Those instances, I understand.
IN each case, every individual in the class, was enumerated.
If you want to support a law, which spells out the exact economic harms, and each and every enumerated individual, sure, go for it.
I was reading some of the links, and the material, and I have followed some of the folks in this movement, and the claims to emotional and psychological damage, and well as pain and suffering caused by slavery and Jim Crow, as a reason for reparations? For it happening to ancestors? Complete bullshit. You don't deserve reparations for pain and suffering, of the pain and suffering, that did not even happen to you. GTFO of here with that garbage.
Whatever those "violations," are? If they specifically happened to you? Then you sue whomever did them to you. If someone did them to your ancestors? You don't deserve squat for them. Oh well, they happened, shit happens, everyone's ancestors had good luck and bad luck. It is not the job of the government to pay people because of shitty luck. What reparations should be for, is demonstrated economic discrimination by the state, against specific individuals. LIKE native Americans, or LIKE interned Japanese.
If you want to make that case? MAKE IT. But don't draw some ambiguous. . . Oh,
"boo hoo, some whites were mean to my great great grandpa, or lynched my great great auntie, gibbs me some money. . " Nope, that is not what those other groups got money for. They demonstrated real economic harms in a court of law.
Do you want me to link you to all the broken legal treaties of those sovereign nations?
What you are suggesting in your OP won't ever fly according to the Fourteenth Amendment though. What you want, is just cash payments for being black. Sorry. It won't work. Obama never had any ancestors that were slaves, neither did Kamala, neither deserves a red cent. The garbage you posted implies that they do. They could never demonstrate, in a court of law, how the state had harmed them, like the Native Americans or Japanese had, whom you are making this comparative argument from.
There has been lots of injustice to lots of people in this nation's history.
Now, if you want to prove, actual economic harms, yeah, I'm on board. But you need to prove them. The shit I read about giving reparations to folks like Obama, or others in the black elites? Well, clearly it is bogus.
In the end, being black, just hasn't held them back all that much, and disproves the myth that it is impossible to get ahead for all person of color.
What you are pushing for? Too broad, and your comparative examples do not justify what you are seeking.
SORRY.