A Nest Of Traitors

[Flanders]

Republicans are not the traitors. Far from hysterics, Democrats see the now-famous ‘Letter to Iran’ as a multiple gift:

1. A way to accuse Republicans of the crime Democrats owned throughout the 20th century. Indeed, every UN-loving Democrat has been committing treason for so long they could all be hanged as traitors without benefit of a trial.

2. Most importantly, the Letter to Iran shifts the topic of treason away from the Chicago sewer rat who has been betraying this country from the day he took office.

3. The media is using the government shutdown template to blame Republicans.

Democrats turned the US Senate into a nest of traitors the day the United Nations opened for business. See this thread for observations on treason and traitors that I’ve been posting for 15 years. Should you read the linked Washington Times article you will learn that the Logan Act is never enforced. Worse still, the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945 made the crime of treason un-punishable as this excerpt details:

In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.

American Traitors Are Sweating US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

NOTE: The Chicago sewer rat handing the Iran Deal to the United Nations Security Council gave him full protection under the Organizations Immunities Act.

Hang ‘em high

If not hanging Democrats for the crime of treason en masse, at least the sewer rat, John Kerry, and Nancy Pelosi should do the rope-dance as a token of judicial sincerity. I would go so far as to hang the late, unlamented, Ted Kennedy in absentia:

Nancy Pelosi, as speaker of the House, traveled to Syria to negotiate with President Bashar Assad of Syria over the objections of President George W. Bush, and the late Sen. Ted Kennedy in 1983 importuned Yuri Andropov, the leader of the Soviet Union, to help him prevent President Ronald Reagan from negotiating a missile treaty with Moscow.

A memorandum in the Soviet files, uncovered after the fall of the Soviet Union, described how the head of the KGB, Kennedy and John Tunney, a Democratic senator from California, tried to enlist Andropov in their effort to halt the deployment of missiles to Europe and weaken Mr. Reagan in anticipation of the presidential election of 1984.

According to the KGB memorandum, "Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA."

Treason in the U.S. Senate
Democratic hysterics should retire to a library and read a little history
By THE WASHINGTON TIMES - - Sunday, March 15, 2015

EDITORIAL Iran letter is not treason - Washington Times​

Finally, Ted Kennedy would be proud of the sewer rat:

Flexibility achieved: Obama pulls missile defense system from eastern Europe
posted at 10:01 am on March 20, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

Flexibility achieved Obama pulls missile defense system from eastern Europe Hot Air​

 

[Grandma]

Why is this not in the Rubber Room?

 

[Geaux4it]

The Iran deal is a non-starter and must be blocked at all cost

-Geaux

 

[Flanders]

. . . Barack Obama’s plan to completely overthrow the constitutional order by going to the United Nations is apparently hunky-dory.

Obama Subverts Constitution to Achieve Iran Deal
Ben Shapiro 16 Mar 2015

Obama Subverts Constitution to Achieve Iran Deal - Breitbart​

The United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945 is exactly why he is doing it.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Why is this not in the Rubber Room?

Better yet, the trash.

That letter makes it very clear - the right wants Iran to build a nuclear weapon so they have an excuse for another ground war.

They can never again tell their lame lie that they're not doing their jobs because of Obama.

 

[DGS49]

The "Right" recognizes that the way to get Iran to do something (or to refrain from doing something) is to force the issue, either by painful sanctions or, in the most extreme case, by military action. It is POINTLESS to negotiate with people who believe that any agreement they make can be ignored if their religious leader finds it offensive to Islam. And that it is perfectly OK to lie and make false promises if the objective is promoted.

The ONLY REASON Barry and Kerry are moving this along is to try to create a "legacy" for this Administration. There is no conceivable benefit to negotiating with Iran or to signing any non-binding "agreement" with no prospect of Senate consent.

 

[TheOldSchool]

The Iran deal is a non-starter and must be blocked at all cost

-Geaux

Including all out war. Which is the one thing all sides don't want.

...wait, what?

 

[Manonthestreet]

Why is this not in the Rubber Room?

Better yet, the trash.

That letter makes it very clear - the right wants Iran to build a nuclear weapon so they have an excuse for another ground war.

They can never again tell their lame lie that they're not doing their jobs because of Obama.

You are not current on your parties talking points. Seems libs here agree Iranian bomb is a good thing

 

[DGS49]

Assume Iran has a Bomb, and the means to deliver it. Does anyone here think they would be stupid enough to do so?

With Israel's nuclear arsenal and the U.S.' capabilities, it would be national suicide.

Seriously, does anybody seriously think Iran would be that stupid? It's all about sabre rattling, which seems to be the favorite national sport in that part of the world.

Remember Saddam, who PRETENDED to have WMD's in order to scare Iran? Seems stupid to us, but it's the way they think.

 

[Flanders]

Assume Iran has a Bomb, and the means to deliver it. Does anyone here think they would be stupid enough to do so?

With Israel's nuclear arsenal and the U.S.' capabilities, it would be national suicide.

Seriously, does anybody seriously think Iran would be that stupid? It's all about sabre rattling, which seems to be the favorite national sport in that part of the world.

Remember Saddam, who PRETENDED to have WMD's in order to scare Iran? Seems stupid to us, but it's the way they think.

To DGS49: Go all the way back to rocks and clubs and you’ll see that there has never been a weapon that was not used. The problem with nuclear did not begin with Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It began when traitors justified treason: “When everybody has them, nobody will use them.”

 

[DGS49]

"...there has never been a weapon that was not used..."

Pretty stupid comment, all in all. Did the Soviets ever use a nuclear weapon? The Chinese? The French? The British? The Israeli's? We Americans have had thousands of nuclear weapons in our arsenal for more than 60 years...never used.

It is a puzzlement, is it not?

Many governments - including the U.S. - have maintained chemical, biological, and radiological weapons for decades, and yet their use has been very, very sporadic.

If you have a coherent rebuttal to my point - that Iran would never drop a Bomb on Israel for fear of retaliation - I would love to read it.

BTW, what does this mean: "It began when traitors justified treason." What the fuck are you talking about? What is "it"? Who are the "traitors"? What "treason"? Do tell.

On the other hand, if you are referring to the letter [not] sent to Iran by our Republican senators, don't bother; you are an idiot.

 

[Flanders]

BTW, what does this mean: "It began when traitors justified treason." What the fuck are you talking about? What is "it"? Who are the "traitors"? What "treason"? Do tell.

To DGA49: Do try to hide your stupidity. I have no intention of explaining everything to a halfwit. Do some research on the traitors who gave the Soviet Union atomic secrets when America had a monopoly on nuclear weapons.

 

[Geaux4it]

Assume Iran has a Bomb, and the means to deliver it. Does anyone here think they would be stupid enough to do so?

With Israel's nuclear arsenal and the U.S.' capabilities, it would be national suicide.

Seriously, does anybody seriously think Iran would be that stupid? It's all about sabre rattling, which seems to be the favorite national sport in that part of the world.

Remember Saddam, who PRETENDED to have WMD's in order to scare Iran? Seems stupid to us, but it's the way they think.

Well normally? Perhaps not. But we need remember we don't have the average POTUS in office. So, my guess is we would not launch back. Obama's final countdown

-Geaux

 

[Flanders]

If you have a coherent rebuttal to my point - that Iran would never drop a Bomb on Israel for fear of retaliation - I would love to read it.

To DGS49: Aside from the fact that I do not write messages for my opposites, rebutting halfwits is a waste of my time. Nevertheless, Wohlstetter’s piece offers a scary similarity to the 1930s with one notable exception: It is not difficult to see that Taqiyya the Liar is disarming the US while Hitler rearmed Germany (1935).

The final three paragraphs will go over your head to be sure, while intelligent people following this thread already understand the danger (1941):

Obama’s 1930s: We’re at 1937
Soon enough the Iran nuclear talks will become a replay of Munich 1938.
By John C. Wohlstetter – 3.19.15

Obama s 1930s We re at 1937 The American Spectator​