Independent thinker
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2015
- 39,343
- 35,915
- 2,788
Are you disputing the fact that their ratings are extremely low? Even they acknowledge that.What's the reason, tell me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you disputing the fact that their ratings are extremely low? Even they acknowledge that.What's the reason, tell me.
You're a hypocrite. Obama and Clinton have done the same things and you are amazingly chary with any criticism of your fair-haired criminals. The democrats are just as corrupt daily as any republican. The difference is you're too myopic or stupid to realize it.Like when the Bush's did it?
I don't have a problem with it. Not if it is free of a quid pro quo. But dee yam, you can't be just wide open about it. I mean Trump has no throttle. I need a billion dollars from you guys. Like I need ten thousand votes or whatever it was. THEN, well I can do this. Good God Almighty, at this point the undercover agent is screaming jellybeans in his wired mic and the agents are rolling in. Come on, be it a drug deal, a bribe, a kickback, a ordered hit. That is what would have happened in this case. And at the time, Trump WAS NOT president, no fake, lame, ass immunity.
And why do you think that is?Are you disputing the fact that their ratings are extremely low? Even they acknowledge that.
Former President George W. Bush earns between $100,000 and $175,000 per speech and is considered one of the most prolific speech-makers in modern politics.bush made his money off th oil industry and baseball
The Clintons off Wall Street and Putin speaking fees
He’s a good speaker I’ll give you thatFormer President George W. Bush earns between $100,000 and $175,000 per speech and is considered one of the most prolific speech-makers in modern politics.
The news source Politico has documented Bush's appearances on the speaking circuit and found he's been the keynote in at least 200 events since leaving office.
Do the math. That amounts to at least $20 million and as much as $35 million in speaking fees he's raked in.
![]()
How Much Do Former Presidents Get Paid in Speaking Fees? Hint: A Lot
Find out much former U.S. presidents are paid to speak. Learn how much they earn a year on the speaking circuit. Find out who gets paid the most.www.thoughtco.com
He netted 15 million on the Ranger's deal and he financed that with what he had left in oil holdings. Not really impressive.
The fact is, the left side is very diluted. The left already have the big three, ABC, CBS, & NBC, on their side, as well as CNN and others, so there's not much room left for viewership.And why do you think that is?
BTW, I stopped watching that network years ago, as well as all the other mainstream media networks.
I have no doubt that some sketchy things went on with both Clinton and Obama. But let's just look at Bush Jr., Harken Energy, and the deal in Bahrain. Bush Sr. was president, and his son sat on the board of Harken. Umm, sound familiar? The Bahrain National Oil Company, a state owned enterprise, signed an exclusive deal to develop their off-shore oil market. Not Chevron, not Amoco, no Harken, with no international production experience and no internal financing capabilities, they had to step to outside investors to even get the money to drill.You're a hypocrite. Obama and Clinton have done the same things and you are amazingly chary with any criticism of your fair-haired criminals. The democrats are just as corrupt daily as any republican. The difference is you're too myopic or stupid to realize it.
publicintegrity.org
No, I liked Bush Jr. He grew on me. He is really pretty smart. Come on, Yale and Harvard, you can't really sneer at that. And Clinton is super smart as well. Rhode's Scholar. You know, the two of them often spoke together, I think you can still book them both. Honestly, Bush is the only one that can hold his on with Clinton on the stage.He’s a good speaker I’ll give you that
Show me where he’s being paid by Putin?
Show me where Putin paid bush a half million dollars like the didn’t ClintonNo, I liked Bush Jr. He grew on me. He is really pretty smart. Come on, Yale and Harvard, you can't really sneer at that. And Clinton is super smart as well. Rhode's Scholar. You know, the two of them often spoke together, I think you can still book them both. Honestly, Bush is the only one that can hold his on with Clinton on the stage.
Finally, an honest statement from you.The fact is, the left side is very diluted. The left already have the big three, ABC, CBS, & NBC, on their side, as well as CNN and others, so there's not much room left for viewership.
I was no fan of dubya and I freely admit it. You, on the other hand seem to have an extreme partisan streak that ignores the fact that EVERY potus has made theft like that. LOL, it is comedy gold that you highlight Bush, and ignore Hunter Biden's quid pro quo employment at Burisma Holdings with absolutely no experience. Run along you're as transparent as a freshly washed window.I have no doubt that some sketchy things went on with both Clinton and Obama. But let's just look at Bush Jr., Harken Energy, and the deal in Bahrain. Bush Sr. was president, and his son sat on the board of Harken. Umm, sound familiar? The Bahrain National Oil Company, a state owned enterprise, signed an exclusive deal to develop their off-shore oil market. Not Chevron, not Amoco, no Harken, with no international production experience and no internal financing capabilities, they had to step to outside investors to even get the money to drill.
Should of been a home run. Nestled between two huge fields located in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, it was certain to hit. Well, except, two dry holes later, it hadn't hit. Yet somehow, Bush Jr. escapes, sells two thirds of his holdings for a million bucks, his money for the Texas Rangers.
![]()
Right on the money: The George W. Bush profile – Center for Public Integrity
On January 30, 1990, Platt’s Oilgram News, a respected trade journal of the petroleum industry, reported that a subsidiary of a small, Dallas-based independent oil company, Harken Energy Corporation, had just signed an agreement with the government of Bahrain. “Harken Bahrain Oil Company signed...publicintegrity.org
CORRECT. Both party's stinkYou're a hypocrite. Obama and Clinton have done the same things and you are amazingly chary with any criticism of your fair-haired criminals. The democrats are just as corrupt daily as any republican. The difference is you're too myopic or stupid to realize it.
No, I specifically mentioned the whole Bush, Bahrain thing because of Hunter Biden. I mean could you not see that. And what you don't understand, talk about partisan blinders, it there are huge differences between the two. But again, neither have an appropriate look. Something like, say, Harry Truman, would be strongly opposed to it.I was no fan of dubya and I freely admit it. You, on the other hand seem to have an extreme partisan streak that ignores the fact that EVERY potus has made theft like that. LOL, it is comedy gold that you highlight Bush, and ignore Hunter Biden's quid pro quo employment at Burisma Holdings with absolutely no experience. Run along you're as transparent as a freshly washed window.
![]()
Trump’s reported deal-making with oil executives sure looks corrupt
Trump’s alleged attempt at a quid pro quo with oil execs could violate federal bribery laws.www.ms.now
So Trump says "For a billion dollars I will get rid of those nasty environmental regulations that President Biden wouldn't and make sure that no new ones are enacted!"
And now, he's going to China and taking Eric along, but "NOT" for business reasons. So, if you buy into that, I have some prime real estate in Florida I would like to interest you in!
His corruption knows no bounds!
Bigly!!!
Your posting history does not support this.No, I specifically mentioned the whole Bush, Bahrain thing because of Hunter Biden. I mean could you not see that. And what you don't understand, talk about partisan blinders, it there are huge differences between the two. But again, neither have an appropriate look. Something like, say, Harry Truman, would be strongly opposed to it.
And I got to be honest, this whole, he did it too shit, is beyond bothersome at this point. Wrong is fawking wrong, get it. No, there is no damn gray. It is white, or it is black.