A Hamburger Now Costs $170 in Venezuela

[Fair&Balanced]

Socialism works pretty well for Wall Street and corporate interests with well heeled lobbyists - not to mention professional sports teams owners.

None of that is socialist .

Jesus people are morons.

Sure it is, all of it, and you support it.

No it isn't you moron. Let's talk specifically about sport's teams. What the ****? You think the there is social ownership of sport's teams? LOL If anything they are the polar opposite of socialism in that a few people own ALL of the sport's teams.

Where do sports team owners always turn to build a new stadium?

Tax payers. Subsidized by the public. Call it whatever you like, the funding source is what it is.

That doesn't make it socialism you ******* idiot.

Certainly not my fault that you are too stupid to understand why cities finance stadiums, BUT nevertheless , it isn't socialism.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Socialism works pretty well for Wall Street and corporate interests with well heeled lobbyists - not to mention professional sports teams owners.

None of that is socialist .

Jesus people are morons.

Sure it is, all of it, and you support it.

No, it's collusion.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Carter has been working hard to maintain his title as Worst President Ever.

2013:
While President Obama called the death of Venezuela strongman Hugo Chaveza chance for a "new chapter" in the Latin American country's history, former President Carter instead praised the strongman's "commitment to improving the lives of millions of his fellow countrymen."

Carter praises Chavez for 'improving the lives of millions' | Fox News

There is literally nothing Carter can do to retrive his former title from Obama's possession.

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

Sore loser, happens a lot to you don't it.

How about you respond to my post? Disparagement is an admission of defeat.

 

[Obiwan]

Socialism works pretty well for Wall Street and corporate interests with well heeled lobbyists - not to mention professional sports teams owners.

None of that is socialist .

Jesus people are morons.

Sure it is, all of it, and you support it.

No it isn't you moron. Let's talk specifically about sport's teams. What the ****? You think the there is social ownership of sport's teams? LOL If anything they are the polar opposite of socialism in that a few people own ALL of the sport's teams.

Where do sports team owners always turn to build a new stadium?

Tax payers. Subsidized by the public. Call it whatever you like, the funding source is what it is.

But how else would the feral chimp Democrats have a game to watch on that big screen TV they're going to loot this weekend, compliments of Freddie Gray???

 

[hjmick]

Socialism - Where health care and college are "free," but a hamburger will cost you $170

Venezuela, where a hamburger is officially $170

$250.00 if you want it made with beef...

 

[Fenton Lum]

Carter has been working hard to maintain his title as Worst President Ever.

2013:
While President Obama called the death of Venezuela strongman Hugo Chaveza chance for a "new chapter" in the Latin American country's history, former President Carter instead praised the strongman's "commitment to improving the lives of millions of his fellow countrymen."

Carter praises Chavez for 'improving the lives of millions' | Fox News

There is literally nothing Carter can do to retrive his former title from Obama's possession.

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

Sore loser, happens a lot to you don't it.

How about you respond to my post? Disparagement is an admission of defeat.

what this?

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

What the hell is there to respond to? Just partisanshit drivel, to silly to be serious about. No substance.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Socialism works pretty well for Wall Street and corporate interests with well heeled lobbyists - not to mention professional sports teams owners.

None of that is socialist .

Jesus people are morons.

Sure it is, all of it, and you support it.

No it isn't you moron. Let's talk specifically about sport's teams. What the ****? You think the there is social ownership of sport's teams? LOL If anything they are the polar opposite of socialism in that a few people own ALL of the sport's teams.

Where do sports team owners always turn to build a new stadium?

Tax payers. Subsidized by the public. Call it whatever you like, the funding source is what it is.

But how else would the feral chimp Democrats have a game to watch on that big screen TV they're going to loot this weekend, compliments of Freddie Gray???

Points for being at least smart enough not to attempt to argue it's not socialism.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Carter has been working hard to maintain his title as Worst President Ever.

2013:
While President Obama called the death of Venezuela strongman Hugo Chaveza chance for a "new chapter" in the Latin American country's history, former President Carter instead praised the strongman's "commitment to improving the lives of millions of his fellow countrymen."

Carter praises Chavez for 'improving the lives of millions' | Fox News

There is literally nothing Carter can do to retrive his former title from Obama's possession.

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

Sore loser, happens a lot to you don't it.

How about you respond to my post? Disparagement is an admission of defeat.

what this?

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

What the hell is there to respond to? Just partisanshit drivel, to silly to be serious about. No substance.

Total substance.
Carter reacted to Iran poorly while obama aids them in gaining nukes; Carter reacted poorly to stifled oil supply while obama created the supply stifle; Carter signed well-intentioned but bogus treaties emboldening the soviets to invade Afghanistan while obama's intentional passivity has allowed Russian aggression; Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers while obama intentionally removed troops from Afghanistan and Iraq thereby fomenting the creation and expansion of more terrorists. The list is almost endless.
Obama is a proactive failure.

 

[Fenton Lum]

There is literally nothing Carter can do to retrive his former title from Obama's possession.

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

Sore loser, happens a lot to you don't it.

How about you respond to my post? Disparagement is an admission of defeat.

what this?

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

What the hell is there to respond to? Just partisanshit drivel, to silly to be serious about. No substance.

Total substance.
Carter reacted to Iran poorly while obama aids them in gaining nukes; Carter reacted poorly to stifled oil supply while obama created the supply stifle; Carter signed well-intentioned but bogus treaties emboldening the soviets to invade Afghanistan while obama's intentional passivity has allowed Russian aggression; Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers while obama intentionally removed troops from Afghanistan and Iraq thereby fomenting the creation and expansion of more terrorists. The list is almost endless.
Obama is a proactive failure.

GW Bush giving US tax payer funding to N Korea so they could buy nuclear reactors from a company Don Rumsfeld had once sat on the board of directors of? And then a couple years later including them in his "axis of evil?

Where ya at on that one?

'Cause so far this sounds like particashit to me.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

Sore loser, happens a lot to you don't it.

How about you respond to my post? Disparagement is an admission of defeat.

what this?

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

What the hell is there to respond to? Just partisanshit drivel, to silly to be serious about. No substance.

Total substance.
Carter reacted to Iran poorly while obama aids them in gaining nukes; Carter reacted poorly to stifled oil supply while obama created the supply stifle; Carter signed well-intentioned but bogus treaties emboldening the soviets to invade Afghanistan while obama's intentional passivity has allowed Russian aggression; Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers while obama intentionally removed troops from Afghanistan and Iraq thereby fomenting the creation and expansion of more terrorists. The list is almost endless.
Obama is a proactive failure.

GW Bush giving US tax payer funding to N Korea so they could buy nuclear reactors from a company Don Rumsfeld had once sat on the board of directors of? And then a couple years later including them in his "axis of evil?

Where ya at on that one?

'Cause so far this sounds like particashit to me.

GW Bush is Carter and obama? Sounds like you're trying to rationalize failures with other failures. That's hypocrisy.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

Sore loser, happens a lot to you don't it.

How about you respond to my post? Disparagement is an admission of defeat.

what this?

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

What the hell is there to respond to? Just partisanshit drivel, to silly to be serious about. No substance.

Total substance.
Carter reacted to Iran poorly while obama aids them in gaining nukes; Carter reacted poorly to stifled oil supply while obama created the supply stifle; Carter signed well-intentioned but bogus treaties emboldening the soviets to invade Afghanistan while obama's intentional passivity has allowed Russian aggression; Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers while obama intentionally removed troops from Afghanistan and Iraq thereby fomenting the creation and expansion of more terrorists. The list is almost endless.
Obama is a proactive failure.

GW Bush giving US tax payer funding to N Korea so they could buy nuclear reactors from a company Don Rumsfeld had once sat on the board of directors of? And then a couple years later including them in his "axis of evil?

Where ya at on that one?

'Cause so far this sounds like particashit to me.

BTW, that was a Clinton deal that led to North Korea nukes.

 

[Fenton Lum]

"Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers .... "

Uh, and the Shah, how did he come to be there? Oh that's right, we took down their democratically elected govt to put in one the oil oligarchs liked better. And we’re still in there ******* around, Jesus that’s dumb as hell. And “both” parties are fine with sending in troops for corporate outcomes.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Sore loser, happens a lot to you don't it.

How about you respond to my post? Disparagement is an admission of defeat.

what this?

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

What the hell is there to respond to? Just partisanshit drivel, to silly to be serious about. No substance.

Total substance.
Carter reacted to Iran poorly while obama aids them in gaining nukes; Carter reacted poorly to stifled oil supply while obama created the supply stifle; Carter signed well-intentioned but bogus treaties emboldening the soviets to invade Afghanistan while obama's intentional passivity has allowed Russian aggression; Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers while obama intentionally removed troops from Afghanistan and Iraq thereby fomenting the creation and expansion of more terrorists. The list is almost endless.
Obama is a proactive failure.

GW Bush giving US tax payer funding to N Korea so they could buy nuclear reactors from a company Don Rumsfeld had once sat on the board of directors of? And then a couple years later including them in his "axis of evil?

Where ya at on that one?

'Cause so far this sounds like particashit to me.

GW Bush is Carter and obama? Sounds like you're trying to rationalize failures with other failures. That's hypocrisy.

That what I thought, partisanshit.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

"Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers .... "

Uh, and the Shah, how did he come to be there? Oh that's right, we took down their democratically elected govt to put in one the oil oligarchs liked better. And we’re still in there ******* around, Jesus that’s dumb as hell. And “both” parties are fine with sending in troops for corporate outcomes.

Typical propaganda parroting. Always make sure to leave out the dynamic of that pesky old Cold War when arguing about Carter's failure with the shah.
Go get some perspective.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

How about you respond to my post? Disparagement is an admission of defeat.

what this?

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

What the hell is there to respond to? Just partisanshit drivel, to silly to be serious about. No substance.

Total substance.
Carter reacted to Iran poorly while obama aids them in gaining nukes; Carter reacted poorly to stifled oil supply while obama created the supply stifle; Carter signed well-intentioned but bogus treaties emboldening the soviets to invade Afghanistan while obama's intentional passivity has allowed Russian aggression; Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers while obama intentionally removed troops from Afghanistan and Iraq thereby fomenting the creation and expansion of more terrorists. The list is almost endless.
Obama is a proactive failure.

GW Bush giving US tax payer funding to N Korea so they could buy nuclear reactors from a company Don Rumsfeld had once sat on the board of directors of? And then a couple years later including them in his "axis of evil?

Where ya at on that one?

'Cause so far this sounds like particashit to me.

GW Bush is Carter and obama? Sounds like you're trying to rationalize failures with other failures. That's hypocrisy.

That what I thought, partisanshit.

Despite the doubts, the unexpected nuclear test is yet another reminder of how the U.S.-led nuclear deal with North Korea, brokered under President Bill Clinton in 1994, failed.

The slow death of the nuclear deal with North Korea

 

[Fenton Lum]

what this?

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

What the hell is there to respond to? Just partisanshit drivel, to silly to be serious about. No substance.

Total substance.
Carter reacted to Iran poorly while obama aids them in gaining nukes; Carter reacted poorly to stifled oil supply while obama created the supply stifle; Carter signed well-intentioned but bogus treaties emboldening the soviets to invade Afghanistan while obama's intentional passivity has allowed Russian aggression; Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers while obama intentionally removed troops from Afghanistan and Iraq thereby fomenting the creation and expansion of more terrorists. The list is almost endless.
Obama is a proactive failure.

GW Bush giving US tax payer funding to N Korea so they could buy nuclear reactors from a company Don Rumsfeld had once sat on the board of directors of? And then a couple years later including them in his "axis of evil?

Where ya at on that one?

'Cause so far this sounds like particashit to me.

GW Bush is Carter and obama? Sounds like you're trying to rationalize failures with other failures. That's hypocrisy.

That what I thought, partisanshit.

Despite the doubts, the unexpected nuclear test is yet another reminder of how the U.S.-led nuclear deal with North Korea, brokered under President Bill Clinton in 1994, failed.

The slow death of the nuclear deal with North Korea

Yes, exactly, see why that partisanshit is bad for ya?

Rumsfeld Company Sold Nuclear Weapon Equipment to North Korea
Rumsfeld Company Sold Nuclear Weapon Equipment to North Korea


The Two Face of Rumsfeld
2000: director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea
2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change
The two faces of Rumsfeld

 

[Weatherman2020]

There is literally nothing Carter can do to retrive his former title from Obama's possession.

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

Sore loser, happens a lot to you don't it.

How about you respond to my post? Disparagement is an admission of defeat.

what this?

The difference between Carter and Obungle is that Carter reacted poorly to bad situations and Obungle has intentionally created bad situations.

What the hell is there to respond to? Just partisanshit drivel, to silly to be serious about. No substance.

Total substance.
Carter reacted to Iran poorly while obama aids them in gaining nukes; Carter reacted poorly to stifled oil supply while obama created the supply stifle; Carter signed well-intentioned but bogus treaties emboldening the soviets to invade Afghanistan while obama's intentional passivity has allowed Russian aggression; Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers while obama intentionally removed troops from Afghanistan and Iraq thereby fomenting the creation and expansion of more terrorists. The list is almost endless.
Obama is a proactive failure.

Just look at Iraq. Obama could not let Iraq be a success. He made the mistake in 2012 saying Iraq was won and used that justification to withdraw the troops.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Total substance.
Carter reacted to Iran poorly while obama aids them in gaining nukes; Carter reacted poorly to stifled oil supply while obama created the supply stifle; Carter signed well-intentioned but bogus treaties emboldening the soviets to invade Afghanistan while obama's intentional passivity has allowed Russian aggression; Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers while obama intentionally removed troops from Afghanistan and Iraq thereby fomenting the creation and expansion of more terrorists. The list is almost endless.
Obama is a proactive failure.

GW Bush giving US tax payer funding to N Korea so they could buy nuclear reactors from a company Don Rumsfeld had once sat on the board of directors of? And then a couple years later including them in his "axis of evil?

Where ya at on that one?

'Cause so far this sounds like particashit to me.

GW Bush is Carter and obama? Sounds like you're trying to rationalize failures with other failures. That's hypocrisy.

That what I thought, partisanshit.

Despite the doubts, the unexpected nuclear test is yet another reminder of how the U.S.-led nuclear deal with North Korea, brokered under President Bill Clinton in 1994, failed.

The slow death of the nuclear deal with North Korea

Yes, exactly, see why that partisanshit is bad for ya?

Rumsfeld Company Sold Nuclear Weapon Equipment to North Korea
Rumsfeld Company Sold Nuclear Weapon Equipment to North Korea


The Two Face of Rumsfeld
2000: director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea
2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change
The two faces of Rumsfeld

A board member is neither a ownership nor a Directors position, Einstein.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Total substance.
Carter reacted to Iran poorly while obama aids them in gaining nukes; Carter reacted poorly to stifled oil supply while obama created the supply stifle; Carter signed well-intentioned but bogus treaties emboldening the soviets to invade Afghanistan while obama's intentional passivity has allowed Russian aggression; Carter gave the shah asylum which prompted the Iranians to kidnap American embassy workers while obama intentionally removed troops from Afghanistan and Iraq thereby fomenting the creation and expansion of more terrorists. The list is almost endless.
Obama is a proactive failure.

GW Bush giving US tax payer funding to N Korea so they could buy nuclear reactors from a company Don Rumsfeld had once sat on the board of directors of? And then a couple years later including them in his "axis of evil?

Where ya at on that one?

'Cause so far this sounds like particashit to me.

GW Bush is Carter and obama? Sounds like you're trying to rationalize failures with other failures. That's hypocrisy.

That what I thought, partisanshit.

Despite the doubts, the unexpected nuclear test is yet another reminder of how the U.S.-led nuclear deal with North Korea, brokered under President Bill Clinton in 1994, failed.

The slow death of the nuclear deal with North Korea

Yes, exactly, see why that partisanshit is bad for ya?

Rumsfeld Company Sold Nuclear Weapon Equipment to North Korea
Rumsfeld Company Sold Nuclear Weapon Equipment to North Korea


The Two Face of Rumsfeld
2000: director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea
2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change
The two faces of Rumsfeld

This goes back to your hypocrisy. You insist on qualifying bad things with bad things.

 

[Fenton Lum]

GW Bush giving US tax payer funding to N Korea so they could buy nuclear reactors from a company Don Rumsfeld had once sat on the board of directors of? And then a couple years later including them in his "axis of evil?

Where ya at on that one?

'Cause so far this sounds like particashit to me.

GW Bush is Carter and obama? Sounds like you're trying to rationalize failures with other failures. That's hypocrisy.

That what I thought, partisanshit.

Despite the doubts, the unexpected nuclear test is yet another reminder of how the U.S.-led nuclear deal with North Korea, brokered under President Bill Clinton in 1994, failed.

The slow death of the nuclear deal with North Korea

Yes, exactly, see why that partisanshit is bad for ya?

Rumsfeld Company Sold Nuclear Weapon Equipment to North Korea
Rumsfeld Company Sold Nuclear Weapon Equipment to North Korea


The Two Face of Rumsfeld
2000: director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea
2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change
The two faces of Rumsfeld

This goes back to your hypocrisy. You insist on qualifying bad things with bad things.

Nah, not really, it goes back to your partisanshit and your inability to figure out your ruling class is all one group engaged in the same shyte.

And you are not of them, but a lost tool.