Here is where most of you draw your problems. Your so busy debunking the theories of what other people drew up instead of looking at the facts of what happened.
You are so fucking wrong it isn't even funny.
Of course...
In the first place....there are very few theories ever mentioned by those who don't believe the 9/11 Commission Report and the other investigations. Please tell us your theory...hell besides Terral's incredibly asinine account it will be the only one here. Nobody has come up with a theory.
There are ALOT of theorys floating around out there, both from the MIHOP and the LIHOP side of things. Alot of it is disinfo pursposfully put out to discredit any kind of actuall independant investigation. I dont have a theory as to HOW it happened. I just know how it didnt.
The bits and pieces trotted fourth make zero sense too. Rimjob, the poster child for abortion, says it was the Mossaad and the CIA. Yeah..like the CIA would outsource the crime of the century? Are you shitting me? Instead of anybody calling out rimjob from your camp, you morons sit there and applaud such an explanation. I mean, you want us to actually consider that? For God's sake; why? Does the CIA lack talent? Get a fucking grip. So we're supposed to consider that the CIA would take another intel agency into it's confidence and work with them to kill nearly 3,000 Americans. Forgive us if we don't buy into such a lame theory.
I dont think the CIA had anything to do with it either. But seriously dont underestimate them.
Were there bombs in the building?
Who knows.
Heres a note that may help you; it's poor form to accuse us of not looking at facts then come back with a "who knows" in the next paragraph.
lol, no, I simply stated that I, me personally, have no idea how those buildings fell, along with most of us. All we know is what we were told. Which contradicts alot of peoples stories who were actually IN the buildings. Im not here to float theories for you to try and debunk. You've already done that with numerous other people. Im here to question the official story.
Explosions do not equal explosives. If you don't believe me, put a can of Coke into your microwave. No explosives there but you're going to have an explosion. When something burns you get, at the very least, a popping (often called a crackling); hell, you even get one at a campfire. In a building with numerous rooms, you'll have air expanded by heat and you're going to have explosions; like you'd have in a house fire. Any firefighter would tell you what a freaking moron you sound like because I'm sure they know what a freaking explosion sounds like when it DOES involve explosives.
Okay. So the fire just exploded on its own without igniting anything. Fare enough, it CAN happen. But enough to destroy a lobby and blow debris out strong enough to IMPLAE itself into other buildings blocks away? No. Sorry, but a heat explosion is not powerfull enough to do that.
They were not there.
Okay, you're new here so maybe you left your common sense on the bus. There are 220 floors in the two towers; a demolition team would wire, liberally every other floor. So that is 110 floors being wired for explosives. You don't think that the 50,000 people who work in and visit the towers would have noticed anything out of place?
I dont really care how new I am. Its a forum, not a damn secret club. Anyone can come in and post, you dont have anymore credibility because youve been here longer. I NEVER said anyone went in and wired the building with explosives (even though the WTC WAS closed for electrical maintence weeks prior to 9/11...just sayin) all Im saying is the story they fed us was bullshit.
You mentioned facts earlier A jumbo jet would disloge the explosives where it hit rendering them useless. It would have damaged the cables. Wireless transmitters wouldn't have worked (343 firefighters died because there wireless comm didn't work). The charges would have been found in the rubble. The facts are that none were found.
Not neccesarily. IF there were explosives, they would have to placed strategically to make the building collapse like that, most likley in the bottom. The plane hit very high up. It didnt cause an effect in the bottom of the building.
We know exactly how the buildings fell. Its well documented; a progressive collapse.
And all three buildings subsequently collapsed into DUST. No floors were intact. A progressive collapse looks like a stack of pancakes. Thats not what happened on 9/11.
It happened twice on 9/11.
Well, duh....
Are you really that stupid? First of all it's melt, not mealt. Secondly nobody ever said the steel melted. Thirdly, jet fuel doesn't get hot enough to melt steel. It does get hot enough to weaken the structure. The plates connecting the floors to the outside wall gave way under the pressure of bowing trusses. That is why the building collapsed.
So what about the steel core holding the floors up in the middle? It should still be standing if it collapsed the way you just described.
And people like you are the ones shoveling it.
Pot meet kettle.
Now you're just being retarded.
Its sad to see how many people treat politics and world events like a damn football game, where your team always needs to win, whether it be republican, democrat, conservative, liberal, what have you.
You'd probably find that the persons who endorse the 9/11 Commission Report are from the whole spectrum of political thought. The good Sergeant Ollie is, I think, a tea party supporter. I think Rightwinger is, well a Right Winger. Toro and I don't agree on much. You wouldn't catch me dead near a tea party rally and I think George Bush Jr. did despicable things during his Presidency especially where Pat Tillman was involved. You don't know shit pal.
We were not told the entire truth of what happened on 9/11, an event that killed innocent civilians and countless members of our armed forces, and your all content with that.
Pathetic.
Again, you don't know shit. Just go the fuck away.