The5thHorseman
Platinum Member
- Nov 22, 2022
- 12,136
- 6,577
- 918
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #81
Toddy,You don't want accurate data?
Don't yap..
Just go ahead and do it..
4%
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Toddy,You don't want accurate data?
Toddy,
Don't yap..
Just go ahead and do it..
4%
I've done all the work, Toddy...
It is clear that everything you yap is something you've been told to believe.
This makes you a Useful Idiot.
Now get on with your Useful Idiocy so we can move on to
4%
Toddster,You did all the work.
And that's why you included Obama spending in Bush's ending budget number.
That's why you included TARP loans in Bush's ending budget number.
Come on, tell me again how those Dem presidents were budget hawks. DURR.
Toddster,
Stop yapping vaingloriously...
Do your math and show me what you come up with..
None of those numbers are "mine"...
Hold on......
That was your junior high school principal calling to revoke your qualifications....said something about how you always squatted to pee.
On the assumption that the cost of the failure of Supply Side shouldn't be assessed to Supply Side.Looks like bank TARP $245B, AIG $68B and Autos $79B spent in FY 2009.
Additional TARP thru October brings the total to about $555 billion.
$68B of the bank TARP was repaid in June 2009.
Leaves about $487B outstanding in FY 2009.
Add about $85B for Fannie and Freddie.
About $572 billion. Now add the spending bills the Dem House stalled until Obama took office
and add the "stimulus" bills Obama signed between January and the end of the Fiscal year.
Another $100B? More?
Bush's last number looks closer to $2845. 5.44%
Obama looks more like 4.3%
On the assumption that the cost of the failure of Supply Side shouldn't be assessed to Supply Side.
Naturally, it should all be assessed to his successor, along with all those expenses necessary in FY2009, whether or not Scrib pouted and refused to sign his last budget.
Before I demonstrate what a dim little tool you are...
Is that a fair description of your position?
Supply Side works every time it's tried.
You think the housing market crashed because of Supply Side?
Naturally, it should all be assessed to his successor, along with all those expenses necessary in FY2009,
Temporary programs, mostly repaid, like TARP, shouldn't become part of the new baseline.
Supply Side works every time it's tried.
We'll go to results shortly, but as fiscal policy, Supply Side is indisputably a failure - every time.
Just go to the OP and see for yourself.
Now to cut this bullshitty short...
Do you know what Scrub requested in Feb 2008, BEFORE any spending necessary for the abysmal failure of Supply Side, Part Deux?
Take that number, add it to his EASs for Iraqnam...
Where are you now?
You're a fucking idiot
Did you note the delta between growth in spending and revenue?Just go to the OP and see for yourself.
I looked at the OP. No evidence of your claim there.
Bush's last number looks closer to $2845.
Where are you now?
Bush's last number looks closer to $2845.
As I already posted 390,000 cars.
Toddsterpatriot
4%
![]()
https://www.cato.org/commentary/whos-blame-massive-deficit
Did you note the delta between growth in spending and revenue?
You're an imbecile, Todd.
Now go to his request in Feb 2008, and see why that is nonsense.
Now go to his request in Feb 2008, and see why that is nonsense.
The normal way, by faking sincerity.I have no idea how getting the rube herd to fall for this delusion was achieved.
JFC!Supply Side works every time it's tried.
Just answer the question, Toddy..Did he get his Feb 2008 request through Congress?
Post Scrub's budget request for FY2009.4% of Bush's 2008 spending is $120B.
Plus $572B in TARP. $692B
$3517B-$692B = $2825B
My original number was $2845B.
Post Scrub's budget request for FY2009.
The minute you post what you were asked to post this is over...Your source said Obama added $140B to Bush's 2009 spending.
If there was $572B in TARP spending in FY 2009, Obama doesn't get
to spend that amount every year and pretend he's a budget hawk.
Only a moron would fall for that........Oh, there you are. LOL!