A poll for liberals, how much C02 in the air is to much?

[Mikeoxenormous]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

God conservatives are so dumb it's scary

Back 100 years ago the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere was 0.03%. That is 3 1/100ths of 1 percent.
In 2000, when Al Gore went shrieking gloom and doom, the CO2 had increased a walloping 1/100th to 0.04% which is 4 1/100ths of 1 percent. Now water vapor which is about 70% of the total atmosphere is the real reason why the temperature goes up or down on a given day, just walk out in DC today where the temperature is 90 degrees(dog days of summer) but feels like over 100, because the humidity is high. So liberals TAX all the carbon products because they can, with the support of the establishment republicans, and if the liberals could, they would be taxing water vapor(Martin O'Malley put a rain tax in Maryland) and you would think after 7 2/3rd years of Obama and his energy taxes must necessarily skyrocket, the oceans would stop rising, and the planet would heal. How is that hope and change working out for you libtards?

The way liberals talk, that the increase in CO2 just sits there in the atmosphere eventually going to kill US, but since they are mind numbed, low information, useful idiots, they don't realize that there is also an increase in plant growth, which thrives with the increase of CO2.

View attachment 85228

Funny because it was 100 years ago science first figured out we were causing an increase in global warming.

Popular Technology.net: 1970s Global Cooling Alarmism

Thursday, February 28, 2013
1970s Global Cooling Alarmism

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." – George Santayana

How easy those who graduated from public education are easily made stupid. Are you glad I reminded you of what the liberals were yowling back in the 1970's?

 

[Conservative65]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

You don't understand the climate. You keep pushing this man made climate change that isn't happening.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Come on guys quit trying to derail my thread, I have a theme and reason for this one....


The answer lies in the past.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

okay, lets hear it from the libs.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

God conservatives are so dumb it's scary

Back 100 years ago the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere was 0.03%. That is 3 1/100ths of 1 percent.
In 2000, when Al Gore went shrieking gloom and doom, the CO2 had increased a walloping 1/100th to 0.04% which is 4 1/100ths of 1 percent. Now water vapor which is about 70% of the total atmosphere is the real reason why the temperature goes up or down on a given day, just walk out in DC today where the temperature is 90 degrees(dog days of summer) but feels like over 100, because the humidity is high. So liberals TAX all the carbon products because they can, with the support of the establishment republicans, and if the liberals could, they would be taxing water vapor(Martin O'Malley put a rain tax in Maryland) and you would think after 7 2/3rd years of Obama and his energy taxes must necessarily skyrocket, the oceans would stop rising, and the planet would heal. How is that hope and change working out for you libtards?

The way liberals talk, that the increase in CO2 just sits there in the atmosphere eventually going to kill US, but since they are mind numbed, low information, useful idiots, they don't realize that there is also an increase in plant growth, which thrives with the increase of CO2.

View attachment 85228

Funny because it was 100 years ago science first figured out we were causing an increase in global warming.

Woa....

Wait a second...I will derail my own thread..

So in your own words How did the scientist know we were warming the planet?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

You have no understanding of climate and only an idiot would think man could control it.

You have no understanding of climate and only an idiot would think man could control it.

The irony of this post is as funny as it is alarming.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

God conservatives are so dumb it's scary

Back 100 years ago the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere was 0.03%. That is 3 1/100ths of 1 percent.
In 2000, when Al Gore went shrieking gloom and doom, the CO2 had increased a walloping 1/100th to 0.04% which is 4 1/100ths of 1 percent. Now water vapor which is about 70% of the total atmosphere is the real reason why the temperature goes up or down on a given day, just walk out in DC today where the temperature is 90 degrees(dog days of summer) but feels like over 100, because the humidity is high. So liberals TAX all the carbon products because they can, with the support of the establishment republicans, and if the liberals could, they would be taxing water vapor(Martin O'Malley put a rain tax in Maryland) and you would think after 7 2/3rd years of Obama and his energy taxes must necessarily skyrocket, the oceans would stop rising, and the planet would heal. How is that hope and change working out for you libtards?

The way liberals talk, that the increase in CO2 just sits there in the atmosphere eventually going to kill US, but since they are mind numbed, low information, useful idiots, they don't realize that there is also an increase in plant growth, which thrives with the increase of CO2.

View attachment 85228

Funny because it was 100 years ago science first figured out we were causing an increase in global warming.

Woa....

Wait a second...I will derail my own thread..

So in your own words How did the scientist know we were warming the planet?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

You have no understanding of climate and only an idiot would think man could control it.

You have no understanding of climate and only an idiot would think man could control it.

The irony of this post is as funny as it is alarming.

No answer from you?

Come on tell me How much you know...

 

[sealybobo]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

God conservatives are so dumb it's scary

Back 100 years ago the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere was 0.03%. That is 3 1/100ths of 1 percent.
In 2000, when Al Gore went shrieking gloom and doom, the CO2 had increased a walloping 1/100th to 0.04% which is 4 1/100ths of 1 percent. Now water vapor which is about 70% of the total atmosphere is the real reason why the temperature goes up or down on a given day, just walk out in DC today where the temperature is 90 degrees(dog days of summer) but feels like over 100, because the humidity is high. So liberals TAX all the carbon products because they can, with the support of the establishment republicans, and if the liberals could, they would be taxing water vapor(Martin O'Malley put a rain tax in Maryland) and you would think after 7 2/3rd years of Obama and his energy taxes must necessarily skyrocket, the oceans would stop rising, and the planet would heal. How is that hope and change working out for you libtards?

The way liberals talk, that the increase in CO2 just sits there in the atmosphere eventually going to kill US, but since they are mind numbed, low information, useful idiots, they don't realize that there is also an increase in plant growth, which thrives with the increase of CO2.

View attachment 85228

Scientists have concluded that most of the observed warming is very likely due to the burning of coal, oil, and gas. This conclusion is based on a detailed understanding of the atmospheric greenhouse effect and how human activities have been tweaking it. At the same time, other reasonable explanations, most notably changes in the Sun, have been ruled out.

The atmospheric greenhouse effect naturally keeps our planet warm enough to be livable. Sunlight passes through the atmosphere. Light-colored surfaces, such as clouds or ice caps, radiate some heat back into space. But most of the incoming heat warms the planet's surface. The Earth then radiates some heat back into the atmosphere. Some of that heat is trapped by greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO2).

Human activity--such as burning fossil fuels--causes more greenhouse gases to build up in the atmosphere. As the atmosphere "thickens" with more greenhouse gases, more heat is held in. Fossil fuels such as oil, coal and natural gas are high in carbon and, when burned, produce major amounts of carbon dioxide or CO2. A single gallon of gasoline, when burned, puts 19 pounds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

The role of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in warming the Earth's surface was first demonstrated by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius more than 100 years ago. Scientific data have since established that, for hundreds of thousands of years, changes in temperature have closely tracked with atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Since the Industrial Revolution, the burning of coal, oil and natural gas has emitted roughly 500 billion tons of CO2, about half of which remains in the atmosphere. This CO2 is the biggest factor responsible for recent warming trends.

rhetoric s0n........been hearing the exact same crap for 20+ years.

Not mattering in the real world though. The voters dont care and renewable energy is still a joke.


Who's not winning?

Eventually we will be proven right. So while your side does slow progress and does cause us to take occasional steps backward, never the less we move forward mostly.

Las Vegas Bets Big on Solar Energy

 

[Katzndogz]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

You have no understanding of climate and only an idiot would think man could control it.

So you think the noaa and every degree program in climatology has no clue. lol You must be god?

Oh no. They know. They are just deliberately fudging the data because that's what pays well.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

So, jackass, how hot is the sun going to be 50 years from now?

You anti-science global warming doomsday cultists are ridiculous.

We're talking about why and how heat is trapped in the planet's environment. How do you believe the sun is integral in that context?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

What would you rather have a planet that is warmer or colder?

Or do you believe man can keep it at a constant temperature and C02 level in the atmosphere?

I would rather have a planet with it's natural processes in equilibrium.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

God conservatives are so dumb it's scary

Back 100 years ago the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere was 0.03%. That is 3 1/100ths of 1 percent.
In 2000, when Al Gore went shrieking gloom and doom, the CO2 had increased a walloping 1/100th to 0.04% which is 4 1/100ths of 1 percent. Now water vapor which is about 70% of the total atmosphere is the real reason why the temperature goes up or down on a given day, just walk out in DC today where the temperature is 90 degrees(dog days of summer) but feels like over 100, because the humidity is high. So liberals TAX all the carbon products because they can, with the support of the establishment republicans, and if the liberals could, they would be taxing water vapor(Martin O'Malley put a rain tax in Maryland) and you would think after 7 2/3rd years of Obama and his energy taxes must necessarily skyrocket, the oceans would stop rising, and the planet would heal. How is that hope and change working out for you libtards?

The way liberals talk, that the increase in CO2 just sits there in the atmosphere eventually going to kill US, but since they are mind numbed, low information, useful idiots, they don't realize that there is also an increase in plant growth, which thrives with the increase of CO2.

View attachment 85228

Scientists have concluded that most of the observed warming is very likely due to the burning of coal, oil, and gas. This conclusion is based on a detailed understanding of the atmospheric greenhouse effect and how human activities have been tweaking it. At the same time, other reasonable explanations, most notably changes in the Sun, have been ruled out.

The atmospheric greenhouse effect naturally keeps our planet warm enough to be livable. Sunlight passes through the atmosphere. Light-colored surfaces, such as clouds or ice caps, radiate some heat back into space. But most of the incoming heat warms the planet's surface. The Earth then radiates some heat back into the atmosphere. Some of that heat is trapped by greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO2).

Human activity--such as burning fossil fuels--causes more greenhouse gases to build up in the atmosphere. As the atmosphere "thickens" with more greenhouse gases, more heat is held in. Fossil fuels such as oil, coal and natural gas are high in carbon and, when burned, produce major amounts of carbon dioxide or CO2. A single gallon of gasoline, when burned, puts 19 pounds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

The role of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in warming the Earth's surface was first demonstrated by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius more than 100 years ago. Scientific data have since established that, for hundreds of thousands of years, changes in temperature have closely tracked with atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Since the Industrial Revolution, the burning of coal, oil and natural gas has emitted roughly 500 billion tons of CO2, about half of which remains in the atmosphere. This CO2 is the biggest factor responsible for recent warming trends.

rhetoric s0n........been hearing the exact same crap for 20+ years.

Not mattering in the real world though. The voters dont care and renewable energy is still a joke.


Who's not winning?

Eventually we will be proven right. So while your side does slow progress and does cause us to take occasional steps backward, never the less we move forward mostly.

Las Vegas Bets Big on Solar Energy

They must have inside knowledge of Harry Reid's China solar deals

 

[Wyatt earp]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

What would you rather have a planet that is warmer or colder?

Or do you believe man can keep it at a constant temperature and C02 level in the atmosphere?

I would rather have a planet with it's natural processes in equilibrium.

So would I, so do you think through social economic justice and redistribution we can control the earthy climate?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

God conservatives are so dumb it's scary

Back 100 years ago the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere was 0.03%. That is 3 1/100ths of 1 percent.
In 2000, when Al Gore went shrieking gloom and doom, the CO2 had increased a walloping 1/100th to 0.04% which is 4 1/100ths of 1 percent. Now water vapor which is about 70% of the total atmosphere is the real reason why the temperature goes up or down on a given day, just walk out in DC today where the temperature is 90 degrees(dog days of summer) but feels like over 100, because the humidity is high. So liberals TAX all the carbon products because they can, with the support of the establishment republicans, and if the liberals could, they would be taxing water vapor(Martin O'Malley put a rain tax in Maryland) and you would think after 7 2/3rd years of Obama and his energy taxes must necessarily skyrocket, the oceans would stop rising, and the planet would heal. How is that hope and change working out for you libtards?

The way liberals talk, that the increase in CO2 just sits there in the atmosphere eventually going to kill US, but since they are mind numbed, low information, useful idiots, they don't realize that there is also an increase in plant growth, which thrives with the increase of CO2.

View attachment 85228

Good point but not the whole story. A rise in temperature creates more water vapor which it turn creates a rise in temperature. At what point does that process run away from us and create unsustainable climate effects in various parts of the world rendering them uninhabitable?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

You have no understanding of climate and only an idiot would think man could control it.

You have no understanding of climate and only an idiot would think man could control it.

The irony of this post is as funny as it is alarming.

No answer from you?

Come on tell me How much you know...

That post wasn't directed at you. Get to your point and it might be addressed if it's not clueless.

 

[Muhammed]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

What would you rather have a planet that is warmer or colder?

Or do you believe man can keep it at a constant temperature and C02 level in the atmosphere?

I would rather have a planet with it's natural processes in equilibrium.

Who has the technological expertise to produce those?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

What would you rather have a planet that is warmer or colder?

Or do you believe man can keep it at a constant temperature and C02 level in the atmosphere?

I would rather have a planet with it's natural processes in equilibrium.

So would I, so do you think through social economic justice and redistribution we can control the earthy climate?

I don't believe either of those are suggested solutions.

We can certainly work to mitigate future impacts from man made sources. The planet will take a long time to move back toward equilibrium.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

What would you rather have a planet that is warmer or colder?

Or do you believe man can keep it at a constant temperature and C02 level in the atmosphere?

I would rather have a planet with it's natural processes in equilibrium.

Who has the technological expertise to produce those?

What?

 

[depotoo]

So you want to live off the grid, no heating, no cooling, no ice unless you live in a climate with ice, because appliances, machinery that run off solar also disrupt the earths natural equilibrium.

Well, based on physics and our understanding of climate...Id say we're likely to see climate changes that could cause a negative on civilization...

Not that you care of course.

What would you rather have a planet that is warmer or colder?

Or do you believe man can keep it at a constant temperature and C02 level in the atmosphere?

I would rather have a planet with it's natural processes in equilibrium.