such dishonest premise.

Wrong. There’s no need to answer that bullshit question, either.

 

[Marener]

It was indeed a set up question.

Congratulations on finally getting the point.

There is no reason to answer a bullshit question.


Wrong. There’s no need to answer that bullshit question, either.

Your question contained a false accusation in its premise. What is dishonest about asking Trump if he’d veto a hypothetical abortion ban? There’s no false accusation there.

 

[Nostra]

I said “perhaps”.

Crawfish much?

Man, that was easy to prove you are full of shit.

 

[Marener]

Crawfish much?

Do you want to look at my actual statement?

 

[Nostra]

Do you want to look at my actual statement?

Already did, Simp.

You are proven to be full of shit.

 

[BackAgain]

Your question contained a false accusation in its premise. What is dishonest about asking Trump if he’d veto a hypothetical abortion ban? There’s no false accusation there.

So, you’re back to being studiously obtuse, eh? Sucks to be you.

A bullshit question is a bullshit question.

 

[Marener]

So, you’re back to being studiously obtuse, eh? Sucks to be you.

A bullshit question is a bullshit question.

Here you are making a claim without supporting your argument.

What was dishonest about the question?

 

[Marener]

Already did, Simp.

You are proven to be full of shit.

How did you do that? You haven’t pointed out any logical inconsistencies in my argument.

 

[BackAgain]

Here you are making a claim without supporting your argument.

What was dishonest about the question?

Here you are either playing stupid or being stupid.

Please point to where I say the question was dishonest.

It is simply a red herring. Try to get him talking about a complete non issue.

Libturd game playing got rejected. And now you’re attempting to make an issue out of that crap again. Another libturd fail.