Missing in that example is where anyone is forced to work for lower wages, missing also is the fact that Walmart has competitors and is subject to the laws of supply and demand and the natural human tendency to promote their own best interest by applying their labors where it is best compensated. Maybe that's the problem, your concept of "unfettered capitalism" is grounded in the mistaken belief that a company can slash wages with no consequences.
You kinda strange. Maybe you should start out by understanding that Walmart is an animal when it comes to cutting costs. They are the big boys in the market place and dictate what they will pay for items. They will blow out price on products till the smaller competitors can't compete. They rule their retail world cause they are the major player.
Who said (besides you) anything about forced labor?
If they (Walmart) had no constraints on labor costs, you think they give a shit if someone quits? Why would they? Like you cons say all the time, these are low skills, no account jobs. With plenty of people out looking for any job.
The job is worth what they will pay for low skill labor. I read that here all the time.
Don't you ever read on here about how bad the economy is out there? How high the UE rate is? When you are the largest employer in a market, you dictate labor costs in that field. Walmart competitor's will also cut wages to increase the bottom line. Especially low wage, no skill jobs. Why wouldn't they? It's not like their employees can quit and go work at Walmart for better wages.
Capitalism unfettered by any wage laws or union demands will ALWAYS seek to CUT labor costs. Thats what capitalists do. Especially low wage low skill jobs. This has been going on for some time.
It's just that the "fettering" part is the unions that still exist. And those pesky MW laws.
When unions are outlawed and all states are right to work and there is no more MW laws, that'll be nirvana for capitalists. Right? That's your long term objective?