the official report the only plausible explanation.
NIST's WTC 7 Reports: Filled with Fantasy, Fiction, and Fraud
The above quoted from the AE911TRUTH page, There are a LOT of reasons to doubt the official explanation of the events of 9/11/2001. Check this out, it has been around for a while >
The evidence that WTC7 fell in the manner that it did and that WTC1, 2 & 7 were completely destroyed is VERY compelling evidence in-and-of itself.
The fact that the alleged airliners were never accounted for, where & when was any inventory of aircraft bits done? Was it documented that anybody conducted scientific tests for explosives or explosive residue, and if so, where are those documents?
The fact that there are HUGE voids in what should have been standard post disaster procedures speaks volumes!
Hold it right there. Some weeks ago you posted your silly pseudoscience here and when it was challenged by Gamo, you ran away ... TWICE. Your credibility - or what passed for it - left with you both times and has yet to return. You are a poster boy for what killed your 9/11 "Truther" Movement, Princess: half-truths, misrepresentations, outright fabrications and general punkiness. You are dismissible and dismissed.