A Video on 'Reasonable Gun Control' that Libtards Like

[gallantwarrior]

This is really a question of democracy:

Do you consider that gun laws should be made more strict, kept as they are, or less strict?

More strict 58%

Less strict 6%

Guns

I assume most people here support the will of the people, no?

So we go with ever changing polls? Gay marriage is opposed by most people, where do you want to go with that one, you know, with the will of the people stuff you spout.

Only the will of people libs agree with counts. All others need not apply because their will is flawed and therefore invalid.

 

[JoeB131]

Why, since you seem impervious facts...

Australia has a much lower murder rate than we do, even factoring in its smaller popuation...

They have a lower murder rate because of other factors, but looking at the change in crime rates, especially violent crimes of all kinds to include rape, armed robbery and armed assault, Australia's rates have gone up in most of them and are higher than ours in most categories.

The epitome of the issue was an discussion between Piers Morgan and some gun rights advocates, when Morgan asked if the solution to stopping a gang of criminals from doing a mob assault on a victim was to allow the victim to shoot the assaulters.

He simply could not see the justice, fairness or need for the victim to be able to defend himself. For him the victim being beat nearly to death was the preferable outcome rather than anyone, to include the criminals, getting killed.

He is the epitome of what is wrong with libtard thinking. US lower income people that have to work among dangerous criminals will not allow ourselves to be beaten to death while ass hats like Morgan are protected by their HEAVILY ARMED bodyguards.

Well, the problem is, you lower income people tolerate the upper income people allowing wealth disparity to exist.

You see, what all those other countries that have lower crime rates and no guns have is income equality. THey don't let people get so poor that a mob thinks beating someone is a plan.

Frankly, I'm tired of living like this. If we have to take all your guns to civilize this society, I've got no problem throwing down...

 

[squeeze berry]

Why, since you seem impervious facts...

Australia has a much lower murder rate than we do, even factoring in its smaller popuation...

They have a lower murder rate because of other factors, but looking at the change in crime rates, especially violent crimes of all kinds to include rape, armed robbery and armed assault, Australia's rates have gone up in most of them and are higher than ours in most categories.

The epitome of the issue was an discussion between Piers Morgan and some gun rights advocates, when Morgan asked if the solution to stopping a gang of criminals from doing a mob assault on a victim was to allow the victim to shoot the assaulters.

He simply could not see the justice, fairness or need for the victim to be able to defend himself. For him the victim being beat nearly to death was the preferable outcome rather than anyone, to include the criminals, getting killed.

He is the epitome of what is wrong with libtard thinking. US lower income people that have to work among dangerous criminals will not allow ourselves to be beaten to death while ass hats like Morgan are protected by their HEAVILY ARMED bodyguards.

Well, the problem is, you lower income people tolerate the upper income people allowing wealth disparity to exist.

You see, what all those other countries that have lower crime rates and no guns have is income equality. THey don't let people get so poor that a mob thinks beating someone is a plan.

Frankly, I'm tired of living like this. If we have to take all your guns to civilize this society, I've got no problem throwing down...

leave the country.

problem solved

 

[gallantwarrior]

Why, since you seem impervious facts...

Australia has a much lower murder rate than we do, even factoring in its smaller popuation...

They have a lower murder rate because of other factors, but looking at the change in crime rates, especially violent crimes of all kinds to include rape, armed robbery and armed assault, Australia's rates have gone up in most of them and are higher than ours in most categories.

The epitome of the issue was an discussion between Piers Morgan and some gun rights advocates, when Morgan asked if the solution to stopping a gang of criminals from doing a mob assault on a victim was to allow the victim to shoot the assaulters.

He simply could not see the justice, fairness or need for the victim to be able to defend himself. For him the victim being beat nearly to death was the preferable outcome rather than anyone, to include the criminals, getting killed.

He is the epitome of what is wrong with libtard thinking. US lower income people that have to work among dangerous criminals will not allow ourselves to be beaten to death while ass hats like Morgan are protected by their HEAVILY ARMED bodyguards.

Well, the problem is, you lower income people tolerate the upper income people allowing wealth disparity to exist.

You see, what all those other countries that have lower crime rates and no guns have is income equality. THey don't let people get so poor that a mob thinks beating someone is a plan.

Frankly, I'm tired of living like this. If we have to take all your guns to civilize this society, I've got no problem throwing down...

You would advocate using violence in order to "civilize this society"?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Why, since you seem impervious facts...

Australia has a much lower murder rate than we do, even factoring in its smaller popuation...

They have a lower murder rate because of other factors, but looking at the change in crime rates, especially violent crimes of all kinds to include rape, armed robbery and armed assault, Australia's rates have gone up in most of them and are higher than ours in most categories.

The epitome of the issue was an discussion between Piers Morgan and some gun rights advocates, when Morgan asked if the solution to stopping a gang of criminals from doing a mob assault on a victim was to allow the victim to shoot the assaulters.

He simply could not see the justice, fairness or need for the victim to be able to defend himself. For him the victim being beat nearly to death was the preferable outcome rather than anyone, to include the criminals, getting killed.

He is the epitome of what is wrong with libtard thinking. US lower income people that have to work among dangerous criminals will not allow ourselves to be beaten to death while ass hats like Morgan are protected by their HEAVILY ARMED bodyguards.

Well, the problem is, you lower income people tolerate the upper income people allowing wealth disparity to exist.

You see, what all those other countries that have lower crime rates and no guns have is income equality. THey don't let people get so poor that a mob thinks beating someone is a plan.

Frankly, I'm tired of living like this. If we have to take all your guns to civilize this society, I've got no problem throwing down...

No, joe, you stupid ****, most lower income people are in support of the concept of unionism and defending the rights of working class people.

The problem is that the unions are infested with degenerate liars like you who cannot think strightk, and who are so consumed by jealousy that you cant live without anything less than government imposed universal equality, which will amount to universal poverty.

 

[JimBowie1958]

They have a lower murder rate because of other factors, but looking at the change in crime rates, especially violent crimes of all kinds to include rape, armed robbery and armed assault, Australia's rates have gone up in most of them and are higher than ours in most categories.

The epitome of the issue was an discussion between Piers Morgan and some gun rights advocates, when Morgan asked if the solution to stopping a gang of criminals from doing a mob assault on a victim was to allow the victim to shoot the assaulters.

He simply could not see the justice, fairness or need for the victim to be able to defend himself. For him the victim being beat nearly to death was the preferable outcome rather than anyone, to include the criminals, getting killed.

He is the epitome of what is wrong with libtard thinking. US lower income people that have to work among dangerous criminals will not allow ourselves to be beaten to death while ass hats like Morgan are protected by their HEAVILY ARMED bodyguards.

Well, the problem is, you lower income people tolerate the upper income people allowing wealth disparity to exist.

You see, what all those other countries that have lower crime rates and no guns have is income equality. THey don't let people get so poor that a mob thinks beating someone is a plan.

Frankly, I'm tired of living like this. If we have to take all your guns to civilize this society, I've got no problem throwing down...

You would advocate using violence in order to "civilize this society"?

Of course he does, he looking forward to the future bringing a shopping spreee.

 

[JoeB131]

[

You would advocate using violence in order to "civilize this society"?

You mean, "Do I think the ATF should pull a Waco on you gun nuts who don't comport with the law?"

Yup. Big time.

 

[JoeB131]

[



No, joe, you stupid ****, most lower income people are in support of the concept of unionism and defending the rights of working class people.

The problem is that the unions are infested with degenerate liars like you who cannot think strightk, and who are so consumed by jealousy that you cant live without anything less than government imposed universal equality, which will amount to universal poverty.

A lot of union guys I know voted for the Weird Mormon Robot because they hated Obama so much. They didn't realize Obama was probably the only thing standing between them and what the rest of us have to put up with.

Point is, we had our greatest prosperity in the 1950's when we had a mostly unionized workforce, and teh wealthy paid confiscatory taxes.

 

[Euroconservativ]

Gun murder by country - rate per 100,000 people.

Norway 0.1

Australia 0.2

Holland 0.3

US 3.2

NZ 0.2

Canada 0.5

Ireland 0.5

Germany 0.2

Sweden 0.4

UK 0.1

Can you provide me these figures?

Demographics, annual population growth and immigration laws of each country

Number of US states where most murders take place in one or two large cities

Crime figures in anti-gun countries like Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela or Colombia

 

[JimBowie1958]

[



No, joe, you stupid ****, most lower income people are in support of the concept of unionism and defending the rights of working class people.

The problem is that the unions are infested with degenerate liars like you who cannot think strightk, and who are so consumed by jealousy that you cant live without anything less than government imposed universal equality, which will amount to universal poverty.

A lot of union guys I know voted for the Weird Mormon Robot because they hated Obama so much. They didn't realize Obama was probably the only thing standing between them and what the rest of us have to put up with.

Point is, we had our greatest prosperity in the 1950's when we had a mostly unionized workforce, and teh wealthy paid confiscatory taxes.

Back when, yes, but not due to.

The unions had a great influence t ill they started using business majors for their managerial ranks who were weened on Marxist class warfare.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Gun murder by country - rate per 100,000 people.

Norway 0.1

Australia 0.2

Holland 0.3

US 3.2

NZ 0.2

Canada 0.5

Ireland 0.5

Germany 0.2

Sweden 0.4

UK 0.1

Can you provide me these figures?

Demographics, annual population growth and immigration laws of each country

Number of US states where most murders take place in one or two large cities

Crime figures in anti-gun countries like Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela or Colombia

What would be hugely informative is a graphic showing what US crime stats would look like without Democrat controled cities in the mix....

 

[JoeB131]

[



No, joe, you stupid ****, most lower income people are in support of the concept of unionism and defending the rights of working class people.

The problem is that the unions are infested with degenerate liars like you who cannot think strightk, and who are so consumed by jealousy that you cant live without anything less than government imposed universal equality, which will amount to universal poverty.

A lot of union guys I know voted for the Weird Mormon Robot because they hated Obama so much. They didn't realize Obama was probably the only thing standing between them and what the rest of us have to put up with.

Point is, we had our greatest prosperity in the 1950's when we had a mostly unionized workforce, and teh wealthy paid confiscatory taxes.

Back when, yes, but not due to.

The unions had a great influence t ill they started using business majors for their managerial ranks who were weened on Marxist class warfare.

No, actually due to.

If you look at the poorest countries, you see vast disparities in wealth. The wealthy live in mansions, the rest of the people live in shanty towns.

You look at the countries that are prosperous, exactly the opposite. You have a middle class, you have strong unions.

And please, you think the business schools are out there teaching "Marxism". You obviously haven't met any business majors lately.