A Zoroastrian Speaks On Israel

[montelatici]

...No such thing as Palestine according Arabs, Muslims...

So, that was just more of your daily drivel. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Like MJ,your grasp of history has a lot to be desired,Palestine was referred to in Roman times and prior...but like MJ keep up the Zionist Bullshit

And before that, guess what the land was referred to? Hint: Isr---.

No, before that it was not referred to as Israel, you idiot. I can't believe how ignorant you are.

 

[MJB12741]

It was according to the Egyptians. But hey, Merneptah was paid by the Zioniists, right Monte?

Merneptah Stele

 

[Ria_Longhorn]

...No such thing as Palestine according Arabs, Muslims...

So, that was just more of your daily drivel. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Nope. That's your daily drivel. It's actually 1000s of years old.

From the Jewish Britannica:

The word Palestine derives from Philistia, the name given by Greek writers to the land of the Philistines, who in the 12th century bce occupied a small pocket of land on the southern coast, between modern Tel Aviv–Yafo and Gaza.

Palestine

If you're saying that the ancient Philistines are the Arabs who today are calling themselves "Palestinians" -- let me disabuse you of that notion:

1 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians practice circumcision; the ancient Philistines did not.
2 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians are monotheistic; the
ancient Philistines were polytheistic.
3 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians' deity is Allah: the ancient Philistines' chief deity was Dagon (Dagan).
4 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians are Semites; the ancient Philistines were not.
5 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians speak Arabic: the ancient Philistines' language is still being deciphered.
Now, in what way are the ancient Philistines and the "Palestinians" the same people?

 

[Ria_Longhorn]

...No such thing as Palestine according Arabs, Muslims...

So, that was just more of your daily drivel. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Of course the Ottomans had a Palestine you dimwit. There is even a Turkish Army intelligence manual the "Filastin Risalesi" which includes maps defining the territory, the native ethnic groups, etc. (Filistin is Palestine in Turkish, by the way, dimwit)



View attachment 122039

View attachment 122040






The Routledge Handbook of the History of the Middle East Mandates

The 13th Century BCE Merneptah Stele, commissioned by the king of Egypt mentions Israel. The Merneptah Stele is currently housed at the Egyptian Museum. You came up short.

 

[Ria_Longhorn]

It was according to the Egyptians. But hey, Merneptah was paid by the Zioniists, right Monte?

Merneptah Stele

13th Century BCE, MJ. The other side came up short.

 

[Ria_Longhorn]

greatest map in history
great cyrus

ThANKS FOR ACKNOWLEGING Palestine

Arab Princeton professor, Philip Hitti, who testified before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry in Jerusalem in 1946 stated that, "[t]here is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not." Of course, what Hitti meant was that there was no Palestine in Arab history, in which he is correct. Hitti was opposed to even using the word "Palestine" in maps because it was "associated in the mind of the average American, and perhaps the Englishman too, with the Jews."

 

[Ria_Longhorn]

...No such thing as Palestine according Arabs, Muslims...

So, that was just more of your daily drivel. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Even United Nations Resolution 181, the partition resolution for Palestine, never refers to the Arabs as "Palestinians" but simply as Arabs.

 

[Challenger]

...No such thing as Palestine according Arabs, Muslims...

So, that was just more of your daily drivel. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Nope. That's your daily drivel. It's actually 1000s of years old.

From the Jewish Britannica:

The word Palestine derives from Philistia, the name given by Greek writers to the land of the Philistines, who in the 12th century bce occupied a small pocket of land on the southern coast, between modern Tel Aviv–Yafo and Gaza.

Palestine

If you're saying that the ancient Philistines are the Arabs who today are calling themselves "Palestinians" -- let me disabuse you of that notion:

1 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians practice circumcision; the ancient Philistines did not.
2 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians are monotheistic; the
ancient Philistines were polytheistic.
3 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians' deity is Allah: the ancient Philistines' chief deity was Dagon (Dagan).
4 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians are Semites; the ancient Philistines were not.
5 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians speak Arabic: the ancient Philistines' language is still being deciphered.
Now, in what way are the ancient Philistines and the "Palestinians" the same people?

1- Really? "...the phallus statues found in Gaza of which some appear to show that the Phillistines did practice circumcision, contrary to the popular term “uncircumcised Phillistine” (1 Samuel 17:26) that was slung at Goliath." The “Philistines” to the North - Biblical Archaeology Society
2- Guess what, once upon a time everyone was polytheistic.
3-"Allah" means "god" and applies to any supreme being, like the chief deity of the Philistines was Baal, Dagon was a Mesopotamian "import" worshipped mainly by the Amorites
4- No-one knows for certain what the origin of the Philistines were and as they were never against intermarriage as far as we know, semitic admixture is highly likely if the weren't originally semites
5-The native population of Palestine spoke several different languages over the millenia, they speak Arabic now, so what?

 

[Challenger]

...No such thing as Palestine according Arabs, Muslims...

So, that was just more of your daily drivel. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Even United Nations Resolution 181, the partition resolution for Palestine, never refers to the Arabs as "Palestinians" but simply as Arabs.

Doesn't refer to the Jewish colonisers as "Israelis" either, so what?

 

[Challenger]

greatest map in history
great cyrus

ThANKS FOR ACKNOWLEGING Palestine

Arab Princeton professor, Philip Hitti, who testified before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry in Jerusalem in 1946 stated that, "[t]here is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not." Of course, what Hitti meant was that there was no Palestine in Arab history, in which he is correct. Hitti was opposed to even using the word "Palestine" in maps because it was "associated in the mind of the average American, and perhaps the Englishman too, with the Jews."

Did he actually say that? His words were never recorded at the time nor was there any mention of his testimony in the final documentation. The only record we have of this comes from Bartley Crum's "Behind the Silken Curtain" as a pro-Jewish state advocate, his memoire may be suspect.

 

[Challenger]

...No such thing as Palestine according Arabs, Muslims...

So, that was just more of your daily drivel. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Of course the Ottomans had a Palestine you dimwit. There is even a Turkish Army intelligence manual the "Filastin Risalesi" which includes maps defining the territory, the native ethnic groups, etc. (Filistin is Palestine in Turkish, by the way, dimwit)



View attachment 122039

View attachment 122040






The Routledge Handbook of the History of the Middle East Mandates

The 13th Century BCE Merneptah Stele, commissioned by the king of Egypt mentions Israel. The Merneptah Stele is currently housed at the Egyptian Museum. You came up short.

It actually mentions the destruction of "Israel"...

 

[theliq]

...No such thing as Palestine according Arabs, Muslims...

So, that was just more of your daily drivel. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Nope. That's your daily drivel. It's actually 1000s of years old.

From the Jewish Britannica:

The word Palestine derives from Philistia, the name given by Greek writers to the land of the Philistines, who in the 12th century bce occupied a small pocket of land on the southern coast, between modern Tel Aviv–Yafo and Gaza.

Palestine

If you're saying that the ancient Philistines are the Arabs who today are calling themselves "Palestinians" -- let me disabuse you of that notion:

1 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians practice circumcision; the ancient Philistines did not.
2 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians are monotheistic; the
ancient Philistines were polytheistic.
3 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians' deity is Allah: the ancient Philistines' chief deity was Dagon (Dagan).
4 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians are Semites; the ancient Philistines were not.
5 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians speak Arabic: the ancient Philistines' language is still being deciphered
Now, in what way are the ancient Philistines and the "Palestinians" the same people?

hes

 

[MJB12741]

...No such thing as Palestine according Arabs, Muslims...

So, that was just more of your daily drivel. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Of course the Ottomans had a Palestine you dimwit. There is even a Turkish Army intelligence manual the "Filastin Risalesi" which includes maps defining the territory, the native ethnic groups, etc. (Filistin is Palestine in Turkish, by the way, dimwit)



View attachment 122039

View attachment 122040






The Routledge Handbook of the History of the Middle East Mandates

The 13th Century BCE Merneptah Stele, commissioned by the king of Egypt mentions Israel. The Merneptah Stele is currently housed at the Egyptian Museum. You came up short.

It actually mentions the destruction of "Israel"...

Oh well, at least the Merneptah Stele got it half right. Heh Heh!

 

[MJB12741]

So, that was just more of your daily drivel. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Of course the Ottomans had a Palestine you dimwit. There is even a Turkish Army intelligence manual the "Filastin Risalesi" which includes maps defining the territory, the native ethnic groups, etc. (Filistin is Palestine in Turkish, by the way, dimwit)



View attachment 122039

View attachment 122040






The Routledge Handbook of the History of the Middle East Mandates

The 13th Century BCE Merneptah Stele, commissioned by the king of Egypt mentions Israel. The Merneptah Stele is currently housed at the Egyptian Museum. You came up short.

It actually mentions the destruction of "Israel"...

Oh well, at least the Merneptah Stele got it half right. Heh Heh!

For over 4000 years Israel's enemies have been preaching the end of Israel. And 4000 years from now Israel's enemies will be preaching the end of Israel.

 

[Challenger]

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Of course the Ottomans had a Palestine you dimwit. There is even a Turkish Army intelligence manual the "Filastin Risalesi" which includes maps defining the territory, the native ethnic groups, etc. (Filistin is Palestine in Turkish, by the way, dimwit)



View attachment 122039

View attachment 122040






The Routledge Handbook of the History of the Middle East Mandates

The 13th Century BCE Merneptah Stele, commissioned by the king of Egypt mentions Israel. The Merneptah Stele is currently housed at the Egyptian Museum. You came up short.

It actually mentions the destruction of "Israel"...

Oh well, at least the Merneptah Stele got it half right. Heh Heh!

For over 4000 years Israel's enemies have been preaching the end of Israel. And 4000 years from now Israel's enemies will be preaching the end of Israel.

To be fair, these so called "enemies" were right for 3800 years, so they're likely to be right 4000 years from now too.

 

[Roudy]

...No such thing as Palestine according Arabs, Muslims...

So, that was just more of your daily drivel. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

Correct. The Ottomans did not have a "Palestine", they called the region Southern Syria. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, and was conquered by the British and Europeans, they renamed the region Palestine. And then the name that referred to Jews of the region, was hijacked to create this fake identity.

Nope. That's your daily drivel. It's actually 1000s of years old.

From the Jewish Britannica:

The word Palestine derives from Philistia, the name given by Greek writers to the land of the Philistines, who in the 12th century bce occupied a small pocket of land on the southern coast, between modern Tel Aviv–Yafo and Gaza.

Palestine

If you're saying that the ancient Philistines are the Arabs who today are calling themselves "Palestinians" -- let me disabuse you of that notion:

1 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians practice circumcision; the ancient Philistines did not.
2 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians are monotheistic; the
ancient Philistines were polytheistic.
3 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians' deity is Allah: the ancient Philistines' chief deity was Dagon (Dagan).
4 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians are Semites; the ancient Philistines were not.
5 - The Arabs who are now calling themselves Palestinians speak Arabic: the ancient Philistines' language is still being deciphered.
Now, in what way are the ancient Philistines and the "Palestinians" the same people?

Origin and identity of the so-called Palestinians

Palestinians are the newest of all the peoples on the face of the Earth, and began to exist in a single day by a kind of supernatural phenomenon that is unique in the whole history of mankind, as it is witnessed by Walid Shoebat, a former PLO terrorist that acknowledged the lie he was fighting for and the truth he was fighting against:

“Why is it that on June 4th 1967 I was a Jordanian and overnight I became a Palestinian?”
“We did not particularly mind Jordanian rule. The teaching of the destruction of Israel was a definite part of the curriculum, but we considered ourselves Jordanian until the Jews returned to Jerusalem. Then all of the sudden we were Palestinians - they removed the star from the Jordanian flag and all at once we had a Palestinian flag”.
“When I finally realized the lies and myths I was taught, it is my duty as a righteous person to speak out”.

This declaration by a true "Palestinian" should have some significance for a sincerely neutral observer. Indeed, there is no such a thing like a Palestinian people, or a Palestinian culture, or a Palestinian language, or a Palestinian history. There has never been any Palestinian state, neither any Palestinian archaeological find nor coinage. The present-day "Palestinians" are an Arab people, with Arab culture, Arabic language and Arab history. They have their own Arab states from where they came into the Land of Israel about one century ago to contrast the Jewish immigration. That is the historical truth. They were Jordanians (another recent British invention, as there has never been any people known as "Jordanians"), and after the Six-Day War in which Israel utterly defeated the coalition of nine Arab states and took legitimate possession of Judea and Samaria, the Arab dwellers in those regions underwent a kind of anthropological miracle and discovered that they were Palestinians - something they did not know the day before. Of course, these people having a new identity had to build themselves a history, namely, had to steal some others' history, and the only way that the victims of the theft would not complain is if those victims do no longer exist. Therefore, the Palestinian leaders claimed two contradictory lineages from ancient peoples that inhabited in the Land of Israel: the Canaanites and the Philistines. Let us consider both of them before going on with the Palestinian issue.

The Canaanites:

The Canaanites are historically acknowledged as the first inhabitants of the Land of Israel, before the Hebrews settled there. Indeed, the correct geographic name of the Land of Israel is Canaan, not "Palestine" (a Roman invention, as we will see later). They were composed by different tribes, that may be distinguished in two main groups: the Northern or Coastland Canaanites and the Southern or Mountain Canaanites.
·The Northern Canaanites settled along the coast of the Mediterranean Sea from the southeastern side of the Gulf of Iskenderun to the proximities of the Gulf of Hayfa. Their main cities were Tzur, Tzidon, Gebal (Byblos), Arvad, Ugarit, and are better known in history by their Greek name Phoenicians, but they called themselves "Kana'ana" or "Kinachnu". They did not found any unified kingdom but were organized in self-ruled cities, and were not a warlike people but rather skilful traders, seafarers and builders. Their language was adopted from their Semitic neighbours, the Arameans, and was closely related to Hebrew (not to Arabic!). Phoenicians and Israelites did not need interpreters to understand each other. They followed the same destiny of ancient Israel and fell under Assyrian rule, then Babylonian, Persian, Macedonian, Seleucian and Roman. Throughout their history the Phoenicians intermarried with different peoples that dwelled in their land, mainly Greeks and Armenians. During the Islamic expansion they were Arabized, yet, never completely assimilated, and their present-day state is Lebanon, erroneously regarded as an "Arab" country, a label that the Lebanese people reject. Unlike the Arab states, Lebanon has a western democratic-style official name, "Lebanese Republic", without the essential adjective "Arab" that is required in the denominations of every Arab state. The only mention of the term Arabic in the Lebanese constitution refers to the official language of the state, which does not mean that the Lebanese people are Arabs in the same way as the official language of the United States is English but this does not qualify the Americans as British.
The so-called Palestinians are not Lebanese (although some of them came from Syrian-occupied Lebanon), therefore they are not Phoenicians (Northern Canaanites). Actually, in Lebanon they are "refugees" and are not identified with the local people.
·The Southern Canaanites dwelled in the mountain region from the Golan southwards, on both sides of the Yarden and along the Mediterranean coast from the Gulf of Hayfa to Yafo, that is the Biblical Canaan. They were composed by various tribes of different stocks: besides the proper Canaanites (Phoenicians), there were Amorites, Hittites and Hurrian peoples like the Yevusites, Hivvites and Horites, all of them assimilated into the Aramean-Canaanite context. They never constituted an unified, organized state but kept within the tribal alliance system.
When the first Hebrews arrived in Canaan they shared the land but did not intermarry, as it was an interdiction for Avraham's family to marry the Canaanites. Nevertheless, eleven of the twelve sons of Yakov married Canaanite women (the other son married an Egyptian), and since then, the Tribes of Israel began to mix with the local inhabitants. After the Exodus, when the Israelites conquered the Land, there were some wars between them and the Canaanites throughout the period of the Sofetim (Judges), and were definitively subdued by King David. By that time, most Canaanites were married to Israelites, others voluntarily accepted Torah becoming Israelites, others joined up in the Israelite or Judahite army. Actually, the Canaanites are seldom mentioned during the Kings' period, usually in reference to their heathen customs introduced among the Israelites, but no longer as a distinguishable people, because they were indeed assimilated into the Israelite nation. When the Assyrians overran the Kingdom of Israel, they did not leave any Canaanite aside, as they had all become Israelites by that time. The same happened when the Babylonians overthrew the Kingdom of Judah.
Therefore, the only people that can trace back a lineage to the ancient Canaanites are the Jews, not the Palestinians, as Canaanites did not exist any longer after the 8th century b.c.e. and they were not annihilated but assimilated into the Jewish people.
Conclusion: the Palestinians cannot claim any descent from the ancient Canaanites - if so, why not to pretend also the Syrian "occupied territories", namely, Lebanon? Why do they not speak the language of the ancient Canaanites, that was Hebrew? Because they are NOT Canaanites at all!

The Philistines:

It is from the term "Philistines" that the name "Palestinians" has been taken. Actually, the ancient Philistines and modern Palestinians have something in common: both are invaders from other lands! That is precisely the meaning of their name, that is not an ethnic denomination but an adjective applied to them: Peleshet, from the verb "pelesh", "dividers", "penetrators" or "invaders". The Philistines were a confederation of non-Semitic peoples coming from Crete, the Aegean Islands and Asia Minor, also known as "Sea Peoples". The main tribes were Shekelesh, Shardana, Tsikel or Thekker, Akhaiusha or Ekwesh, Danauna or Denyen, Masa or Meshuesh, Uashesh, Teresh or Tursha, Keshesh or Karkisha, Lukka or Rukka, and Labu. The original homeland of the group that ruled the Philistine federation, namely the "Pelesati", was the island of Crete. When the Minoic civilization collapsed, also the Minoic culture disappeared from Crete, as invaders from Greece took control of the island. These ancient Cretans arrived in Southern Canaan and were known as "Peleshtim" by Hebrews and Canaanites (that became allied to fight the invaders). They also invaded Egypt and were defeated by Pharaoh Ramose III in the 12th century b.c.e. The Philistines were organized in city-states, being the most important the Pentapolis: Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gath and Ekron, and their territory was close to the Mediterranean coast, a little longer and broader than the present-day "Gaza Strip" - not the whole Judah, they never reached Hevron, Jerusalem or Yericho!
Those Sea Peoples that invaded Egypt were expelled towards other Mediterranean lands and did not evolve into any Arab people, but disappeared as distinguishable groups in Roman times. Those dwelling in Canaan were defeated by King David and reduced to insignificance, the best warriors among them were chosen as David's bodyguard. The remaining Philistines still dwelling in Gaza were subdued by Sargon II of Assyria and after that time, they disappeared definitively from history. They are no longer mentioned since the return of the Jewish exiles from Babylon.
Conclusion: there is not one single person in the world who may be able to prove Philistine lineage, yet, if Palestinians insist, they have to recognize themselves as invaders in Israel, and then they must ask Greece to return them back the Isle of Crete! The Philistines are extinct and claims to alleged links with them are utterly false as they are historically impossible to establish. In any case, claiming a Philistine heritage is idle because it cannot legitimate any land in which they were foreign occupants and not native dwellers. Philistines were not Arabs, and the only feature in common between both peoples is that in Israel they should be regarded as invaders, Philistines from the sea and Arabs from the wilderness. They do not want Jerusalem because it is their city, which is not and never has been, they simply want to take her from the Jews, to whom she has belonged for three thousand years. The Philistines wanted to take from Israelites the Holy Ark of the Covenant, modern so-called Palestinians want to take from them the Holy City of the Covenant.

The Palestinians: No, they are not any ancient people, but claim to be. They were born in a single day, after a war that lasted six days in 1967 c.e. If they were true Canaanites, they would speak Hebrew and demand from Syria to give them back their occupied homeland in Lebanon, but they are not. If they were Philistines, they would claim back the Isle of Crete from Greece and would recognize that they have nothing to do with the Land of Israel, and would ask excuses to Israel for having stolen the Ark of the Covenant.

 

[montelatici]

Now, that's about as funny as the idiot gets. He posts nonsense from a tinfoil propaganda antenna site "under construction" and thinks he makes a point. Grow up you stupid little turd.

 

[Roudy]

Of course the Ottomans had a Palestine you dimwit. There is even a Turkish Army intelligence manual the "Filastin Risalesi" which includes maps defining the territory, the native ethnic groups, etc. (Filistin is Palestine in Turkish, by the way, dimwit)



View attachment 122039

View attachment 122040






The Routledge Handbook of the History of the Middle East Mandates

The 13th Century BCE Merneptah Stele, commissioned by the king of Egypt mentions Israel. The Merneptah Stele is currently housed at the Egyptian Museum. You came up short.

It actually mentions the destruction of "Israel"...

Oh well, at least the Merneptah Stele got it half right. Heh Heh!

For over 4000 years Israel's enemies have been preaching the end of Israel. And 4000 years from now Israel's enemies will be preaching the end of Israel.

To be fair, these so called "enemies" were right for 3800 years, so they're likely to be right 4000 years from now too.

Actually just like the Palestinian hoax, they were never right and never will be!

 

[Roudy]

Now, that's about as funny as the idiot gets. He posts nonsense from a tinfoil propaganda antenna site "under construction" and thinks he makes a point. Grow up you stupid little turd.

The mentally ill antisemite likes to label the truth propaganda. How unusual. The Arabs themselves would laugh at the thought of being related to Philistines, dickhead.

 

[montelatici]

Now, that's about as funny as the idiot gets. He posts nonsense from a tinfoil propaganda antenna site "under construction" and thinks he makes a point. Grow up you stupid little turd.

The mentally ill antisemite likes to label the truth propaganda. How unusual. The Arabs themselves would laugh at the thought of being related to Philistines, dickhead.

You haven't posted anything but Zionist propaganda (lies) since you have been posting. By the way, are you speaking of Arabs (people that speak Arabic) or Arabians, people from the Arabian peninsula?