Rawley
Diamond Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 52,669
- 38,699
- 3,645
"melting down" LOL
A "Nobel" Attempt At Becoming Credible Again?
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
Mack The Finger
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #43
World News
...., the deadline for nominations was Jan. 31 — just days into Trump’s second term in office — meaning all nominations Trump has earned this year for settling conflicts across the world are for the 2026 prize."
nypost.com
"Head of Nobel Peace Prize tries to justify not honoring Trump with award
The head of the Nobel Peace Prize tried to justify not giving the award to President Trump early Friday — subtly suggesting the commander-in-chief was not worthy of the illustrious award despite his historic breakthroughs seeking the end of the Israel-Hamas war....., the deadline for nominations was Jan. 31 — just days into Trump’s second term in office — meaning all nominations Trump has earned this year for settling conflicts across the world are for the 2026 prize."
Head of Nobel Peace Prize tries to justify not honoring Trump with award
Nobel Committee Chair Jørgen Watne Frydnes was asked about the clamor to give the prize to Trump, who had said it would be an insult to the US not to award it to him.
nypost.com
- Thread starter
- #44
This was one of the comments after the award:
"Bidensautopen
3 hours ago
This prize became meaningless a decade ago when Obama got one a month into his presidency for doing nothing. A clearly political organization that lost its purpose long ago.
Trump was clearly the most effective candidate for peace in the world, but their hatred for the man blinded them to shallow th...
See more"
"Bidensautopen
3 hours ago
This prize became meaningless a decade ago when Obama got one a month into his presidency for doing nothing. A clearly political organization that lost its purpose long ago.
Trump was clearly the most effective candidate for peace in the world, but their hatred for the man blinded them to shallow th...
See more"
Mushroom
Gold Member
When one is so deluded into radicalism on either side, all they know how to do is attack endlessly and gaslight.
In that, the Far Right and Far Left are both the exact same. And laughingly, both claiming at the same time that there is no "Far XXX".
- Thread starter
- #46
".... radicalism on either side...."
You seem to have accepted the propaganda of the Democrats.
There is no radicalism on the Right, only the Left.
"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)
The question was can you show any right wing politions contrary to American traditions, values, and history.
- Thread starter
- #47
Mushroom
Gold Member
As I said, I see no difference between the two. And both behave in the exact same way, claiming there are no "Radicals" on their side, only the other.
Thank you for so clearly proving my point.
- Thread starter
- #49
Let me prove you are a dunce.
Watch me provide the radical agenda of the Democrats, and note how you will be unable to do the same for the Right....and that should prove how truly dense you have been.
1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical?
2. Another of those positions under regular discussion is 'prayer' in the public arena....Congress opens each year with prayer. Opposing prayer is radical....religiosity is traditional in America.
3. Is 'free speech' embraced by one side, and opposed by the other? You betcha! Obama's Supreme Court nominee says it would be be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
Starting to see a pattern?
4. While we were founded on the biblical idea that all men are created equal,
LBJ advanced a two-class nation based on skin color.
....this radical view was advanced: affirmative action. Hence, Democrats....the Far Left.
5. Here's one more radical position by the Left....fighting to elect a sexual pervert and admitted liar and disbarred lawyer to the White House: Bill Clinton
Relative to American traditions, values, and history ...championing a man of such low character is a radical position.
Hence, Far Left..
6. Franklin Roosevelt threw the United States Constitution under the bus, and used the public fisc for all sorts of endeavors not authorized in Article 1, section 8.
A radical and Progressive position.
He was the ultimate "Far Leftist."
7. Under Franklin Roosevlet the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. ....the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, ...
Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; ...
Radical to the utmost....hence Far Left.
8. Under Roosevelt's NRA, most manufacturing industries were suddenly forced into government-mandated cartels. Codes that regulated prices and terms of sale briefly transformed much of the American economy into a fascist-style arrangement,
"... into a fascist-style arrangement,..."
"A New Jersey tailor named Jacob Maged was arrested and sent to jail for the “crime” of pressing a suit of clothes for 35 cents rather than the NRA-inspired “Tailor’s Code” of 40 cents."
No surprise here: FDR's New Deal was a copy of Mussolini's economic program.
Could anything short of setting up concentration camps for our citizens, be more radical???
Oh...wait....he did build concentration camps for innocent civilians....his own citizens.
9. How about The Far Left's Gender-Agenda., versus the Right's stand for tradition and reality: "Republicans Battle to Roll Back Washington's New Transgender Bathroom Rules"
Really....could there be a more pertinent example of the radical, insane Far Left's corruption of tradition and history???
Could there?
10. The corruption of the press by the Far Left: the JournoList Scandal: hundreds of Leftist journalists plotted to minimize negative publicity surrounding Obama’s radical ties. They plotted to smear the other side with lies. Peter Zenger....spinnning in his grave.
A clear affront to the honor bestowed on the press by the first amendment.
And don't forget this winner......men can menstruate and have babies and women can become men.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.
And several times, I've presented this challenge: If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or extremist for the Right, or radical Right, or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.
The prize has been awarded to some very questionable recipients such as Yassar Arafat over the years. But nothing diminished its credibility as much as the one awarded Barack Obama who had done absolutely nothing of any kind to merit it.
Zebra
Gold Member
what do you say about Machado?
- Thread starter
- #52
Why do you ask?
Zebra
Gold Member
why not .... because she won the prize
- Thread starter
- #54
How about you start your own thread.
- Jan 19, 2010
- 83,758
- 84,183
- 3,605
Mushroom
Gold Member
Attacking and gaslighting does not prove your point, but your endless denial tells a lot more.
- Thread starter
- #57
I provided a dozen examples of radical, insane standards the Left champions and the best you can do is "is not, isssssssss noooootttttttttt!!!!!!!!"
......and note how you will be unable to do the same for the Right....and that should prove how truly dense you have been.
Grow up and be an adult.
Mushroom
Gold Member
Which does not a god damned thing to prove your point that there is no "Radical Right".
And if you talk to those on the Radical Left, they make the exact same claim. Both of you really are just opposite sides of the same coin. And make as much logical sense as a left handed pencil.
- Thread starter
- #59
No, dunce, you proved my point by being unable to find any....ANY.....radical positions on the Right..
Didn't you ever go to school????
Mushroom
Gold Member
And endlessly attacking somebody simply because they do not agree with you does not show how unhinged you are?
There is literally no difference in my eye between you and somebody who screams I am a "Nazi" because I do not think people who do not agree with them should be shot or put into reeducation camps.
To me, there is absolutely no point in discussing anything with a person who attacks all who refuse to accept their beliefs. That is "Groupthink", and something a wise man warned all of us about over half a century ago.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
CNN deletes tone-deaf post downplaying moment Islam terrorists hurled bombs near Gracie Mansion: ‘Enjoying the city’- Started by Sayaras
- Replies: 0
-
-
Nooo! Bastards! Iran lays mines in Strait of Hormuz- Started by Conservative from Georgia
- Replies: 135
-
