Rat in the Hat
Gold Member
- Mar 31, 2010
- 21,949
- 6,021
- 198
you gave a rats assIt's all his delusions deserve.
And it is mine to give.
9/11 Proof: Basic Physics. Can you handle it?
- Thread starter PhysicsExist
- Start date
It's all his delusions deserve.
And it is mine to give.
PhysicsExist
Member
- Dec 8, 2010
- 661
- 18
- 16
- Thread starter
- #362
It's unique design done this way in order to build these towers were it's undoing.Oh and it didn't help that two planes loaded with jet fuel flew into them....
Did I miss something that day when I saw the TV video replays over and over again and every year since.
Yes. because you saw an explosions with Nanothermite and explosives, not a collapse. Physics prove it was not a collapse due to fire+gravity.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgN080yySe0[/ame]
www.BuildingWhat.org
Fact.
And did you know 3 buildings fell that day? WTC7 was NOT hit by a plane. It freefell for 2.25 seconds, it was demolished with explosives.
Last edited:
candycorn
Diamond Member
It's unique design done this way in order to build these towers were it's undoing.Oh and it didn't help that two planes loaded with jet fuel flew into them....
Did I miss something that day when I saw the TV video replays over and over again and every year since.
Yes. because you saw an explosions with Nanothermite and explosives, not a collapse. Physics prove it was not a collapse due to fire+gravity.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgN080yySe0[/ame]
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 |Please stand with the 9-11 families in calling for a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?
Fact.
And did you know 3 buildings fell that day? WTC7 was NOT hit by a plane. It freefell for 2.25 seconds, it was demolished with explosives.
You're on ignore <plink!>
dipshit, did you know 8 buildings were destroyed that day?
It's unique design done this way in order to build these towers were it's undoing.Oh and it didn't help that two planes loaded with jet fuel flew into them....
Did I miss something that day when I saw the TV video replays over and over again and every year since.
Yes. because you saw an explosions with Nanothermite and explosives, not a collapse. Physics prove it was not a collapse due to fire+gravity.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgN080yySe0[/ame]
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 |Please stand with the 9-11 families in calling for a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?
Fact.
And did you know 3 buildings fell that day? WTC7 was NOT hit by a plane. It freefell for 2.25 seconds, it was demolished with explosives.
and several others badly damaged
and still only 2 were hit by planes
hortysir
In Memorial of 47
Admitted by whom?
You?
Whomever it was, they lied.
You don't get to redefine "free fall" to suit your conspiracy.
"Free fall" is to say with zero resistance. A crumbling column or a desk or a filing cabinet represent resistance.
Even the pressure of fire would pose some resistance.
If you want to believe that it was a "controlled demolition", that's your prerogative and I can *almost* understand why you might think that. At least that goes in line with a conspiracy theory.
But no amount of twisting will redefine "free fall".
unsub
PhysicsExist
Member
- Dec 8, 2010
- 661
- 18
- 16
- Thread starter
- #366
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 |Please stand with the 9-11 families in calling for a NEW Building 7 investigation - Free Fall Collapse
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 |Please stand with the 9-11 families in calling for a NEW Building 7 investigation - Explosive Residues
Governments Explanation:
What really happened:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuyZJl9YleY&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
Stop being drones.
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 |Please stand with the 9-11 families in calling for a NEW Building 7 investigation - Explosive Residues
Governments Explanation:
What really happened:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuyZJl9YleY&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
Stop being drones.
PhysicsExist
Member
- Dec 8, 2010
- 661
- 18
- 16
- Thread starter
- #367
Admitted by whom?
You?
Whomever it was, they lied.
You don't get to redefine "free fall" to suit your conspiracy.
"Free fall" is to say with zero resistance. A crumbling column or a desk or a filing cabinet represent resistance.
Even the pressure of fire would pose some resistance.
If you want to believe that it was a "controlled demolition", that's your prerogative and I can *almost* understand why you might think that. At least that goes in line with a conspiracy theory.
But no amount of twisting will redefine "free fall".
unsub
What are you talking about? USE YOUR EYES, READ THE FACTS. stop deflecting...
NIST CONCLUDES FREEFALL AFTER BEING CONFRONTED BY AE911TRUTH
“This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds]" - NIST THEMSELVES IN THEIR REPORT
What is your deal? It's RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU. THE FACTS PROVE IT.
SFC Ollie
Still Marching
It's unique design done this way in order to build these towers were it's undoing.Oh and it didn't help that two planes loaded with jet fuel flew into them....
Did I miss something that day when I saw the TV video replays over and over again and every year since.
Yes. because you saw an explosions with Nanothermite and explosives, not a collapse. Physics prove it was not a collapse due to fire+gravity.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgN080yySe0[/ame]
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 |Please stand with the 9-11 families in calling for a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?
Fact.
And did you know 3 buildings fell that day? WTC7 was NOT hit by a plane. It freefell for 2.25 seconds, it was demolished with explosives.
Really, what gutted Building 6?
PhysicsExist
Member
- Dec 8, 2010
- 661
- 18
- 16
- Thread starter
- #369
It's unique design done this way in order to build these towers were it's undoing.Oh and it didn't help that two planes loaded with jet fuel flew into them....
Did I miss something that day when I saw the TV video replays over and over again and every year since.
Yes. because you saw an explosions with Nanothermite and explosives, not a collapse. Physics prove it was not a collapse due to fire+gravity.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgN080yySe0[/ame]
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 |Please stand with the 9-11 families in calling for a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?
Fact.
And did you know 3 buildings fell that day? WTC7 was NOT hit by a plane. It freefell for 2.25 seconds, it was demolished with explosives.
Really, what gutted Building 6?
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsJQKpnkZ10[/ame]
You're gross for comparing this to WTC6. Disturbing denial. Wake up coward.
SFC Ollie
Still Marching
PhysicsExist
Member
- Dec 8, 2010
- 661
- 18
- 16
- Thread starter
- #374
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 |Please stand with the 9-11 families in calling for a NEW Building 7 investigation - Free Fall Collapse
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 |Please stand with the 9-11 families in calling for a NEW Building 7 investigation - Explosive Residues
Governments Explanation:
What really happened:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuyZJl9YleY&feature=player_embedded
Stop being drones.
You can't even handle this basic fact and acknowledge it.
hortysir
In Memorial of 47
Admitted by whom?
You?
Whomever it was, they lied.
You don't get to redefine "free fall" to suit your conspiracy.
"Free fall" is to say with zero resistance. A crumbling column or a desk or a filing cabinet represent resistance.
Even the pressure of fire would pose some resistance.
If you want to believe that it was a "controlled demolition", that's your prerogative and I can *almost* understand why you might think that. At least that goes in line with a conspiracy theory.
But no amount of twisting will redefine "free fall".
unsub
What are you talking about? USE YOUR EYES, READ THE FACTS. stop deflecting...
NIST CONCLUDES FREEFALL AFTER BEING CONFRONTED BY AE911TRUTH
“This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds]" - NIST THEMSELVES IN THEIR REPORT
What is your deal? It's RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU. THE FACTS PROVE IT.
Let me type this real slow for you.
The NIST is full of shit.
Got it?
A parachuter free falls.
My pencil falling off my desk is in free fall until it hits the floor.
A floor of a building CANNOT....slower still C-A-N-N-O-T----F-R-E-E----F-A-L-L.
Supports can give way. Floors can collapse. Ceilings can cave.
That isn't free fall.
PhysicsExist
Member
- Dec 8, 2010
- 661
- 18
- 16
- Thread starter
- #377
You are a disgrace and a coward who cannot accept FACTS.
You deflect and hide because your are scared.
You act immature because you are afraid.
You are a joke until you accept freefall. Freefall = Demolition 100% guaranteed. All you can do is cry and bitch about the facts, instead of rebuttal them.
“The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.”
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming
Fact.
PhysicsExist
Member
- Dec 8, 2010
- 661
- 18
- 16
- Thread starter
- #378
Admitted by whom?
You?
Whomever it was, they lied.
You don't get to redefine "free fall" to suit your conspiracy.
"Free fall" is to say with zero resistance. A crumbling column or a desk or a filing cabinet represent resistance.
Even the pressure of fire would pose some resistance.
If you want to believe that it was a "controlled demolition", that's your prerogative and I can *almost* understand why you might think that. At least that goes in line with a conspiracy theory.
But no amount of twisting will redefine "free fall".
unsub
What are you talking about? USE YOUR EYES, READ THE FACTS. stop deflecting...
NIST CONCLUDES FREEFALL AFTER BEING CONFRONTED BY AE911TRUTH
“This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds]" - NIST THEMSELVES IN THEIR REPORT
What is your deal? It's RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU. THE FACTS PROVE IT.
Let me type this real slow for you.
The NIST is full of shit.
Got it?
A parachuter free falls.
My pencil falling off my desk is in free fall until it hits the floor.
A floor of a building CANNOT....slower still C-A-N-N-O-T----F-R-E-E----F-A-L-L.
Supports can give way. Floors can collapse. Ceilings can cave.
That isn't free fall.
THATS THE WHOLE POINT.
FREEFALL CAN ONLY HAPPEN IN CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
WTC7 WAS THE MOST EFFICIENT DEMOLITION IN HISTORY, BECAUSE OF THE 2.25 SECONDS OF FREEFALL.
Use common SENSE!
BuildingWhat? - Building 7 |Please stand with the 9-11 families in calling for a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?
Then wouldn't it be LEGALLY PROPER and COMMON SENSE to REINVESTIGATE if NIST is 'full of shit'? 3000 people were murdered. we are in wars. we have affected millions.
You said it yourself. NIST is full of shit.
THATS WHY AE911TRUTH.ORG confronted them and made them ADMIT TO FREEFALL, which in turn PROVED controlled demolition.
Fact.
Last edited:
Jeremy
TRANSFER!!!
- Jun 11, 2010
- 7,777
- 1,991
- 98
Similar threads
- Poll
- Poll
