Irrelevant. Your position on gun ownership and personal safety in the presence of guns is a stand alone position that you had before the shooting. Therefore, whether or not the NG should have been there is not germane to your original point.
Most likely a CIA adjunct, the equivalent of a deputy or a scout in the war in Afghanistan. The equivalent of Bin Laden as an asset in the resistance of the Soviets in Afghanistan in 1980.
Was this guy vetted? No. Next!
Aloha Snackbar - great little place in Hawaii!
How do you know? He WAS working for the CIA in Afghanistan.
He was vetted, but not in the way either of you think.
Less than 1% of confrontations require the use of a gun
coward
Put this issue into the same context..
Cia starting shitJust hearing it now on the radio.
Link to follow.
EDIT
First link:
Who is Rahmanullah Lakanwal? Afghan identified as DC shooting suspect after National Guard incident
Rahmanullah Lakanwal was identified as the suspect who opened fire at two National Guard troops near the White House on Wednesdaywww.hindustantimes.com
Clever. Once again you demonstrate your inability to see other possibilities.
That's OK. Thank god the Afghani wasn't unarmed. As long as everyone has a gun, that's the most important thing.
In America people have a name for Catholics but I'm sure you don't want me to tell what that word is.
Are you talking about Democrats?
Where do you get, that he was not vetted? How do you know?
why so angry?
as a Catholic I am interested
