Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,102
- 245
Wrong.
The scientist say that this might possibly be either a new particle or a new force, not both. On top of that it is most likely that they just do not understand something properly and that this will be easily explained. It is extremely interesting, but light years away from what you claim it is.
Jesus. Chill out. Take some metamucil or something.
"has shown compelling hints"
"must be more fully confirmed"
"If proved"
"It could"
Really?"If it holds up" is a order of magnitude away from the shit you are posting.![]()
First, science is not served by people who make sensational claims about preliminary data.
Second, Chris tried to sensationalize this by claiming in the thread title that this was both a new particle and a new force in physics.
Third, the article clearly said what I said, not what Chris said.
Yet, for some reason, all the whingers who think they understand English better than I do decide to defend the article instead of realizing I was talking about the idiot who tried to sensationalize it.
Finally, it turns out that the data was a glitch.
Dreams of a new particle fizzle out at Tevatron collider | Science | guardian.co.uk
Don't worry though, Chris will be back any day to make science a laughing stock and sensationalize something else.