A Child Can't Call 2 Women or 2 Men "Mom & Dad"

[Syriusly]

Well If I "hallucinated" the extrapolation of the results of the Prince's Trust Survey (the largest of its kind)

Hallucination would be a practical explanation of what you post about the Prince's Trust Survey.

 

[Syriusly]

Let people draw their own conclusions about the Prince's Trust "mdk". You're not afraid of that, right?

We all have- that is why we keep pointing out that you are lying about what the study says.

 

[Syriusly]

Boy the left is obsessed with homosexuality, infanticide & drugs... what a crew.

And yet what we see is the right actually obsesively posting about homosexuality, and drugs.

I haven't seen anyone but conservatives post about infanticide-

 

[g5000]

So you won't worry about people here reading the Prince's Trust survey and deciding for themselves if the physical structure of so-called "gay marriage" harms 50% of kids involved, right?

That survey had nothing to do with kids with gay parents.

You are really reaching now, which is typical of someone suffering from a pathological confirmation bias.

 

[Skylar]

So you won't worry about people here reading the Prince's Trust survey and deciding for themselves if the physical structure of so-called "gay marriage" harms 50% of kids involved, right?

That survey had nothing to do with kids with gay parents.

You are really reaching now, which is typical of someone suffering from a pathological confirmation bias.

Nope. But a complete lack of factual veracity has never stopped Silo before.

 

[rightwinger]

The reason a Child Can't Call 2 Women or 2 Men "Mom & Dad is because it would freak conservatives out too much

 

[boilermaker55]

You mean they might call them parents.
Definition of PARENT
b : a person who brings up and cares for another

 

[Silhouette]

The reason a Child Can't Call 2 Women or 2 Men "Mom & Dad is because it would freak conservatives out too much

Just conservatives eh? Do you remember the election results of 2014? Middle voters made that happen. Might want to check your definition of "conservative" when it comes to this question..

 

[Skylar]

The reason a Child Can't Call 2 Women or 2 Men "Mom & Dad is because it would freak conservatives out too much

Just conservatives eh? Do you remember the election results of 2014? Middle voters made that happen. Might want to check your definition of "conservative" when it comes to this question..

The majority of the nation supports gay marriage, with support out pacing opposition by 12 to 19 points.

So what does gay marriage have to do with the 2014 election results?

 

[Silhouette]

So you won't worry about people here reading the Prince's Trust survey and deciding for themselves if the physical structure of so-called "gay marriage" harms 50% of kids involved, right?

That survey had nothing to do with kids with gay parents..

Structurally there is no difference in the findings. It's about structure, not a title of how people call themselves by their sexaul deviance.

 

[Skylar]

So you won't worry about people here reading the Prince's Trust survey and deciding for themselves if the physical structure of so-called "gay marriage" harms 50% of kids involved, right?

That survey had nothing to do with kids with gay parents..

Structurally there is no difference in the findings. It's about structure, not a title of how people call themselves by their sexaul deviance.

Then 'structurally' where does the Prince Trust study say that a good same sex role model can only be a parent?

........

....

..

.

Nowhere. So much for your 'structural' bullshit. The Prince Trust study doesn't say anything you've hallucinated.

 

[rightwinger]

The reason a Child Can't Call 2 Women or 2 Men "Mom & Dad is because it would freak conservatives out too much

Just conservatives eh? Do you remember the election results of 2014? Middle voters made that happen. Might want to check your definition of "conservative" when it comes to this question..

Now the 2014 election was because of gay marriage?

Methinks you do stretch too much

 

[Silhouette]

The reason a Child Can't Call 2 Women or 2 Men "Mom & Dad is because it would freak conservatives out too much

Just conservatives eh? Do you remember the election results of 2014? Middle voters made that happen. Might want to check your definition of "conservative" when it comes to this question..

Now the 2014 election was because of gay marriage?

Methinks you do stretch too much

And yet it was voted down twice in California.

Is California a blue or red state? I forget...

 

[rightwinger]

The reason a Child Can't Call 2 Women or 2 Men "Mom & Dad is because it would freak conservatives out too much

Just conservatives eh? Do you remember the election results of 2014? Middle voters made that happen. Might want to check your definition of "conservative" when it comes to this question..

Now the 2014 election was because of gay marriage?

Methinks you do stretch too much

And yet it was voted down twice in California.

Is California a blue or red state? I forget...

So long ago, I don't remember

How is gay marriage working out in California anyway?

 

[Silhouette]

The reason a Child Can't Call 2 Women or 2 Men "Mom & Dad is because it would freak conservatives out too much

Just conservatives eh? Do you remember the election results of 2014? Middle voters made that happen. Might want to check your definition of "conservative" when it comes to this question..

Now the 2014 election was because of gay marriage?

Methinks you do stretch too much

And yet it was voted down twice in California.

Is California a blue or red state? I forget...

So long ago, I don't remember

How is gay marriage working out in California anyway?

Don't know how it's working out because it's still illegal there as it is in every state where a lower circuit Justice circumvented due process and didn't allow SCOTUS to overturn Windsor on their own...providing that's what they have in mind for April...

What wasn't long ago was the 2014 election. I'll search the internet but I don't recall an initiative proposed to Californians last Fall to remove the law from their Constitution that defines marriage as between a man and a woman only. Why wasn't that on their ballot rightwinger?

Oh, and why did LGBT lobbiests pull the same initiative off the Ohio ballot at the last minute when they were telling everyone how popular gay marriage was in that state too?

Is Ohio a blue or a red state...I forget..

 

[Silhouette]

The bottom line is that this brand new social experiment is detested left of center all the way to just the beginnings of the fringe left. It's quite simple and visceral actually....people detest the idea of using kids as lab rats. And they remember that states regulate lifestyles and behaviors. They like to self-govern and don't like the idea of a fringe cult dictating to them that they cannot act to preserve the best definition for the sake of childrens' formative environment (marriage)....with "mom and dad".

 

[Silhouette]

Yeah, I thought I'd get crickets on those points..

 

[NYcarbineer]

This drum beat needs to be heard on behalf of the most meek voices in this debate: children. They cannot vote to affect their fate and they rely solely upon the citizens of their respective states to act as their custodians in this matter. If those voices are silenced, so are theirs.

California, the most permissive state in the Union with the longest opportunity to observe the LGBT culture (San Francisco, CA as ground-zero) and uber-aggressive-litigation-machine, voted to preserve the physical structure of marriage as man/woman TWICE. What this means is, the experimental-lifestyle-as-parents is repugnant to the most permissive state with the most experience with the brand spanking new lab experiment with children.

This is obvious upon it's face, but a child cannot call 2 women or 2 men "Mom and Dad". This thread in the link below goes into excruciating detail as to why states must be allowed to incentivize the best physical structure of marriage on behalf of children/future productive or nonproductive liabilities to that respective state. That state's discreet community MUST have a voice on behalf of its unprotected citizens: children...

Prince s Trust Survey The Voices of the Voteless Children in Gay Marriage Debate US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Here's where your position is irrational.

1. You believe that same sex couples with children are harmful to those children.

2. You are willing to leave same sex marriage up to the states.

Question: why would you be willing to allow the states to sanction something you believe causes harm to children?

 

[Silhouette]

Here's where your position is irrational.

1. You believe that same sex couples with children are harmful to those children.

2. You are willing to leave same sex marriage up to the states.

Question: why would you be willing to allow the states to sanction something you believe causes harm to children?

1. They are, they deprive 50% of children involved of their same gender as a role model. It's not their fault, it's a structural problem. And since it's a no-fault situation, the benefit of the choice always goes to the children because unlike gays, they cannot vote to affect their fate.

2. Thanks for acknowledging finally that that is the interim law that must be re-avered this year. We're talking about lifestyles, not a race of people.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Here's where your position is irrational.

1. You believe that same sex couples with children are harmful to those children.

2. You are willing to leave same sex marriage up to the states.

Question: why would you be willing to allow the states to sanction something you believe causes harm to children?

1. They are, they deprive 50% of children involved of their same gender as a role model. It's not their fault, it's a structural problem. And since it's a no-fault situation, the benefit of the choice always goes to the children because unlike gays, they cannot vote to affect their fate.

2. Thanks for acknowledging finally that that is the interim law that must be re-avered this year. We're talking about lifestyles, not a race of people.

You dodged the point, thus proving mine.