I agree with that. I believe a significant portion would, and how many weapons depots would have to fall into the hands of the rebels to make the battle much more costly?Thank you for being the voice of reason hereThe right to bear arms is a Constitutional right, not an inalienable right.
The Constitution was made to be amended.
Yes the Constitution was made to be amended, but the right to bear arms hasn't been... well ever. The Second Amendment isn't there to say that civilians that serve in the military can have guns. It's meant as a protection so that civilians can defend themselves against a tyrannical government. ie. Like the British Empire.
When the government takes away guns, and then it creates the opportunity to take away more and more rights.
Your little AR15 isn't going to stop the U.S army, which has tactical nuclear missiles, M1 Abrams Tanks, and a fleet of drones.
And yes, I've served in the Army, so I know this very well
You're making the unfounded assumption that the military wouldn't side with the citizens.