9/11 Conspiracy

[SAYIT]

the official report the only plausible explanation.

NIST's WTC 7 Reports: Filled with Fantasy, Fiction, and Fraud

The above quoted from the AE911TRUTH page, There are a LOT of reasons to doubt the official explanation of the events of 9/11/2001. Check this out, it has been around for a while >

The evidence that WTC7 fell in the manner that it did and that WTC1, 2 & 7 were completely destroyed is VERY compelling evidence in-and-of itself.
The fact that the alleged airliners were never accounted for, where & when was any inventory of aircraft bits done? Was it documented that anybody conducted scientific tests for explosives or explosive residue, and if so, where are those documents?
The fact that there are HUGE voids in what should have been standard post disaster procedures speaks volumes!

Hold it right there. Some weeks ago you posted your silly pseudoscience here and when it was challenged by Gamo, you ran away ... TWICE. Your credibility - or what passed for it - left with you both times and has yet to return. You are a poster boy for what killed your 9/11 "Truther" Movement, Princess: half-truths, misrepresentations, outright fabrications and general punkiness. You are dismissible and dismissed.

 

[SAYIT]

the official report the only plausible explanation.

NIST's WTC 7 Reports: Filled with Fantasy, Fiction, and Fraud

The above quoted from the AE911TRUTH page, There are a LOT of reasons to doubt the official explanation of the events of 9/11/2001. Check this out, it has been around for a while >

The evidence that WTC7 fell in the manner that it did and that WTC1, 2 & 7 were completely destroyed is VERY compelling evidence in-and-of itself.
The fact that the alleged airliners were never accounted for, where & when was any inventory of aircraft bits done? Was it documented that anybody conducted scientific tests for explosives or explosive residue, and if so, where are those documents?
The fact that there are HUGE voids in what should have been standard post disaster procedures speaks volumes!

a&e for truth is not CREDIBLE

Trolling An AE 911 Truth Member
Meet one of the very few structural engineers for AE 9/11 truth, Charles N. Pegelow. He receives a call from a man asking about what he could present as the best piece of evidence they have for the inside job theory. Mr Pegelow starts at around 4:00 minutes to present what he feels is the best piece of evidence.


He states the following," There was 100,00lbs of steel missing and you have to ask the question where did it go." he then proceeds to explain how the steel simply EVAPORATED and it was accomplished by using, in his own words, "a pineapple sized nuclear bomb that melted out the insides."


Later on he dances around the question when asked in another call and he then admits that he hasnt told Gage about his idea because people find it "crazy".


So to top off this post, the petition and group he has associated himself with doesnt believe what Mr. Pegelow believes. Is it the truth they are searching for or just more people with credentials to sign their petition ? Also, if this is what truthers consider as credible source then maybe they lack the understanding of what credible truly means.

Read more at

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available

THE VIDEO IS A HOOT!

Your a hoot! AE911 Truth has over 2000 licensed Architects and Engineers, very few indeed. Don't forget these professionals have put their careers and good names on the line by signing the petition.

As for Mr. Pegelow, he made the mistake of speculating, something that Richard Gage does not engage in. But it is a plausible explanation, suitcase nukes do exist.

Why don't you explain how all the concrete floors turned to dust. Not broken concrete but dust. And don't try the bull about the pancaking effect because the steel floor pans are gone too. The floor pans are corrugated steel upon which the concrete floors are poured. Even if the concrete could entirley turn to dust, which it can't, where did the floor pans go? If the Official Conspiracy Theory is true and the floors pancaked turning the concrete to dust there should be a stack of floor pans. There isn't.

I don't speculate, I just point out how completely ridiculous the Official Conspiracy Theory is. This is why we need a real investigation.

Ah, so you just question the official reports but have absolutely no interest in stacking those reports against any alternative scenarios. Well here's some 4-1-1 for you ... when compared to any of the dozens of 9/11 conspiracy theories, the NIST report is the only plausible explanation. I'll let 9/11 "Truth" UAlbany's co-founder, Mike Metzger, explain your CT M.O.:
"There are no facts in the 9/11 Truth Movement. Just a lot of theories, which eventually break down to 'hey, we're just asking questions' if someone questions the validity of such. No structural, civil, or any engineers agree with the truthers. Yet, most of my friends will try to explain the hard physics involved in structural collapses. None of these people are engineers, physicists, or even in a scientific field, for that matter. Someone's supposed to take their word over an expert's?
The truthers will just tell you that all the experts are 'in on it.' Yeah, sure. Every engineer in the world is complicit in the government's murder of 3,000 people. And so are the firemen, who apparently ordered Larry Silverstein to 'pull' Building 7. The truthers' misrepresentation of Silverstein's quote is one of the most popular 'facts' to spit out, but in doing so, you are effectively in agreement that firefighters were not only involved in the controlled demolition of WTC7, but they are also aiding and abetting in the government's cover-up. Yeah, every firefighter who was out there on 9/11 is going to be complicit in the MURDER OF 343 OF THEIR FALLEN BROTHERS! To quote Loose Change co-creator Jason Bermas, 'the firefighters are paid off.' "

 

[Gamolon]

In case you don't grasp the implication of this fact it means all the supporting columns were severed at precisely the same moment.

That's a lie.

Why did the penthouse collapse into the building first? Try again.

What's that supposed to prove?

That you truthers have to distort the facts to make your conspiracies work. That's just one example.

The penthouse collapsing first makes your claim the "all the supporting columns were severed at the same moment" completely false.

Ridiculous, watch the building fall after the penthouse portion the entire structure moves straight down at free fall acceleration, which means that there was zero resistance to load - all the columns were severed.

Sorry but physics says your theory, the Official Conspiracy Theory is a pile of crap.

Why after the penthouse? Is it because it refutes your claim?

You said ALL SUPPORTS WERE SEVERED AT PRECISELY THE SAME TIME did you not? If that's the case, then why did the penthouse fall into the building a full 6 or 7 seconds sooner than the rest of the building???

Are you retracting your claim or adjusting it? Which one?

 

[Gamolon]

the official report the only plausible explanation.

NIST's WTC 7 Reports: Filled with Fantasy, Fiction, and Fraud

The above quoted from the AE911TRUTH page, There are a LOT of reasons to doubt the official explanation of the events of 9/11/2001. Check this out, it has been around for a while >

The evidence that WTC7 fell in the manner that it did and that WTC1, 2 & 7 were completely destroyed is VERY compelling evidence in-and-of itself.
The fact that the alleged airliners were never accounted for, where & when was any inventory of aircraft bits done? Was it documented that anybody conducted scientific tests for explosives or explosive residue, and if so, where are those documents?
The fact that there are HUGE voids in what should have been standard post disaster procedures speaks volumes!

Why have you not addressed the mistakes and falsehoods pointed out to you regarding your "understanding" of physics? You've been asked several times. VERY telling.

 

[daws101]

the official report the only plausible explanation.

NIST's WTC 7 Reports: Filled with Fantasy, Fiction, and Fraud

The above quoted from the AE911TRUTH page, There are a LOT of reasons to doubt the official explanation of the events of 9/11/2001. Check this out, it has been around for a while >

The evidence that WTC7 fell in the manner that it did and that WTC1, 2 & 7 were completely destroyed is VERY compelling evidence in-and-of itself.
The fact that the alleged airliners were never accounted for, where & when was any inventory of aircraft bits done? Was it documented that anybody conducted scientific tests for explosives or explosive residue, and if so, where are those documents?
The fact that there are HUGE voids in what should have been standard post disaster procedures speaks volumes!

a&e for truth is not CREDIBLE

Trolling An AE 911 Truth Member
Meet one of the very few structural engineers for AE 9/11 truth, Charles N. Pegelow. He receives a call from a man asking about what he could present as the best piece of evidence they have for the inside job theory. Mr Pegelow starts at around 4:00 minutes to present what he feels is the best piece of evidence.


He states the following," There was 100,00lbs of steel missing and you have to ask the question where did it go." he then proceeds to explain how the steel simply EVAPORATED and it was accomplished by using, in his own words, "a pineapple sized nuclear bomb that melted out the insides."


Later on he dances around the question when asked in another call and he then admits that he hasnt told Gage about his idea because people find it "crazy".


So to top off this post, the petition and group he has associated himself with doesnt believe what Mr. Pegelow believes. Is it the truth they are searching for or just more people with credentials to sign their petition ? Also, if this is what truthers consider as credible source then maybe they lack the understanding of what credible truly means.

Read more at

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available

THE VIDEO IS A HOOT!

Your a hoot! AE911 Truth has over 2000 licensed Architects and Engineers, very few indeed. Don't forget these professionals have put their careers and good names on the line by signing the petition.

As for Mr. Pegelow, he made the mistake of speculating, something that Richard Gage does not engage in. But it is a plausible explanation, suitcase nukes do exist.

Why don't you explain how all the concrete floors turned to dust. Not broken concrete but dust. And don't try the bull about the pancaking effect because the steel floor pans are gone too. The floor pans are corrugated steel upon which the concrete floors are poured. Even if the concrete could entirley turn to dust, which it can't, where did the floor pans go? If the Official Conspiracy Theory is true and the floors pancaked turning the concrete to dust there should be a stack of floor pans. There isn't.

I don't speculate, I just point out how completely ridiculous the Official Conspiracy Theory is. This is why we need a real investigation.

false everything you post is erroneous speculation.
saying that this actual story is a conspiracy is speculation.

 

[wihosa]

In case you don't grasp the implication of this fact it means all the supporting columns were severed at precisely the same moment.

That's a lie.

Why did the penthouse collapse into the building first? Try again.

What's that supposed to prove?

That you truthers have to distort the facts to make your conspiracies work. That's just one example.

The penthouse collapsing first makes your claim the "all the supporting columns were severed at the same moment" completely false.

Ridiculous, watch the building fall after the penthouse portion the entire structure moves straight down at free fall acceleration, which means that there was zero resistance to load - all the columns were severed.

Sorry but physics says your theory, the Official Conspiracy Theory is a pile of crap.

Why after the penthouse? Is it because it refutes your claim?

You said ALL SUPPORTS WERE SEVERED AT PRECISELY THE SAME TIME did you not? If that's the case, then why did the penthouse fall into the building a full 6 or 7 seconds sooner than the rest of the building???

Are you retracting your claim or adjusting it? Which one?

Oh brother, you are really clutching at straws, obviously the upper columns supporting the penthouse were severed first causing the penthouse to collapse first. This was probably done to help control the demolition, keeping the collapse within the footprint of the building.
Regardless, this in no way changes the fact that the building collapsed at free fall acceleration thereafter. Free fall means no resistance to load, hence all supporting columns were severed simultaneously.

The penthouse collapsing first in no way changes what I said. If you think it does explain it, rather than saying it went first as if there is some significance to that fact. There isn't! And by the way, your Official Conspiracy Theory is still a heaping pile of crap!

 

[SAYIT]

That's a lie.

Why did the penthouse collapse into the building first? Try again.

What's that supposed to prove?

That you truthers have to distort the facts to make your conspiracies work. That's just one example.

The penthouse collapsing first makes your claim the "all the supporting columns were severed at the same moment" completely false.

Ridiculous, watch the building fall after the penthouse portion the entire structure moves straight down at free fall acceleration, which means that there was zero resistance to load - all the columns were severed.

Sorry but physics says your theory, the Official Conspiracy Theory is a pile of crap.

Why after the penthouse? Is it because it refutes your claim?

You said ALL SUPPORTS WERE SEVERED AT PRECISELY THE SAME TIME did you not? If that's the case, then why did the penthouse fall into the building a full 6 or 7 seconds sooner than the rest of the building???

Are you retracting your claim or adjusting it? Which one?

Oh brother, you are really clutching at straws, obviously the upper columns supporting the penthouse were severed first causing the penthouse to collapse first. This was probably done to help control the demolition, keeping the collapse within the footprint of the building.
Regardless, this in no way changes the fact that the building collapsed at free fall acceleration thereafter. Free fall means no resistance to load, hence all supporting columns were severed simultaneously.

The penthouse collapsing first in no way changes what I said. If you think it does explain it, rather than saying it went first as if there is some significance to that fact. There isn't! And by the way, your Official Conspiracy Theory is still a heaping pile of crap!

Just so I clearly understand you: Are you saying that rather than the structural damage done by large chunks of the North Tower and hours of chaotic fires causing 7's collapse, a demo crew (of hundreds) slipped into the building and rigged it for a PERFECT, free-fall CD while chaotic fires raged? Perhaps you, like Dr. James Fetzer (PhD - history and philosophy of science) think mini-nukes that had undetectable explosions were used? Woo ... talk about steaming piles of CT crap.

 

[Capstone]

Some OCTers claim that the penthouse's "collapse" a few seconds prior to the onset of the main roof-line's symmetrical descent is evidence of the near complete removal of interior structural support, leaving nothing but the outer shell to bear its own weight, and that this explains the two and a quarter seconds worth of gravitational acceleration admitted by NIST. Even granting the laughable notion that the building's 'facade' (as some have erroneously called it) could have stood entirely intact as its steel skeleton was taken out progressively by office fires, the bigger problem with their obfuscatory bullshit is that the bearing walls themselves were composed of physical building materials (primarily concrete) that couldn't possibly have pulverized themselves without creating resistance in their own right. In line with NIST's explanation, the outer shell descended against zero resistance for an estimated 100+ sq. ft. (or approximately 8 floors), and that in itself is reason enough to reject their findings. Any report that would have us suspend faith in the laws of physics isn't worth the paper on which it was written.

 

[SAYIT]

Some OCTers claim that the penthouse's "collapse" a few seconds prior to the onset of the main roof-line's symmetrical descent is evidence of the near complete removal of interior structural support, leaving nothing but the outer shell to bear its own weight, and that this explains the two and a quarter seconds worth of gravitational acceleration admitted by NIST. Even granting the laughable notion that the building's 'facade' (as some have erroneously called it) could have stood entirely intact as its steel skeleton was taken out progressively by office fires, the bigger problem with their obfuscatory bullshit is that the bearing walls themselves were composed of physical building materials (primarily concrete) that couldn't possibly have pulverized themselves without creating resistance in their own right. In line with NIST's explanation, the outer shell descended against zero resistance for an estimated 100+ sq. ft. (or approximately 8 floors), and that in itself is reason enough to reject their findings. Any report that would have us suspend faith in the laws of physics isn't worth the paper on which it was written.

Just so I clearly understand you: Are you saying that rather than the structural damage done by large chunks of the North Tower and hours of chaotic fires causing 7's collapse, a demo crew (of hundreds) slipped into the building and rigged it for a PERFECT, free-fall CD while chaotic fires raged? Perhaps you, like Dr. James Fetzer (PhD - history and philosophy of science) think silent mini-nukes were used?

 

[wihosa]

What's that supposed to prove?

That you truthers have to distort the facts to make your conspiracies work. That's just one example.

The penthouse collapsing first makes your claim the "all the supporting columns were severed at the same moment" completely false.

Ridiculous, watch the building fall after the penthouse portion the entire structure moves straight down at free fall acceleration, which means that there was zero resistance to load - all the columns were severed.

Sorry but physics says your theory, the Official Conspiracy Theory is a pile of crap.

Why after the penthouse? Is it because it refutes your claim?

You said ALL SUPPORTS WERE SEVERED AT PRECISELY THE SAME TIME did you not? If that's the case, then why did the penthouse fall into the building a full 6 or 7 seconds sooner than the rest of the building???

Are you retracting your claim or adjusting it? Which one?

Oh brother, you are really clutching at straws, obviously the upper columns supporting the penthouse were severed first causing the penthouse to collapse first. This was probably done to help control the demolition, keeping the collapse within the footprint of the building.
Regardless, this in no way changes the fact that the building collapsed at free fall acceleration thereafter. Free fall means no resistance to load, hence all supporting columns were severed simultaneously.

The penthouse collapsing first in no way changes what I said. If you think it does explain it, rather than saying it went first as if there is some significance to that fact. There isn't! And by the way, your Official Conspiracy Theory is still a heaping pile of crap!

Just so I clearly understand you: Are you saying that rather than the structural damage done by large chunks of the North Tower and hours of chaotic fires causing 7's collapse, a demo crew (of hundreds) slipped into the building and rigged it for a PERFECT, free-fall CD while chaotic fires raged? Perhaps you, like Dr. James Fetzer (PhD - history and philosophy of science) think mini-nukes that had undetectable explosions were used? Woo ... talk about steaming piles of CT crap.

No that's not what I'm saying, obviously there would not be time on that day to prepare a building for controlled demolition. Therefore it was prepared beforehand. But at least your are now admitting that it was in fact a perfect free fall controlled demolition.
And yes I'm saying it is total BS that B7 was brought down by "normal office fires" as claimed by NIST.
I don't know what Dr. Fetzer thinks, and it doesn't matter. You are the one with the Official Conspiracy Theory to defend, so where is your proof?
The OCT is an obvious lie, that is why I'm calling for a real investigation. What about you, what are you afraid of?

 

[wihosa]

Some OCTers claim that the penthouse's "collapse" a few seconds prior to the onset of the main roof-line's symmetrical descent is evidence of the near complete removal of interior structural support, leaving nothing but the outer shell to bear its own weight, and that this explains the two and a quarter seconds worth of gravitational acceleration admitted by NIST. Even granting the laughable notion that the building's 'facade' (as some have erroneously called it) could have stood entirely intact as its steel skeleton was taken out progressively by office fires, the bigger problem with their obfuscatory bullshit is that the bearing walls themselves were composed of physical building materials (primarily concrete) that couldn't possibly have pulverized themselves without creating resistance in their own right. In line with NIST's explanation, the outer shell descended against zero resistance for an estimated 100+ sq. ft. (or approximately 8 floors), and that in itself is reason enough to reject their findings. Any report that would have us suspend faith in the laws of physics isn't worth the paper on which it was written.

Not to mention the fact that NIST refuses to release the data used to form their computer model showing how this could be possible based on the claim that it could endanger public safety. Really? It's beyond credulity!

The whole Official Conspiracy Theory is a pile of crap and it is upon all the conspiracy theorists who believe it to prove it.

 

[Capstone]

Just so I clearly understand you: Are you saying that rather than the structural damage done by large chunks of the North Tower and hours of chaotic fires causing 7's collapse, a demo crew (of hundreds) slipped into the building and rigged it for a PERFECT, free-fall CD while chaotic fires raged? ...

Well, just so I clearly understand you, is there some reason the distinct possibility that all three buildings were wired in the weeks and months leading up to 9/11/01 ...should be automatically precluded?

We know there were questions surrounding the company that provided security to the WTC complex; we know, as well, that a major renovation to the elevator systems in buildings 1 and 2 had recently been completed; so who's to say whether or not such access to building 7's interior columns might have been similarly granted to a team of misidentified workmen and their supplies shortly before 9/11?

If we're talking about plausibility here, the scenario I've alluded to above is infinitely more plausible than accepting that the laws of physics not only can be but apparently were violated during the progressive collapse of building 7.

...Perhaps you, like Dr. James Fetzer (PhD - history and philosophy of science) think silent mini-nukes were used?

No, the physical evidence for military-grade incendiaries (as discovered and explicated several years ago by the likes of Farrer, Jones, and Harrit) is strong enough, in my opinion, to justify my beliefs that the buildings were wired in advance and that the plane crashes were collectively more a smokescreen than anything else.

 

[wihosa]

Micro spheres of iron in all the samples of dust have yet to be explained by the OCT defenders.
Military grade nano thermite explains the iron microspheres though.

 

[daws101]

That you truthers have to distort the facts to make your conspiracies work. That's just one example.

The penthouse collapsing first makes your claim the "all the supporting columns were severed at the same moment" completely false.

Ridiculous, watch the building fall after the penthouse portion the entire structure moves straight down at free fall acceleration, which means that there was zero resistance to load - all the columns were severed.

Sorry but physics says your theory, the Official Conspiracy Theory is a pile of crap.

Why after the penthouse? Is it because it refutes your claim?

You said ALL SUPPORTS WERE SEVERED AT PRECISELY THE SAME TIME did you not? If that's the case, then why did the penthouse fall into the building a full 6 or 7 seconds sooner than the rest of the building???

Are you retracting your claim or adjusting it? Which one?

Oh brother, you are really clutching at straws, obviously the upper columns supporting the penthouse were severed first causing the penthouse to collapse first. This was probably done to help control the demolition, keeping the collapse within the footprint of the building.
Regardless, this in no way changes the fact that the building collapsed at free fall acceleration thereafter. Free fall means no resistance to load, hence all supporting columns were severed simultaneously.

The penthouse collapsing first in no way changes what I said. If you think it does explain it, rather than saying it went first as if there is some significance to that fact. There isn't! And by the way, your Official Conspiracy Theory is still a heaping pile of crap!

Just so I clearly understand you: Are you saying that rather than the structural damage done by large chunks of the North Tower and hours of chaotic fires causing 7's collapse, a demo crew (of hundreds) slipped into the building and rigged it for a PERFECT, free-fall CD while chaotic fires raged? Perhaps you, like Dr. James Fetzer (PhD - history and philosophy of science) think mini-nukes that had undetectable explosions were used? Woo ... talk about steaming piles of CT crap.

No that's not what I'm saying, obviously there would not be time on that day to prepare a building for controlled demolition. Therefore it was prepared beforehand. But at least your are now admitting that it was in fact a perfect free fall controlled demolition.
And yes I'm saying it is total BS that B7 was brought down by "normal office fires" as claimed by NIST.
I don't know what Dr. Fetzer thinks, and it doesn't matter. You are the one with the Official Conspiracy Theory to defend, so where is your proof?
The OCT is an obvious lie, that is why I'm calling for a real investigation. What about you, what are you afraid of?

prepared before hand ?
would have been a neat trick if it were not total fantasy.
besides all logistic problems.
there is the slight problem of the damage from wtc1 which would have destroyed the necessary charges /thermite / thermite / chewing gum.
that would have caused to collapse by use of explosives..
the biggest hole in your Swiss cheese of a "theory" is the why...

 

[SAYIT]

Just so I clearly understand you: Are you saying that rather than the structural damage done by large chunks of the North Tower and hours of chaotic fires causing 7's collapse, a demo crew (of hundreds) slipped into the building and rigged it for a PERFECT, free-fall CD while chaotic fires raged? ...

Well, just so I clearly understand you, is there some reason the distinct possibility that all three buildings were wired in the weeks and months leading up to 9/11/01 ...should be automatically precluded?

The "distinct possibility" you speak of is nothing more than your vivid imagination run amok. For instance, how would that wiring have survived the plane impact and the chaotic fires that ensued and how could the planners have known exactly what of their demo charges would have still worked an hour after the impact? The world's leading demo guy said while watching on TV he tried to imagine how he would demo what might be left after 9/11 ... he had no idea.

 

[SAYIT]

Just so I clearly understand you: Are you saying that rather than the structural damage done by large chunks of the North Tower and hours of chaotic fires causing 7's collapse, a demo crew (of hundreds) slipped into the building and rigged it for a PERFECT, free-fall CD while chaotic fires raged? Perhaps you, like Dr. James Fetzer (PhD - history and philosophy of science) think mini-nukes that had undetectable explosions were used? Woo ... talk about steaming piles of CT crap.

No that's not what I'm saying, obviously there would not be time on that day to prepare a building for controlled demolition. Therefore it was prepared beforehand. But at least your are now admitting that it was in fact a perfect free fall controlled demolition.

Please quote something from my post in which I admit any of the WTC buildings collapsed in "a perfect free fall controlled demolition."

 

[n0spam4me]

the biggest hole in your Swiss cheese of a "theory" is the why.

First & foremost, it is necessary to define what we see on the videos, and then and only then after having the what nailed down do we even attempt to go & name suspects & ask WHY this was done. lets have this one step at a time.

The fact is that the fall of WTC7 was of such a nature that it would ONLY be possible as a consequence of an engineered event, since there are no photographs of the alleged damage to the south side of the building, its all speculation as to the exact nature of any damage that may have been done by rubble thrown off from the "collapsing" towers.

The argument that an airliner crashing into the tower would probably mess up a controlled demolition, so therefore it wasn't a controlled demolition, ignores the logic here, the fact that an aircraft crash would damage a controlled demolition set-up also points to the fact that there was no airliner crash.

 

[daws101]

the biggest hole in your Swiss cheese of a "theory" is the why.

First & foremost, it is necessary to define what we see on the videos, and then and only then after having the what nailed down do we even attempt to go & name suspects & ask WHY this was done. lets have this one step at a time.

The fact is that the fall of WTC7 was of such a nature that it would ONLY be possible as a consequence of an engineered event, since there are no photographs of the alleged damage to the south side of the building, its all speculation as to the exact nature of any damage that may have been done by rubble thrown off from the "collapsing" towers.

The argument that an airliner crashing into the tower would probably mess up a controlled demolition, so therefore it wasn't a controlled demolition, ignores the logic here, the fact that an aircraft crash would damage a controlled demolition set-up also points to the fact that there was no airliner crash.

the award for the best dodge in a thread goes to....

 

[Capstone]

. . .For instance, how would that wiring have survived the plane impact and the chaotic fires that ensued and how could the planners have known exactly what of their demo charges would have still worked an hour after the impact? ...

I meant "wired" at least partially in the figurative sense, although internal wiring may well have been used sufficiently below the predetermined impact zones. The latest remote detonation technology, well-placed 'cutter charges', and precision RC guidance of the aircraft/drones involved in the operation could've easily circumvented any such issue.

The world's leading demo guy said while watching on TV he tried to imagine how he would demo what might be left after 9/11 ... he had no idea.

Something tells me he'd have plenty ideas for the demos of those structures before they were damaged primarily due to their general proximity to the three collapsed skyscrapers on 9/11.

 

[n0spam4me]

Please quote something from my post in which I admit any of the WTC buildings collapsed in "a perfect free fall controlled demolition."

So you do not recognize the fact of 2.25 sec of free fall acceleration for WTC7?
that is you disagree with the NIST report on the subject.....
what?