A Legal Fork for SCOTUS: How to Arrange Alphabet Soup Into a Viable Static Class.

[paddymurphy]

There should be no "special protections" for anyone. That's half our problem. Every wacko group in the country thinks they should be "special".

There are no "special protections" for anyone. That comment could only be made by one wholly ignorant of the law on discrimination. Everyone is protected from discrimination that is based on race, gender, age, ethnicity, religion or real or perceived disability. Those protections are not special; they are simply extending to all Americans the same rights long enjoyed by those in the majority, white, male, christian, straight, not disabled.

So, if "protected classes" are not protected, what need for "protected classes"?

What Are The Protected Classes Under Discrimination Laws - Attorneys.com

Kind of hard to explain those legal principles in a message board post to someone with little or no understanding of the law. Race is a protected class; not black; not white... race. So the suggestion that some races get special protection is wrong. It is not accurate. No anti-discrimination law applies only to a specific group; they ban discrimination based on certain characteristics by which people can be grouped. A business that would ban white people is just as illegal as on banning blacks.

 

[Silhouette]

Kind of hard to explain those legal principles in a message board post to someone with little or no understanding of the law. Race is a protected class; not black; not white... race. So the suggestion that some races get special protection is wrong. It is not accurate. No anti-discrimination law applies only to a specific group; they ban discrimination based on certain characteristics by which people can be grouped. A business that would ban white people is just as illegal as on banning blacks.

And the LGBT membership doesn't even know how to group themselves; what behavior (that day) is included in the fold and which isn't... The only thing that seems to cohesively bind the group is a requirement for expansionism of the type of sexual behaviors our great grandparent tried to minimize in society, mental illness and a penchant to destroy any other person or group of people (Christians) who resist the outward spreading of their deviant sexual behaviors and mental illness "as the new normal". That's really it in a nutshell. It is as if the only requirement to belong to the group is to physically-display a wanton rebellious nature (using exceptionally-variant sexual behaviors) towards anyone who believes in striving to achieve personal restraint instead.

If I wouldn't be accused of wearing a tin foil hat, I'd even go so far to say that you could distill this group down further to represent the proverbial demons and their hedonistic dogma of self-absorbed narcissism vs the proverbial saints and their dogma of self-restraint and altruism. I really do think at times this whole deal is an allegoricial expression of those two forces at war.

In one ear of society today whispers the devil. In the other ear whispers the saints. And we are really at a pivotal point. What is decided today will set the tone for everyone. The matrix we will find humanity in after 30 years hence will either be basically recognizable or so foreign even the most liberally-accepting today would find themselves being laughed out of the room as "too conservative" then. One need only to read my signature on my posts to see exactly where "1/2 way there" has already gotten to..

Michigan chose to listen to the saints. What will you choose?

 

[paddymurphy]

Kind of hard to explain those legal principles in a message board post to someone with little or no understanding of the law. Race is a protected class; not black; not white... race. So the suggestion that some races get special protection is wrong. It is not accurate. No anti-discrimination law applies only to a specific group; they ban discrimination based on certain characteristics by which people can be grouped. A business that would ban white people is just as illegal as on banning blacks.

And the LGBT membership doesn't even know how to group themselves; what behavior (that day) is included in the fold and which isn't... The only thing that seems to cohesively bind the group is a requirement for expansionism of the type of sexual behaviors our great grandparent tried to minimize in society, mental illness and a penchant to destroy any other person or group of people (Christians) who resist the outward spreading of their deviant sexual behaviors and mental illness "as the new normal". That's really it in a nutshell. It is as if the only requirement to belong to the group is to physically-display a wanton rebellious nature (using exceptionally-variant sexual behaviors) towards anyone who believes in striving to achieve personal restraint instead.

If I wouldn't be accused of wearing a tin foil hat, I'd even go so far to say that you could distill this group down further to represent the proverbial demons and their hedonistic dogma of self-absorbed narcissism vs the proverbial saints and their dogma of self-restraint and altruism. I really do think at times this whole deal is an allegoricial expression of those two forces at war.

In one ear of society today whispers the devil. In the other ear whispers the saints. And we are really at a pivotal point. What is decided today will set the tone for everyone. The matrix we will find humanity in after 30 years hence will either be basically recognizable or so foreign even the most liberally-accepting today would find themselves being laughed out of the room as "too conservative" then. One need only to read my signature on my posts to see exactly where "1/2 way there" has already gotten to..

Michigan chose to listen to the saints. What will you choose?

Since most Gay people are Christians, your argument that they are trying to destroy them is moronic. There are a minority or small minded, hateful prick like you who think that you are best qualified to communicate to the rest of us what God wants. You are not. All that gay people want, quite simply, is to allowed to live their lives without interference from intrusive fucks like you. And, if you are what passes for a saint these days, the standards are slipping.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Kind of hard to explain those legal principles in a message board post to someone with little or no understanding of the law.

Gosh, I see! You demote me true! But, I would think that someone with your apparent legal acumen would have no difficulty explaining such heady minutia.

And whence springs your particular understanding of the law? In skimming your previous posts it seems you are quite the self-appointed expert in these matters.

Enthrall me.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

There should be no "special protections" for anyone. That's half our problem. Every wacko group in the country thinks they should be "special".

There should be no discrimination against anyone, that's the problem; stop discriminating and there's no need for lawsuits.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

There should be no discrimination against anyone, that's the problem; stop discriminating and there's no need for lawsuits.

Agreed, but human nature is rather unchangeable, and as I said earlier, you cannot legislate togetherness.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Since most Gay people are Christians

Source? Just curious.

Is that nationally or globally?

 

[Silhouette]

Since most Gay people are Christians, your argument that they are trying to destroy them is moronic. There are a minority or small minded, hateful prick like you who think that you are best qualified to communicate to the rest of us what God wants. You are not. All that gay people want, quite simply, is to allowed to live their lives without interference from intrusive fucks like you. And, if you are what passes for a saint these days, the standards are slipping.

Let me be more specific then. Maybe gay people are calling themselves christians and being welcomed into the fold. All sinners are welcome. But what they're trying to do is force other Christians to turn their back on the Biblical mandates that prescribe that no practicing Christian may, under threat of eternal damnation, assist the spread of a homosexual cultural movement (as differentiated from individual homosexuals, whom they are to show compassion "making a difference"). Long story short, LGBT cultees are trying to force Christians to make "sin" into "virtue". Exactly like was predicted the Dark One would do. Just like they're trying to legally force our society to change the fundamental meaning of the word "marriage".

They are attacking the mandates. And, as a matter of fact, any Christian not acquiescing to that attack and surrendering their principles upon demand, is dragged into a courtroom and flogged....very publicly (their friends in media make sure of that) "as an example" to other would-be rebels who defy their demands to redact the Bible to accomodate their hendonist/demonic lifestyle That's already a documented fact, bro. I dare you to refute it. One after the other the LGBT militia level their sniper rifles, invite an audience to watch and then pull the trigger on one Christian after another in court.

 

[paddymurphy]

Since most Gay people are Christians, your argument that they are trying to destroy them is moronic. There are a minority or small minded, hateful prick like you who think that you are best qualified to communicate to the rest of us what God wants. You are not. All that gay people want, quite simply, is to allowed to live their lives without interference from intrusive fucks like you. And, if you are what passes for a saint these days, the standards are slipping.

Let me be more specific then. Maybe gay people are calling themselves christians and being welcomed into the fold. All sinners are welcome. But what they're trying to do is force other Christians to turn their back on the Biblical mandates that prescribe that no practicing Christian may, under threat of eternal damnation, assist the spread of a homosexual cultural movement (as differentiated from individual homosexuals, whom they are to show compassion "making a difference"). They are attacking the mandates. And, as a matter of fact, any Christian not acquiescing to that attack and surrendering their principles upon demand, is dragged into a courtroom and flogged....very publicly (their friends in media make sure of that) "as an example" to other would-be rebels who defy their demands to redact the Bible to accomodate the demonic lifestyle That's already a documented fact, bro. I dare you to refute it.

"no practicing Christian may, under threat of eternal damnation, assist the spread of a homosexual cultural movement" Go find that in the bible, you lying sack of shit.

 

[paddymurphy]

Since most Gay people are Christians

Source? Just curious.

Is that nationally or globally?

Nationally.

 

[paddymurphy]

Kind of hard to explain those legal principles in a message board post to someone with little or no understanding of the law.

Gosh, I see! You demote me true! But, I would think that someone with your apparent legal acumen would have no difficulty explaining such heady minutia.

And whence springs your particular understanding of the law? In skimming your previous posts it seems you are quite the self-appointed expert in these matters.

Enthrall me.

I did explain it to you. That you did not realize that I did kind of proves my point.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

"no practicing Christian may, under threat of eternal damnation, assist the spread of a homosexual cultural movement" Go find that in the bible, you lying sack of shit.

Hmmm.

Is that more of your understanding of the law?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Since most Gay people are Christians

Source? Just curious.

Is that nationally or globally?

Nationally.

You skipped part of the question.

Source?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Kind of hard to explain those legal principles in a message board post to someone with little or no understanding of the law.

Gosh, I see! You demote me true! But, I would think that someone with your apparent legal acumen would have no difficulty explaining such heady minutia.

And whence springs your particular understanding of the law? In skimming your previous posts it seems you are quite the self-appointed expert in these matters.

Enthrall me.

I did explain it to you. That you did not realize that I did kind of proves my point.

That you believe you did proves mine. And, you skipped the second question altogether. That's twice now.

 

[paddymurphy]

Since most Gay people are Christians

Source? Just curious.

Is that nationally or globally?

Nationally.

You skipped part of the question.

Source?

Common sense. The vast majority of Americans are Christians so most gay people certainly are.

 

[Silhouette]

Since most Gay people are Christians, your argument that they are trying to destroy them is moronic. There are a minority or small minded, hateful prick like you who think that you are best qualified to communicate to the rest of us what God wants. You are not. All that gay people want, quite simply, is to allowed to live their lives without interference from intrusive fucks like you. And, if you are what passes for a saint these days, the standards are slipping.

Let me be more specific then. Maybe gay people are calling themselves christians and being welcomed into the fold. All sinners are welcome. But what they're trying to do is force other Christians to turn their back on the Biblical mandates that prescribe that no practicing Christian may, under threat of eternal damnation, assist the spread of a homosexual cultural movement (as differentiated from individual homosexuals, whom they are to show compassion "making a difference"). Long story short, LGBT cultees are trying to force Christians to make "sin" into "virtue". Exactly like was predicted the Dark One would do. Just like they're trying to legally force our society to change the fundamental meaning of the word "marriage".

They are attacking the mandates. And, as a matter of fact, any Christian not acquiescing to that attack and surrendering their principles upon demand, is dragged into a courtroom and flogged....very publicly (their friends in media make sure of that) "as an example" to other would-be rebels who defy their demands to redact the Bible to accomodate their hendonist/demonic lifestyle That's already a documented fact, bro. I dare you to refute it. One after the other the LGBT militia level their sniper rifles, invite an audience to watch and then pull the trigger on one Christian after another in court.

"no practicing Christian may, under threat of eternal damnation, assist the spread of a homosexual cultural movement" Go find that in the bible, you lying sack of shit.

Jude 1 of the New Testament:

1Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James, to them that are sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, and called:
2Mercy unto you, and peace, and love, be multiplied.
3Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
4For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
5I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.
6And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
7Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
8Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.
9Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
10But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.
11Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.
12These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;
13Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.
14And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,
15To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.
16These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men's persons in admiration because of advantage.
17But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;
18How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.
19These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit.
20But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost,
21Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.
22And of some have compassion, making a difference:
23And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh.
24Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy,
25To the only wise God our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen.


Condensed, that says "the ungodly lusts you were warned about can descend upon you any time. Not just in Sodom. And when they do and the practitioners thereof petition you with smooth speech, coercion, positions of power, you are to resist them. You are to "earnestly contend" the spread of that mindset into the good and restrained Christian society. If you don't, remember that everyone in Sodom was destroyed. Those who indulged and those who refused to check that indulgence. All together were put into the pit of fire for eternity.

ie: a Christian who allows this coercive, manipulative bunch to steamroller over their faith is headed to the Big Dungeon right alongside his or her oppressors. This truly is a test. Michigan passed. Will you?

 

[paddymurphy]

"no practicing Christian may, under threat of eternal damnation, assist the spread of a homosexual cultural movement" Go find that in the bible, you lying sack of shit.

Hmmm.

Is that more of your understanding of the law?

No, it is the law. That you choose to comment on things beyond your understanding is your problem.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Since most Gay people are Christians

Source? Just curious.

Is that nationally or globally?

Nationally.

You skipped part of the question.

Source?

Common sense. The vast majority of Americans are Christians so most gay people certainly are.

Non sequitur. That's an assumption. Wouldn't hold up in court I'm afraid.

"The vast majority of Americans are Christians so most Communists certainly are."

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

"no practicing Christian may, under threat of eternal damnation, assist the spread of a homosexual cultural movement" Go find that in the bible, you lying sack of shit.

Hmmm.

Is that more of your understanding of the law?

No, it is the law. That you choose to comment on things beyond your understanding is your problem.

Too funny.

It seems I've discovered another nut here. You are free to go.

 

[paddymurphy]

Since most Gay people are Christians

Source? Just curious.

Is that nationally or globally?

Nationally.

You skipped part of the question.

Source?

Common sense. The vast majority of Americans are Christians so most gay people certainly are.

Non sequitur. That's an assumption. Wouldn't hold up in court I'm afraid.

"The vast majority of Americans are Christians so most Communists certainly are."

We are not in a court and your claim makes no sense. Mine does. How about this, most Christians reject the suggestion that gay people should not be treated equally with straight people. Most Christians support marriage equality. And, don't ask me for a source, google those issues and you will see poll after poll that prove that.