Abbas Will Oppose Official Recognition of Jewish State

georgephillip, et al,

No, --- This is wrong. First, the US should not get involved, under any circumstances; or for any reason.

How is any agreement, accidental or otherwise, going to survive without NATO peacekeepers under US officers in the Jordan Valley for at least the next generation?
(COMMENT)

If, for any reason, UN Peacekeepers are needed - to be deployed, they should be either Russian [Special Forces (Spetsnaz)] or Chinese (People's Liberation Army Special Operations Forces); definitely not American. Neither the Chinese or the Russians will take any disrespect or place themselves in a position in which the Palestinians can manipulate them. They have the ability to quietly and firmly send a message to the Palestinian Leadership in ways that the Palestinians could only appreciate.

Most Respectfully,
R
Rocco...it seems like the US is already deeply involved in the quagmire and bears far more responsibility for its current state than either Russia or China. There's also an issue raised by Jonathon Cook lately referring to 2007's Annapolis meetings:

"The main sticking point is the Jordan Valley, an area that was expected to comprise nearly a quarter of a future Palestinian state.

"Gen Allen has indulged an Israeli demand that it be allowed to continue a long-term “military presence” in the Jordan Valley, with a reassessment by the US in 10-15 years’ time.

"That is a retreat from Washington’s earlier commitment at the Annapolis talks of 2007 that no Israeli soldiers would be stationed in the West Bank following an agreement.

"Security guarantees were to be provided instead by Nato troops, under US command.

"The new proposal should be a deal-breaker.

"The valley is a vital resource for the Palestinians, one they have been effectively stripped of for decades by Israel’s exaggerated 'security needs'”.

The US plan makes a viable Palestinian state untenable | Jonathan Cook: the View from Nazareth

I actually like your idea of UNSC peacekeepers in the Jordan Valley, but I think China should have the option of sub-contracting some of its responsibilities to the North Koreans, just to keep the Jews honest.

If we add the US military to the mix, I'm pretty sure there could be some huge pay-per-view revenues from cage fights featuring the best empty-handed fighters from all the peacekeepers with the IDF waiting for the winner in Bethlehem. (maybe next Christmas?)

"Gen Allen has indulged an Israeli demand that it be allowed to continue a long-term “military presence” in the Jordan Valley, with a reassessment by the US in 10-15 years’ time.

And asshole Kerry keeps trying different colors of lipstick on that pig and still can't get it to fly.
 
The peace process has always been fake. There was never any intention of making peace.
Yes, certainly there has never been any good intention on the Palestinian side. It's always been this dream of destroying the Jewish state and replacing it with an Arab Islamic Khalifate of Palestine. Keep wanking yourself off to that.

Maybe Israel needs to stop making shit offers.
Yeah, especially when any offer less than the destruction of the Jewish state would be considered a "shit" offer. It just depends on the perspective I guess.

Wank on....
 
georgephillip, et al,

No, --- This is wrong. First, the US should not get involved, under any circumstances; or for any reason.


(COMMENT)

If, for any reason, UN Peacekeepers are needed - to be deployed, they should be either Russian [Special Forces (Spetsnaz)] or Chinese (People's Liberation Army Special Operations Forces); definitely not American. Neither the Chinese or the Russians will take any disrespect or place themselves in a position in which the Palestinians can manipulate them. They have the ability to quietly and firmly send a message to the Palestinian Leadership in ways that the Palestinians could only appreciate.

Most Respectfully,
R
Rocco...it seems like the US is already deeply involved in the quagmire and bears far more responsibility for its current state than either Russia or China. There's also an issue raised by Jonathon Cook lately referring to 2007's Annapolis meetings:

"The main sticking point is the Jordan Valley, an area that was expected to comprise nearly a quarter of a future Palestinian state.

"Gen Allen has indulged an Israeli demand that it be allowed to continue a long-term “military presence” in the Jordan Valley, with a reassessment by the US in 10-15 years’ time.

"That is a retreat from Washington’s earlier commitment at the Annapolis talks of 2007 that no Israeli soldiers would be stationed in the West Bank following an agreement.

"Security guarantees were to be provided instead by Nato troops, under US command.

"The new proposal should be a deal-breaker.

"The valley is a vital resource for the Palestinians, one they have been effectively stripped of for decades by Israel’s exaggerated 'security needs'”.

The US plan makes a viable Palestinian state untenable | Jonathan Cook: the View from Nazareth

I actually like your idea of UNSC peacekeepers in the Jordan Valley, but I think China should have the option of sub-contracting some of its responsibilities to the North Koreans, just to keep the Jews honest.

If we add the US military to the mix, I'm pretty sure there could be some huge pay-per-view revenues from cage fights featuring the best empty-handed fighters from all the peacekeepers with the IDF waiting for the winner in Bethlehem. (maybe next Christmas?)

"Gen Allen has indulged an Israeli demand that it be allowed to continue a long-term “military presence” in the Jordan Valley, with a reassessment by the US in 10-15 years’ time.

And asshole Kerry keeps trying different colors of lipstick on that pig and still can't get it to fly.
I agree, you can put lipstick on the on the so called pig leaders of Palestine, at the end of the day, they're all terrorist pigs. :clap:
 
georgephillip, et al,

No, --- This is wrong. First, the US should not get involved, under any circumstances; or for any reason.


(COMMENT)

If, for any reason, UN Peacekeepers are needed - to be deployed, they should be either Russian [Special Forces (Spetsnaz)] or Chinese (People's Liberation Army Special Operations Forces); definitely not American. Neither the Chinese or the Russians will take any disrespect or place themselves in a position in which the Palestinians can manipulate them. They have the ability to quietly and firmly send a message to the Palestinian Leadership in ways that the Palestinians could only appreciate.

Most Respectfully,
R
Rocco...it seems like the US is already deeply involved in the quagmire and bears far more responsibility for its current state than either Russia or China. There's also an issue raised by Jonathon Cook lately referring to 2007's Annapolis meetings:

"The main sticking point is the Jordan Valley, an area that was expected to comprise nearly a quarter of a future Palestinian state.

"Gen Allen has indulged an Israeli demand that it be allowed to continue a long-term “military presence” in the Jordan Valley, with a reassessment by the US in 10-15 years’ time.

"That is a retreat from Washington’s earlier commitment at the Annapolis talks of 2007 that no Israeli soldiers would be stationed in the West Bank following an agreement.

"Security guarantees were to be provided instead by Nato troops, under US command.

"The new proposal should be a deal-breaker.

"The valley is a vital resource for the Palestinians, one they have been effectively stripped of for decades by Israel’s exaggerated 'security needs'”.

The US plan makes a viable Palestinian state untenable | Jonathan Cook: the View from Nazareth

I actually like your idea of UNSC peacekeepers in the Jordan Valley, but I think China should have the option of sub-contracting some of its responsibilities to the North Koreans, just to keep the Jews honest.

If we add the US military to the mix, I'm pretty sure there could be some huge pay-per-view revenues from cage fights featuring the best empty-handed fighters from all the peacekeepers with the IDF waiting for the winner in Bethlehem. (maybe next Christmas?)

"Gen Allen has indulged an Israeli demand that it be allowed to continue a long-term “military presence” in the Jordan Valley, with a reassessment by the US in 10-15 years’ time.

And asshole Kerry keeps trying different colors of lipstick on that pig and still can't get it to fly.
Kerry has never understood how Clinton made it to the White House, and he didn't.
Hopefully both of the rich war-whores will die in federal prison.
 
Rocco...it seems like the US is already deeply involved in the quagmire and bears far more responsibility for its current state than either Russia or China. There's also an issue raised by Jonathon Cook lately referring to 2007's Annapolis meetings:

"The main sticking point is the Jordan Valley, an area that was expected to comprise nearly a quarter of a future Palestinian state.

"Gen Allen has indulged an Israeli demand that it be allowed to continue a long-term “military presence” in the Jordan Valley, with a reassessment by the US in 10-15 years’ time.

"That is a retreat from Washington’s earlier commitment at the Annapolis talks of 2007 that no Israeli soldiers would be stationed in the West Bank following an agreement.

"Security guarantees were to be provided instead by Nato troops, under US command.

"The new proposal should be a deal-breaker.

"The valley is a vital resource for the Palestinians, one they have been effectively stripped of for decades by Israel’s exaggerated 'security needs'”.

The US plan makes a viable Palestinian state untenable | Jonathan Cook: the View from Nazareth

I actually like your idea of UNSC peacekeepers in the Jordan Valley, but I think China should have the option of sub-contracting some of its responsibilities to the North Koreans, just to keep the Jews honest.

If we add the US military to the mix, I'm pretty sure there could be some huge pay-per-view revenues from cage fights featuring the best empty-handed fighters from all the peacekeepers with the IDF waiting for the winner in Bethlehem. (maybe next Christmas?)

"Gen Allen has indulged an Israeli demand that it be allowed to continue a long-term “military presence” in the Jordan Valley, with a reassessment by the US in 10-15 years’ time.

And asshole Kerry keeps trying different colors of lipstick on that pig and still can't get it to fly.
I agree, you can put lipstick on the on the so called pig leaders of Palestine, at the end of the day, they're all terrorist pigs. :clap:

The Palestinians already have foreign asshole troops in the West Bank. Why should they agree to keep them?
 
And asshole Kerry keeps trying different colors of lipstick on that pig and still can't get it to fly.
I agree, you can put lipstick on the on the so called pig leaders of Palestine, at the end of the day, they're all terrorist pigs. :clap:

The Palestinians already have foreign asshole troops in the West Bank. Why should they agree to keep them?

Those foreign asshole troops in the West Bank are making their surrounding 1.2 billion Arabs neighbors look pretty weak.
Imagine if they weren't a$$holes.

I wonder what's it's like for Arabs and their supporters to know that God is on Israel's side.
Is there any other explanation for wiping the desert with these suicidal/murderous clowns for over 50 years?
Yep, you must be damn frustrated.
 
I agree, you can put lipstick on the on the so called pig leaders of Palestine, at the end of the day, they're all terrorist pigs. :clap:

The Palestinians already have foreign asshole troops in the West Bank. Why should they agree to keep them?

Those foreign asshole troops in the West Bank are making their surrounding 1.2 billion Arabs neighbors look pretty weak.
Imagine if they weren't a$$holes.

I wonder what's it's like for Arabs and their supporters to know that God is on Israel's side.
Is there any other explanation for wiping the desert with these suicidal/murderous clowns for over 50 years?
Yep, you must be damn frustrated.

Israel has been able to mooch much more and better weapons than their neighbors. That is why they can act like assholes.
 
The Palestinians already have foreign asshole troops in the West Bank. Why should they agree to keep them?

Those foreign asshole troops in the West Bank are making their surrounding 1.2 billion Arabs neighbors look pretty weak.
Imagine if they weren't a$$holes.

I wonder what's it's like for Arabs and their supporters to know that God is on Israel's side.
Is there any other explanation for wiping the desert with these suicidal/murderous clowns for over 50 years?
Yep, you must be damn frustrated.

Israel has been able to mooch much more and better weapons than their neighbors. That is why they can act like assholes.

So they can mooch better weapons from some higher, wealthier source, but they can't get that source to rid Israel of the Arabs?
Do you know something I don't?
 
Those foreign asshole troops in the West Bank are making their surrounding 1.2 billion Arabs neighbors look pretty weak.
Imagine if they weren't a$$holes.

I wonder what's it's like for Arabs and their supporters to know that God is on Israel's side.
Is there any other explanation for wiping the desert with these suicidal/murderous clowns for over 50 years?
Yep, you must be damn frustrated.

Israel has been able to mooch much more and better weapons than their neighbors. That is why they can act like assholes.

So they can mooch better weapons from some higher, wealthier source, but they can't get that source to rid Israel of the Arabs?
Do you know something I don't?

Hmmm, interesting question.
 
"On 27 November 2007, Rabbi Dov Lior of the Yesha Rabbis Council called an 'emergency meeting' in order to discuss the upcoming (Annapolis) conference.

"During the meeting, Lior stated: 'No leader, in any generation, has the right to give away Eretz Israel… we call on the Jews abroad, and especially on community leaders and rabbis, to join us in our efforts against this treaty and its implications... Together, we will save the people of Israel from the government's terrible plan.'

"Lior further stated that peace would only be achieved by '[cleansing] the country of Arabs and [resettling] them in the countries where they came from.'[29]

Annapolis Conference - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Where do you plan on "resettling" the indigenous Arabs of Palestine?

Time to stop evicting Jews from the homeland for more war
What borders are you considering for that "homeland?"

The Boarders have been established by G-d not me.:cool:
 
The Palestinians already have foreign asshole troops in the West Bank. Why should they agree to keep them?

Those foreign asshole troops in the West Bank are making their surrounding 1.2 billion Arabs neighbors look pretty weak.
Imagine if they weren't a$$holes.

I wonder what's it's like for Arabs and their supporters to know that God is on Israel's side.
Is there any other explanation for wiping the desert with these suicidal/murderous clowns for over 50 years?
Yep, you must be damn frustrated.

Israel has been able to mooch much more and better weapons than their neighbors. That is why they can act like assholes.


Bullshit that's a recent thing. When Israel destroyed the Arabs in 67' and before that they were out gunned, and out manned, but the Jews prevailed:cool:
 
Those foreign asshole troops in the West Bank are making their surrounding 1.2 billion Arabs neighbors look pretty weak.
Imagine if they weren't a$$holes.

I wonder what's it's like for Arabs and their supporters to know that God is on Israel's side.
Is there any other explanation for wiping the desert with these suicidal/murderous clowns for over 50 years?
Yep, you must be damn frustrated.

Israel has been able to mooch much more and better weapons than their neighbors. That is why they can act like assholes.


Bullshit that's a recent thing. When Israel destroyed the Arabs in 67' and before that they were out gunned, and out manned, but the Jews prevailed:cool:

Israel never got any serious aid from the US until after the '67 war. But, from Rothschild to little blue boxes and many sources in between, Israel has always lived on OPM.
 
Israel has been able to mooch much more and better weapons than their neighbors. That is why they can act like assholes.


Bullshit that's a recent thing. When Israel destroyed the Arabs in 67' and before that they were out gunned, and out manned, but the Jews prevailed:cool:

Israel never got any serious aid from the US until after the '67 war. But, from Rothschild to little blue boxes and many sources in between, Israel has always lived on OPM.

Jewish conspiracy again? Israel modified old tanks and equipment. they beat the Arabs with intellect, something they lack:cool:
 
15th post
Israel has been able to mooch much more and better weapons than their neighbors. That is why they can act like assholes.


Bullshit that's a recent thing. When Israel destroyed the Arabs in 67' and before that they were out gunned, and out manned, but the Jews prevailed:cool:

Israel never got any serious aid from the US until after the '67 war. But, from Rothschild to little blue boxes and many sources in between, Israel has always lived on OPM.

So let's take score...
Jews help each other.
Arabs murder each other.

I wonder on which team I would rather be.
 
Love this vid...:cool:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ULCTDOToP4]History Channel Battlefield Detectives Israel's Six Day War PDTV XViD SoS - YouTube[/ame]
 
So let's take score...
Jews help each other.
Arabs murder each other.

I wonder on which team I would rather be.
Jews don't murder each other?

It wasn't arabs who murdered Rabin.

I'll go for that.
1 Jew murdered by 1 Jew...
Versus how many Arabs murdered by how many Arabs?

Or are Jews so special that 1 Jew counts as a few hundred million Arabs.
Actually, from an education point of view, that comparison is quite valid.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom