A purely English betrayal

[rupol2000]

The US policy will be defined by the 'liberal' views - secularism, personal freedom (by this I mean a personal choice of a personal life) etc.

This is the right policy

 

[rupol2000]

Yeah? Including China, North Korea and Russia?

North Korea and China for sure. Russia, partly through its Gautleiters, whose influence has recently increased

 

[ESay]

North Korea and China for sure. Russia, partly through its Gautleiters, whose influence has recently increased

I should admit that you have quite specific views.

 

[ESay]

This is the right policy

Maybe. But ask a Polack what a right-wing policy means for them. I'll bet that will be nationalism, 'Christian' values and maybe some will say a 'strong' government. The things that are quite in the opposition of American 'liberalism'.

 

[rupol2000]

I should admit that you have quite specific views.

The usual views that left-wing crooks impose do not provide answers to the contradictions that arise in the analysis. Precisely this is what they want, so that there are "usual" false patterns, that supposedly left faggots are for the freedom of the individual, and so on. If they are for individual freedom, then why did they leave the Northern Alliance to be torn to pieces by the Taliban? If they want good for the Ukrainians, why do they support Bandera, who are killing Ukrainians? Etc.

 

[rupol2000]

Maybe. But ask a Polack what a right-wing policy means for them. I'll bet that will be nationalism, 'Christian' values and maybe some will say a 'strong' government. The things that are quite in the opposition of American 'liberalism'.

There are no liberals in America, there are Democrats and Republicans.

Libertarianism is a right-wing movement.

From the point of view of the leftist propaganda of Europe, liberalism is democrats and faggots, but this is just a tool for the matrix.

 

[rupol2000]

ESay
Americans do not interpret freedom as it is interpreted by the victims of left-wing swindlers in Europe. For America, freedom is right values: the right to protection, independence from the feds, individual freedom and individual responsibility.

 

[ESay]

The usual views that left-wing crooks impose do not provide answers to the contradictions that arise in the analysis. Precisely this is what they want, so that there are "usual" false patterns, that supposedly left faggots are for the freedom of the individual, and so on. If they are for individual freedom, then why did they leave the Northern Alliance to be torn to pieces by the Taliban? If they want good for the Ukrainians, why do they support Bandera, who are killing Ukrainians? Etc.

Because you can't support a country for eternity vasting enormous recourses and people lives there for some corrupted government that isn't able to stand even for three months on their own. Afghanistan is a classical example of a failed state.

In Ukraine far-right movements are the only ideologically motivated groups who are ready to fight against Russia without any questions. They are a useful tool.

That is actually quite simple.

 

[rupol2000]

Anti-federalists stood at the origins of right-wing America.

In Europe, including in Russia, the following myth has been created: conservatives are right. It follows that those who want the conservation of slavery and absolutism are "right".

As supporters of tradition, they are presented with Bolshevik ultra-left faggots and pedophiles, friends of Stalin and Roosevelt.

As Democrats, supporters of debauchery, decay and feminism, they are presented with the American right, supporters of the conservative family and strict morality.

IQ levels have now dropped by about 20-30% in a few years, so these fools will even believe that the right ones are dancing whores in a Shanghai restaurant

 

[ESay]

There are no liberals in America, there are Democrats and Republicans.

Libertarianism is a right-wing movement.

From the point of view of the leftist propaganda of Europe, liberalism is democrats and faggots, but this is just a tool for the matrix.

Liberalism is a political view that puts a personal freedom at a cornerstone. And yes, the 'faggots' are also fall in this category.

 

[ESay]

ESay
Americans do not interpret freedom as it is interpreted by the victims of left-wing swindlers in Europe. For America, freedom is right values: the right to protection, independence from the feds, individual freedom and individual responsibility.

Yes, I also think so. But what does it have to do with the Polish view? Their right wing ideals are quite opposite.

 

[rupol2000]

Because you can't support a country

No, it's because it's their leftist friends and Biden's friends who want bacha bazi with Tajik children

 

[rupol2000]

Yes, I also think so. But what does it have to do with the Polish view? Their right wing ideals are quite opposite.

Poland is at the origins of a right deal in Europe, it is a country of freedom and hussars. They are mentally close to the right in America (not counting the Warsaw region, the Jewish-Lithuanian land)

 

[rupol2000]

Liberalism is a political view that puts a personal freedom at a cornerstone. And yes, the 'faggots' are also fall in this category.

No, they don't. Strictly speaking, it is from the origins of the definition. In right-wing military cultures, they were killed, and in left-wing slave-owning societies, no one forbade assfucking.

No categories of lechers and villains fall within the sphere of right-wing freedom.

 

[rupol2000]

This is the left scam. In a right society, there is a freedom to protect against a lecher and a villain, and not the freedom of the villain and lecher himself to corrupt and commit villainy.

 

[ESay]

No, it's because it's their leftist friends and Biden's friends who want bacha bazi with Tajik children

Nah, I like my version much more. The Taliban condemns this practice, btw.

 

[ESay]

Poland is at the origins of a right deal in Europe, it is a country of freedom and hussars. They are mentally close to the right in America (not counting the Warsaw region, the Jewish-Lithuanian land)

Poland never was for freedom. Okay, for aristocracy - for sure. I think they are much closer to the Russians in this regard.

 

[ESay]

No, they don't. Strictly speaking, it is from the origins of the definition. In right-wing military cultures, they were killed, and in left-wing slave-owning societies, no one forbade assfucking.

No categories of lechers and villains fall within the sphere of right-wing freedom.

Yes, because you have a right East European mentality.

They were quite tolerated in Ancient Greece and Rome, btw. Not sure in what spectre you will consider these cultures.

 

[rupol2000]

In general, the concept of freedom plays into the hands of the left. Out of context, it's just manipulation and a play on words. The freedom of the villain is contrary to the freedom of the killer of the villain, any of the options can be considered as freedom, the question is whose freedom.

As if the wolves were proclaiming freedom to eat sheep, and the sheep would see it as freedom to graze in the meadow.

Therefore, it would be better for rights to avoid this. This is weak place in PR

 

[rupol2000]

Poland never was for freedom

Always were. They conquered Lithuania precisely in order to free the people from the slavery of the Knyazes. And they liberated Europe from Ottoman's slavery