Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only way repubs could have saved LA was by getting elected in place of woke democrats like Bass and NewsomeI have no illusion that Republican leadership in California would have made a great deal of difference in preparedness for these semi-predictable fires.
California would.View attachment 1066253
View attachment 1066254
Could someone remind me, since the Federal government owns over 50% of the land in California...
Who would be responsible for Santa Monica Recreation National Park and Angeles National Forest upkeep?
WW
The Democrats are incapable of protecting the public where we need it most
The dems could have done much moreWell, for the most part, it was a lost cause. For one thing, water isn't a great fire suppressant. It takes a lot of water to smother out a raging fire. Everything there was super dry. And the firefighters are just shooting water at the fire they see on the outside, the real fire is going on inside and until that is put out, it will just keep burning. Most of the time, they were struggling just to keep it spreading from a burning house to an adjacent non-burning house.
Then thousands of embers started blowing in from another direction and set the other house on fire anyway.
Didn't help they had inadequate water and inadequate fire trucks and turned away thousands of firefighters. The time to fight these fires is BEFORE they get out of control. Not when half of LA is burning to the ground.
The dems could have done much more Controlled burns are necessary to limit and slow down the spread of fires that start
Its not the burning national forests where no houses are, its the forest fires burning up 7,000 or so homes.Could someone remind me, since the Federal government owns over 50% of the land in California...
Who would be responsible for Santa Monica Recreation National Park and Angeles National Forest upkeep? WW
Its not the burning national forests where no houses are, its the forest fires burning up 7,000 or so homes.
The Democrats are incapable of protecting the public where we need it most
Its too bad that 51% of california voters embrace the woksters instead of people who make sound judgements
The Democrats are incapable of protecting the public where we need it most
Its too bad that 51% of california voters embrace the woksters instead of people who make sound judgements
The Democrats are incapable of protecting the public where we need it most
Its too bad that 51% of california voters embrace the woksters instead of people who make sound judgements
I agree with that, and that the fires spread a lot faster with 75mph to 100mph Santa Ana winds.I've fought forest fires where I grew up, not claiming to be an expert.
However, forest fires are like a virus. They spread. Just as a viral infection spreads and if not caught and arrested quickly become an epidemic and/or even a pandemic. Same with forest fires. WW
I agree with that, and that the fires spread a lot faster with 75mph to 100mph Santa Ana winds.
Which is why my recommendations for CA to reduce the fire risk includes the following:
1. Build the reservoirs that the Feds gave Gavin money for, he should be prosecuted for this one.
2. Rebuild the 4 dams Gavin demolished, he should be prosecuted for this one too.
3. Revise the stupid insurance Laws CA has that caused insurance companies to cancel policies
4. Bulldoze the tops of the mountain ridges as fire-breaks and to allow maintenance & fire truck access
5. Use tanker trucks to spray salt water down the mountains to kill underbrush and vegetation.
6. Allow CHUBB to offer high-end insurance coverage, including spraying fire-resistant foam on covered homes
7. Ensure that there are adequate fire breaks between homes and brush/trees.
8. Use modern forest management methods to reduce fire potential, similar to Finland.