94% of Fatal Terrorist Attacks in US Caused by Muslims

[JQPublic1]

If this is true, then not only should we ban them coming in and Trump was right, really makes you wonder what is in the head of those who fought to stop the ban. I have heard that research indicates that 20-40% of Muslims are sympathetic to 9/11 and other terror attacks, maybe they wouldn't do it themselves, but they feel they were justified. Sort of makes you wonder the wisdom of it all. HOW MANY PEOPLE are 20-40% of Muslims in this country that feel we deserved 9/11?

Before you get too deeply ensconced in your condemnation of Muslims ponder this:
Muslims sympathetic to our cause are the biggest adversaries of radical Muslims. Would you propose that we alienate our numerous muslim allies in the fight against jihadist terrorists?
Think about the ramifications of that before you continue with your present mindset.

LMFAO sympathetic.................

as they are ready for war and terorisim from with in,... are you that seriously clueless oh wait you are.

The take down of this Country is being done from within, and bringing more here builds their army j.

Do you think when we look like Germany, or France these Muslims are going to say oh wait you cared about us we're going to spare you give me a g.d. f.n break.

If you are white you will be a target the size of the grand canyon fool.

yeah, yeah there are white muslims too, dont' think they see them as their blood brother/sister either.

Looking at the large number of refugees trying to escape jihadist terrorism , I tend to believe that many Muslims don't share those jihadist ideals. But I am not so naive as to believe that some terrorist don't slip through and become cells for future clandestine operations or agents for the recruitment and the radicalization of new domestic converts. But, since 911, the only hint of that are terrorist acts commited by native born muslims
who were allegedly radicalized by unclear means.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Must be why the left want unvetted Muslims to flood into America. They look at what's happened in Europe and dream it happens here.

FACT CHECK: 94 Percent of US Terrorism Fatalities Are Caused By Islamic Terrorists

I don't even have to read your link to know that most of those terrorists were homegrown.... not immigrants.

False, the largest portion comes from the 911 attacks none of which were US citizens.

Then I suppose you are restricting your data to the 21st century White perspective. Set your mind free. Break free from the shackles of ignorance and put domestic terrorism and the corresponding numbers of fatality victims in the proper historical context.
Look from the perspectives of the American Indians, Blacks and other
minorities. The number of fatalities represented at the hands of domestic
Terrorists there is so huge that it completely dwarfs the number of fatalities in the 911 attack.

Oh freaking spare me the KKK has killed a grand total of 26 people since 1945, that's almost half of the number killed in the Orlando night club shooting alone.

But hey if you want to play that game then Muslims are responsible for the largest genocude in human history (80 million hindus and buddhists on the Indian subcontinent alone).

The Arab Muslim slave trade was greater in scale and longer in duration than the transatlantic slave trade.

Muslims have been attacking the west since Mohammad (battle of Mutah) and they have been attacking the US since our founding (Barbary wars).

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Must be why the left want unvetted Muslims to flood into America. They look at what's happened in Europe and dream it happens here.

FACT CHECK: 94 Percent of US Terrorism Fatalities Are Caused By Islamic Terrorists

I don't even have to read your link to know that most of those terrorists were homegrown.... not immigrants.

Irrelevant. The key is Muslim as that is the incentive for terrorism. The logic would suggest preventing more Muslims from coming to the country would reduce the risk.
Basic, obvious logic.

The key word is terrorist. Your right wing bias has condemned all Muslims as terrorists or potential terrorists. That isn't logical at all, it's just a mental symptom of your irrational fear. But even so, I too am somewhat apprehensive about just letting anyone. Into the country, muslim or not, without proper vetting.

The keywords are "attacks vs. fatalities". The OP is misleading. It designates individual fatalities on 9/11 into individual attacks.

Exactly. But even when skewed as "evidence of muslim taqiyya" that death toll of 911 doesn't surpass all the fatalities commited by non-muslim terrorists in this country since colonial times.

How many Muslims were in the US during colonial times? 87% of mosques in the US were founded within the last 30 years.

 

[toobfreak]

How many Muslims were in the US since colonial times?

Do not forget--- Barack H. Obama said once that Muslims were a key contributing factor to the founding, history and greatness of this country! Couldn't have done it without them.

 

[Rocko]

I guess when you lose 3000 in one attack on 9-11 it skews your results

Yeah I'm sure if not for 911 muslims would only only be responsible for a tiny fraction of terrorism. Why must you guys pretend? Is it that you're afraid of offending?

 

[rightwinger]

I guess when you lose 3000 in one attack on 9-11 it skews your results

Yeah I'm sure if not for 911 muslims would only only be responsible for a tiny fraction of terrorism. Why must you guys pretend? Is it that you're afraid of offending?

We need to look at the total threat

Our actual threat in this country is gangs

 

[Rocko]

I guess when you lose 3000 in one attack on 9-11 it skews your results

Yeah I'm sure if not for 911 muslims would only only be responsible for a tiny fraction of terrorism. Why must you guys pretend? Is it that you're afraid of offending?

We need to look at the total threat

Our actual threat in this country is gangs

What? Come on man. There's a faction of muslims that want to kill us. And then there's a faction of muslims that are sympathetic to the muslims that want to kill us. That's why we shouldn't be importing them. We shouldn't make any qualms about that. Sure gangs are a problem, but we're talking apples to oranges. They're e 2 different problems that both need our attention.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Must be why the left want unvetted Muslims to flood into America. They look at what's happened in Europe and dream it happens here.

FACT CHECK: 94 Percent of US Terrorism Fatalities Are Caused By Islamic Terrorists

I don't even have to read your link to know that most of those terrorists were homegrown.... not immigrants.

Irrelevant. The key is Muslim as that is the incentive for terrorism. The logic would suggest preventing more Muslims from coming to the country would reduce the risk.
Basic, obvious logic.

The key word is terrorist. Your right wing bias has condemned all Muslims as terrorists or potential terrorists. That isn't logical at all, it's just a mental symptom of your irrational fear. But even so, I too am somewhat apprehensive about just letting anyone. Into the country, muslim or not, without proper vetting.

Your misapprehension is not shared. You're logic-challenged.

 

[rightwinger]

I guess when you lose 3000 in one attack on 9-11 it skews your results

Yeah I'm sure if not for 911 muslims would only only be responsible for a tiny fraction of terrorism. Why must you guys pretend? Is it that you're afraid of offending?

We need to look at the total threat

Our actual threat in this country is gangs

What? Come on man. There's a faction of muslims that want to kill us. And then there's a faction of muslims that are sympathetic to the muslims that want to kill us. That's why we shouldn't be importing them. We shouldn't make any qualms about that. Sure gangs are a problem, but we're talking apples to oranges. They're e 2 different problems that both need our attention.

Your "faction" is a "fraction"

The number of crazed Muslims running around America randomly killing people is very small. The biggest threat right now is gang related killings which we just shrug off. I didn't say don't fight both but the resources allocated to fighting terrorism is misallocated based on the actual threat
Over 8000 murders in the US last year with a few dozen by terrorists

 

[Rocko]

I guess when you lose 3000 in one attack on 9-11 it skews your results

Yeah I'm sure if not for 911 muslims would only only be responsible for a tiny fraction of terrorism. Why must you guys pretend? Is it that you're afraid of offending?

We need to look at the total threat

Our actual threat in this country is gangs

What? Come on man. There's a faction of muslims that want to kill us. And then there's a faction of muslims that are sympathetic to the muslims that want to kill us. That's why we shouldn't be importing them. We shouldn't make any qualms about that. Sure gangs are a problem, but we're talking apples to oranges. They're e 2 different problems that both need our attention.

Your "faction" is a "fraction"

The number of crazed Muslims running around America randomly killing people is very small. The biggest threat right now is gang related killings which we just shrug off. I didn't say don't fight both but the resources allocated to fighting terrorism is misallocated based on the actual threat
Over 8000 murders in the US last year with a few dozen by terrorists

That tiny fraction makes up a lot of people. And like I said before, many of them are terrorist sympathizers if not terrorists. Without the antiterrorist apparatus that we have terrorists would destroy the country. We're spending all this money to combat terrorism because it's a deterrent and the threat is legitimate. Gangs aren't looking to inflict mass casualties all over the country. Terrorists are. They are at war with America.

 

[Weatherman2020]

If this is true, then not only should we ban them coming in and Trump was right, really makes you wonder what is in the head of those who fought to stop the ban. I have heard that research indicates that 20-40% of Muslims are sympathetic to 9/11 and other terror attacks, maybe they wouldn't do it themselves, but they feel they were justified. Sort of makes you wonder the wisdom of it all. HOW MANY PEOPLE are 20-40% of Muslims in this country that feel we deserved 9/11?

Before you get too deeply ensconced in your condemnation of Muslims ponder this:
Muslims sympathetic to our cause are the biggest adversaries of radical Muslims. Would you propose that we alienate our numerous muslim allies in the fight against jihadist terrorists?
Think about the ramifications of that before you continue with your present mindset.

LMFAO sympathetic.................

as they are ready for war and terorisim from with in,... are you that seriously clueless oh wait you are.

The take down of this Country is being done from within, and bringing more here builds their army j.

Do you think when we look like Germany, or France these Muslims are going to say oh wait you cared about us we're going to spare you give me a g.d. f.n break.

If you are white you will be a target the size of the grand canyon fool.

yeah, yeah there are white muslims too, dont' think they see them as their blood brother/sister either.

Looking at the large number of refugees trying to escape jihadist terrorism , I tend to believe that many Muslims don't share those jihadist ideals. But I am not so naive as to believe that some terrorist don't slip through and become cells for future clandestine operations or agents for the recruitment and the radicalization of new domestic converts. But, since 911, the only hint of that are terrorist acts commited by native born muslims
who were allegedly radicalized by unclear means.

Funny how almost everyone "escaping" Islamic terrorism are males 18-35, aka Jihad material. Where are their families? They are on a mission. That's why there are no women or children or older males.

 

[August West]

I guess when you lose 3000 in one attack on 9-11 it skews your results

That's how you get more Trump.

You thought you would get a free wall to hide behind. This guy you`re cool with.
http://nypost.com/2017/07/10/army-soldier-killed-wife-before-gunning-down-state-trooper-cops/

 

[rightwinger]

I guess when you lose 3000 in one attack on 9-11 it skews your results

Yeah I'm sure if not for 911 muslims would only only be responsible for a tiny fraction of terrorism. Why must you guys pretend? Is it that you're afraid of offending?

We need to look at the total threat

Our actual threat in this country is gangs

What? Come on man. There's a faction of muslims that want to kill us. And then there's a faction of muslims that are sympathetic to the muslims that want to kill us. That's why we shouldn't be importing them. We shouldn't make any qualms about that. Sure gangs are a problem, but we're talking apples to oranges. They're e 2 different problems that both need our attention.

Your "faction" is a "fraction"

The number of crazed Muslims running around America randomly killing people is very small. The biggest threat right now is gang related killings which we just shrug off. I didn't say don't fight both but the resources allocated to fighting terrorism is misallocated based on the actual threat
Over 8000 murders in the US last year with a few dozen by terrorists

That tiny fraction makes up a lot of people. And like I said before, many of them are terrorist sympathizers if not terrorists. Without the antiterrorist apparatus that we have terrorists would destroy the country. We're spending all this money to combat terrorism because it's a deterrent and the threat is legitimate. Gangs aren't looking to inflict mass casualties all over the country. Terrorists are. They are at war with America.

There are 2 million Muslim in the US
As a group they are higher educated and more law abiding than most other groups

We need Muslims. We need them in our military. We need them aiding police forces

 

[MindWars]

Due to the broad and ironclad protections of the first Amendment, A charge of sedition against a U.S. citizen is extremely rare. Nevertheless, sedition remains a crime in the United States under 18 U.S.C.A. § 2384 (2000), a federal statute that punishes seditious conspiracy, and 18 U.S.C.A. § 2385 (2000), which outlaws advocating the overthrow of the federal government by force. Generally, a person may be punished for sedition only when he or she makes statements that create a Clear and Present Danger to rights that the government may lawfully protect. A person found guilty of seditious conspiracy or advocating the overthrow of the government may be fined and sentenced to up to 20 years in prison. States also maintain laws that punish similar advocacy and conspiracy against the state government.

Brooklyn born Palestinian-American Activist Linda Sarsour is walking a tightrope as she tests those federal statutes.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yeah I'm sure if not for 911 muslims would only only be responsible for a tiny fraction of terrorism. Why must you guys pretend? Is it that you're afraid of offending?

We need to look at the total threat

Our actual threat in this country is gangs

What? Come on man. There's a faction of muslims that want to kill us. And then there's a faction of muslims that are sympathetic to the muslims that want to kill us. That's why we shouldn't be importing them. We shouldn't make any qualms about that. Sure gangs are a problem, but we're talking apples to oranges. They're e 2 different problems that both need our attention.

Your "faction" is a "fraction"

The number of crazed Muslims running around America randomly killing people is very small. The biggest threat right now is gang related killings which we just shrug off. I didn't say don't fight both but the resources allocated to fighting terrorism is misallocated based on the actual threat
Over 8000 murders in the US last year with a few dozen by terrorists

That tiny fraction makes up a lot of people. And like I said before, many of them are terrorist sympathizers if not terrorists. Without the antiterrorist apparatus that we have terrorists would destroy the country. We're spending all this money to combat terrorism because it's a deterrent and the threat is legitimate. Gangs aren't looking to inflict mass casualties all over the country. Terrorists are. They are at war with America.

There are 2 million Muslim in the US
As a group they are higher educated and more law abiding than most other groups

We need Muslims. We need them in our military. We need them aiding police forces

Pew poll of the 2.35 million Muslims in America:

Relevant Question Number 1: Can Suicide Bombing of Civilian Targets to Defend Islam be Justified?

A: Often/Sometimes: 8%

A: Rarely: 5%

A: Don’t Know/Refuse to Answer: 9%

A: Never: 78%

Muslim Americans: Middle Class and Mostly Mainstream

So 188,000 Muslims in America believe terrorism is often/sometimes justified, another 117,500 say terrorism should be used rarely.

That's 305,500 Muslims in America who support terrorism. And I bet you all of that 9% who refuse to answer also support terrorism, bringing the grand total to 517,000 Muslims in America who support terrorism.

 

[Rocko]

Yeah I'm sure if not for 911 muslims would only only be responsible for a tiny fraction of terrorism. Why must you guys pretend? Is it that you're afraid of offending?

We need to look at the total threat

Our actual threat in this country is gangs

What? Come on man. There's a faction of muslims that want to kill us. And then there's a faction of muslims that are sympathetic to the muslims that want to kill us. That's why we shouldn't be importing them. We shouldn't make any qualms about that. Sure gangs are a problem, but we're talking apples to oranges. They're e 2 different problems that both need our attention.

Your "faction" is a "fraction"

The number of crazed Muslims running around America randomly killing people is very small. The biggest threat right now is gang related killings which we just shrug off. I didn't say don't fight both but the resources allocated to fighting terrorism is misallocated based on the actual threat
Over 8000 murders in the US last year with a few dozen by terrorists

That tiny fraction makes up a lot of people. And like I said before, many of them are terrorist sympathizers if not terrorists. Without the antiterrorist apparatus that we have terrorists would destroy the country. We're spending all this money to combat terrorism because it's a deterrent and the threat is legitimate. Gangs aren't looking to inflict mass casualties all over the country. Terrorists are. They are at war with America.

There are 2 million Muslim in the US
As a group they lomj higher educated and more law abiding than most other groups

We need Muslims. We need them in our military. We need them aiding police forces

We don't need them. This country survived for long time without muslims. Also very few of them serve in the military so I don't know what you're talking about. The negatives outweigh the Positives by far. We're safer without importing them.

 

[MindWars]

 

[rightwinger]

We need to look at the total threat

Our actual threat in this country is gangs

What? Come on man. There's a faction of muslims that want to kill us. And then there's a faction of muslims that are sympathetic to the muslims that want to kill us. That's why we shouldn't be importing them. We shouldn't make any qualms about that. Sure gangs are a problem, but we're talking apples to oranges. They're e 2 different problems that both need our attention.

Your "faction" is a "fraction"

The number of crazed Muslims running around America randomly killing people is very small. The biggest threat right now is gang related killings which we just shrug off. I didn't say don't fight both but the resources allocated to fighting terrorism is misallocated based on the actual threat
Over 8000 murders in the US last year with a few dozen by terrorists

That tiny fraction makes up a lot of people. And like I said before, many of them are terrorist sympathizers if not terrorists. Without the antiterrorist apparatus that we have terrorists would destroy the country. We're spending all this money to combat terrorism because it's a deterrent and the threat is legitimate. Gangs aren't looking to inflict mass casualties all over the country. Terrorists are. They are at war with America.

There are 2 million Muslim in the US
As a group they are higher educated and more law abiding than most other groups

We need Muslims. We need them in our military. We need them aiding police forces

Pew poll of the 2.35 million Muslims in America:

Relevant Question Number 1: Can Suicide Bombing of Civilian Targets to Defend Islam be Justified?

A: Often/Sometimes: 8%

A: Rarely: 5%

A: Don’t Know/Refuse to Answer: 9%

A: Never: 78%

Muslim Americans: Middle Class and Mostly Mainstream

So 188,000 Muslims in America believe terrorism is often/sometimes justified, another 117,500 say terrorism should be used rarely.

That's 305,500 Muslims in America who support terrorism. And I bet you all of that 9% who refuse to answer also support terrorism, bringing the grand total to 517,000 Muslims in America who support terrorism.

A: Never: 78%

 

[rightwinger]

We need to look at the total threat

Our actual threat in this country is gangs

What? Come on man. There's a faction of muslims that want to kill us. And then there's a faction of muslims that are sympathetic to the muslims that want to kill us. That's why we shouldn't be importing them. We shouldn't make any qualms about that. Sure gangs are a problem, but we're talking apples to oranges. They're e 2 different problems that both need our attention.

Your "faction" is a "fraction"

The number of crazed Muslims running around America randomly killing people is very small. The biggest threat right now is gang related killings which we just shrug off. I didn't say don't fight both but the resources allocated to fighting terrorism is misallocated based on the actual threat
Over 8000 murders in the US last year with a few dozen by terrorists

That tiny fraction makes up a lot of people. And like I said before, many of them are terrorist sympathizers if not terrorists. Without the antiterrorist apparatus that we have terrorists would destroy the country. We're spending all this money to combat terrorism because it's a deterrent and the threat is legitimate. Gangs aren't looking to inflict mass casualties all over the country. Terrorists are. They are at war with America.

There are 2 million Muslim in the US
As a group they lomj higher educated and more law abiding than most other groups

We need Muslims. We need them in our military. We need them aiding police forces

We don't need them. This country survived for long time without muslims. Also very few of them serve in the military so I don't know what you're talking about. The negatives outweigh the Positives by far. We're safer without importing them.

We do need them....especially in the military, Homeland Security and fighting terrorism

Our troops are in strange territory hostile to Americans. Not having soldiers who can speak the language and understand local customs is a detriment. You need soldiers who can interrogate prisoners, read the language, and ask questions of the local population
Muslims are very important to our military

 

[Rocko]

What? Come on man. There's a faction of muslims that want to kill us. And then there's a faction of muslims that are sympathetic to the muslims that want to kill us. That's why we shouldn't be importing them. We shouldn't make any qualms about that. Sure gangs are a problem, but we're talking apples to oranges. They're e 2 different problems that both need our attention.

Your "faction" is a "fraction"

The number of crazed Muslims running around America randomly killing people is very small. The biggest threat right now is gang related killings which we just shrug off. I didn't say don't fight both but the resources allocated to fighting terrorism is misallocated based on the actual threat
Over 8000 murders in the US last year with a few dozen by terrorists

That tiny fraction makes up a lot of people. And like I said before, many of them are terrorist sympathizers if not terrorists. Without the antiterrorist apparatus that we have terrorists would destroy the country. We're spending all this money to combat terrorism because it's a deterrent and the threat is legitimate. Gangs aren't looking to inflict mass casualties all over the country. Terrorists are. They are at war with America.

There are 2 million Muslim in the US
As a group they lomj higher educated and more law abiding than most other groups

We need Muslims. We need them in our military. We need them aiding police forces

We don't need them. This country survived for long time without muslims. Also very few of them serve in the military so I don't know what you're talking about. The negatives outweigh the Positives by far. We're safer without importing them.

We do need them....especially in the military, Homeland Security and fighting terrorism

Our troops are in strange territory hostile to Americans. Not having soldiers who can speak the language and understand local customs is a detriment. You need soldiers who can interrogate prisoners, read the language, and ask questions of the local population
Muslims are very important to our military

Yet very few muslims serve the military.

Minuscule Number of Muslims Serve in US Military as Share of Population