A purely English betrayal

Ringo

Gold Member
Jun 14, 2021
11,112
4,508
208
Over there
(Translation from ukrainian)
There are winged phrases with a national flavor that have long been in use and have become well known. If robbery, then in Italian. The murder must be purely English. A kiss is definitely French. Cutlets in Kyiv style, and the barber - in Seville. What should be the betrayal? Not a beloved, not a homeland, but a military ally?

On February 1, 2022, on the occasion of the New Year of the Tiger, the Prime Minister-loser of the United Kingdom Boris Johnson, deeply despised by the British voters, a disgrace and shame of the British Crown, visited Kyiv. It is hard to imagine that majestic London, which remembers such mastodons of world politics as Benjamin Disraeli, David Lloyd George, Winston Churchill, Clement Attlee, Anthony Eden, Harold Wilson, Margaret Thatcher, suddenly found itself under the leadership of the base.

Boris Johnson came not so much to support Ukraine as to flee London in hopes of diverting the British public's attention from a scandal that could cost him his job.

A British government official, Sue Gray, recently released a report on holiday parties and feasts at the prime minister's residence on Downing Street in the midst of a pandemic. Sue Gray concluded that the Prime Minister's Office and the government did ignore the anti-antiquity restrictions. This is something like the scandal analogous to our restaurant "Velor", when "Servants of the People" drank and had a snack in between calls to the people to strictly adhere to social distance.

By the way, a very good term is social distance. Not to be confused with the sanitary distance of one and a half meters between individuals. Social distance is the insurmountable distance that separates the poor who have to wear muzzles and takeaway fast food from the happy owners of the Gelendvagen and the 600 Mercedes, for whom the doors of all elite restaurants are always open.

British Prime Minister's Chief Political Adviser Munir Mirza was the first to announce her resignation. In her letter, she accused Johnson of misconduct. Three other top aides to Boris Johnson have resigned on February 3, 2022: Chief of Staff Dan Rosenfield, Chief Personal Secretary Martin Reynolds and Communications Director Jack Doyle.

Boris Johnson himself has proved to be a true ally of the Servant of the People party, publicly declaring that he is not going to resign and wants to remain prime minister until 2029. He promised to fight for re-election for another five years in 2024, despite the downgrade.

The anti-rating of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Boris Johnson, according to the sociological service YouGov, reached 73% - reports "Public" .

What brought this grandson of a Turkish citizen and Jewish relatives from Lithuania to Kyiv at this difficult time? Perhaps the former untalented journalist, who was expelled from the Times at the beginning of his career for professional incompetence, and the former untalented actor decided to discuss the prospects for the development of pop and circus art in both countries? Or a strategy for how to change the election in an environment where three-quarters of your fellow citizens saw you in a coffin in white sneakers? No, these two People's Artists decided to discuss the International Military Union of Britain, Poland and Ukraine.

Historians will not lie: any reminder of the strong military alliance between Poland and Britain cannot be accepted without irony and smiles. This time Mr. Johnson was drawn to the pathos.

"We are doing everything possible to strengthen Ukraine's ability to offer military resistance. But I think the best thing we can do is to convey to Russian citizens the possibility of what will happen. The reality of the fact that Ukrainians will defend themselves, they will fight for their country. Ukrainians will resist to the last drop of blood "

You look so smart! Just want to take him by the collar and ask: tell me, dear sir, when was the last time British soldiers fought to the death, to the last drop of English blood? Maybe in 1938 for Prague? Or in 1939 for Warsaw? Or in 1940 for Paris ?! Was it for Singapore in 1942, when British Commander-in-Chief Lieutenant General Arthur Percival personally carried a white flag to the headquarters of the bewildered Japanese? Probably, Mr. Boris meant the heroic defense of Kabul in 2021…

Because there is another side of the coin - purely English betrayal. Please tell me, at least one ally of Britain (apart from the United States, which they are simply afraid of), who would not be betrayed by the British Lion?

The American film company Netflix decided to patrol the British counterparts a bit by releasing the film "Munich. On the verge of war "about the dramatic events of the autumn of 1938.

Jokers have already started to mock: betrayed then, will betray now…

The widespread historical allegation that Britain allegedly betrayed Czechoslovakia in Munich in 1938 is a relief. In fact, Britain never betrayed Czechoslovakia, because it never undertook any military guarantees to defend Prague from Hitler's encroachments. In fact, London acted entirely as an accomplice and supporter on the side of the Third Reich, only verbally making empty promises to respect the territorial integrity of this Eastern European country. It was not Hitler or Ribbentrop, but British Prime Minister Chamberlain and French Prime Minister Daladier who did everything in their power to break Czechoslovakia's defense, intimidate and force it to surrender. This is how this event is described in detail in the historical literature.

As early as September 20, 1938, Czechoslovakia resisted with all its might. At 7.30 pm that day, the British Ambassador to Newton and the French Ambassador to Delacroix received an official response from the Czechoslovak Government requesting a review of the decisions of the British and French Governments, which had previously approved the terms of the Munich Agreement. Then London and Paris decided to talk to Prague in another language.

At 2 o'clock in the morning on September 21, Czechoslovak President Benes was raised from his bed by another arrival of Newton and Delacroix. This was their fifth visit in one day. The night guests presented Benes with an ultimatum: "If he does not accept the Anglo-French plan, the whole world will recognize Czechoslovakia as the sole culprit of the inevitable war." Worse, the envoys warned: "If the Czechs turn to the Russians for help, the war could take the form of a crusade against the Bolsheviks. Then it will be very difficult for the governments of England and France to stay away. " That is, not only will they leave Czechoslovakia to their own devices, but they will also join the attackers! This is not surprising, since Germany did not act alone, at the same time, territorial claims to Czechoslovakia were made by neighboring Poland and Hungary:
1938-1024x714.png

Stages of the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia:
1. Annexation of the Sudetenland by Nazi Germany (October 1-10, 1938).
2. Occupation of Zaolzie with Teszyn in Poland (October 1-2, 1938).
3. Areas with a Hungarian majority were transferred to Hungary in accordance with the First Vienna Arbitration (November 2, 1938).
4. Occupation of Subcarpathian Russia by Hungary (March 16-23, 1939).
5. Occupation of the remnants of the Czech Republic and its declaration as a protectorate of Germany (March 15, 1939).
6. Slovakia declares its independence, becoming a military ally of Germany (March 14, 1939)


In fact, the night Anglo-French ultimatum to Beneš was an act of moral rape of the Czechoslovak government by Western partners. At the same time, there were no legally binding agreements between London and Prague on joint defense against German aggression. Therefore, there is no reason to accuse the British of treason.

It was a little more difficult with the French, as they seemed to have made some commitments to Czechoslovakia, stemming from a systematic interpretation of the 1935 Franco-Soviet and Soviet-Czechoslovak agreements. At the same time, they were designed very vaguely and vaguely, in the spirit of the infamous "Budapest Memorandum of December 5, 1994". Something like holding consultations, contacting the League of Nations, and so on. Under these agreements, the USSR had the right to provide assistance to Czechoslovakia only if France provided similar assistance, and not alone. That is, all these agreements were ineffective from the beginning.

Those who believe that the Munich Agreement provided security guarantees for Czechoslovakia in the future with reduced borders are also mistaken. It is not true. The quadripartite agreement of Great Britain, France, Germany, and Italy of September 29, 1938 (signed after midnight on September 30) provided for only one thing: the complete and unconditional surrender of Czechoslovakia and the satisfaction of all territorial claims of Germany, Poland, and Hungary.
 
Only Annex 1 to the Guarantor Agreement mentioned the interests of Czechoslovakia:

"Annex I.

His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom and the French Government have concluded this agreement, remembering that they support the proposal contained in § 6 of the Franco-British Proposals of 19 September 1938 on international guarantees for the new borders of the Czechoslovak state against any unprovoked aggression. .

As soon as the issue of the Polish and Hungarian minorities in Czechoslovakia is settled, Germany and Italy, for their part, will provide a guarantee to Czechoslovakia. "


So, even after Munich, no one promised the Czechs anything. Therefore, it is useless and unfounded to accuse Paris and London of failing to respond to the full occupation of the remnants of Czechoslovakia on March 15, 1939. What would they have? However, it is clearly written in Annex 1 to the Agreement - to remember the Franco-British proposal of 19 September 1938. They remembered! And Czechoslovakia was remembered. Her memory is eternal…

The real triumphants were the Poles: moving forward with the Germans, Polish troops were perhaps the first to invade on October 1, 1938 in the territory of Zaolzhye - Teszyn Silesia.

Soviet diplomacy suffered a complete and unconditional defeat in those days. Polish political observers carefully counted everything and came to the conclusion that Soviet Ivan was finally shown his place in Munich. Polish newspapers demonstrated the art of topical political caricature:
Polsha_pokazala_Yvanu_eho_mesto.jpg


Another winner from Munich was Hungary. Acting without haste, Hungarian dictator Vice Admiral Miklós Horthy first seized the southern regions of Slovakia, and on March 16, 1939, the day after the German occupation of Prague and the liquidation of the remnants of the Czechoslovak state, he ordered the occupation of Subcarpathian Russia.
By the way, our Foreign Ministry notes: Subcarpathian Russia is the same territory that unites pre-war Czechoslovakia with modern Ukraine.

Ironically, after 1945, this Hungarian-occupied territory was not returned to Czechoslovakia, but included in the USSR. Meanwhile, Hungarians have changed little since then, given their behavior on the international stage. Probably, in Budapest they still dream of returning in March 1939…

Those who acted treacherously in this situation are the common Czech people, ordinary soldiers and officers. The Czechs insidiously betrayed the British and French with their hopes that they would fight the Germans to the last drop of Czech blood, to the last living Czech. As a result, Hitler will be trapped in this bloody swamp, which will give Paris and London invaluable pre-war gains of time and improve their position in negotiations with Berlin. At the same time, the Czechs thought as cynically as the last egotists: for four centuries Prague was under the Habsburgs and only a small twenty years independent. Is the return of the old owners a good reason to say goodbye to life? You have never lived freely, you should not start. And did not come to war…

The only heroes, of course, were: Captain Pavlik's machine-gun company, acting rudely against the orders of his command, did not disarm, but on the evening of March 14, 1939, fought in the town of Mistek in Czech Moravia, defending its own barracks. This was the only case of armed resistance. The battle itself lasted no more than 30-40 minutes, all German attacks were repulsed. At the same time, at 7 am the next day, Captain Pavlik and his soldiers had to lay down their arms because not only no one came to his aid, but on the contrary - the Czech high command rang the phone, threatening the military tribunal if Captain Pavlik did not stop immediately. self-government ".

When German tanks finally entered Prague at 8 am on March 15, 1939, they met a completely indifferent city, without flowers, but without any resistance. The Czechs, like real Europeans, splashed all their indignation in beer halls and coffee shops. And only wet snow was the only real obstacle on the Wehrmacht's victorious path…

The real betrayal unfolded a little later from the unexpected. Three weeks after the "successful" partition of Czechoslovakia on October 24, 1938, the Foreign Minister of the Third Reich, Joachim von Ribbentrop, said at a luncheon in honor of Polish Ambassador to Germany Józef Lipski that it was time to finalize relations between Poland and Germany. First of all, we are talking about Danzig, which must be "returned" to the Third Reich.
This was to be expected, as Adolf Hitler made no secret of his goal - to return at least to the borders of 1914, which were unfairly, according to Germany, changed by the Versailles Peace Treaty of 1919.
Poles had to understand that Danzig was a German city, and the Reich needed a land corridor between the central part of the country and East Prussia, between which the so-called Polish Corridor suddenly "emerged."

The Germans considered different options. According to Ribbentrop, Germany planned to build a highway and build a double-track railway through the "Polish corridor" with the right of extraterritoriality to connect Germany with Danzig and East Prussia. Poland was also required to accede to the Anti-Comintern Pact against the USSR. In return, Germany was ready to extend the Polish-German treaty for 10 to 20 years and guarantee the inviolability of Poland's borders. But Poland was in no hurry to accept the German proposals, trying to "stir up".

The next time, as a sign of the high level of German-Polish relations, on January 5, 1939, at the Fuhrer's stake, Obersalzberg (Berchtesgaden, Bavaria) was received with all honors by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Poland, Jozef Beck. Hitler personally tried to persuade Beck to compromise, in particular by proposing a formula according to which Danzig became politically German but remained economically with Poland. There were many hints of the possibility of improving the territorial position of Poland in the future at the expense of Ukraine and so on. However, bowing to the Führer in conversation on the form, Józef Beck remained steadfast in essence. Then, on March 21, 1939, Hitler sent a written memorandum to the Polish government with "compromise" proposals.

Who knows how long these persuasions would have lasted if the British had not joined the game and started actively seducing Poland. On March 26, 1939, the Polish government officially rejected Hitler's memorandum. During a speech to Parliament on 31 March 1939, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Neville Chamberlain, stated that if Poland's independence was threatened, the British Government intended to guarantee its independence by all means at its disposal. He also confirmed that the French government holds the same position. Thus, Chamberlain unilaterally provided Poland with military guarantees, which Warsaw did not even officially ask for.
On April 6, Józef Beck signed an agreement on mutual guarantees between Great Britain and Poland in London. At the same time, in April 1939, the imitation of the Anglo-Franco-Soviet negotiations on the formation of a future anti-Hitler coalition began in Moscow. Of course, Chamberlain, who six months earlier had warned Prague against military cooperation with Moscow, was not going to make any agreements with Stalin. These fruitless meetings of diplomats in Moscow were to reassure Poles that the whole world is with Poland, everyone only cares about Poles, and therefore Warsaw must be bold and steadfast in its relations with Berlin.
 
Hitler was furious: this led to the rupture of the German-Polish Declaration of Non-Aggression of January 26, 1934 and the Anglo-German Treaty on the Limitation of Arms at Sea of June 18, 1935. He also said that this is another English bluff. He well remembered the winged words of Neville Chamberlain, said two days before the signing of the Munich Agreement:

"How horrible, fantastic and unbelievable the very idea that we should dig trenches and try on gas masks here, just because people in a distant country quarreled with each other, about whom we know nothing, seems. It seems even more impossible that an already fundamentally settled quarrel can become the subject of war. "

The quote intentionally did not contain the name of the country, as it is a supplement to the universal imperial formula: in England there are no eternal allies and enemies, there are only eternal interests.

The announcement of the Soviet-German non-aggression pact of August 23, 1939, had the effect of a bomb blast. This meant one thing - to be a war, and then the British and French will have to prove not theoretically but practically that they are military allies.
Without, in fact, the slightest desire to fight against the Germans, London continued its big bluff: on August 25, 1939, two days after the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, Poland and Great Britain signed their Treaty of Mutual Assistance. London insincerely encouraged Warsaw, saying that not all is lost. All you have to do is fight to the last Pole until the British Lion deploys his powerful military machine at his own convenience and comes to the rescue. Necessarily. Five years from now…
We will not repeat the course of the beginning of the Second World War - it is well known. It should be noted that by declaring war on the Reich on September 3, 1939, with a numerical advantage (because all combat-ready Wehrmacht units were transferred to the Eastern Front), the Anglo-French coalition began its decisive inaction on the Western Front. After desperate reminders from Warsaw, British and French troops even advanced into German territory for several tens of kilometers without encountering any resistance.

Hitler was not at all worried about this, because he knew perfectly well that neither London nor Paris had any strategic plan in the event of a real war. They received the initiative, but did not know what to do with it. The entire Polish defense plan was designed to last a few weeks before the start of the offensive in the West. At the same time, neither London nor Paris had any plan, and most importantly, no desire to attack. Warsaw did not know at the time that the Western Allies had decided in advance that they would act mainly through devastating economic sanctions, including a naval blockade. When diplomatic démarches and threats did not affect Berlin, the "Strange" or "Sitting" War in the West began.

As a result, on September 12, 1939, the Western Allies simply decided to end all offensive operations and began to watch in astonishment the Polish military agony. Officially, London and Paris supported the Poles' confidence that the general offensive was about to begin. From day to day. When the Wehrmacht completely surrounded and cut off Warsaw on September 14, and the Red Army entered Poland from the east on September 17, a catastrophe of Polish statehood occurred. The president and the government "removed themselves" and kicked Romania in the heels. On September 17, 1939, the commander-in-chief of the Polish army, Marshal Edward Rydz-Smigli, ordered not to engage in battle with Soviet troops and to retreat to Romania. And also disappeared in an unknown direction. Consequently, talk of an offensive by Britain and France on the Western Front was removed from the agenda as inappropriate.
What is remarkable is that the decision not to declare war on the Soviet Union and not to go to war with it is also a decision made on September 17, 1939, at the behest of London. Like, Poland has fallen, what's the difference now? And for the West, this could pave the way for diplomatic maneuvers with Moscow in the future…

As a result of this decision, all members of the Polish government and military leadership were immediately arrested and interned for crossing the Romanian border. Molotov had every reason to claim that Poland had "withdrawn"… More than 454,700 soldiers and officers of the Polish Armed Forces, police, gendarmes and other combatants detained in the Soviet zone of occupation also had no right to count on the status of prisoners of war. For what prisoners, if no war has been declared ?! Exclusively detained and arrested in criminal proceedings.

After Hitler fulfilled his plan at least to restore the borders in 1914, Paris and London hoped in vain that this time Hitler would calm down, or finally go east. Who knew that the Great Fuhrer of the German nation had tasted the sweet taste of victory and the rot of Western democracies, and decided to teach them a lesson.
If you don't step on it, they step on you. On May 10, 1940, the Wehrmacht's classic "blitzkrieg" against the morally incompetent armies of England and France began. While the stunned French were following in the footsteps of the defeated Poles, London on the eighth day of the German offensive was preoccupied with a completely different military question: how to kick the heels from the front, to bring the entire British expeditionary force home. On May 26, 1940, just on the 16th day of the active campaign, British troops were ordered to evacuate from Dunkirk, a port city on the English Channel, where hundreds of thousands of Allied troops were surrounded. Observing this shameful purely English cowardice, Hitler graciously ordered not to pursue the enemy and allowed them to flee home. Provided something like a "green corridor". Although I could probably just throw it into the sea…

Of course, if Boris Johnson had personally led the British Expeditionary Force into battle, Paris would have been saved and the Third Reich defeated in a month. Unfortunately, the British army did not have such brilliant commanders as this former journalist of the Times and the Daily Telegraph. There was one such notorious example in the Red Army: Lev Zakharovich Mehlis, the former editor-in-chief of Pravda, who was not a soldier, took the initiative and tried to command the Crimean Front. It all ended naturally - the Kerch catastrophe of 1942…

After Hitler escorted the British guests home, he solemnly entered Paris on June 14, 1940, without a single shot. Why so? Because less important nations have to fight to the last drop of blood. French soldiers did not write: "I am dying, but I do not give up!" The cultural French declared Paris an open city, because it is a cultural heritage and heritage of generations. Why spoil it with shelling and bombing?
Without waiting for German proposals, on the 15th day of the war, May 25, 1940, the Commander-in-Chief of the French Armed Forces, General Weigan, took the initiative and demanded at a government meeting that the Germans be asked to surrender.

Of course, if the French themselves ask, how to refuse them? On June 22, 1940, France solemnly capitulated. The signing took place in the Compiègne Forest, in the same railway car where Kaiser's Germany signed its surrender in World War I in 1918…
Hitler_in_Paris_23_June_1940-699x1024.jpg

But the history of the heroic Anglo-French military fraternity in 1940 did not end there. After the surrender, the newly formed government of the losers, led by Marshal Petten and Fleet Commander Admiral Darlan, declared that none of the ships would reach Germany. At the same time, the British government feared that if French ships joined the German navy, it would seriously change the balance of power. That is why London decided to conduct a daring, unprecedented military operation: to capture, and in case of failure - to destroy the entire demoralized French fleet by aircraft and artillery.

The secret operation "Catapult" began on the morning of July 3, 1940 at the same time in different parts of the world. The easiest was in the English ports of Portsmouth and Plymouth: the British Marines easily captured French ships, shooting only one officer, one midshipman and two sailors. In the Egyptian port of Alexandria, through negotiations between British Admiral Andrew Cunningham and French Commander Rene Godfrey, it was possible to peacefully disarm French ships without capturing and destroying them.

The bloodiest operation in the Algerian port of Mers el-Kebir turned out to be the worst, where the British shot their French counterparts. As a result, 1,297 Frenchmen were killed, 350 were wounded, 1 battleship went under water, 2 were disabled. The losses of the British were incomparable: 2 pilots were killed and 6 planes were shot down. As the damage to the battleship Dunkirk could be repaired in a short time, on July 6, 1940, a second attack was carried out, which brought the battleship down. On July 3, 1940, it was also planned to strike at French ships in the port of Pointe-a-Pitre (Guadeloupe). Fortunately, the attack was called off at the last minute by US President Franklin Roosevelt.
In fact, there was no military necessity in this operation, nor were there any significant achievements. History has shown that when, indeed, there was a threat of capture of ships by the Germans - French sailors did their duty and blew up at the same time 77 warships in the port of Toulon on November 27, 1942. All that Churchill achieved with his madness, stabbing a knife in the back of yesterday's ally - completely damaged for years Anglo-French relations, both officially and at the level of nations. In his memoirs, General de Gaulle mentioned that the bloody massacre at Mers el-Kebir had hit hard on his plans to continue the fight against Hitler: the number of volunteers had fallen sharply.

If you think you know everything about our English friends, I assure you - you are deeply mistaken!

It was mentioned above that at the beginning of the Polish campaign of 1939, the British government hoped to largely avoid stifling economic sanctions against the Third Reich, thus limiting the direct involvement of British soldiers in the war. Sanctions against the enemy are good! The main thing is to be able to apply them correctly. The bright heads in London decided to show everyone a master class on economic weapons, hastily adopting the "Trading with the Enemy Act 1939", or the Law "On Trade with the Enemy" of September 5, 1939. This law established criminal liability of up to 7 years in prison for any trade relations with hostile countries. But most importantly, under this Act, the British government confiscated the property and bank deposits of all citizens of Germany, Italy and Japan.
Who came under these sanctions the most? That's right, refugees from Germany and Italy, mostly Jews with Third Reich passports! And really, what to take from these hungry Germans? Can a decent Volksdeutsche keep his savings in an English savings bank? And how much of that savings does he have? Instead, many wealthy German Jews cautiously seemed to transfer their millions to British banks on the eve of the war. Winston Churchill gave them all a warm greeting! Your money has become ours…

Therefore, when London today is frightened by the confiscation of the assets of Russia's rich, you can be sure that with all English bureaucratic determination, the ruble, or rather the pound, will be hit first by various exiles like Chichvarkin or Durov. Kasparov may not be pardoned. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has already stated in her own way:

"The main thing is not a step back, Mrs. Trass!" We are very much hoping for you. No immediate British financial interests can be more important than democracy and freedom! ”

All of the above is just a small piece of information that will help us fully appreciate all the benefits of participating in the Anglo-Polish Military Union. Involuntarily you begin to understand the old wise Ukrainian proverb in a different way: you don't need enemies and enemies with such friends!
 
Soviet diplomacy suffered a complete and unconditional defeat in those days. Polish political observers carefully counted everything and came to the conclusion that Soviet Ivan was finally shown his place in Munich. Polish newspapers demonstrated the art of topical political caricature:

Of course, just over two weeks after Germany invaded Poland, the Soviets did the same thing.

Yes, petty details I know. Never let details get in the way of propaganda.
 
Of course, just over two weeks after Germany invaded Poland, the Soviets did the same thing.
No, they didn't. The Red Army entered Poland after the Polish government fled to Romania and Poland's ability to resist the Germans effectively ended.
After the USSR entered the territory of Poland, the commander-in-chief of the Polish army gave the order not to resist the Red Army and neither France nor England, for some reason, declared war on the USSR (as they did against Germany). I wonder why...
the Red Army entered in order to occupy the territories of Western Ukraine and Western Belarus, thereby saving them from nazi occupation. If the USSR had not done this, the germans launched an offensive in the summer of 1941 much closer to Moscow and the center of Russia. This could have played a fatal role in the war against Hitler's Nazism.
Without the victory of the USSR over Germany, you would be a slave or a lampshade today, if your parents had survived the defeat of the USSR at all.
Say thank you to the USSR and personally to Comrade Stalin for his wise policy.
 
The reality of all of that is if Poland wants to keep its independence, it has to be allied with some powerful nations to do so. And the US and UK is the only option available for them. The 'Union of three Black Eagles' will virtually mean the end of their statehood.
 
The British crown has nothing but shame at all: it is left-wing imperialists and traders. Almost everything British smells bad.

Ukrainians live according to the scenarios of Moscow ideologists from among the Gautleiters. The northern pig breeding of the Moscow swamps is their "national dish", the Moscow Hetmanate is their history, Ukraine separate from Poland is their "state", Bandera, an accomplice of Bolshevism in the extermination of native Ukrainians, is their national hero.
 
The reality of all of that is if Poland wants to keep its independence, it has to be allied with some powerful nations to do so. And the US and UK is the only option available for them. The 'Union of three Black Eagles' will virtually mean the end of their statehood.
The ideal allies of Poland are the USA with a right-wing government and the countries of the former Austro-Hungarian influence (including Polish Ukraine) except the Balkans. They do not need Britain, it is not interested in the prosperity of Poland.
 
The Left knew what they were doing when they cut the missile defense program in Eastern Europe. This is one of the foundations of such de facto unity of the countries of Eastern Europe. This is a means to assert the United States in Eastern Europe, because of this, leftist perverts would not be able to trade Ukrainian children.
 
This program was designed by the right, when the US had a coherent foreign policy and foreign policy doctrine. The Left did everything to destroy this undertaking. They played a performance that it was supposedly pressure from Moscow, to which they unquestioningly obeyed. If Moscow is so pressing on them, then why the fuck are they pretending to oppose it in Ukraine? Let them either put on pants or take off the cross.
 
British pseudo-right Tories dream of the rebirth of empire and absolutism. This means that they want to enslave the United States again and establish totalitarianism there. Destroy the Wall Street Bull, Rodeo, Cowboy culture, American football and CrossFit, impose English football and feminine British boxing and so on.
 
As long as there is a Bull in the US, British feminists will not take over America

tomswallpapers.com-63937.jpg
 

Great Bull is the Great Bel of Babylon. That's why there are skyscrapers in the USA, that's why Americans love grandeur, superman and freedom.

 
The ideal allies of Poland are the USA with a right-wing government and the countries of the former Austro-Hungarian influence (including Polish Ukraine) except the Balkans. They do not need Britain, it is not interested in the prosperity of Poland.
If Britain wants to be a regional power, it will inevitably have to develop cooperation with Poland and some other East European countries. As a counter-balance of German and Russian influence.

About the right-wing policy in the US and Poland.. I don't think the US will adpopt a 'right-wing' policy as you and most East Europeans perceive it. I think it is quite the contrary. The US policy will be defined by the 'liberal' views - secularism, personal freedom (by this I mean a personal choice of a personal life) etc.
 
If Britain wants to be a regional power, it will inevitably have to develop cooperation with Poland and some other East European countries. As a counter-balance of German and Russian influence.
Britain wants world domination.
This is not a regional power, this is a Crypto Empire and it controls all leftists and all totalitarian governments.
 
Britain wants world domination.
This is not a regional power, this is a Crypto Empire and it controls all leftists and all totalitarian governments.
Yeah? Including China, North Korea and Russia?
 

Forum List

Back
Top