911 facts no theories

Obamerican

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
1,732
Reaction score
136
Points
48
Address the facts:

Explosive Residues

“[T]he red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”

REFERENCES

Harrit, Farrer, Jones, Ryan, Legge, Farnsworth, Roberts, Gourley, Larsen, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,” Bentham Open Access, 2009. http://buildingwhat.org/downloads/Full_Thermite_paper.pdf

You will continue to run.


Let us know when your paper has been peer reviewed by people who are not members of the .01% of truthers.


Your last grasp. You are in such a deep stage of DENIAL its going to be 10x worse when the truth actually wakes you up.

Responding to the criticism, NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, “This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds].”[v] However, NIST did not attempt to explain how Building 7’s free fall descent could have occurred.

However, Mr. Chandler does explain how in Part 3 of his video, NIST Finally Admits Freefall, saying:[vi]

“In the case of a falling building, the only way it can go into free fall is if an external force removes the supporting structure. None of the gravitational potential energy of the building is available for this purpose, or it would slow the fall of the building. The fact of free fall by itself is strong evidence of explosive demolition, but the evidence of explosive demolition is even stronger than that.”

Mr. Chandler goes on to describe two particular attributes of Building 7’s free fall descent that make the evidence for explosive demolition even more overwhelming:

“What is particularly striking is the suddenness of onset of free fall. Acceleration doesn’t build up gradually. The graph [measuring the building’s descent] simply turns a corner. The building went from full support to zero support instantly.”



2.25 seconds of freefall 110% proves a controlled demolition. The more and more you deny physics exist, the more and more you look like a coward.......have some pride.
Keep posting the same crap over and over, bitch. It's YOU that's making you look like a fucking idiot. Moron.:lol::lol::lol:
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top