A DEEP DIVE -- Thoughts From a Competent Lawyer on the Minneapolis ICE Shooting:

Bootlickers love it when the feds murder an American by shooting them in the back
Communists love it when a revolutionary becomes a martyr by trying to kill cops and gets shot to dollrags. Great publicity for the movement, eh?
 
Sad that she had to die. But she was there for a while, harassing ICE activity. And blocking their vehicles

She then made a fatal error.


1. The left is positively turgid about this INCIDENT. They wanted a shooting and did everything they could to set the conditions that made it inevitable, from the rhetoric of the Democrat politicians to the provocations on the street. One leftist white lady dead is a small price to pay for the martyr they wanted.
2. Note that yesterday (1/6/26), the Democrats changed from “The feds are the Gestapo” to “A zillion federal officers died defending Our Democracy, and we support these heroes- here’s a plaque!” back to “The feds are the Gestapo” the very next day.
3. The law is clear – you can use deadly force against someone threatening you with deadly force. The ICE agent had no duty to retreat. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. You will see many experts with zero actual knowledge of the law opining – including the typically terrible cadre of leftist lawyers.
4. The video is clear that the driver was heading at and came in contact with the ICE agent. He had a right to use deadly force to defend himself. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. The left will do everything it can to keep people from looking at the actual video that shows the incident. It will push video that does not show the incident clearly, as well a perjured or irrelevant witness statements.
5. The leftist narrative will be “Trump’s ICE nazis are literally murdering innocent people.” This will work on Democrats and Republican sissies. Normal people will ask why she did not comply with the officers’ orders and why she drove at a cop. Properly addressed, we can leverage the gross irresponsibility of the Dem pols and communist foot soldiers to defeat their bogus narrative.
Read the remainder in the X post.​




1767838309989.webp
 
Sad that she had to die. But she was there for a while, harassing ICE activity. And blocking their vehicles

She then made a fatal error.


1. The left is positively turgid about this INCIDENT. They wanted a shooting and did everything they could to set the conditions that made it inevitable, from the rhetoric of the Democrat politicians to the provocations on the street. One leftist white lady dead is a small price to pay for the martyr they wanted.
2. Note that yesterday (1/6/26), the Democrats changed from “The feds are the Gestapo” to “A zillion federal officers died defending Our Democracy, and we support these heroes- here’s a plaque!” back to “The feds are the Gestapo” the very next day.
3. The law is clear – you can use deadly force against someone threatening you with deadly force. The ICE agent had no duty to retreat. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. You will see many experts with zero actual knowledge of the law opining – including the typically terrible cadre of leftist lawyers.
4. The video is clear that the driver was heading at and came in contact with the ICE agent. He had a right to use deadly force to defend himself. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. The left will do everything it can to keep people from looking at the actual video that shows the incident. It will push video that does not show the incident clearly, as well a perjured or irrelevant witness statements.
5. The leftist narrative will be “Trump’s ICE nazis are literally murdering innocent people.” This will work on Democrats and Republican sissies. Normal people will ask why she did not comply with the officers’ orders and why she drove at a cop. Properly addressed, we can leverage the gross irresponsibility of the Dem pols and communist foot soldiers to defeat their bogus narrative.
Read the remainder in the X post.​




If the driver was an American citizen it was a bad shoot. If it was an invader, good job.
 
From the video.
She backed up.
Put it in drive.
Straightened the wheels.
And then gunned it.
You can see the wheels spinning loose.
I bet the the ICE LEO could hear the engine rev and the tires squeal.
That was intent.
That was self defense.

Thats what I am seeing as well.

Had I been the PoPo I would have tried to jump out of the way, as even stopping the person's brain function just puts a dead man's switch on the accelerator, as we saw during the event. However, I am not going to second guess their reaction instead of mine.

Whether or not the shoot was in accord with ICE policy - I have no idea though.
 
15th post
There were multiple uniformed identified police entities ordering her to stop. But for her attempt to flee and evade a lawful stop, she would not have been shot, correct?

We see the officer directly in front of the vehicle when she accelerates. I don't see how a jury would not find the officer reasonably in fear of his life or imminent harm.
 
Sad that she had to die. But she was there for a while, harassing ICE activity. And blocking their vehicles

She then made a fatal error.


1. The left is positively turgid about this INCIDENT. They wanted a shooting and did everything they could to set the conditions that made it inevitable, from the rhetoric of the Democrat politicians to the provocations on the street. One leftist white lady dead is a small price to pay for the martyr they wanted.
2. Note that yesterday (1/6/26), the Democrats changed from “The feds are the Gestapo” to “A zillion federal officers died defending Our Democracy, and we support these heroes- here’s a plaque!” back to “The feds are the Gestapo” the very next day.
3. The law is clear – you can use deadly force against someone threatening you with deadly force. The ICE agent had no duty to retreat. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. You will see many experts with zero actual knowledge of the law opining – including the typically terrible cadre of leftist lawyers.
4. The video is clear that the driver was heading at and came in contact with the ICE agent. He had a right to use deadly force to defend himself. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. The left will do everything it can to keep people from looking at the actual video that shows the incident. It will push video that does not show the incident clearly, as well a perjured or irrelevant witness statements.
5. The leftist narrative will be “Trump’s ICE nazis are literally murdering innocent people.” This will work on Democrats and Republican sissies. Normal people will ask why she did not comply with the officers’ orders and why she drove at a cop. Properly addressed, we can leverage the gross irresponsibility of the Dem pols and communist foot soldiers to defeat their bogus narrative.
Read the remainder in the X post.​




No one is above the law. And ANYBODY using ANYTHING to attack a law enforcement officer with the intent to hurt or kill that officer should expect that lethal force will be used to stop that attack.
 
Back
Top Bottom