ABC moderators slammed for their pathetic bias.

[Dragonlady]

The DOJ is within the executive branch

And it is stocked with obama flunkies who are out of control

It needs to be reigned in

The executive branch are all hires of the current president. There is nobody working in the White House who was there when Trump was there except for the people that Biden deliberately kept on in the Executive Agencies like Christopher Wray and Gina Haspell.

You seem to have no clue as to how your own government functions.

 

[Marener]

Maybe it’s asking too much, but some of the blame here is on Trump for saying such crazy shit about eating pets and aborting children.

 

[Rawley]

So that’s why you want to censor them.

Is that why you said you want to pleasure Muir?

 

[Dragonlady]

Nah someone with integrity, a foreign concept to you. Harris campaign workers "fact checked" Trump five times and were wrong every time. THey fact checked her a total of ZERO times, despite lie after lie. They has one question on her flip flopping on virtually every major issue, 40 minutes into the debate, and didn't have a single follow up question on the lie she responded with.

The Mods let a lot of Donald Trump’s lies slide by. They only called out the craziest lies he tried, not every lie out of his mouth.

 

[Marener]

Is that why you said you want to pleasure Muir?

You’re very nasty. All I did was show you Trump wanting the government to punish ABC.

Free speech apparently doesn’t mean what it used to.

 

[Marener]

The Mods let a lot of Donald Trump’s lies slide by. They only called out the craziest lies he tried, not every lie out of his mouth.

How many times did they actually fact check him? They called him out on the eating pets thing and the killing children thing.

What a weirdo.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

If he can't handle a couple of moderators and a woman young enough to be his child, and they make him totally lose control and fall apart, what in the world will he do on the world stage with Strongman Leaders?

Except the moderation was tilted. Are you that stupid?

 

[Nostra]

<

Try looking at it another way Nostra Dumbass. Trump needs to stop lying.

If Trump hadn’t lied, every time, he opened his mouth, there would’ve been no need for the moderators to fact check all of his ridiculous claims.

Nobody forced Trump to tell lies and try to get by with his usual bullshit conspiracy theories. He did that all by himself.

It absolutely is the job of the moderator to fact check Donald Trump when he flagrantly lies about the stolen election, murdering babies after they’re born, and immigrants eating cats and dogs.

And it’s absolutely the job of Donald Trump to tell the truth for a change! If Trump actually believes this stuff that he’s spouting, then he’s bat shit crazy and unfit for office.

So either Trump is deliberately lying, which disqualifies them for office or he’s bat shit crazy and doesn’t know what’s real and what isn’t. In which case he’s unfit for office.

Which is it, Fuck Boi? Was Trump lying or does he actually believe the bullshit he spouts? Pick your poison.

utter bullshit from beginning to end, as always with you

 

[Rawley]

You’re very nasty. All I did was show you Trump wanting the government to punish ABC.

Nah, you claimed I supported something. I thought we were playing your typical game of making shit up about other poster's positions

Free speech apparently doesn’t mean what it used to.

Not in a Biden/Harris administration, that's for sure.

 

[Rawley]

How many times did they actually fact check him?

Five. And they fact checked her ZERO times although she lied and lied and lied, again and again.

 

[Marener]

Not in a Biden/Harris administration, that's for sure.

They’re not taking away licenses for networks that they dont like.

Trump wants to.

The contrast is striking. Not that you’ll ever acknowledge it. MAGA loves turning a blind eye to their authoritarian.

 

[Marener]

Five. And they fact checked her ZERO times although she lied and lied and lied, again and again.

One was the fake story about eating pets. One was the fake allegation of killing children. What were the other 3?

 

[Rawley]

They’re not taking away licenses for networks that they dont like.

No. They are just censoring opionins and facts they don't like. But it seems that's OK with you becasue they are on your team

Trump wants to.

The contrast is striking. Not that you’ll ever acknowledge it. MAGA loves turning a blind eye to their authoritarian.

It certainly is . Your team actually censors and you're cool with that. Trump offhandedly suggests something and you lose your shit.

 

[WEATHER53]

Five. And they fact checked her ZERO times although she lied and lied and lied, again and again.

It’s like proving citizenship -she says she’s fine so no confirmation necessary

 

[Marener]

No. They are just censoring opionins and facts they don't like. But it seems that's OK with you becasue they are on your team

It certainly is . Your team actually censors and you're cool with that. Trump offhandedly suggests something and you lose your shit.

Your allegations are false.

We have Trump on tape saying he wants censorship.

 

[Rawley]

One was the fake story about eating pets. One was the fake allegation of killing children. What were the other 3?

Ignoring Northam, huh? I would too. Your party's lust for killing babies is disturbing.

Crime. He was absolutely correct that the FBI under Biden no longer tracks crime in the biggest cities, NY, LA .... The FBI's crime statistics have become bullshit to make Biden look better.

Recent statement on 2020 election - Trump was being sarcastic, but Muir himself didn't detect sarcasm.

Biden sent the Vapid Twit to negotiate between the Ukranians and the Russians three days before the invasion - He did, she went - miserable failure.

 

[Rawley]

Your allegations are false.

Zuckerberg is lying? Do tell

We have Trump on tape saying he wants censorship.

And we have the Vapid twit on tape taking a 180 on virtually every issue significant to America today. And Bernie Sanders saying she'll say any lie to get elected

 

[Rawley]

If he can't handle a couple of moderators

He handled them very well. THe issue is why so called journalists act like blatant campaign surrogates in a Presidential debate.

 

[Marener]

Ignoring Northam, huh? I would too. Your party's lust for killing babies is disturbing.

Northam’s discussion is about children born with fatal abnormalities, and has nothing about killing babies but allowing them to die peacefully with comfort cares. You’re not being honest.

Crime. He was absolutely correct that the FBI under Biden no longer tracks crime in the biggest cities, NY, LA .... The FBI's crime statistics have become bullshit to make Biden look better.

The FBI’s data is more complete than any year under Trump’s administration, but we don’t even need to rely solely on the FBI data since it’s consistent with all the other statistical data out there. If you’re worried about the distorting effect of NYC, you could just check their data yourself. Did you? Probably not. There were 20% fewer murders in 2023 as in 2020.

Recent statement on 2020 election - Trump was being sarcastic, but Muir himself didn't detect sarcasm.

Okay. So he took his statement to be an honest one. I guess you’re never really sure when Trump is being serious or not.

Biden sent the Vapid Twit to negotiate between the Ukranians and the Russians three days before the invasion - He did, she went - miserable failure.

She went to meet with Zelensky. She never met with Putin or any Russian. Clearly she wasn’t sent to negotiate with the Russians.

 

[Marener]

Zuckerberg is lying? Do tell

He didn’t say what you claim.

This already made it to SCOTUS and they said by a 6-3 decision that you are wrong.

Justices side with Biden over government’s influence on social media content moderation - SCOTUSblog

The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out a lawsuit seeking to limit the government’s ability to communicate with social media companies about their content moderation policies. By a vote of 6-3, the court ruled that that the plaintiffs did not have a legal right, known as standing, to bring their la

www.scotusblog.com